It is frequently said that evangelism or proselytizing has no place in the classroom. The purpose of this essay is to counter this generalization and to explore the nature of legitimate religious influence in the classroom. In doing so I will offer some criteria to help us determine what is and what is not acceptable by way of religious persuasion in the classroom, drawing on my recent work, The Ethics of Evangelism: A Philosophical Defence of Ethical Proselytizing and Persuasion (2011).
CoolingT. (1994). A Christian vision for state education. London: SPCK.
5.
CoolingT. (2007). The challenge of passionate religious commitment for school education in a world of religious diversity: Reflections on evangelical Christianity and humanism. Journal of Education and Christian Belief, 11(1), 23–34.
6.
CoolingT. (2010). Doing God in education. London: Theos.
7.
CoolingT. (2012) What is a controversial issue? Implications for the treatment of religious beliefs in education. Journal of Beliefs and Values33(2), 169–181.
8.
HandM. (2008). What should we teach as controversial? A defense of the epistemic criterion. Educational Theory, 58(2), 213–228.
9.
HaugheyJ. C. (1998). The complex accusation of sheep-stealing: Proselytism and ethics. Journal of Ecumenical Studies35(2), 257–268.
10.
HillB. V. (2008). Values in free fall? Religious education and values in public schools. Journal of Christian Education51(3), 43–55.
11.
HoekemaD. A.1996. Politics, religion, and other crimes against civility. ACADEME82(6), 33–37.
12.
HulmesE. (1979). Commitment and neutrality in religious education. London: Geoffrey Chapman.
13.
JohnstoneH. W.Jr. (1981). Towards an ethics of rhetoric. Communication6, 305–314.
14.
LernerN. (1998). Proselytism, change of religion, and international human rights. Emory International Law Review12(1), 477–560.
15.
PlantingaA. (2000). A defense of religious exclusivism. In QuinnP. & MeakerK. (Eds.), Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity (pp. 172–192). New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
PollardN. (1996). Positive deconstruction: A model for education and evangelism. Spectrum, 28(1), 29–32.
SandsmarkS. (2000). Is world view neutral education possible and desirable?Carlisle, Cumbria: Paternoster Press and the Stapleford Centre.
19.
SchwartzJ. E. (1998). Christians teaching in the public schools. Journal of Education and Christian Belief, 2(1), 53–64.
20.
ThiessenE. J. (1993). Teaching for commitment: Liberal education, indoctrination, and Christian nurture. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press. (Co-published by Gracewing, Leominster, UK).
21.
ThiessenE. J. (2001). In defence of religious schools and colleges. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
22.
ThiessenE. J. (2011). The ethics of evangelism: A philosophical defence of proselytizing and persuasion. Crownhill, Milton Keynes: Paternoster Press.
23.
WoltersA. M. (2005). Creation regained: Biblical basics for a reformational worldview (2nd ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
24.
YoungJ. L., & GriffithE. E. (1992). A critical evaluation of coercive persuasion as used in the assessment of cults. Behavioral Sciences and the Law10(1), 89–101.
