This paper discusses the difference between growth and development in plants, and how these concepts can be applied to human civilization. While growth refers to the quantitative gain of biomass, development is characterized by qualitative changes in the specialization and functioning of cells, tissues, and organs. In human society, growth is often prioritized over development, as evidenced by the focus on gross domestic product without considering its social and environmental impacts. Waste, which is produced during consumption, is a significant problem for human civilization as it contributes to pollution and environmental degradation. Waste management and finding new uses for waste are important efforts to utilize waste production; however, their effectiveness is often unclear. Sustainable development of human society should focus on creating systems inspired by nature, which can be achieved by reducing waste production and increasing the share of waste utilizable in biological processes. The functional interconnection between decomposer (waste) and producers (raw materials) in human society is essential for achieving sustainable development. Ultimately, this path leads to the reduction of waste and improves the effectiveness of human activities, thereby reducing threats to ecosystems.
AhamedMKWangHHazellPJ (2022) From biology to biomimicry: Using nature to build better structures – A review. Construction and Building Materials320(7): 126195
2.
ArtecaRN (1996) Plant Growth Substances: Principles and Applications. New York Springer Science & Business Media.
3.
BaoZLuW (2023) Applicability of the environmental Kuznets curve to construction waste management: A panel analysis of 27 European economies. Resources Conservation and Recycling188: 106667
4.
BarlesS (2014) History of waste management and the social and cultural representations of waste. In: AgnolettiM (Eds.) The Basic Environmental History. Cham: Springer, pp.199–226.
5.
BhadraUMishraPP (2021) Extended producer responsibility in India: Evidence from Recykal, Hyderabad. Journal of Urban Management10(4): 430–439.
6.
BhattacharyaKDeSKKhanA, et al. (2021) Pollution sensitive global crude steel production–transportation model under the effect of corruption perception index. OPSEARCH58(3): 636–660.
7.
BradleyCGCorsiniL (2023) A literature review and analytical framework of the sustainability of reusable packaging. Sustainable Production and Consumption37: 126–141.
8.
Chen AustinMSolanoTTejedor-FloresN, et al. (2022) Bio-inspired approaches for sustainable cities design in tropical climate. In: PalombiniFLMuthuSS (Eds.) Bionics and Sustainable Design. Singapore: Springer, pp.333–365.
DalhammarCWihlborgEMiliosL, et al. (2021) Enabling reuse in extended producer responsibility schemes for white goods: Legal and organisational conditions for connecting resource flows and actors. Circular economy and sustainability1(2): 671–695.
11.
DalyHE (1991) Steady-State Economics: With New Essays. Washington Island press.
12.
DalyHE (2014) Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Boston Beacon Press, p.298.
13.
D’ItriaEAusR (2023) Circular fashion: Evolving practices in a changing industry. Sustainability19(1): 2220592.
14.
FarhidiFMadaniKCrichtonR (2022) How the US economy and environment can both benefit from composting management. Environmental Health Insights16: 11786302221128454.
15.
FellnerJBrunnerPH (2022) Plastic waste management: Is circular economy really the best solution?Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management24(1): 1–3.
16.
FreudenreichBSchalteggerS (2020) Developing sufficiency-oriented offerings for clothing users: Business approaches to support consumption reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production247: 119589.
17.
GaurAGurjarSKChaudharyS (2022) Circular system of resource recovery and reverse logistics approach: Key to zero waste and zero landfill. In: HussainChaudheryHaitSubrata (Eds.) Advanced Organic Waste Management. Elsevier, pp.365–381.
18.
GreenwoodSCWalkerSBairdHM, et al. (2021) Many happy returns: Combining insights from the environmental and behavioural sciences to understand what is required to make reusable packaging mainstream. Sustainable Production and Consumption27: 1688–1702.
19.
GertsakisJLewisH (2003) Sustainability and the Waste Management Hierarchy – A Discussion Paper. Werribee EcoRecycle Victoria.
20.
GuptaVKumarE (2023) H3O-LGBM: Hybrid Harris hawk optimization based light gradient boosting machine model for real-time trading. Artificial Intelligence Review56: 8697–8720.
21.
HerradorMde JongWNasuK, et al. (2023) The rising phenomenon of circular cities in Japan. Case studies of Kamikatsu, Osaki and Kitakyushu. Science of the Total Environment894: 165052.
22.
