Conceptual metaphors are pervasive in our lives, including in our thoughts, actions, and languages. Although they can be found in biblical texts as well, the standard literature on the theory and practice of Bible translation focuses only on metaphors as figures of speech. This article presents the theory of conceptual metaphors, which is based on cognitive linguistics. Following Lakoff and Johnson ([1980] 2003), metaphor is regarded as being anchored in the cultural system of language users. This observation has a far greater significance for Bible translation than previously assumed. This is demonstrated by means of biblical examples. The article concludes with some suggestions for practice.
AndersonGary A.2009. Sin: A History. New Haven: Yale University Press.
2.
BeekmanJohnCallowJohn. 1974. Translating the Word of God: With Scripture and Topical Indexes. Dallas: SIL.
3.
BussmannHadomud. 1996. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. London: Routledge.
4.
CarsonDonald A.MooDouglas J.2005. An Introduction to the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
5.
CroftWilliamCruseD. Alan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
DawaIshaku. 2025. The Language of Violence and War: A Study of Imagery in Lamentations and Contemporary Glavda. PhD diss., Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
7.
FabryHeinz-Josef. 2004. “šûb.” Pages 461–521 in Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament 14. Edited by RinggrenHelmeret al. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
8.
FitzmyerJoseph A.1979. “The Study of the Aramaic Background of the New Testament.” Pages 1–27 in A Wandering Aramean: Collected Aramaic Essays. Edited by FitzmyerJoseph A.Missoula: Scholars Press.
9.
GuttErnst-August. 1992. Relevance Theory: A Guide to Successful Communication in Translation. Dallas: SIL.
10.
GuttErnst-August. 2000. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Oxford: Blackwell.
11.
GzellaHolger. 2018. “šbq.” Pages 750–52 in Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament 16. Edited by RinggrenHelmeret al. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
12.
HemphillChristy. 2019. “Dressing for Spiritual Battle and Other Challenges: Translating Passages with Underlying Conceptual Metaphors.” Journal of Translation15(1): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.54395/jot-6j9c9.
13.
HermansonEric A.1996. “Recognising Hebrew Metaphors: Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Bible Translation.” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages22(2): 67–78.
14.
HermansonEric A.2006. Metaphor in Zulu. Problems in the Translation of Biblical Metaphor in the Book of Amos. Stellenbosch: SUN PreSS.
15.
HarrietHillGuttErnst-AugustHillMargaretUngerChristophFloydRick. 2011. Bible Translation Basics: Communicating Scripture in a Relevant Way. Dallas: SIL.
16.
JobesKaren H.SilvaMoisés. 2000. Invitation to the Septuagint. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
17.
KingPhilip. 2010. Surrounded by Bitterness: Image Schemas and Metaphors for Conceptualising Distress in Classical Hebrew. PhD diss., London School of Theology.
18.
KotzéZacharias. 2004. The Conceptualisation of Anger in the Hebrew Bible. PhD diss., Stellenbosch University.
19.
KotzéZacharias. 2005. “Metaphors and Metonymies for Anger in the Old Testament: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach.” Scriptura88: 118–25.
20.
KövecsesZoltán. 2008. “Metaphor and Emotion.” Pages 390–96 in The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Edited by GibbsRaymond W.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
KövecsesZoltán. 2017. “Conceptual Metaphor Theory.” Pages 13–27 in The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. Edited by SeminoElenaet al. London: Routledge.
22.
KronemanDick. 2004. The LORD is My Shepherd: An Exploration into the Theory and Practice of Translating Biblical Metaphor. PhD diss., Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
23.
KrugerPaul A.2000. “A Cognitive Interpretation of the Emotion of Anger in the Hebrew Bible.” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages26(1): 181–93.
24.
KrugerPaul A.2004. “On Emotions and the Expression of Emotions in the Old Testament: A Few Introductory Remarks.” Biblische Zeitschrift48: 213–28. https://doi.org/10.30965/25890468-048-02-90000004.
LarsonMildred L.1984. Meaning-Based Translation: A Guide to Cross-Language Equivalence. Lanham: University Press of America.
31.
LevineRobert N.2006. A Geography Of Time: On Tempo, Culture, and the Pace of Life. London: Oneworld Publications.
32.
MerweChristo H. J. van der. 2021. “Biblical Hebrew and Cognitive Linguistics: A General Orientation.” Pages 641–96 in New Perspectives in Biblical and Rabbinic Hebrew. Semitic Languages and Cultures 7. Edited by HornkohlAaron D.KhanGeoffrey. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
33.
NidaEugene A.1964. Toward a Science of Translating: With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Leiden: Brill.
34.
NidaEugene A.TaberCharles R.1969. The Theory and Practice of Translation, Leiden: Brill.
35.
NordChristiane. 1997. Translating as a Purposeful Activity: Functionalist Approaches Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.
36.
PattemoreStephen. 2007. “Framing Nida: The Relevance of Translation Theory in the United Bible Societies.“ Pages 217–63 in A History of Bible Translation. History of Bible Translation 1. Edited by NossPhilip A.Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.
37.
RichardsIvor A.1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York and London: Oxford University Press.
38.
RitchieL. David. 2013. Metaphor: Key Topics in Semantics and Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
RöselChristoph. 2021. “Die BasisBibel: ein Einblick in die Übersetzungswerkstatt.” Theologische Beiträge52: 50–62.
WendlandErnst R.2006. LiFE-Style Translating: A Workbook for Bible Translators. Publications in Translation and Textlinguistics 2. Dallas: SIL International.
51.
ZavattaBenedetta. 2019. “Metaphor.” Pages 595–600 in A Guide to Bible Translation: People, Languages, and Topics. History of Bible Translation 4. Edited by NossPhilip A.HouserCharles S.Swindon: United Bible Societies and Xulon Press.
52.
ZehnderMarkus. 1999. Wegmetaphorik im Alten Testament: Eine semantische Untersuchung der alttestamentlichen und altorientalischen Weg-Lexeme mit besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer metaphorischen Verwendung. Beiefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 268. Berlin: De Gruyter.
