Solar geoengineering has been proposed as a possible response measure in the event of a ‘climate emergency’. Scientific evidence for climate emergencies in the form of tipping points, however, is contested and unsettled. Furthermore, declarations of emergency entail authoritarian political tendencies that historically have given rise to repression and abuse. By definition, an emergency must exhibit a combination of high risk, urgency and necessity; no plausible climatic tipping point displays all these attributes simultaneously. A weak scientific basis together with genuine societal peril argues against the continued emergency framing of solar geoengineering.
AgambenG (2005) State of Exception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
BlackstockJJBattistiDSCaldeiraK. (2009) Climate Engineering Responses to Climate Emergencies. Santa Barbara, CA: Novim.
3.
BrookBWEllisECPerringMP. (2013) Does the terrestrial biosphere have planetary tipping points?Trends in Ecology & Evolution28(7): 396–401.
4.
CalhounC (2004) A world of emergencies: Fear, intervention, and the limits of cosmopolitan order. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie41(4): 373–395.
5.
FerejohnJPasquinoP (2004) The law of the exception: A typology of emergency powers. International Journal of Constitutional Law2(2): 210–239.
6.
GoldblattCWatsonAJ (2012) The runaway greenhouse: Implications for future climate change, geoengineering and planetary atmospheres. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A370(1974): 4197–4216.
7.
HeywardCRaynerS (2013) Apocalypse nicked!Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Paper Series. Oxford: ESRC.
8.
HulmeM (2014) Can Science Fix Climate Change?Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group II (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
KeithD (2013) A Case for Climate Engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
LentonTMHeldHKrieglerE. (2008) Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences105(6): 1786–1793.
13.
LongJRademakerSAndersonJG. (2011) Geoengineering: A National Strategic Plan for Research on the Potential Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Consequences of Climate Remediation Technologies. Washington, DC: Bipartisan Policy Center.
14.
MacMynowskiDGKeithDWCaldeiraK. (2011) Can we test geoengineering?Energy & Environmental Science4: 5044–5052.
15.
Royal Society (2009) Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty. London: Royal Society.
16.
SchmittC (2014) Dictatorship: From the Origin of the Modern Concept of Sovereignty to Proletarian Class Struggle. Cambridge: Polity Press.
