Digital communication technologies such as the Internet intensify and accelerate the phenomenon of information diffusion by social exchange. The aim of this paper is to assess whether product introduction strategies should be modified in the light of this phenomenon. We conducted an empirical analysis on the movie market to compare the ability of web user opinions with classic indicators such as the mass media and critics to predict box-office takings. The results show that all three variables influence movie attendances. Promotion of a movie has no influence on web user opinions, but critics are influenced negatively for low-budget movies and positively for large-budget movies. Critic and web user advice merges only for large-budget movies.
AlbertS. (1998), Movie stars and the distribution of financially successful films in the motion picture industry, Journal of Cultural Economics, 22, 4, 248–270.
2.
BassF.M. (1969), A new product growth model for consumer durables, Management Science, 15, 5, 215–227.
3.
BasuroyS.ChatterjeeS.RavidS.A. (2003), How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power and budgets, Journal of Marketing, 67, 4, 103–117.
4.
BourdieuP. (1979), La distinction, critique sociale du jugement, Paris, Les Éditions de Minuit.
5.
BourgeonD.KrugerA. (1997), L'effet de bouche-à-oreille et le processus de choix du spectateur cinématographique, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the French Marketing Association (AFM), Toulouse, 1, 452–478.
6.
BurzynskiM.H.BayerD.J. (1977), The effect of positive and negative prior information on motion picture, Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 2, 215–218.
7.
CarricanoM.BertrandiasL. (2004), Analyse des phénomènes d'influence interpersonnelle au sein d'une communauté virtuelle de professionnels de la fixation des prix, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the French Marketing Association (AFM), Saint-Malo.
8.
CestreG. (1996), Diffusion et innovativité: Définition, modélisation et mesure, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 11, 1, 69–88.
9.
ChenK.K.MisraS. (1990), Characteristics of the opinion leader: A new dimension, Journal of Advertising, 19, 3, 53–61.
10.
ChevalierJ.MayzlinD. (2006), The effect of word of mouth online: Online book reviews, Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 3, 345–354.
11.
CNC (2006), La promotion des films. Analyse en données brutes, Report, March.
12.
CoisneE.SoussinF. (1998), Internet @ visages humains, Paris, Éditions d'Organisation.
13.
Cooper-MartinE. (1992), Consumers and movies: Some findings on experiential products, Advances in Consumer Research, 19, 756–761.
14.
CretonL. (2003), Cinéma, critique et promotion: La valorisation symbolique et le marchand, in SojcherF.BenghoziP.J. (Eds.), Quel modèle audiovisuel européen?, Paris, L'Harmattan.
15.
De SilvaI. (1998), Consumer selection of motion pictures, in LitmanB.R. (Ed.), The motion picture mega-industry, Boston, MA, Allyn and Bacon, 144–171.
16.
De VanyA.WallsD. (1996), Bose-Einstein dynamics and adaptive contracting in the motion picture industry, The Economic Journal, 106, 439, 1493–1514.
17.
De VanyA.WallsD. (1997), The market for motion pictures: Rank, revenue and survival, Economic Inquiry, 35, 4, 783–797.
18.
De VanyA.WallsD. (2002), Movie stars, big budgets, and wide releases: empirical analysis of the blockbuster strategy, Working Paper, University of California, Irvine.
19.
DebenedettiS. (2006), L'impact de la critique de presse sur la consommation culturelle: Un essai de synthèse dans le champ cinématographique, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 21, 2, 43–59.
20.
DellarocasC.N.AwadN.ZhangX. (2004), Using online reviews as a proxy of word-of-mouth for motion picture revenue forecasting, Working Paper, MIT.
21.
DenjeanL. (2006), Internet média cannibale, Paris, EBG.
22.
DesayK.K.BasuroyS. (2005), Interactive influence of genre familiarity, star power, and critic's reviews in the cultural goods industry: The case of motion pictures, Psychology and Marketing, 22, 3, 203–223.
23.
DoddsJ.C.HolbrookM.B. (1988), What's an Oscar worth? An empirical estimation of the effects of nominations and awards on movie distribution and revenues, Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics and Law, 4, 72–87.
24.
DuanW.GuB.WhinstonA.B. (2005), Do online reviews matter? — An empirical investigation of panel data, Working Paper, http://papers.ssrn.com.
25.
DyeR. (2000), The buzz on the buzz, Harvard Business Review, 78, 6, 139–146.
26.
ElberseA.EliashbergJ. (2002), The drivers of motion picture performance: the need to consider dynamics, endogeneity and simultaneity, Working Paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
27.
EliashbergJ.JonkerJ.J.SawhneyM.WierengaB. (2000), MOVIEMOD: An implementable decision-support system for prerelease market evaluation of motion pictures, Marketing Science, 19, 3, 226–243.
