The management of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has come under scrutiny in recent years following growing reports of mesh-related complications. Patients require thorough evaluation and management as part of a multidisciplinary team, and extensive counselling about the surgical treatment options is imperative. There is no clear consensus on the optimal management of the complex group of patients with mesh-related complications or recurrent SUI. We present two cases of female SUI to highlight the key factors to be considered when managing these patients.
AbramsPCardozoLFallM, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn2002; 21: 167–178.
2.
HunskaarSLoseGSykesD, et al. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Int2004; 93: 324–330.
3.
PapanicolaouSPonsMEHampelC, et al. Medical resource utilisation and cost of care for women seeking treatment for urinary incontinence in an outpatient setting. Examples from three countries participating in the PURE study. Maturitas2005; 52 (Suppl 2): S35–S47.
BlaivasJGOlssonCA.Stress incontinence: Classification and surgical approach. J Urol1988; 139: 727–731.
7.
SwiftSEYoonEA.Test-retest reliability of the cough stress test in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol1999; 94: 99–102.
8.
BurkhardFCBoschJLHRCruzF, et al. EAU Guidelines on urinary incontinence in adults 2018. European Association of Urology guidelines 2018 edition. Arnhem, the Netherlands: European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, 2018.
9.
FrancoAVLeeFFynesMM.Is there an alternative to pad tests? Correlation of subjective variables of severity of urinary loss to the 1-h pad test in women with stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int2008; 102: 586–590.
10.
HunskaarS.A systematic review of overweight and obesity as risk factors and targets for clinical intervention for urinary incontinence in women. Neurourol Urodyn2008; 27: 749–757.
11.
VissersDNeelsHVermandelA, et al. The effect of non-surgical weight loss interventions on urinary incontinence in overweight women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev2014; 15: 610–617.
12.
SubakLLWingRWestDS, et al. Weight loss to treat urinary incontinence in overweight and obese women. N Engl J Med2009; 360: 481–490.
13.
BurgioKLRichterHEClementsRH, et al. Changes in urinary and fecal incontinence symptoms with weight loss surgery in morbidly obese women. Obstet Gynecol2007; 110: 1034–1040.
14.
NagerCWBrubakerLLitmanHJ, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med2012; 366: 1987–1997.
15.
van LeijsenSAKluiversKBMolBW, et al. Can preoperative urodynamic investigation be omitted in women with stress urinary incontinence? A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn2012; 31: 1118–1123.
16.
Finazzi-AgroEGammieAKesslerTM, et al. Urodynamics useless in female stress urinary incontinence? Time for some sense – A European expert consensus. Eur Urol Focus. Epub ahead of print 27 July 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.07.031.
17.
SirlsLTRichterHELitmanHJ, et al. The effect of urodynamic testing on clinical diagnosis, treatment plan and outcomes in women undergoing stress urinary incontinence surgery. J Urol2013; 189: 204–209.
18.
HiltonPArmstrongNBrennandC, et al. A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: The INVESTIGATE-I study. Trials2015; 16: 400.
19.
AgurWHousamiFDrakeM, et al. Could the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines on urodynamics in urinary incontinence put some women at risk of a bad outcome from stress incontinence surgery?BJU Int2009; 103: 635–639.
20.
DigesuGAKhullarVCardozoL, et al. Overactive bladder symptoms: Do we need urodynamics?Neurourol Urodyn2003; 22: 105–108. [Erratum in Neurourol Urodyn 2003; 22: 356.]
21.
HouwertRMVenemaPLAquariusAE, et al. Risk factors for failure of retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol2009; 201: 202.e1–202.e8.
22.
PaickJSOhSJKimSW, et al. Tension-free vaginal tape, suprapubic arc sling, and transobturator tape in the treatment of mixed urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct2008; 19: 123–129.
23.
NittiVWCombsAJ.Correlation of Valsalva leak point pressure with subjective degree of stress urinary incontinence in women. J Urol1996; 155: 281–285.
24.
HaylenBTde RidderDFreemanRM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J2010; 21: 5–26.
25.
MinardiDPiloniVAmadiA, et al. Correlation between urodynamics and perineal ultrasound in female patients with urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn2007; 26: 176–182; discussion 183–184.
26.
DumoulinCHay-SmithJHabée-SéguinGM, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women: A short version Cochrane systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurourol Urodyn2015; 34: 300–308.
27.
PetrouSPLissonSWCrookJE, et al. An exploration into patient preference for injectable therapy over surgery in the treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Braz J Urol2006; 32: 578–582.
28.