HolzingerAKeiblingerKHolubP, et al. (2023) AI for life: Trends in artificial intelligence for biotechnology. New Biotechnology74: 16–24.
23.
JakimiukAMatsuiYPodlasekA, et al. (2023) Closing the loop: A case study on pathways for promoting sustainable waste management on university campuses. Science of the Total Environment892: 164349.
24.
LiYKongDFuY, et al. (2020) The effect of developmental and environmental factors on secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry148: 80–89.
25.
MairS (2022) Writing our way to sustainable economies? How academic sustainability writing engages with capitalism. Environment and Planning A54(7): 1460–1474.
26.
NewmanS (2023) Unmaking Waste: New Histories of Old Things. Chicago University of Chicago Press.
27.
NilesMT (2020) Majority of rural residents compost food waste: Policy and waste management implications for rural regions. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems3: 123.
28.
Ouro-SalimOGuarnieriP (2022) Circular economy of waste in agrifood supply chain: A review. Thunderbird International Business Review64: 333–348.
29.
PaikIHuqE (2019) Plant photoreceptors: Multi-functional sensory proteins and their signaling networks. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology92: 114–121.
30.
ParadisoRProiettiS (2022) Light-quality manipulation to control plant growth and photomorphogenesis in greenhouse horticulture: The state of the art and the opportunities of modern LED systems. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation41(2): 742–780.
31.
ParkS (2021) Assessing the recycling performance of extended producer responsibility (EPR) programs: A case study of the steel can packaging recycling system in South Korea. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association71(5): 586–596.
32.
RathjeWLHughesWWWilsonDC, et al. (1992) The archaeology of contemporary landfills. American Antiquity57(3): 437–447.
33.
RathjeWLMurphyC (2001) Rubbish!: The Archaeology of Garbage. Tucson University of Arizona Press.
34.
RiceJ (2022) The economic and environmental impact of food waste.
35.
RossiJBianchiniA (2022) Plastic waste free” – A new circular model for the management of plastic packaging in food value chain. Transportation Research Procedia67: 153–162.
36.
SchatzCPfoertschW (2023) Case study: Patagonia—A human-centered approach to marketing. In: KotlerPPfoertschWSponholzU (Eds.) H2H Marketing: Case Studies on Human-to-Human Marketing. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.195–213.
37.
ShenyoputroKJonesTE (2023) Reflections on a two-decade journey toward zero waste: A case study of Kamikatsu town, Japan. Frontiers in Environmental Science11: 443.
38.
ShooshtarianSMaqsoodTWongPS, et al. (2021) Extended producer responsibility in the Australian construction industry. Sustainability13(2): 620.
39.
TheofanidisSAAntzarasANLemonidouAA (2023) CO2 as a building block: From capture to utilization. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering39: 100902.
40.
Van Den BerghJAntalM (2014) Evaluating alternatives to GDP as measures of social welfare/progress (No. 56). WWW for Europe Working Paper.
41.
VaverkováMDKodaE (2023) Why landfill deposits are a distinguishing feature of the anthropocene. Anthropocene Review10(2): 463-473.
42.
WinklerJKodaESkutnikZČernýMAdamcováDPodlasekA.VaverkováMD (2021) Trends in the succession of synanthropic vegetation on a reclaimed landfill in Poland. Anthropocene35: 100299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2021.100299
43.
WinklerJMatsuiYFillaJVykydalováLJiroušekM.VaverkováMD (2023) Responses of synanthropic vegetation to composting facility. Science of The Total Environment859(1): 160160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160160
44.
WuYDuYLiuX, et al. (2023) Grassland biodiversity response to livestock grazing, productivity, and climate varies across biome components and diversity measurements. Science of the Total Environment878: 162994.
45.
YangXGengLZhouK (2020) Environmental pollution, income growth, and subjective well-being: Regional and individual evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research27(27): 34211–34222.
46.
YumashevAŚlusarczykBKondrashevS, et al. (2020) Global indicators of sustainable development: Evaluation of the influence of the human development index on consumption and quality of energy. Energies13(11): 2768.
47.
ZhangXLiuCChenY, et al. (2022) Source separation, transportation, pretreatment, and valorization of municipal solid waste: A critical review. Environment Development and Sustainability24: 11471–11513.
48.
ZucchellaAPrevitaliP (2019) Circular business models for sustainable development: A “waste is food” restorative ecosystem. Business Strategy and the Environment28(2): 274–285.
