Abstract
IT IS NOW over thirty years since the publication of the Schools' Council, Working Paper 36: Religious Education in the Secondary School. It is widely regarded as one of the most influential documents on British religious education in the post-war era. The aim of this paper is to reassess and re-evaluate Working Paper 36's central arguments: (1) its critique of Christian confessionalism in education; (2) its advocacy of a phenomenological approach to religious education; and (3) its strategy for developing tolerance among adherents of different religions or none. I conclude that the central arguments of Working Paper 36 are much less robust than is believed by many contemporary commentators on religious education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