CasteleijnFMZwolsmanSEKowalikCR, et al. Patients’ perspectives on urethral bulk injection therapy and mid-urethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J2018; 29: 1249–1257.
HardingCKThorpeAC.The surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Indian J Urol. 2010; 26: 257–262.
31.
MedinaCACostantiniEPetriE, et al. Evaluation and surgery for stress urinary incontinence: A FIGO working group report. Neurourol Urodyn2017; 36: 518–528.
32.
FuscoFAbdel-FattahMChappleCR, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol2017; 72: 567–591.
33.
WithingtonJHirjiSSahaiA.The changing face of urinary continence surgery in England: A perspective from the Hospital Episode Statistics database. BJU Int2014; 114: 268–277.
34.
RichterHEAlboMEZyczynskiHM, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med2010; 362: 2066–2076.
35.
MahonJCikaloMVarleyD, et al. Summaries of the safety/adverse effects of vaginal tapes/slings/meshes for stress urinary incontinence and prolapse. York Health Economics Consortium on behalf of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, 2012.
JeonMJJungHJChungSM, et al. Comparison of the treatment outcome of pubovaginal sling, tension-free vaginal tape, and transobturator tape for stress urinary incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol2008; 199: 76.e1–76.e4.
39.
KhanZANambiarAMorleyR, et al. Long-term follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape, xenograft and autologous fascial slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. BJU Int2015; 115: 968–977.
40.
OsmanNIHillaryCJMangeraA, et al. The Midurethral fascial “sling on a string”: An alternative to midurethral synthetic tapes in the era of mesh complications. Eur Urol2018; 74: 191–196.
41.
GuerreroKWatkinsAEmeryS, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing two autologous fascial sling techniques for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: Short, medium and long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct2007; 18: 1263–1270.
42.
LatiniJMLuxMMKrederKJ.Efficacy and morbidity of autologous fascia lata sling cystourethropexy. J Urol2004; 171: 1180–1184.
43.
AngerJTWeinbergAEAlboME, et al. Trends in surgical management of stress urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries. Urology2009; 74: 283–287.
44.
SiddiquiZAAbboudiHCrawfordR, et al. Intraurethral bulking agents for the management of female stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review. Int Urogynecol J2017; 28: 1275–1284.
45.
PaiAAl-SingaryW.Durability, safety and efficacy of polyacrylamide hydrogel (Bulkamid(®)) in the management of stress and mixed urinary incontinence: Three year follow up outcomes. Cent European J Urol2015; 68: 428–433.
46.
SokolERKarramMMDmochowskiR.Efficacy and safety of polyacrylamide hydrogel for the treatment of female stress incontinence: A randomized, prospective, multicenter North American study. J Urol2014; 192: 843–849.
47.
ZoorobDKarramM.Bulking agents: A urogynecology perspective. Urol Clin North Am2012; 39: 273–277.
48.
KhooCCKKujawaMReidS, et al. Mixed urinary incontinence – What should we treat first?J Clin Urol2017; 10: 492–499.
49.
McCootySNightingalePLattheP.The predictive value of ePAQ in the urodynamic diagnoses – A prospective cohort study. Neurourol Urodyn2018; 37: 169–176.
50.
LucasMGBoschRJBurkhardFC, et al. EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence. Eur Urol2012; 62: 1118–1129.
51.
GleasonJLPardenAMJaukV, et al. Outcomes of midurethral sling procedures in women with mixed urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J2015; 26: 715–720.
52.
ChouECFlisserAJPanagopoulosG, et al. Effective treatment for mixed urinary incontinence with a pubovaginal sling. J Urol2003; 170: 494–497.
53.
SchrepfermanCGGrieblingTLNygaardIE, et al. Resolution of urge symptoms following sling cystourethropexy. J Urol2000; 164: 1628–1631.
54.
DengDYRutmanMRazS, et al. Presentation and management of major complications of midurethral slings: Are complications under-reported?Neurourol Urodyn2007; 26: 46–52.
55.
HouJCAlhalabiFLemackGE, et al. Outcome of transvaginal mesh and tape removed for pain only. J Urol2014; 192: 856–860.
56.
KeltieKElneilSMongaA, et al. Complications following vaginal mesh procedures for stress urinary incontinence: An 8 year study of 92,246 women. Sci Rep2017; 7: 12015.
57.
FordAARogersonLCodyJD, et al. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2017; 7: CD006375.
58.
ShahKNikolavskyDGilsdorfD, et al. Surgical management of lower urinary mesh perforation after mid-urethral polypropylene mesh sling: Mesh excision, urinary tract reconstruction and concomitant pubovaginal sling with autologous rectus fascia. Int Urogynecol J2013; 24: 2111–2117.
