Reader response theory, the broad range of literary perspectives which place emphasis upon the role of readers and their responses to texts, has contributed important insights to biblical hermeneutics and to pedagogy in literature education. Yet reader response theory does not appear, as yet, to have had as significant an influence as it might upon the way we teach individuals to read and respond to that most important of texts, the Bible. It is proposed in this article that Rosenblatt's transactional theory of the literary work offers valuable insights that can be applied to both the reading of the Bible and also how it can be taught in a range of contexts, in Christian and state schools, as well as in churches. Consequently, pedagogy informed by Rosenblatt's reader response theory may offer us a biblical use of the Bible as it can foster the spiritual development of readers by enabling them to engage with Scripture at a deeply personal level. It is suggested that Bible teaching must be responsive to the individual and to society but must, most of all, be responsive to the Holy Spirit.
Bible Authorised Version (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1611).
2.
ChiangH. M.MaslowA., (eds) The Healthy Personality: Readings (London: Van Nostrand).
3.
ClinesD. J. A., The Bible and the Modern World (Sheffield, Sheffield Academic Press, 1997).
4.
CoxW. F.Jr., ‘Lessons about Education that Christianity can Learn from a Defector’ in Journal of Education and Christian BeliefVol 1No 2 (Autumn, 1997) pp.111–118.
5.
CoxW. F.Jr., ‘Wisdom in Defeat: Prayer in Public Schools’ in Journal of Education and Christian BeliefVol 5No 1 (Spring, 2001) pp. 51–60.
6.
CoxR., ‘Using the Bible with Children’ in Journal of Education and Christian BeliefVol 5No 1 (Spring, 2001) pp. 41–49.
7.
DoddC. H., The Parables of the Kingdom (London: Nisbet, 1948).
8.
FergusonD., Biblical Hermeneutics – An Introduction (Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1986).
9.
FishS.‘Normal circumstances, literal language, direct speech acts, the ordinary, the everyday, the obvious, what goes without saying, and other special cases’ in CriticalInquiryVol 4 (1978) pp. 625–644.
10.
FishS.Is there a Text in this class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Harvard, Harvard University Press, 1980).
11.
FreundE., The Return of the Reader – Reader Response Criticism (London. Methuen, 1987).
12.
JasperD., ‘How can we read the Bible?’ in GearonL. (ed.) English Literature, Theology and the Curriculum (London & New York, Cassell, 1999) pp. 9–26.
13.
KayW.WilkinsR., ‘Reading for Readiness’ in Journal of Education and Christian BeliefVol 2No 1 (Spring, 1998) pp. 65–69.
14.
LundinR.WalhoutC.ThistletonA., The Promise of Hermeneutics (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1999).
15.
McKnightE. V., The Bible and the Reader (Philadelphia, Fortress Press, 1985).
16.
PikeM. A., ‘Reading the Writer Reading the Reader’ in The Use of EnglishVol 51No 1 (1999) pp. 41–52.
17.
PikeM. A., Keen Readers: A Study of Communication and Learning in Adolescents Reading of Pre-twentieth Century Poetry (unpublished Ph.D thesis, Research and Graduate School of Education, University of Southampton, 2000a).
18.
PikeM. A., ‘Keen Readers: Adolescents and pre-twentieth century poetry’ in Educational ReviewVol 52No 1 (2000b) pp. 13–28.
19.
PikeM. A., ‘Boys, Poetry and the Individual Talent’ in English in EducationVol 34No 3 (2000c) pp. 41–55.
20.
PikeM. A., ‘Spirituality, Morality and Poetry’ in International Journal of Children's SpiritualityVol 5No 2 (2000d) pp. 177–191.
21.
PikeM. A., ‘Pupils Poetics’ in Changing English – Studies in Reading and CultureVol 7No 1 (2000e) pp. 45–54.
22.
PikeM. A., ‘Adolescents as Active Readers’ in TOPICVol 24No 12 (Basingstoke: National Foundation for Educational Research/NFER, 2001).
23.
PikeM. A., ‘Aesthetic Distance and the Spiritual Journey: Educating for spiritually and morally significant experiences across the art and literature curriculum’ in International Journal of Children's SpiritualityVol 10No 1 (2002a) pp. 9–21.
24.
PikeM. A., ‘The canon in the classroom: Theorizing students' experiences of texts from other times’ in Journal of Curriculum Studies (forthcoming 2002b).
25.
PikeM. A., ‘Action Research for English Teaching: Ideology, Pedagogy and Personal Growth’ in Educational Action ResearchVol 10No 1 (2002c) pp. 27–44.
26.
PikeM. A., ‘From Personal to Social Transaction: A model of aesthetic reading in the classroom’ in Journal of Aesthetic Education (Illinois: University of Illinois Press, forthcoming, 2002d).
27.
PowellM. A., Chasing the Eastern Star – adventures in reader response criticism (Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001).
28.
QCAThe promotion of Pupils' Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development – The Contribution of Subject Teaching in Secondary Schools and Colleges (HMSO, 1999).
29.
RadfordM., ‘Religious Education, Spiritual Experience and Truth’ in British Journal of Religious EducationVol 21No 3 (2000) pp. 166–174.
30.
RichardsI. A., Practical Criticism (New York: Harcourt and Co, 1929).
31.
RosenblattL., Literature as Exploration (London: Heinemann, 1968).
32.
RosenblattL., The Reader, the Text, The Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work, (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1978).
33.
RosenblattL., ‘The transactional theory of the literary work: Implications for research’ in CooperC. (ed) Researching response to Literature and the Teaching of Literature (Norwood, NY: Ablex, 1985/1989).
34.
SmithD. I.ShorttJ., The Bible and the Task of Teaching, (Nottingham: The Stapleford Centre, 2002).
35.
StablesA.MopganC.JonesS., ‘Educating for Significant Events: The application of Harre's social reality matrix across the lower secondary school curriculum’ in Journal of Curriculum Studies (1999) pp. 449–461.
36.
ThistletonA., New Horizons in Hermeneutics: The Theory and Practice of Transforming Biblical Reading (Grand Rapids, Zondervan, 1992).
VanhoozerK. J., Is there a meaning in this text? The Bible, the reader and the morality of literary knowledge (Grand Rapids: IVP, Apollos/Zondervan, 1998).
39.
WachlinM. G., ‘The Place of Bible Literature in Public High School English Classes’ in Research in the Teaching of EnglishVol 31 (1997) pp. 7–49.
40.
WimsattW. K.BeardsleyM., (1954) The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry, (Lexington, Kentucky University Press, 1954).
41.
WrightT.R.‘Get Thee behind me Satan: On Resisting Fishy Models of Reading’ in GearonL (ed.) English Literature, Theology and the Curriculum (London: Cassell, 1999) pp. 27–34.
