More sustainable food choices are part of a complex system that combines practices, which themselves are interconnected in a network of elements made up of competences, meanings and material devices. This article proposes an innovative method for studying this system through a non-deductive quantitative approach. The research adds to the corpus of the ‘theory of practices’ by defining the concepts of ‘central’ practices (i.e. connected to many elements of the system, such as the practice of buying and cooking sustainable products in the sustainable food system) and ‘peripheral’ practices (i.e. connected in a lesser extent to other elements of the system, such as the practices of anti-waste, growing your own food and the consumption of plant proteins). It also highlights the ‘connector’ role between the practices of certain elements. Finally, based on the current structure of the system of sustainable food practices, the article makes several propositions for speeding up change.
AbidTRodierFDurifF (2020) Produits alimentaires locaux. Les motivations d’achat en fonction des circuits de distribution. Décisions Marketing98: 127–143.
2.
AbricJC (2014) The search for the central core and the silent zone of social representations. In: AbricJC (ed.) Methods of Studying Social Representations. Toulouse: Erès: 59–80.
3.
AchabouMADekhiliS (2021) Luxury and sustainable development: Companies facing the challenge of convincing reluctant consumers. In: DekhiliS (ed.) Marketing for Sustainable Development: Rethinking Consumption Models. London: ISTE Editions, pp. 33–49.
Agence de l’environnement et de la maîtrise de l’énergie (ADEME) (2016) Etat des lieux des masses de gaspillages alimentaires et de sa gestion aux différentes étapes de la chaîne alimentaire (Study carried out for ADEME by INCOME Consulting-AK2D). Angers Cedex: ADEME.
6.
Agence de l’environnement et de la maîtrise de l’énergie (ADEME) (2017) Food – Local Short Circuits (Les Avis de l’ADEME, June). Angers Cedex: ADEME.
7.
Agence de l’environnement et de la maîtrise de l’énergie (ADEME) (2018) Manger mieux, gaspiller moins – Pour une alimentation saine et durable (Keys to action). Angers Cedex: ADEME.
8.
Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation de l’environnement et du travail (ANSES) (2017) Etude Individuelle Nationale des Consommations Alimentaires 3 (INCA3). Rapport d’expertise collective, June. Available at: https://medias.vie-publique.fr/data_storage_s3/rapport/pdf/174000565.pdf
9.
AllèsBPéneauSKesse-GuyotEBaudryJHercbergSMéjeanC (2017) Food choice motives including sustainability during purchasing are associated with a healthy dietary pattern in French adults. Nutrition Journal16(1): 1–16.
10.
ArselZBeanJ (2013) Taste regimes and market-mediated practice. Journal of Consumer Research39(5): 899–917.
11.
AvenierMJGavard-PerretML (2012) Inscrire son projet de recherche dans un cadre épistémologique. In: Gavard-PerretMLGottelandDHaonCJolibertA (eds) Méthodologie de la recherche en sciences de gestion -Réussir son mémoire ou sa thèse en science de gestion. Paris: Pearson Education, pp. 11–62.
12.
BiermannGRauH (2020) The meaning of meat: (Un)sustainable eating practices at home and out of home. Appetite153: 104730.
13.
BrabetJ (1988) Faut-il encore parler d’approche qualitative et d’approche quantitative ?Recherche et Applications en Marketing3(1): 75–89.
14.
CadarioRChandonP (2019) Effectiveness or consumer acceptance? Tradeoffs in selecting healthy eating nudges. Food Policy85: 1–6.
15.
CadarioRChandonP (2020) Which healthy eating nudges work best? A meta-analysis of field experiments. Marketing Science39(3): 465–486.
16.
CarstensenTAEbertAK (2013) Cycling cultures in Northern Europe: From ‘Golden Age’ to ‘Renaissance’. In: ParkinJ (ed.) Cycling and Sustainability, vol. 1. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 23–58.
17.
Cartron and Fichet (2020) Vers une alimentation durable : Un enjeu sanitaire, social, territorial et environnemental majeur pour la France. Rapport d’information fait au nom de la délégation sénatoriale à la prospective du Sénat 476. Available at: https://www.senat.fr/rap/r19-476/r19-476.html (accessed 5 May 2023).
18.
CasteloAFMSchäferMSilvaME (2021) Food practices as part of daily routines: A conceptual framework for analysing networks of practices. Appetite157(3): 104978.
19.
CheahJHMemonMAChuahFTingHRamayahT (2018) Assessing reflective models in marketing research: A comparison between pls and plsc estimates. International Journal of Business and Society19(1): 139–160.
20.
ColeyDHowardMWinterM (2011) Food miles: Time for a re-think?British Food Journal113(7): 919–934.
