Lead-users play a significant role in new product development; consequently it is a major challenge for companies that want to innovate to identify them. Although several lead-user scales exist in the literature, none is completely efficient. A new measure therefore deserves to be developed. Its validity is proved on many product categories, through three different studies. The first is devoted to developing the lead-user’s scale. The second sets up the scale’s construct validity and norms the scale on a representative sample of the French population for three food products. We point out that lead-user and opinion-leader are two different concepts, although some people can combine the two statuses and thus be both lead-user and opinion-leader. Lead-user refers to a specific product category. Based on a new representative sample, the third study confirms the scale’s nomological validity for a new product category: lead-user is positively related to co-creation competencies and to engagement in video games co-creation.
AlbaJHutchinsonJ (1987) Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research13: 411–454.
2.
AlterN (2010) L’innovation ordinaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
3.
Béji-BécheurA (1998) L’utilisateur leader et le degré de novation du produit: une contribution à l’amélioration de l’analyse de tests de produits nouveaux. Application au domaine de l’automobile. Doctoral dissertation, Université Paris Dauphine.
4.
Béji-BécheurAGolletyM (2006) Validation d’une échelle de mesure du lead-user. Revue Française du Marketing206(1/5): 29–39.
5.
Béji-BécheurAGolletyM (2007) Lead user et leader d’opinion: Deux cibles majeures au service de l’innovation. Décisions marketing48(4):21–34.
6.
BelzFMBaumbachW (2010) Netnography as a method of lead-user identification. Creativity and Innovation Management19(2): 304–313.
7.
Ben MiledHLe LouarnP (1994) Analyse comparative de deux échelles de mesure du leadership d’opinion: validité et interpretation. Recherche et Applications en Marketing9(4): 23–51.
8.
BilgramVBartlMBielS (2011) Getting closer to the consumer: How Nivea co-creates new product. Marketing Review St Gallen1: 34–40.
9.
BilgramVBremAVoigtKI (2008) User-centric innovations in new product development –systematic identification of lead users harnessing interactive and collaborative online-tools. International Journal of Innovation Management12(3): 419–458.
10.
BlunchNJ (2008) Introduction to Structural Equation Modelling using SPSS and AMOS. London: Sage.
11.
CampbellDFiskeD (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin56: 81–105.
12.
ChurchillGA (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research16(1): 64–73.
13.
ChurchillJVon HippelESonnackM (2009) Lead-user Project Handbook: A Practical Guide for Lead-user Teams. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
DahlDWMoreauCP (2007) Thinking inside the box: Why consumers enjoy constrained creative experiences. Journal of Marketing Research44(3): 357–369.
15.
FornellCLarckerD (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
16.
FrankeNVon HippelE (2003) Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache security software. Research Policy32(7): 1199–1216.
17.
FrankeNShahS (2003) How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy32(1): 157–178.
18.
FrankeNVon HippelESchreierM (2006) Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead-user theory. The Journal of Product Innovation Management23(4): 301–315.
19.
FüllerJ (2010) Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. California Management Review52(2): 98–122.
20.
FüllerJBartlMErnstHMühlbacherH (2006) Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development. Electronic Commerce Research6(1): 57–73.
21.
FüllerJJaweckiGMühlbacherH (2007) Développement de produits et services en coopération avec les communautés en ligne. Décisions Marketing48: 47–58.
22.
FüllerJMühlbacherHMatzlerKJaweckiG (2009) Consumer empowerment through internet-based co-creation. Journal of Management Information System26(3): 71–102.
23.
GambettiRCGraffignaG (2010) The concept of engagement: A systematic analysis of the ongoing marketing debate. International Journal of Market Research52(6): 801–826.
24.
HamdiLKorotkovaNVernetteE (2011) Comparaison de deux échelles de mesure du caractère lead-user. In: Actes du 27ème Congrès International de l’AFM. Bruxelles.
25.
HasanS (2008) Bringing lead-user innovations to the market: Research and management implications. SAM Advanced Management Journal, Autumn: 51–58.
26.
HerstattCVon HippelE (1992) From experience: Developing new product concept via the lead-user method: A case study in a ‘low-tech’ field. Journal of Product Innovation Management9: 213–221.
27.
HoffmanDKopallePNovakT (2010) The ‘right’ consumers for better concepts: Identifying consumers high in emergent nature to develop new product concepts. Journal of Marketing Research47: 854–865.
28.
