In a study of the French media coverage surrounding the introduction of the 2021 Bioethics Law that allowed lesbian couples and single women access to Assisted Reproductive Technologies (i.e. fertility treatments), this article investigates how regulatory changes affect feeling rule hierarchies and how such interactions influence market legitimacy. This article contributes to research on collective affects and marketplace sentiments in market systems dynamics by extending our understanding of the role that feeling rules play in market legitimation and enlightening the role of state actors in the market shaping of moral sentiments. This study also enhances our understanding of consumer inclusion trajectories by highlighting a case of regulatory-driven inclusion dynamic in a controversial market.
AboelenienAArselZ (2024) The shaping of marketplace moral sentiments. Journal of Business Research182: 114810.
2.
Béji-BécheurAÖzçağlar-ToulouseN (2014) Institutionalization of sustainable development and emergence of sustainable marketing. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)29(3): 3–9.
3.
CariouA (2021) PMA «Do it yourself»: Ces femmes qui n’ont pas attendu la loi bioéthique. Aujourd’hui France, 9June.
4.
ChaneyDBen SlimaneK (2014) A neo-institutional analytic grid for extending marketing to institutional dimensions. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)29(2): 95–111.
5.
DeephouseDBundyJPlunkett TostLSuchmanM (2017) Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. In: GreenwoodROliverCLawrenceTMeyerR (eds) The SAGE Handbook or Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, pp. 1–42.
6.
DionDTachetB (2020) Dynamics between market categories: A study of the (in) visibility of the plus-size fashion market. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)35(1): 62–83.
7.
EichertCLuedickeM (2022) Almost equal: Consumption under fragmented stigma. Journal of Consumer Research49(3): 409–429.
8.
FischerEOtnesCCTuncay ZayerL (2007) Pursuing parenthood: Integrating cultural and cognitive perspectives on persistent goal striving. Journal of Consumer Research34(4): 425–440.
9.
FligsteinNMcAdamD (2012) A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
GalluzzoAGorgeH (2020) Institutional entrepreneurs and legitimation strategies: The case of personal hygiene in France from 1880 to 1980. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)35(4): 2–22.
11.
GieslerMVeresiuE (2014) Creating the responsible consumer: Moralistic governance regimes and consumer subjectivity. Journal of Consumer Research41(3): 840–857.
12.
GogginMOrthDBleiklieIRothmayrC (2004) The comparative policy design perspective. ECPR Studies in European Political Science32: 1–20.
13.
GopaldasA (2014) Marketplace sentiments. Journal of Consumer Research41(4): 995–1014.
14.
HochschildA (1983) The Managed Heart. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
HumphreysA (2010) Megamarketing: The creation of markets as a social process. Journal of Marketing74(2): 1–19.
16.
IllouzEGilonDShachakM (2014) Emotions and cultural theory? In: StetsJTurnerJ (ed.) Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions: Volume II. London: Springer, pp. 221–244.
17.
LimaVBelkR (2024) Bodies as machines. Machines as bodies. Consumption Markets & Culture27(2): 178–190.
18.
MimounLTrujillo-TorresLSobandeF (2022) Social emotions and the legitimation of the fertility technology market. Journal of Consumer Research48(6): 1073–1095.
19.
NabiRLPrestinA (2016) Unrealistic hope and unnecessary fear: Exploring how sensationalistic news stories influence health behavior motivation. Health Communication31(9): 1115–1126.
20.
PescosolidoBAMartinJK (2015) The stigma complex. Annual Review of Sociology41(1): 87–116.
ScarabotoDFischerE (2013) Frustrated fatshionistas: An institutional theory perspective on consumer quests for greater choice in mainstream markets. Journal of Consumer Research39(6): 1234–1257.
24.
ScheufeleDA (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication49(1): 103–122.
25.
ScottR (1995) Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
ScottR (2008) Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society37(5): 427–442.
SibaiOMimounOBoukisA (2021) Authenticating brand activism: Negotiating the boundaries of free speech to make a change. Psychology & Marketing38(10): 1651–1669.
29.
SobandeFMimounLTrujillo-TorresL (2020) Soldiers and superheroes needed! Masculine archetypes and constrained bodily commodification in the sperm donation market. Marketing Theory20(1): 65–84.
30.
SpiggleS (1994) Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research21(3): 491–503.
31.
SuchmanM (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review20(3): 571–610.
32.
TakharJRika HoustonH (2019) Forty years of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs): The evolution of a marketplace icon. Consumption Markets & Culture24(5): 468–478.
33.
ThompsonCJ (1997) Interpreting consumers: A hermeneutical framework for deriving marketing insights from the texts of consumers’ consumption stories. Journal of Marketing Research34(4): 438–455.
34.
ValorCLloverasJPapaoikonomouE (2021) The role of emotion discourse and pathic stigma in the delegitimization of consumer practices. Journal of Consumer Research47(5): 636–653.
Wahl-JorgensenK (2019) Emotions, Media and Politics. Cambridge: Polity.
37.
WallendorfMBelkRW (1989) Assessing trustworthiness in naturalistic consumer research. In: HirschmanEC (ed.) Special Volume–Interpretive Consumer Research. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 69–84.
