This article applies Lakoff and Johnson’s cognitive metaphor theory to the key terms of death and resurrection in the Scriptures and examines the translation of these terms into languages with a traditional Buddhist culture whose worldview is different from that of the Bible. The present analysis indicates that in the conceptual system of the biblical authors, the concept of death is metaphorically described as sleep while resurrection is pictured as waking up and standing up. However, in the Buddhist worldview the concept of the resurrection is absent and the concept of death is not always metaphorically extended as sleep. This article discusses the practical possibilities and limits of the representations of these metaphorical extensions in three Buddhist-context translation projects of the Institute for Bible Translation in Russia: Buryat, Kalmyk, and Tuvan. It also offers some suggestions about searching for their possible representations in the target language.
BaileyRobert E.1964. “Is ‘Sleep’ the Proper Biblical Term for the Intermediate State?” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche55(2): 161–67.
2.
BascomRobert. 2003. “The Role of Culture in Translation.” Pages 81–111 in Bible Translation: Frames of Reference. Edited by WiltTimothy. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome.
3.
BeckerCarl B.1993. Breaking the Circle: Death and the Afterlife in Buddhism. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
4.
BlackMax. 1962. Models and Metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
5.
EvansVyvyan. 2007. A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
6.
EvansVyvyanGreenMelanie. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
7.
FauconnierGillesTurnerMark. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
8.
FerréFrederick. 1968. “Metaphors, Models, and Religion.” Sound51: 327–45.
9.
GentnerDedre. 1983. “Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy.” Cognitive Science7: 155–70.
10.
GentnerDedreMarkmanArthur B.1997. “Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity.” American Psychologist52: 45–56.
11.
GibbsR. W.1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
GibbsR. W.1996. “Why Many Concepts are Metaphorical.” Cognition61: 301–19.
13.
GradyJoseph E.2007. “Metaphor.” Pages 188–213 in The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Edited by GeeraertsDirkCuyckensHubert. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
HarriesKarsten. 1979. “Metaphor and Transcendence.” Pages 71–88 in On Metaphor. Edited by SacksSheldon. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
15.
HornerI. B. trans. 1990. The Middle Length Sayings. Vol. 3. Oxford: Pali Text Society.
16.
JäkelOlaf. 2003. Wie Metaphern Wissen schaffen: Die kognitive Metapherntheorie und ihre Anwendung in Modell-Analysen der Diskursbereiche Geistestätigkeit, Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Religion. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač.
17.
JarickJohn. 1999. “Questioning Sheol.” Pages 22–32 in Resurrection. Edited by PorterStanley E.HayesMichael A.TombsDavid. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
18.
JohnsonM.1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
KatanDavid. 1999. Translating Cultures: An Introduction for Translators, Interpreters and Mediators. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome.
20.
Kenin-LopsanM. B.1987. Ritual Practice and Folklore of Tuvan Shamanism at the End of the Nineteenth to the Twentieth Century [in Russian]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
21.
KövecsesZoltán. 1986. Metaphors of Anger, Pride, and Love: A Lexical Approach to the Structure of Concepts. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
22.
KövecsesZoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
LakoffGeorge. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
24.
LakoffGeorge. 1990. “The Invariance Hypothesis.” Linguistics1: 39–74.
25.
LakoffGeorgeJohnsonMark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
26.
LakoffGeorgeTurnerMark. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
LangackerRonald W.1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
28.
MacCormackE. R.1985. A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
McAlpineThomas H.1987. Sleep, Divine and Human, in the Old Testament. Sheffield: JSOT Press.
30.
McElhanonKenneth A.2006. “From Simple Metaphors to Conceptual Blending: The Mapping of Analogical Concepts and the Praxis of Translation.” Journal of Translation2(1): 31–81.
31.
McFagueS.1982. Metaphorical Theology: Models of God in Religious Language. Minneapolis: Fortress.
32.
MongushM.V.2001. History of Buddhism in Tuva [in Russian]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
33.
PerdueLeo G.1991. Wisdom in Revolt: Metaphorical Theology in the Book of Job. Sheffield: JSOT Press.
34.
PereiraFrancisco Câmara. 2007. Creativity and Artificial Intelligence: A Conceptual Blending Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
35.
RichardsI. A.1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
RicoeurPaul. 1976. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth, TX: TCU.
37.
RicoeurPaul. 1977. The Rule of Metaphor: The Creation of Meaning in Language. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
38.
SawyerJohn F. A.1973. “Hebrew Words for the Resurrection of the Dead.” Vetus Testamentum23: 218–34.
39.
SomovAlexey. 2013. “Biblical Terms of the Conceptual Domain ‘Afterlife’: Translating the Bible into Languages of Buddhist Cultures” [in Russian]. Rodnoy Jazik1: 93–116.
40.
SomovAlexey. 2017. Representations of the Afterlife in Luke–Acts. International Studies in Christian Origins within Library of New Testament Studies Series. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.
41.
SomovAlexeyVoinovVitaly. Forthcoming. “Translating ‘Abraham’s Bosom’ (Luke 16:22-23) as a Key Metaphor in the Overall Composition of the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly.
42.
SoskiceJ. M.1985. Metaphor and Religious Language. Oxford: Clarendon.
43.
SweetserEve E.1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
TovEmmanuel. 1999. The Greek and Hebrew Bible: Collected Essays on the Septuagint. Leiden: Brill.