59.
MacDonaldSTerleckiRCostantiniE, et al. Complications of transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: Tips for prevention, recognition, and management. Eur Urol Focus2016; 2: 260–267.
60.
BlaivasJGPurohitRSBenedonMS, et al. Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery. Nat Rev Urol2015; 12: 481–509.
61.
KavanaghASanaeeMCarlsonKV, et al. Management of patients with stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling. Can Urol Assoc J2017; 11 (6Suppl 2): S143-S146.
62.
TerleckiRPFlynnBJ.The use of surgical mesh for incontinence and prolapse surgery: Indications for use, technical considerations, and management of complications. Lesson 14. AUA Update Ser2010; 29.
63.
BlaivasJGPurohitRSWeinbergerJM, et al. Salvage surgery after failed treatment of synthetic mesh sling complications. J Urol2013; 190: 1281–1286.
64.
DoumouchtsisSKLeeFYBramwellD, et al. Evaluation of holmium laser for managing mesh/suture complications of continence surgery. BJU Int2011; 108: 1472–1478.
65.
OhTHRyuDS.Transurethral resection of intravesical mesh after midurethral sling procedures. J Endourol2009; 23: 1333–1337.
66.
DavisNFSmythLGGiriSK, et al. Evaluation of endoscopic laser excision of polypropylene mesh/sutures following anti-incontinence procedures. J Urol2012; 188: 1828–1832.
67.
DuckettJRJainS.Groin pain after a tension-free vaginal tape or similar suburethral sling: Management strategies. BJU Int2005; 95: 95–97.
68.
MiklosJRChinthakananOMooreRD, et al. The IUGA/ICS classification of synthetic mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: A multicenter study. Int Urogynecol J2016; 27: 933–938.
69.
Rogo-GuptaLHuynhLHartshornTG, et al. Long-term symptom improvement and overall satisfaction after prolapse and incontinence graft removal. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg2013; 19: 352–355.
70.
BakaliEBuckleyBSHiltonP, et al. Treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic suburethral tape surgery in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013; CD009407.
71.
AgurWRiadMSeccoS, et al. Surgical treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur Urol2013; 64: 323–336.
72.
Amaye-ObuFADrutzHP.Surgical management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence: A 12-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol1999; 181: 1296–1307; discussion 1307–1309.
73.
AbramsPAnderssonKEBirderL, et al. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn2010; 29: 213–240.
74.
GiarenisIThiagamoorthyGZaccheM, et al. Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling: A survey of members of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA). Int Urogynecol J2015; 26: 1285–1291.
75.
ZivanovicIRautenbergOLobodaschK, et al. Urethral bulking for recurrent stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling failure. Neurourol Urodyn2017; 36: 722–726.
76.
PetrouSPDavidiukAJRawalB, et al. Salvage autologous fascial sling after failed synthetic midurethral sling: Greater than 3-year outcomes. Int J Urol2016; 23: 178–181.
77.
McCoyOVaughanTNicklesSW, et al. Outcomes of autologous fascia pubovaginal sling for patients with transvaginal mesh related complications requiring mesh removal. J Urol2016; 196: 484–489.
78.
Chartier-KastlerEVan KerrebroeckPOlianasR, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800) implantation for women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency: A technique for insiders?BJU Int2011; 107: 1618–1626.
79.
CostaPPoinasGBen NaoumK, et al. Long-term results of artificial urinary sphincter for women with type III stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol2013; 63: 753–758.
80.
BiardeauXRizkJMarcelliF, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in 11 women with urinary stress incontinence: Surgical technique and initial experience. Eur Urol2015; 67: 937–942.
81.
GiarenisIMastoroudesHCardozoL, et al. What do we do when a midurethral tape fails? Rediscovery of open colposuspension as a salvage continence operation. Int Urogynecol J2012; 23: 1117–1122.
82.
WoodDNAllenSEHussainM, et al. Stomal complications of ileal conduits are significantly higher when formed in women with intractable urinary incontinence. J Urol2004; 172: 2300–2303.
83.
LiapisABakasPPafitiA, et al. Changes of collagen type III in female patients with genuine stress incontinence and pelvic floor prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2001; 97: 76–79.
84.
SinghGWilkinsonJMThomasDG.Supravesical diversion for incontinence: A long-term follow-up. Br J Urol1997; 79: 348–353.
85.
SchultzABoyeBJonssonO, et al. Urostomy and health-related quality of life in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Scand J Urol2015; 49: 2–7.
