Contemporary standards in UK nephrectomy practice: Analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Reports,2016

Abstract

Objective:

To analyse the 2016–2018 British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) Complex Operations Reports nephrectomy database, providing a comprehensive description of modern nephrectomy practice.

Patients and Methods:

Analysis of 2016–2018 data held on the BAUS Complex Operations Reports nephrectomy database was performed for 21,366 patients in England. Data are reported on patient, disease, operation and outcome variables.

Results:

Using Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) as a comparator, the database captured an estimated 88% of nephrectomies. Benign nephrectomies (BNs) accounted for 11%, 51% were radical nephrectomies (RNs), 14% were nephroureterectomies (NUs) and 22% were partial nephrectomies (PNs). Of the 2399 BNs, 10% were performed for stone disease, 9% for allograft donation and 9% for infective pathology. Aetiology was not specified further than non-functioning kidney in 51% of cases; 80% of cases adopted minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Histology was benign in 96% of cases. Of 10,843 RNs performed, 77% were performed using MIS. Final histology was renal cell carcinoma in 87% of cases and benign histology confirmed in 9% of cases. Of 3038 NUs performed, 88% were performed using MIS. Histology confirmed malignancy in 94% of cases with transitional cell carcinoma accounting for 82% of cases overall. Of 4708 PNs performed, 74% were performed using MIS; 85% of cases were performed for T1 disease; 16% of cases overall returned benign histology. Across the cohort, 30-day mortality was 0.36%. Transfusion rates were 3.3%, 6.1%, 3.3% and 2.0% for BNs, RNs, NUs and PNs, respectively. In malignant disease, positive surgical margins were present in 0.7% of RNs, 1.2% of NUs and 7.3% of PNs.

Conclusions:

The BAUS nephrectomy dataset provides a real-world description of nephrectomy practice across England, enabling surgeons to compare their practice against a national average. This dataset allows surgeons to share data with patients enhancing informed consent and facilitating shared-decision making. Overall, MIS is widespread, and early mortality after nephrectomy is low.

Level of evidence:

Keywords

Nephrectomy kidney cancer renal cell carcinoma benign nephrectomy nephroureterectomy partial nephrectomy minimally invasive surgery renal biopsy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

British Association of Urological Surgeons. BAUS: BAUS Data and Audit Programme BAUS – Complex Operation Reports. https://www.baus.org.uk/professionals/baus_business/data_audit.aspx (accessed 17 February 2021).

Ristau

Kutikov

Uzzo

, et al. Active surveillance for small renal masses: when less is more. Eur Urol Focus 2016; 2(6): 660–668.

John

Anderson

Dutton

, et al. Percutaneous microwave ablation of renal masses in a UK cohort. BJU Int 2021; 127(4): 486–494.

Curry

Pahuja

Loan

, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of small renal masses: outcomes, complications and effects on renal function. Curr Urol 2018; 11(4): 196–200.

Zondervan

Buijs

de la Rosette

, et al. Cryoablation of small kidney tumors. Int J Surg 2016; 36: 533–540.

Gao

Pan

, et al. Surgical outcomes of nephrectomy for elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma. Pak J Med Sci 2018; 34(2): 288–293.

Han

Kim

Pantuck

, et al. Use of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification to assess perioperative risk in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 2004; 63(5): 841–846.

Arfi

Baldini

Decaussin-Petrucci

, et al. Impact of obesity on complications of laparoscopic simple or radical nephrectomy. Curr Urol 2015; 8: 149–155.

Baker

UK Parliament: House of Common Library – Obesity statistics. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn03336/ (accessed 16 May 2021).

10.

Kim

Shim

Lee

, et al. Prevalence of benign pathology after partial nephrectomy for suspected renal tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2020; 84: 161–170.

11.

Richard

Lavallée

Pouliot

, et al. Is routine renal tumor biopsy associated with lower rates of benign histology following nephrectomy for small renal masses? J Urol 2018; 200(4): 731–736.

12.

Harrison

. Urology: GIRFT Programme National Specialty Report. https://gettingitrightfirsttime.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/CranialNeurosurgeryJune18-L.pdf

13.

Nuttall

van der Meulen

Phillips

, et al. A systematic review and critique of the literature relating hospital or surgeon volume to health outcomes for 3 urological cancer procedures. J Urol 2004; 172(6 Pt. 1): 2145–2152.

14.

Hsu

RCJ

Salika

Maw

, et al. Influence of hospital volume on nephrectomy mortality and complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis stratified by surgical type. BMJ Open 2017; 7(9): e016833.

15.

Gray

Day

Briggs

TWR

, et al. Understanding volume–outcome relationships in nephrectomy and cystectomy for cancer: evidence from the UK Getting It Right First Time programme. BJU Int 2020; 125(2): 234–243.

16.

Motzer

Jonasch

Agarwal

, et al. Kidney cancer, version 2.2017: clinical practice guidelines in oncology. JNCCN J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2017; 15(6): 804–834.

17.

Blom

JHM

van Poppel

Maréchal

, et al. Radical nephrectomy with and without lymph-node dissection: final results of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized phase 3 trial 30881. Eur Urol 2009; 55(1): 28–34.

18.

Ljungberg

Albiges

Bensalah

, et al. EAU Guidelines. Edn. Presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020. Eur Urol 2020; 67(5): 913–924.

19.

Gershman

Thompson

Moreira

, et al. Radical nephrectomy with or without lymph node dissection for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-based analysis. Eur Urol 2017; 71(4): 560–567.

20.

Henderson

Fowler

Joyce

, et al. Perioperative outcomes of 6042 nephrectomies in 2012: surgeon-reported results in the UK from the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) nephrectomy database. BJU Int 2015; 115(1): 121–126.

21.

Aning

Parry