21.
CrippaMSolazzoEGuizzardiDMonforti-FerrarioFTubielloFNLeipA (2021) Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature Food2: 198–209.
22.
CroizeanJPRobert-DemontrondP (2021) Segmenter les marchés à partir des représentations sociales : le cas des produits alimentaires. Décisions Marketing103(3): 9–32.
23.
DivardRFrançois-LecompteAGabrielPGuillemotSInnocentM (2020a) L’alimentation durable : dimensionnement et proposition d’une mesure de cette pratique. In: Journée de recherche interdisciplinaire : Pratiques alimentaires, santé et territoire. 4 juin 2020, Brest, France.
24.
DivardRFrançois-LecompteAGabrielPGuillemotSInnocentMLe Gall-ElyMPirisYTamaroA (2020b) La pratique de l’alimentation durable par les consommateurs, état des lieux en 2020 (Partial project report commissioned by ADEME). Angers Cedex: ADEME.
25.
Dubuisson-QuellierSPlesszM (2013) Theory of practice. What contributions for the sociological study of consumption?Sociologie4(4): 451–469.
26.
Dubuisson-QuellierSGojardSPlesszM (2019) Dispositifs et dispositions de la consommation. Retour sur une enquête contemporaine articulant méthodes qualitatives et quantitatives. Les études sociales169(1): 133–152.
27.
DyenMSirieixLCostaSDepezayLCastagnaE (2018) Exploring the dynamics of food routines: A practice-based study to understand households’ daily life. European Journal of Marketing52(12): 2544–2556.
28.
El AlamiYCovaV (2018) Numérimorphose et activités sportives : le rôle des objets connectés dans l’harmonisation des pratiques. In: 17èmes Journées Normandes de la Recherche sur la Consommation, 22–23 novembre 2018, Rouen.
29.
EskenaziM (2022) Voir, faire et vivre la ville pour le vélo. Pratiques du vélo et politiques de mobilité dans deux métropoles européennes. Doctoral Thesis, Urban Planning and Development defended at the Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil.
30.
Esposito VinziVTrincheraL (2013) Modèles à équations structurelles, approches basées sur les composantes. In: SaportaGDroesbekeJJThomas-AgnanC (eds) Modèles à variables latentes et modèles de mélange. Paris: Editions Technip: 153–176.
31.
EvansD (2011) Blaming the consumer – Once again: The social and material contexts of everyday food waste practices in some English households. Critical Public Health21(4): 429–440.
32.
EvansDWelchDSwaffieldJ (2017) Constructing and mobilizing ‘the consumer’: Responsibility, consumption and the politics of sustainability. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space49(6): 1396–1412.
33.
FardetA (2017) Holistic Nutrition: Towards a healthy, sustainable and ethical preventive diet. In: Les Conférences De L’arche Des Métiers, Le Cheylard, 6 May, Blanzat, France.
34.
Farr-WhartonGFothMChoiJHJ (2014) Identifying factors that promote consumer behaviours causing expired domestic food waste. Journal of Consumer Behaviour13(6): 393–402.
35.
GalanJP (2011) Une déconstruction des outils de mesure en marketing. Actes du 27 ème Congrès de l’Association Française du Marketing, Bruxelles, 18–20 Mai, Belgique.
36.
GallenC (2005) Le rôle des représentations mentales dans le processus de choix, une approche pluridisciplinaire appliquée au cas des produits alimentaires. Recherche et Applications en Marketing20: 59–76.
37.
GirardonKGabrielPDupréM (2022) La prise en compte du niveau de connaissance préalable des individus dans l’efficacité des nudges: une application au tri des déchets en Corse. Décisions Marketing105: 2–18.
38.
GuillardVGaucelSFornaciariCAngellier-CoussyHBuchePGontardN (2018) The next generation of sustainable food packaging to preserve our environment in a circular economy context. Frontiers in Nutrition5: 121.
39.
HaenleinMBitnerMJKohliAKLemonKNReibsteinDJ (2022) Guest Editorial: Responsible Research in Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science50: 8–12.
40.
HairJFSarstedtMRingleCMMenaJA (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science40: 414–433.
41.
HalkierB (2009) A practice theoretical perspective on everyday dealings with environmental challenges of food consumption. Anthropology of Food. Epub ahead of print 10 September. DOI: 10.4000/aof.6405.
42.
HammersleyM (1992) Deconstructing the qualitative-quantitative divide. In: BrannenJ (ed.) Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 39–55.
43.
HargreavesT (2011) Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture11(1): 79–99.
44.
