The analysis of the dialectical relationships between marketing ideology and
criticism is supported by the distinction between legitimacy and legitimization.
Marketing ideology is defined as a relatively stable set of arguments that
provide legitimacy to marketers and the market economy. However it does not
preclude contradictions and the dissenting voice of criticism. Marketing
doctrine also produces legitimization to lessen the tensions between the
marketer’s claim to legitimacy and other people’s belief in
this legitimacy. As marketing doctrine develops through incorporation of
criticism, it follows that the critical process is a never-ending one.
Alderson, W.
(1965) Dynamic Marketing Behavior. A Functionalist Theory of
Marketing.
Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin
.
2.
AMA (2005) American Marketing Association’s webpage. Available
online from: www.marketingpower.com (last accessed 30 March 2005).
3.
Austin, J. L.
(1975) How to Do Things With Words (2nd ed.).
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
4.
Boltanski, L.
and
Chiapello, E.
(2005) The New Spirit of Capitalism.
London: Verso
.
5.
Certeau, de M.
(1984) The Practices of Every Day Life.
Berkeley: University of California
.
6.
Chiapello, E.
(2003)
‘Reconciling the Two Principal Meanings of the Notion of
Ideology. The Example of the Concept of the “Spirit” of Capitalism’
, European Journal of Social Theory6(2):
155-171
.
7.
Cochoy, F.
(1998) ‘Another Discipline for the Market
Economy: Marketing as Performative Knowledge and Know-How for
Capitalism’, in
M. Callon
(ed.) The Laws of the Markets, pp. 194-221.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
8.
Dumont, L.
(1977) From Mandeville to Marx.
Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
.
9.
Ewen, S.
(1988) All Consuming Images: The Politics of Style in
Contemporary Culture.
New York: Basic
.
10.
Foucault, M.
(1988) ‘The Political Technology of
Individuals’, in
L. Martin
,
H. Gutman
and
P. Hutton
(eds) Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault,
pp. 16-49.
Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press
.
11.
Fullerton, R. A.
(1988)
‘How Modern is Modern Marketing? Marketing’s evolution
and the Myth of the “Production Era”’
, Journal of Marketing, 52(January):
108-125
.
12.
Frank, T.
(1997) The Conquest of Cool: Business Culture,
Counterculture, and the Rise of Hip Consumerism.
Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
.
13.
Håkansson, H.
,
Harrison, D.
and
Waluszewski, A.
(2004) Rethinking Marketing: Developing a New Understanding
of Markets.
Chichester: John Wiley
.
14.
Holt, D.
(2002)
‘Why Do Brands Cause Trouble? A Dialectical Theory of Consumer
Culture and Branding’
, Journal of Consumer Research29(June):
70-90
.
15.
Keith, R. J.
(1960)
‘The Marketing Revolution’
, Journal of Marketing24:
35-38
.
16.
Kotler, P.
(2003 [1967]) Marketing Management.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
.
17.
Kotler, P.
and
Levy, S. J.
(1969)
‘Broadening the Concept of Marketing’
, Journal of Marketing33:
10-15
.
18.
Lang, T.
and
Gabriel, Y.
(1995)
‘The Consumer as Citizen’
, Consumer Policy Review5(3):
96-106
.
19.
Latour, B.
(1987) Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and
Engineers Through Society.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
20.
Marion, G.
(1993) ‘The Marketing Management Discourse:
What’s New Since the 1960s?’, in
M. J. Baker
(ed.) Perspectives on Marketing Management Vol. 3, pp.
143-168.
Chichester: Wiley
.
21.
Marion, G.
(2004) L’idéologie Marketing.
Paris: Eyrolles
.
22.
Maslow A.
(1954) Motivation and Personality,
New York: Harper & Row
.
23.
Sampson, E. E.
(1977)
‘Psychology and the American Ideal’
, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology35:
767-782
.
24.
Sheth, J. N.
,
Sisodia, R. J.
and
Sharma, A.
(2000)
‘The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer-Centric Marketing’
, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science28(1):
55-66
.
25.
Smith, A.
(1759) The Theory of the Moral Sentiments. Available
online from: www.adamsmith.org/smith/ (last accessed 30 March 2005).
26.
Smith A.
(1776) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of
Nations. Available online from: www.adamsmith.org/smith/ (last
accessed 30 March 2005).
27.
Sutton, F. X.
,
Seymour, E. H.
,
Kaysen, C.
and
Tobin, J.
(1956) The American Business Creed.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
28.
Tocqueville, de A.
[1850] (1947) Democracy in America.
London: Oxford University Press
.
29.
Vargo, S. L.
and
Lusch, R. F.
(2004)
‘Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing’
, Journal of Marketing68:
1-17
.
30.
Wilkie W. L.
and
Moore E. S.
(1999)
‘Marketing’s Contributions to Society’
, Journal of Marketing63(Special Issue):
198-218
.
31.
Wilkie, W. L.
and
Moore, E. S.
(2003)
‘Scholarly Research in Marketing: Exploring the “4
Eras” of Thought Development’
, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing22(2):
116-146
.