28.
EliashbergJ.ShuganS.M. (1997), Film critics or predictors?, Journal of Marketing, 61, 2, 68–78.
29.
EuzebyF. (1999), Marketing et cinéma: un état de l'art en marketing, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Management of Arts and Culture, Helsinki, 703–711.
30.
EuzebyF.MartinezC. (2004), La bande-annonce cinématographique: Quel impact sur la décision d'aller voir un film? Une étude exploratoire, Décisions Marketing, 33, 39–51.
31.
FaberR.J.O'GuinnT.C. (1984), Effect of media advertising and other sources on movie selection, Journalism Quarterly, 61, 2, 371–377.
32.
FeickL.F.PriceL.L. (1987), The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information, Journal of Marketing, 51, 1, 83–97.
33.
FinnA.McFadyenS.HoskinsC. (1995), Le développement de nouveaux produits dans les industries culturelles, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 10, 4, 47–63.
34.
FourtL.A.WoodlockJ.W. (1960), Early prediction of market success for new grocery products, Journal of Marketing, 25, 1, 31–38.
35.
Garcia-BardidiaR. (2002), Discours sur la consommation, construction du statut et influence sociale dans le contexte des groupes de discussion sur Internet, Proceedings of the 7th Research in Marketing Day in Bourgogne, Dijon, 58–79.
36.
GatignonH.RobertsonT. (1985), A propositional inventory for a new diffusion research, Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 4, 849–867.
37.
GhoseA.IpeirotisP.G. (2006), Designing ranking systems for consumer reviews: the impact of review subjectivity on product sales and review quality, 16th Information Technology and Systems Workshop, Milwaukee.
38.
GodesD.MayzlinD. (2004), Se servir des conversations en ligne pour étudier le bouche-à-oreille, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 19, 4, 89–110.
39.
GrunbachM.HerpinN. (2006), À propos de quelques travaux de Lazarsfeld et de son école, Survey, Varia, 4.
40.
GuillaumeB.JallatF. (2001), Blair Witch, Hotmail et le marketing viral, L'Expansion Management Review, 100, 81–92.
41.
Hennig-ThurauT.HoustonM.B.WalshG.J. (2003), Determinants of motion picture box office and profitability: an interrelationship approach, Working Paper n° 4, Chair for Marketing and Media Research.
42.
Hennig-ThurauT.WalshG.WruckO. (2001), An investigation into the factors determining the success of service innovations: The case of motion pictures, Academy of Marketing Science Revue, 5, 7, 1–27.
43.
HerrP.M.KardesF.R.KimJ. (1991), Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective, Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 4, 454–462.
44.
HolbrookM.B. (1999), Popular appeal versus expert judgments of motion pictures, Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 2, 144–155.
45.
HorskiD.SimonL.S. (1983), Advertising and the diffusion of new products, Marketing Science, 2, 1, 1–18.
46.
JedidiK.KriderR.E.WeinbergC.B. (1998), Clustering at the movies, Marketing Letters, 4, 9, 393–405.
47.
KatzE.LazarsfeldP. (1955), Personal influence, Glencoe, Free Press.
48.
KellerE.B.BerryJ. (2003), The influentials, New York, Simon & Schuster.
49.
KozinetsR.V. (2002), The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities, Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 1, 61–72.
50.
KriderR.E.WeinbergC.B. (1998), Sales through sequential distribution channels: An application to movies and videos, Journal of Marketing, 64, 3, 18–33.
51.
KrugerA. (1997), Traitement de l'information et décision de choix d'un film: influence des caractéristiques individuelles et de la communication interpersonnelle, Doctoral Dissertation on Management Science, University of Bourgogne.
52.
LampelJ.ShamsieJ. (2000), Critical push: Strategies for creating momentum in the motion picture industry, Journal of Management, 26, 2, 233–257.
53.
LarceneuxF. (1999), L'influence de la critique culturelle: une analyse exploratoire sur le marché du disque classique, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Management of Arts and Culture, Helsinki, 738–747.
54.
LaurichesseH.MagneS. (2003), Marketing du film: résultats et conséquences d'une tendance inflationniste, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Management of Arts and Culture, Milan.
55.
Le NagardE.SteyerA. (1995), La prévision des ventes de nouveaux produits en télécommunications, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 10, 1, 57–68.
56.
Leonard-BartonD. (1985), Experts as negative opinion leaders in the diffusion of a technological information, Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 4, 914–926.
57.
LevinA.M.LevinI.P.HeathC.E. (1997), Movie stars and authors as brand names: Measuring brand equity in experiential products, Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 175–181.
