This article proposes a new and original measurement scale for consumers’ ethical sensitivity (CES). Usually measured using scenarios, ethical sensitivity appears as a fundamental variable in understanding consumers’ ethical behaviour. In this study, we propose an alternative definition and a new scale for ethical sensitivity. We use a series of qualitative and quantitative studies and analyse construct validity, that is, content, convergent and discriminant validities. The results indicate that ethical sensitivity is a better predictor of ethical consumption behaviour when measured by our new scale than by a scenario. Implications are outlined for academics and professionals looking to better understand the relationship between consumer ethics and consumption behaviour.
AmeenECGuffeyDMMcMillanJJ (1996) Gender differences in determining the ethical sensitivity of future accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics15(5): 591–597.
BardinL (2007) L’analyse de contenu (Coll Quadrige), dernière edition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
4.
BarnettCCafaroPNewholmT (2005) Philosophy and ethical consumption. In: HarrisonRNewholmTShawD (eds) The Ethical Consumer. London: SAGE, pp. 138–153.
5.
BarnettJHKarsonMJ (1987) Personal values and business decisions: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Business Ethics6: 371–382.
6.
BartikowskiBKameiKChandonJL (2010) A verbal rating scale to measure Japanese consumers’ perceptions of product quality. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics22(2): 179–195.
7.
BebeauMJRestJRYamoorCM (1985) Measuring the ethical sensitivity of dental students. Journal of Dental Education49(4): 225–235.
BergkvistLRossiterJR (2007) The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research44(2): 175–184.
10.
BressollesG (2006) La qualité de service électronique: NetQu@l proposition d’une échelle de mesure appliquée aux sites marchands et effets modérateurs. Recherche et Applications en Marketing21(3): 19–45.
11.
BrewerGA (2003) Building social capital: Civic attitudes and behavior of public servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory13(1): 5–25.
12.
BristolTFernEF (2003) The effects of interaction on consumers’ attitudes in focus groups. Psychology & Marketing20(5): 433–454.
13.
BuchanHF (2005) Ethical decision making in the public accounting profession: An extension of Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics61: 165–181.
14.
BurkeFPEckertCDavisS (2014) Segmenting consumers’ reasons for and against ethical consumption. European Journal of Marketing48(11–12): 2237–2261.
15.
ByrneB (2010) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Canto-SperberMOgienR (2010) La Philosophie Morale (Que sais-je), 3ème édition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, p. 130.
17.
CeluchKDillA (2011) An extension of the theory of reasoned action in ethical decision contexts: The role of normative influence and ethical judgment. Journal of Education for Business86: 201–220.
18.
ChowdhuryRMFernandoM (2012) The role of spiritual well-being and materialism in determining consumers’ ethical beliefs: An empirical study with Australian consumers. Journal of Business Ethics113(1): 61–79.
19.
ChurchillGA (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research16(1): 64–73.
20.
CohenJRPantLWSharpDJ (1993) A validation and extension of a multidimensional ethics scale. Journal of Business Ethics12(1): 13–26.
21.
CohenJRPantLWSharpDJ (2001) An examination of differences in ethical decision-making between Canadian business students and accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics30: 319–335.
22.
CollinsD (2000) The quest to improve the human condition: The first 1 500 articles published in journal of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics26(1): 1–73.
23.
CovaB (1996) Leçons de marketing postmoderne. Expansion Management Review83: 91–101.
24.
CrowneDPMarloweD (1960) A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology24: 349–354.
25.
CrumpMJMcDonnellJVGureckisTM (2013) Evaluating Amazon’s mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS ONE8(3): e57410.
26.
CzellarS (2006) Self-presentational effects in the implicit association test. Journal of Consumer Psychology16(1): 92–100.
27.
DavisKFrederickWC (1984) Business and Society: Management, Public Policy, Ethics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
De FerranF (2003) Sensibilités et motivations à la consommation de produits éthiques: Application au domaine des produits issus du commerce équitable. In: 2E Journées Normandes de la Consommation, Caen, 31 March.
29.
De FerranFGrunertKG (2007) French fair trade coffee buyers’ purchasing motives: An exploratory study using means-end chains analysis. Food Quality and Preference18: 218–229.
30.
De VellisRF (1991) Scale Development: Theory and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
DialloMFDiop-SallFLerouxE. (2015) Responsible tourist behaviour: The role of social engagement. Recherche et Applications en Marketing30(3): 88–108.
32.