HuLTBentlerPM (1995) Evaluating model fit. In: HoyleRH (ed.) Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
JeppesenLLaursenK (2009) The role of lead users in knowledge sharing. Research Policy38(10): 1582–1589.
30.
KellerEBBerryJ (2003) The Influentials. New York: Simon & Schuster.
31.
KingCWSummersJO (1970) Overlap of opinion leadership across consumer product categories. Journal of Marketing Research7(1): 43–50.
32.
KratzerJLettlC (2009) Distinctive roles of lead users and opinion leaders in the social networks of schoolchildren. Journal of Consumer Research36(4): 646–659.
33.
LilienGMorrisonPSearlsKSonnackMvon HippelE (2002) Performance assessment of the lead user idea generation process for new product development. Management Science48(8): 1042–1059.
34.
LüthjeC (2004) Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer field: An empirical study of sport-related product consumers. Technovation24(9): 683–695.
35.
LüthjeCHerstattC (2004) The lead user method: An outline of empirical findings and issues for future research. R&D Management34(5): 553–568.
36.
LüthjeCLettlCHerstattC (2003) Knowledge distribution among market experts: A closer look into the efficiency of information gathering for innovation projects. International Journal of Technology Management26(5/6): 561–577.
37.
MagnussonP (2009) Exploring the contributions of involving ordinary users in ideation of technology-based services. Journal of Product Innovation Management26(5): 578–593.
MorrisonPRobertsIMidgleyD (2004) The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status. Research Policy33(2): 351–363.
40.
MorrisonPRobertsIVon HippelE (2000) Determinants for user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Science46(12): 1513–1527.
41.
NunnallyJC (1967) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
42.
OzerM (2009) The roles of product lead-users and product experts in new product evaluation. Research Policy38(8): 1340–1349.
43.
PillerFWalcherD (2006) Toolkits for idea competitions: A novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management36(3): 307–318.
44.
PrahaladCKVenkatramR (2003) Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value With Customers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press Books.
45.
PreacherKHayesA (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods40: 879–891.
46.
RamaswamyVGouillartF (2010) The Power of Co-creation. NewYork: Free Press, Simon & Schuster.
47.
RogersE (2003) Diffusion of Innovations (5th edition). New York: The Free Press.
48.
SalernoA (2009) L’expérience créative du consommateur: le rôle de l’orientation motivationnelle dans l’activité de loisir creative. Recherche et Applications en Marketing24(1): 69–92.
49.
SchreierMPrüglR (2008) Extending lead user theory: Antecedents and consequences of consumer lead userness. Journal of Product Innovation Management25(4): 331–346.
50.
SchreierMOberhauserSPrüglR (2007) Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: insights from two extreme sports communities. Marketing Letters18(1–2): 15–30.
51.
SpannMHolgerESkieraBSollH (2006) Identification of lead users for consumer products via virtual stock markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management26(3): 322–355.
52.
ThomkeSVon HippelE (2002) Customers as innovators: A new way to create value. Harvard Business Review80(4): 74–81.
53.
UrbanGVon HippelE (1988) Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Science34(5): 569–582.
54.
VernetteE (1991) L’efficacité des instruments d’études: évaluation des échelles de mesure. Recherche et Applications en Marketing6(2): 43–66.
55.
VernetteE (2002) Le rôle et le profil des leaders d’opinion pour la diffusion de l’internet. Décisions Marketing25(1): 37–51.
56.
VernetteEGiannelloniJL (2004) L’auto-évaluation du leadership d’opinion en marketing: nouvelles investigations psychométriques. Recherche et Applications en Marketing19(4): 65–87.
57.
VernetteESchmutzB (2000) Les influenceurs: une cible média stratégique pour les marques. In: Séminaire IREP-Médias Proceedings, 13/14 December. Paris.
58.
Von HippelE (1986) Lead users: A source of novel product concept. Management Science32(7): 791–805.
59.
Von HippelEFrankeNPrüglR (2009) Pyramiding: Efficient search for rare subjects. Research Policy38(9): 1397–1406.
60.
Von HippelEThomkeSSonnackM (1999) Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Business Review77(5): 47– 57.
61.
WattsDJDoddsPS (2007) Networks, influence, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research34(4): 441–458.
62.
WittU (2001) Learning to consume: A theory of wants and the growth of demand. Journal of Evolutionary Economics11: 23–36.
63.
WeimannG (1994) The Influentials: People Who Influence People. New York: SUNY.
