Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

The incidence of upper gastrointestinal injury by low-dose aspirin (LDA) has increased.

Objective

We aimed to clarify the risk factors and prevention strategies associated with LDA-induced gastroduodenal ulcer in Japanese patients.

Methods

A retrospective study involving 284 LDA users who underwent oesophagogastroduodenoscopy between January and December 2010 were included. We investigated the patients’ clinical characteristics and endoscopic findings.

Results

Of 284 patients, 29 (10.2%) had gastro and/or duodenal ulcers. Male gender, peptic ulcer history, abdominal symptoms, half-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), complete-dose PPIs, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were significantly associated with LDA-induced gastro and/or duodenal ulcers: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 3.62 (1.06–12.27), 6.60 (1.84–23.62), 3.06 (1.12–8.40), 0.16 (0.03–0.94), 0.07 (0.01–0.61), and 9.68 (1.64–57.18), respectively. PPI significantly reduced gastric ulcers and/or duodenal ulcers (p = 0.03). The modified Lanza score for gastric mucosal lesion in the LDA cessation group was significantly lower than in the LDA noncessation group (0.53 vs. 1.02; p = 0.008).

Conclusions

Half-dose PPIs as well as complete-dose PPIs were effective for preventing LDA-induced gastric and/or duodenal ulcers. The cessation of LDA before endoscopy may lead to an underestimation of LDA-induced gastric injury.

Keywords

Gastric mucosal injury gastroduodenal ulcer low-dose aspirin PPI

Introduction

Low-dose aspirin (LDA; 75–325 mg daily) prevents thrombus and embolus in patients suffering from ischaemic heart disease or ischaemic cerebrovascular disease.¹ The tendency for LDA to be prescribed has increased because of the number of patients with advanced age, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension, which are all risk factors for ischaemic heart disease. However, LDA has been shown to cause gastrointestinal damage² and is associated with a high risk of gastroduodenal ulcers and their potentially fatal complications (e.g. gastrointestinal bleeding, perforation).³ In case–control studies, the odds ratio (OR) of bleeding is in the range of 2.4–7.7,^4,5 which is similar to that seen in a regular user of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).⁶ The mortality attributable to NSAIDs or LDA use is approximately 20–25 cases per million people, of which one-third are attributable to LDA.⁷

The identified risk factors for gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding with aspirin use are as follows: a history of ulcer bleeding, regular use of aspirin, advanced age (>70 years), concomitant use of NSAIDs or anticoagulants, use of dual antiplatelet therapy, infection of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), history of alcohol abuse, diabetes, and renal failure.^6,8 Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are prescribed for decreasing LDA-associated gastroduodenal mucosal injury as well as NSAID-induced injury.^9–11 However, in Japan, there have been few studies on the association between the risk factors and prevention of upper gastrointestinal mucosal injury by aspirin alone and in combination with other medicines.

In this retrospective study, our purpose was to elucidate the risk factors and prevention strategies associated with LDA-induced gastroduodenal mucosal injury in Japanese patients treated with LDA for arteriosclerotic disease.

Methods

This retrospective study was performed at the Aichi Medical University Hospital from January 2010 through December 2010. All endoscopic examinations were recorded digitally. Consecutive outpatients receiving LDA (75 mg) were enrolled and endoscopic findings were evaluated by an experienced endoscopist (TI) who was blinded to the study. We defined an ulcer as a mucosal deficit of >5 mm in diameter. Patients who had a history of gastrectomy were excluded from the study.

We recorded the following data from medical records: clinical characteristics, including sex, age, smoking, and drinking habits; underlying disease (hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, ischaemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, and collagen disease); peptic ulcer history; concomitant drugs [gastric agents, anticoagulants (warfarin and potassium), antiplatelet drugs (ticlopidine HCL, clopidogrel sulfate, and cilostazol), NSAIDs, corticosteroids, antihypertensives, and antihyperlipidaemics]; the presence of H. pylori infection; the reason for undergoing endoscopy [abdominal symptoms (epigastric pain, heart burn, dysphagia, anorexia, nausea) or bleeding signs (anaemia, haematemesis, tarry stool)]; and endoscopic findings.

The extent of gastrointestinal mucosal injury was expressed using a modified Lanza score (MLS); a score of 0 indicating no injury, a score of 5 indicating an ulcer for gastric injury, and a score of 4 indicating an ulcer for duodenal injury.¹² H. pylori infection was determined using the rapid urease test or via histology. The criterion for the absence of pre-existing gastroduodenal ulcer was defined as no peptic ulcer history in the current medical record and no evidence of peptic ulcer scar via endoscopy. Gastric mucosal atrophy was endoscopically scored in six grades (C1, C2, C3, O1, O2, and O3; C, closed; O, opened) according to Kimura and Takemoto’s classification.¹³ The presence of gastric mucosal atrophy was defined as an endoscopic score from C3 to O3.