EvrardYPrasBRouxE (1993) Market: Études Et Recherches En Marketing – Fondements Méthodes. Paris: Dunod.
33.
FabrigarLRWegenerDTMacCallumRC. (1999) Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods4(3): 272–299.
34.
FerrellOCFraedrichJFerrellL (2002) Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
35.
FieldA (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
36.
FinnDWChonkoLBHuntSD (1988) Ethical problems in public accounting: The view from the top. Journal of Business Ethics7: 605–615.
37.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–150.
38.
ForsythDR (1980) A taxonomy of ethical ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39: 175–184.
39.
FrydmanMLedrucIHofmansV. (1995) The development of altruistic attitudes. Enfance1: 89–100.
40.
Gavard-PerretMLGottelandDHaonC. (2008) Méthodologie de la Recherche. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
41.
GerbingDWAndersonJC (1988) An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research25(2): 186–192.
42.
GierlHStumppS (1999) L’influence des convictions de contrôle et des attitudes globales sur le comportement écologique du consommateur. Recherche et Applications en Marketing14(2): 71–83.
43.
GrzesiukAWanatT (2010) Consumer ethics: Some evidence from young consumers from Poland. In: 9th international conference marketing trends, Venice, 21–23 January.
44.
GurviezPSirieixL (2013) Resistance to a social innovation: An analytic framework for problems of fair trade diffusion. Recherche et Applications en Marketing28(2): 25–45.
45.
GurviezPKreziakDSirieixL (2003) La matrice des vertus: Une nouvelle approche méthodologique des préoccupations liées à l’éthique. Les Actes Du 19ème Congrès de l’AFM19: 485–494.
46.
HardestyDMBeardenWO (2004) The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs. Journal of Business Research57(2): 98–107.
47.
HolbrookMB (1994) Ethics in consumer research: An overview and prospectus. In: AllenCTJohnDR (eds) Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 21. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 566–571.
48.
HolbrookMB (1999) Consumer Value. New York: Routledge.
49.
HuntSDVitellSJ (1986) A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing6: 5–16.
50.
HuntSDVitellSJ (1991) The general theory of marketing ethics: A retrospective and revision. In: SmithNCQuelchJA (eds) Ethics in Marketing. Homewood, IL: Irwin Custom Publishing, pp. 775–784.
51.
JarvisCBMackenzieSBPodsakoffPM (2003) A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research30: 199–218.
52.
JonesTM (1991) Ethical decision making by individuals in organization: An issue–contingent model. Academy of Management Review16(2): 366–395.
53.
KarcherJN (1992) ‘Auditors’ ability to discuss the presence of ethical problems. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
54.
KarylowskiJ (1982) Two types of altruistic behavior: Doing good to feel good or to make the other feel good. In: DerlegaVJGrzelakJ (eds) Cooperation and Helping Behavior. New York: Academic Press, pp. 397–413.
55.
LavorataL (2007) Proposal for a measurement scale of the ethical climate in business: A study in the area of B-to-B selling. Recherche et Applications en Marketing22(1): 1–24.
56.
Le Gall-ElyM (2013) Giving in consumer research and marketing: A state of the art. Recherche et Applications en Marketing28(4): 47–71.
57.
LecompteA (2005) Consommation socialement responsable: Proposition et validation d’un modèle intégrateur. Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences de Gestion, Université Pierre Mendes, Grenoble.
58.
LecompteAValette-FlorenceP (2004) Proposition d’une échelle de mesure de CSR. In: Actes du 20ème congrès international de l’afm, Université De Rennes, Rennes.
59.
LichtléMCPlichonV (2014) Emotions experienced in retail outlets: A proposed measurement scale. Recherche et Applications en Marketing29(1): 3–26.
60.
LuL-CLuC-J (2010) Moral philosophy, materialism and consumer ethics: An exploratory study in Indonesia. Journal of Business Ethics94: 193–210.
61.
MilesMBHubermanAM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London: SAGE.
62.
MintelP (1994) The Green Consumer (Mintel special report, Vols 1 et 2). London: Mintel.
63.
MohrLAWebbDJHarrisKE (2001) Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs35(1): 45–72.
NunnallyJCBernsteinIH (1994) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
66.
OumlilABBallounJL (2009) Ethical decision-making differences between American and Moroccan managers. Journal of Business Ethics84(4): 457–478.
67.
Ozcaglar-ToulouseN (2005) Apport du concept d’identité à la compréhension du comportement du consommateur responsable: Une application à la consommation des produits issus du commerce equitable. Doctoral Dissertation, Université du Droit et de la Santé-Lille II, Lille.
