Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction

There is a growing interest in collaborative care for older adults in Nigeria; however, little is known about the application of a transdisciplinary approach to care in a typical Nigerian geriatric unit. Therefore, we described healthcare professionals’ (HCPs’) perception of a transdisciplinary approach to older adults’ care in Southern Nigeria.

Methods

Using Stakian’s approach to a qualitative case study, we purposively invited 16 HCPs working in the geriatric unit of a teaching hospital in Nigeria to a single, in-depth, semi-structured interview. We analysed data using Stakian’s approach of categorical aggregation and direct interpretation.

Results

Our participants identified five-key features of a transdisciplinary approach to care: consolidated consultation, consolidated care documentation, care files accessibility, shared care decision and a designated care manager. HCPs stated that transdisciplinary approach to care allowed for a consolidated consultation of patients, with all the HCPs (in the same room or via telehealth/telemedicine) and care decisions should be shared between all stakeholders and documented in an accessible unified electronic care document that is managed by a care manager. Factors ranging from lack of consensus on time for a consolidation consultation to inter-professional conflicts were perceived as possible hindrances to a transdisciplinary approach to older adults’ care.

Discussion

The features of transdisciplinary care described in this study partly aligned with the WHO’s integrated care for older people (ICOPE). Additional components not captured in ICOPE were found. While the description of transdisciplinary was from the perceptive of our study participant, caution should be applied when interpreting these findings.

Keywords

Transdisciplinary collaborations qualitative research healthcare workers aged Nigeria

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gowing

Dickinson

Gorman

, et al. Patients’ experiences of a multidisciplinary team-led community case management programme: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2016; 6: 9.

Meier

Beresford

The palliative care team. J Palliat Med 2008; 11: 677–681.

Iyoke

Lawani

Ugwu

, et al. Knowledge and attitude toward interdisciplinary team working among obstetricians and gynecologists in teaching hospitals in southeast Nigeria. J Multidiscip Healthc 2015; 8: 237–244.

Tanaka

Multidisciplinary team approach for elderly patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2003; 3: 69–72.

Hickman

Phillips

Newton

, et al. Multidisciplinary team interventions to optimise health outcomes for older people in acute care settings: a systematic review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2015; 61: 322–329.

Zaharatos

JP.

Interdisciplinary care for older adults with complex needs: American Geriatrics Society Position Statement. J Am Geriatri Soc 2006; 54: 849–852.

Whitfield

Reid

Assumptions, ambiguities, and possibilities in interdisciplinary population health research. Can J Public Health 2004; 95: 434–436.

Choi

BCK

Pak

AWP.

Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clin Investig Med 2006; 29: 351–364.

Choi

BCK

Pak

AWP.

Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 3. Discipline, inter-discipline distance, and selection of discipline. CIM 2008; 31: E41–E48.

10.

Jensenius

AR.

Disciplinarities: intra, cross, multi, inter, trans. Blog post, megteknitve, University of Oslo, http://www.arj.2012 (accessed 5 March 2015).

11.

Puts

MTE

Strohschein

Del Giudice

, et al. Role of the geriatrician, primary care practitioner, nurses, and collaboration with oncologists during cancer treatment delivery for older adults: a narrative review of the literature. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 9: 398–404.

12.

Grand

JHG

Caspar

MacDonald

SWS.

Clinical features and multidisciplinary approaches to dementia care. J Multidiscip Healthc 2011; 4: 125–147.

13.

Dotchin

Akinyemi

Gray

, et al. Geriatric medicine: services and training in Africa. Age Ageing 2013; 42: 124–128.

14.

Akoria

OA.

Establishing in-hospital geriatrics services in Africa: insights from the University of Benin Teaching Hospital geriatrics project. Ann Afr Med 2016; 15: 145–153.

15.

United Nation, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_Highlights.pdf (2019, accessed 15 February 2020).

16.

Yadav

Kulkarni

Gaiha

Growing burden of non-communicable diseases in India. Popul Cent Work Pap, https://repository.upenn.edu/psc_publications/20 (2018, accessed 21 February 2020).

17.

Lyall

Bruce

Tait

, et al. Interdisciplinary research journeys: practical strategies for capturing creativity. London: Bloomsbury Publication, 2015.

18.

Johnson

Stake

RE.

The art of case study research. Mod Lang J 1996; 80: 556.

19.

Yazan

De Vasconcelos

ICO.

Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. Meta: Aval 2016; 8: 149–182.

20.

Baxter

Jack

Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep 2008; 13: 544–559.

21.

Garza

A. L

Travis

The STEAM revolution: transdisciplinary approaches to science, technology, engineering, arts, humanities and mathematics. Berlin: Springer, 2018.

22.

Pohl

What is progress in transdisciplinary research?

Futures 2011; 43: 618–626.

23.

Holzer

Carmon

Orenstein

DE.

A methodology for evaluating transdisciplinary research on coupled socio-ecological systems. Ecol Indic 2018; 85: 808–819.

24.

Fawcett

Thoughts about multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary research. Nurs Sci Q 2013; 26: 376–379.

25.

Bhaskar

Danermark

Price

Interdisciplinarity and wellbeing: a critical realist general theory of interdisciplinarity. London: Taylor & Francis, 2017.

26.

Nancarrow

Booth

Ariss

, et al. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Hum Resour Health. 2013; 11: 19.

27.

Patton

MQ.

Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry. Qual Social Work 2002; 1: 261–283.

28.

Marshall

Cardon

Poddar

, et al. Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: A review of qualitative interviews in is research. J Comput Inf Syst 2013; 54: 11–22.

29.

Kalu

ME.

How does “subjective I” influence a qualitative research question, theoretical approach and methodologies?

Glo Jnl Pure Appl Sci 2019; 25: 97.

30.

Stake

RE.

Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press, 2006.

31.

Lincoln

Guba

EG.

Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications, 1985.

32.

Peshkin

In search of subjectivity – one’s own. Educ Res 1988; 17: 17–21.

33.

World Health Organization. WHO | global consultation on integrated care for older people (ICOPE) – the path to universal health coverage. WHO, https://www.who.int/ageing/health-systems/icope/icope-consultation/en/ (2018, accessed 21 February 2020).

34.

Poitras

Maltais

Bestard-Denommé

, et al. What are the effective elements in patient-centered and multimorbidity care? A scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18: 446.

35.

McMillan

Kendall

Sav

, et al. Patient-centered approaches to health care. Med Care Res Rev 2013; 70: 567–596.

36.

Bunn

Goodman

Russell

, et al. Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18: 165.

37.

Fewster-Thuente

Velsor-Friedrich

Interdisciplinary collaboration for healthcare professionals. Nurs Adm Q 2008; 32: 40–48.

38.

Thompson

Building collective communication competence in interdisciplinary research teams. J Appl Commun Res 2009; 37: 278–297.

39.

Légaré

Moumjid-Ferdjaoui

Drolet

, et al. Core competencies for shared decision making training programs: insights from an International, Interdisciplinary Working Group. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2013; 33: 267–273.

40.