Haut Conseil de la Santé Publique (HCSP) (2017) Pour Une Politique Nationale Nutrition Santé En France PNNS 2017-2021. Collection Avis et Rapports, HCSP, Paris, 27 September.
HennchenB (2019) Knowing the kitchen: Applying practice theory to issues of food waste in the food service sector. Journal of Cleaner Production225: 675–683.
47.
HenselerJRingleCMSarstedtM (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science43(1): 115–135.
48.
HertwigRGrüne-YanoffT (2017) Nudging and boosting: Steering or empowering good decisions. Perspectives on Psychological Science12(6): 973–986.
49.
HoulahanJEMcKinneySTAndersonTMMcGillBJ (2017) The priority of prediction in ecological understanding. Oikos126(1): 1–7.
50.
HunemanP (2023) Les sociétés du profilage: evaluer, optimiser, prédire. Paris: Payot & Rivages.
51.
InnocentM (2017) La valeur pour le consommateur d’une pratique de maîtrise de consommation: le cas de l’électricité. PhD Thesis in Management Sciences defended at the University of Western Brittany-Brest, Brest.
52.
InnocentMFrançois-LecompteA (2020) The value derived from a practice: An application to the case of energy savings. Recherche et Applications En Marketing (English Edition)35(2): 74–96.
53.
InnocentMFrançois-LecompteAGabrielPDivardRLe Gall-ElyM (2021) Sustainable food practice: The influence of the physical environment. Systèmes Alimentaires/Food Systems6: 217–238.
54.
Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES) (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook – General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment: Detailed Guidance. Brussels: Joint Research Centre, European Commission; Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
55.
JolibertAJourdanP (2011) Marketing Research: Methods of Research and Studies in Marketing, 1st edition. Paris: Dunod.
56.
KaiserFGFuhrerU (2003) Ecological behavior’s dependency on different forms of knowledge. Applied Psychology52(4): 598–613.
57.
LahlouS (1995) Penser manger. Les représentations sociales de l’alimentation. PhD Thesis in Social Psychology, École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), Paris.
58.
LaisneyC (2016) Vegetarianism and flexitarianism, an emerging trend. Meat & Meat Products32: 1–6.
59.
Le BorgneGSirieixLForgeauFCostaSGagneuxCVN (2016) Les internautes face au gaspillage alimentaire. Décisions Marketing81: 61–80.
MarionG (2013) Customer value formation: Interactions, uncertainties and framings. Cultural Perspectives on Consumption3(1): 13–46.
62.
MarquetPAAllenAPBrownJHDunneJAEnquistBJGilloolyJFGowatyPAGreenJLHarteJHubbellSPO’DwyerJOkieJGOstlingARitchieMStorchDWestGB (2014) On theory in ecology. BioScience64(8): 701–710.
63.
MassaC (2014) Value, service and sensation in the current music concert experience: An interpretative approach using quantitative and qualitative data. PhD Thesis in Management Sciences defended at the University of Toulouse 1, Toulouse.
64.
MassonTFritscheI (2021) We need climate change mitigation and climate change mitigation needs the ‘We’: A state-of-the-art review of social identity effects motivating climate change action. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences42: 89–96.
65.
MathieuSDorardG (2021) Végétarisme, végétalisme, veganisme: des comportements (alimentaires) au service de l’identité? Une étude qualitative en population française. Psychologie Française66(3): 273–288.
66.
MeinherzFFritzL (2021) ‘Ecological concerns weren’t the main reason why I took the bus, that association only came afterwards’: On shifts in meanings of everyday mobility. Mobilities16: 825–842.
67.
MonnotEReniouFRouquetA (2014) The sorting of household waste: A characterization of the logistics deployed by consumers. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)29(3): 74–98.
68.
NicoliniD (2012) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization. An Introduction, 1st edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69.
OttoSPensiniPZabelSDiaz-SieferPBurnhamENavarro-VillarroelCNeamanA (2021) The prosocial origin of sustainable behavior: A case study in the ecological domain. Global Environmental Change69: 102312.
70.
PaddockJ (2015) Invoking simplicity: ‘Alternative’ food and the reinvention of distinction. Sociologia Ruralis55(1): 22–40.
71.
PetrilloJCanoSJMcLeodLDCoonCD (2015) Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: A comparison of worked examples. Value in Health18(1): 25–34.
72.
PlesszMDubuisson-QuellierSGojardSBarreyS (2016) How consumption prescriptions affect food practices: Assessing the roles of household resources and life-course events. Journal of Consumer Culture16(1): 101–123.
73.
ReckwitzA (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory5(2): 243–263.
74.
RedmanE (2013) Advancing educational pedagogy for sustainability: Developing and implementing programs to transform behaviors. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education8(1): 1–34.
75.