68.
PattersonDM (2001) Causal effects of regulatory, organizational and personal factors on ethical sensitivity. Journal of Business Ethics30(2): 123–159.
69.
PetersonRA (1994) A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha. Journal of Consumer Research21(2): 381–391.
70.
PiliavinJACharngHW (1990) Altruism: A review of recent theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology16: 27–65.
71.
RandallMFFernandesDM (1992) Social desirability bias in ethics research. Business Ethics Quarterly2(2): 183–205.
72.
ReidenbachRERobinDP (1988) Some initial steps toward improving the measurement of ethical evaluations of marketing activities. Journal of Business Ethics7: 871–879.
73.
ReidenbachRERobinDP (1990) Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics9(8): 639–653.
74.
RestJR (1979) Revised manual for the defining issues test. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
75.
RestJR (1983) Morality. In: FlavellJMarkmanE (eds) Handbook of Child Psychology, vol. 3, 4th edition.New York: Wiley, pp. 556–628.
76.
RestJR (1986) Moral development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Praeger.
77.
RevickiDACookKFAmtmannD. (2014) Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the PROMIS pain quality item bank. Quality of Life Research23(1): 245–255.
78.
RhodesSDArceoR (2004) Developing and testing measures predictive of hepatitis A vaccination in a sample of men who have sex with men. Health Education Research19(3): 272–283.
79.
RichinsMLDawsonS (1992) A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research19: 303–316.
80.
RoehrichG (1993), Validité convergente et validité discriminante : l’apport des modèles d’equations structurelles. Papier de recherche n°92–23: Grenoble, École Supérieure des Affaires, Université Pierre Mendès France.
81.
RojotJ (1992) Déontologie Et Gestion Des Ressources Humaines (ed de La BruslerieH). Paris: Editions Economica.
82.
RossiPHWrightJDAndersonAB (1983) Sample surveys: History, current practice and future prospects. In: RossiPHWrightJDAndersonAB (eds) Handbook of Survey Research. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, pp. 1–20.
83.
RouseSV (2015) A reliability analysis of mechanical Turk data. Computers in Human Behavior43: 304–307.
84.
RousselPDurrieuFCampoyE. (2002) Méthodes D’équations Structurelles: Recherche et Applications en Gestion. Paris: Editions Economica.
85.
RushtonJPChrisjohnRDFekkenGC (1981) The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences2(4): 293–302.
86.
SchwartzSH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology25: 1–65.
87.
SenSGurhan-CanliZMorwitzV (2001) Withholding consumption: A social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. Journal of Consumer Research28: 399–417.
88.
ShaubMK (1989) An empirical examination of the determinants of auditors’ ethical sensitivity. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Accounting, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
89.
ShaubMKFinDWMunterP (1993) The effects of auditors’ ethical orientation on commitment and ethical sensitivity. Behavioral Research in Accounting5: 145–169.
90.
ShawDGrehanEShiuE. (2005) An exploration of values in ethical consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Behavior4(3): 185–200.
91.
Simga-MuganCDalyBOnkalD. (2005) The influence of nationality and gender on ethical sensitivity: An application of the issue-contingent model. Journal of Business Ethics57: 139–159.
92.
SingerAESingerMS (1997) Management-science and business-ethics. Journal of Business Ethics16: 385–395.
93.
SinghapakdiASVitell FrankeGR (1999) Antecedents, consequences and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science27: 19–36.
94.
SmithA (1776) Recherches sur la nature et les causes de la richesse des nations, traduction française de Germain Garnier, 1881 à partir de l’édition revue par Adolphe Blanqui en 1843. Liens Internet: http://dx.doi.org/doi, 10.
95.
SmithNC (1990) Morality and the Market. London: Routledge.
96.
SmithNC (1999) Ethics and the typology of consumer value. In: HolbrookM (ed.) Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 147–158.
97.
SparksRJHuntS (1998) Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity: Conceptualization, measurement and exploratory investigation. Journal of Marketing62: 92–109.
98.
VanhammeJ (2008) The surprise-delight relationship revisited in the management of experience. Recherche et Applications en Marketing23(3): 115–141.
99.
VivekSD (2009) A scale of consumer engagement. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
100.
VolkerJM (1984) Counseling experience, moral judgment, awareness of consequences and moral sensitivity in counseling practice. Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
101.
ZaichkowskyJL (1985) Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research12: 341–352.