58.
LitmanB.R. (1983), Predicting success of theatrical movies: An empirical study, Journal of Popular Culture, 16, 4, 159–175.
59.
LitmanB.R.KohlL.S. (1989), Predicting financial success of motion pictures: The ‘80s experience, Journal of Media Economics, 2, 1, 35–50.
60.
LohmöllerJ.-B. (1989), Latent variables path modeling with partial least squares, Heidelberg, Physica-Verlag.
61.
MansfieldE. (1961), Technical change in the rate of imitation, Econometrica, 29, 4, 741–766.
62.
MarcotteJ.-F. (2001), La sociologie des rapports sociaux en réseaux: Un champ d'étude en formation, Esprit Critique, 3, 10.
63.
MarteauxS. (2006), Un nouveau moyen de communication: le bouche-à-oreille électronique. Perspectives stratégiques pour l'industrie cinématographique, Proceedings of the 2nd Non-media Communication Day, Nancy, 1–27.
64.
MontelJ.-J. (1990), Le cycle de vie des films de cinéma, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the French Marketing Association (AFM), La Baule, 585–609.
65.
MyersJ.H.RobertsonT.S. (1972), Dimensions of opinion leadership, Journal of Marketing Research, 9, 1, 41–46.
66.
NeelameghamR.ChintaguntaP. (1999), A bayesian model to forecast new product performance in domestic and international markets, Marketing Science, 18, 2, 115–136.
67.
NeelameghamR.OstromA.L. (1997), Was it as much fun as you thought it would be?Consumer choice and post consumption evaluations of experimental products, Working Paper, INSEAD.
68.
NelsonR.A.DonihueM.R.WaldmanD.M.WheatonC. (2001), What's an Oscar worth?, Economic Inquiry, 39, 1, 1–16.
69.
PragJ.CasavantJ. (1994), An empirical study of the determinants of revenues and marketing expenditures in the motion picture industry, Journal of Cultural Economics, 18, 3, 217–235.
70.
RadasS.ShuganS.M. (1998), Seasonal marketing and timing new product introductions, Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 3, 296–315.
71.
RavidS.A. (1999), Information, blockbusters and stars: A study of the film industry, Journal of Business, 72, 4, 463–492.
72.
RichinsM.L.Root-ShafferT. (1988), The role of involvement and opinion leadership in consumer word of mouth: An implicit model made explicit, Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 32–36.
73.
RogersE.M. (1962), Diffusion of innovations, New York, Free Press.
74.
RogersE.M.ShoemakerF.F. (1971), Communication of innovations, New York, Free Press.
75.
RosenD. (1993), A fresh look at movie making, AMA's Marketing Research Conference, Chicago, IL.
76.
SawhneyM.S.EliashbergJ. (1996), A parsimonious model of forecasting gross box-office revenues of motion pictures, Marketing Science, 15, 2, 113–131.
77.
ShethJ.MittalB.NewmanB.I. (1999), Consumer behavior, Fort Worth, TX, The Dryden Press.
78.
SochayS. (1994), Predicting the performances of motion pictures, Journal of Media Economics, 7, 4, 1–20.
SteyerA. (2005), Géométrie de l'interaction sociale: Le modèle de diffusion en avalanches spatiales, Recherches et Applications en Marketing, 23, 3, 3–20.
81.
SteyerA.ZimmermannJ.-B. (2004), Influence sociale et diffusion de l'innovation, Mathematics and Social Sciences, 168, 4, 43–57.
82.
VernetteE. (2006), Une nouvelle vision du leader d'opinion en marketing: une approche phénoménolo-gique, Proceedings of the 5th Conference in Marketing Trends, Venise.
83.
VernetteE. (2002), Le rôle et le profil des leaders d'opinion pour la diffusion de l'Internet, Décisions Marketing, 25, 37–51.
84.
VernetteE.FloresL. (2004), Communiquer avec les leaders d'opinion en marketing: Comment et dans quels médias?, Décisions Marketing, 35, 23–37.
85.
WoldH. (1985), Partial least squares, Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, 6, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 581–591.
86.
WyattO.W.BadgerD.P. (1984), How reviews affect interest in and evaluation in film criticism, Journalism Quarterly, 61, 4, 874–878.
87.
WyattO.W.BadgerD.P. (1990), Effects of information and evaluation in film criticism, Journalism Quarterly, 67, 2, 359–368.
88.
ZufrydenF. (1996), Linking advertising to box-office performance of new film releases — a marketing planning model, Journal of Advertising Research, 36, 4, 29–41.
89.
ZufrydenF. (2000), New film website promotion and box-office performance, Journal of Advertising Research, 40, 1/2, 55–64.