RedmanERedmanA (2014) Transforming sustainable food and waste behaviors by realigning domains of knowledge in our education system. Journal of Cleaner Production64: 147–157.
76.
ReniouFMonnotESirieixLDaniel-CheverM (2021) Le marché du vrac: un renouveau des pratiques. In: DekhiliS (ed.) Le marketing au service du développement durable: repenser les modèles de consommation. London: ISTE Group: 95–118.
77.
RingleCMSarstedtMStraubDW (2012) Editor’s comments: A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in ‘MIS Quarterly’. MIS Quarterly36(1): iii–xiv.
78.
Robert-DemontrondPBellionABeaussetT (2020) Principes, enjeux et limites de la théorie des pratiques pour le marketing. Management & Sciences Sociales, Humanisme & Gestion: 28: 93–105.
79.
RøpkeI (2009) Theories of practice – New inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption. Ecological Economics68(10): 2490–2497.
80.
RoquesPRouxD (2018) Consommation d’énergie et théorie des pratiques : vers des pistes d’action pour la transition énergétique.Décisions Marketing90: 35–54.
81.
SachseV (2020) Les jardins partagés, terreau de participation citoyenne: de l’appropriation de l’espace public à la construction de commun(s). Regards croisés entre la France et l’italie. PhD Thesis in Geography, defended at the University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg.
82.
SandbergJ (2005) How do we justify knowledge produced within interpretive approaches?Organizational Research Methods8(1): 41–68.
83.
SchatzkiTR (1996) Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84.
SchatzkiTR (2002) The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
85.
SchatzkiTR (2011) Where the action is: On large social phenomena such as sociotechnical regimes. Working paper 1. Sustainable Practices Research Group. Available at: http://www.sprg.ac.uk/uploads/schatzki-wp1.pdf
86.
SchmittMTAkninLBAxsenJShwomRL (2018) Unpacking the relationships between pro-environmental behavior, life satisfaction, and perceived ecological threat. Ecological Economics143: 130–140.
87.
SchwartzSEBenoitLClaytonSParnesMFSwensonLLoweSR (2022) Climate change anxiety and mental health: Environmental activism as buffer. Current Psychology. Epub ahead of print 28 February. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-02735-6.
88.
Séré de LanauzeG (2015) L’adoption d’un produit alimentaire nouveau face à des freins culturels forts : le cas de l’entomophagie en France. Décisions Marketing79: 15–33.
89.
ServedioMRBrandvainYDholeSFitzpatrickCLGoldbergEESternCAVan CleveJYehDJ (2014) Not just a theory: The utility of mathematical models in evolutionary biology. PLoS Biology12(12): e1002017.
90.
ShoveEPantzarM (2005) Consumers, producers and practices: Understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic Walking. Journal of Consumer Culture5(1): 43–64.
91.
ShoveEPantzarMWatsonM (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. London: SAGE.
92.
ShoveEWatsonMSpurlingN (2015) Conceptualizing connections: Energy demand, infrastructures and social practices. European Journal of Social Theory18(3): 274–287.
93.
ShoveEWatsonMHandMIngramM (2007) The Design of Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.
SommierBPlaudCPoulainM (2019) La consommation alimentaire biologique comme fait social total. Une analyse ethnomarketing des clients Biocoop. Management & Avenir109: 15–35.
Van LangePHuckelbaAL (2021) Psychological distance: How to make climate change less abstract and closer to the self. Current Opinion in Psychology42: 49–53.
101.
VerainMCDagevosHAntonidesG (2015) Sustainable food consumption. Product choice or curtailment?Appetite91: 375–384.
102.
VerplankenBFaesS (1999) Good intentions, bad habits, and effects of forming implementation intentions on healthy eating. European Journal of Social Psychology29: 591–604.
103.
WardeA (1997) Consumption, Food and Taste. London: SAGE.
104.
WardeA (2005) Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture5(2): 131–153.
105.
WardeA (2016) The Practice of Eating. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
106.
WatsonMBrowneAEvansDFodenMHoolohanCSharpL (2020) Challenges and opportunities for re-framing resource use policy with practice theories: The change points approach. Global Environmental Change62: 102072.
107.
WebbDJMohrLAHarrisKE (2008) A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement. Journal of Business Research61(2): 91–98.
108.
WhittallBWarwickSMGuyDJAppletonKM (2023) Public understanding of sustainable diets and changes towards sustainability: A qualitative study in a UK population sample. Appetite181: 106388.
XuXSharmaPShuSLinTSCiaisPTubielloFNSmithPCampbellNJainAK (2021) Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nature Food2: 724–732.
112.
YanowDSchwartz-SheaP (2006) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