Results

A total of 284 patients (mean 72.0 years) were enrolled, of which 29 (10.2%) were diagnosed with peptic ulcer via endoscopy. The demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Of 284 patients, 99 (34.9%) were women and 185 (65.1%) were men. The conditions for which LDA were administered included hypertension (164, 57.7%), hyperlipidaemia (100, 35.2%), ischaemic heart disease (137, 48.2%), diabetes mellitus (54, 19.0%), cerebrovascular disease (39, 13.7%), and collagen disease (6, 2.1%). Twenty-two patients (7.7%) had peptic ulcer history, 49 (17.3%) were current smokers, and 36 (12.7%) were current alcohol consumers. In this retrospective analysis, H. pylori infection was diagnosed in only 13 patients, and the infection rate was 38.5%. Gastric mucosal atrophy was diagnosed via endoscopy in 128 patients (45.1%). Endoscopy was performed either because the patients were asymptomatic (143, 50.4%) or because the following symptoms were observed (141, 49.6%): epigastric pain (25, 8.8%), heart burn (14, 4.9%), indigestion (11, 3.9%), bleeding sign (21, 7.4%), anorexia (10, 3.5%), dysphagia (15, 5.3%), abdominal pain (6, 2.1%), vomiting (9, 3.2%), and anaemia (30, 10.6%). In 113 patients (39.8%), LDA was discontinued for 3–5 days before endoscopy.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Characteristic	Sample population (n = 284)
Sex (male/female)	185/99
Age (years)	72.0 ± 9.4
Disease
Hypertension	164 (57.7)
Hyperlipidaemia	100 (35.2)
Ischaemic heart disease	137 (48.6)
Diabetes mellitus	54 (19.0)
Cerebrovascular disease	39 (13.7)
Collagen disease	6 (2.1)
Peptic ulcer history	22 (7.7)
Current smoker	49 (17.3)
Current alchohol consumer	36 (12.7)
Helicobacter pylori infection
Positive	5 (1.8)
Negative	8 (2.8)
Unknown	272 (95.8)
Gastric mucosal atrophy
Positive (C3–3)	128 (45.1)
Negative (0–C2)	156 (54.9)
Reason for endoscopy
Screening (no symptom)	143 (50.4)
Epigastric pain	25 (8.8)
Heart burn	14 (4.9)
Indigestion	11 (3.9)
Bleeding sign	21 (7.4)
Anorexia	10 (3.5)
Dysphagia	15 (5.3)
Abdominal pain	6 (2.1)
Vomiting	9 (3.2)
Anaemia	30 (10.6)
LDA before endoscopy
Noncessation	171 (60.2)
Cessation	113 (39.8)

Values are n, mean ± SD or n (%).

LDA, low-dose aspirin.

In 114 patients (40.1%), no gastric agents were coprescribed, whereas cytoprotective gastric agents, H2 receptor antagonists (H2RA), and PPIs were coprescribed in 38 (13.4%), 48 (16.9%), and 103 (36.3%) patients, respectively. Anticoagulants, antiplatelets, NSAIDs, and corticosteroids were coprescribed in 33 (11.6%), 62 (21.8%), 14 (4.9%), and 12 (4.2%), respectively (Table 2).

Table 2.

Concomitant drugs

Drug	Sample population (n = 284)
Gastric agents
None	114 (40.1)
Cytoprotective gastric agents	38 (13.4)
H2RA	48 (16.9)
Half-dose	25 (8.8)
Full-dose	23 (8.1)
PPI	105 (36.3)
Half-dose	76 (26.8)
Full-dose	29 (10.2)
Other concomitant drugs
Anticoagulant	33 (11.6)
Warfarin	33 (11.6)
Antiplatelet drug	62 (21.8)
Ticlopidine	17 (6.0)
Clopidogrel	30 (10.6)
Cilostazol	14 (4.9)
Others	9 (3.2)
NSAIDs	14 (4.9)
Non-selective	11 (3.9)
Selective inhibitor of COX-2	3 (1.1)
Corticosteroid	12 (4.2)

H2RA, H2-receptor antagonist; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PPI, proton pomp inhibitor.

To identify the factors associated with LDA-induced gastroduodenal ulcers, the results were analysed using multiple logistic regression analysis (Table 3). Male gender, peptic ulcer history, abdominal symptoms, and NSAIDs were significantly associated with LDA-induced gastroduodenal ulcers: OR (95% CI) 3.62 (1.06–12.27), 6.6 (1.84–23.62), 3.06 (1.12–8.40), and 9.68 (1.64–57.18), respectively.

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis of the factors associated with gastroduodenal ulcers in patients receiving LDA

Factor	OR (95% CI)	p-value
Male	3.62 (1.06–12.27)	0.039
Advanced age (≥65 years)	1.16 (0.03–4.27)	0.828
Peptic ulcer history	6.6 (1.84–23.62)	0.004
Smoking	4.55 (0.90–22.93)	0.066
Alcohol	0.24 (0.04–1.61)	0.142
Abdominal symptom	3.06 (1.12–8.40)	0.030
PPI
Half-dose	0.16 (0.03–0.94)	0.043
Full-dose	0.07 (0.01–0.61)	0.016
H2RA
Half-dose	0.21 (0.02–1.89)	0.166
Full-dose	0.49 (0.08–3.18)	0.457
Cytoprotective agents	0.6 (0.11–3.32)	0.556
Anticoagulant	3.46 (0.96–12.40)	0.057
Antiplatelet	0.23 (0.04–1.28)	0.094
NSAIDs	9.68 (1.64–57.18)	0.012
Ca-blocker	1.86 (0.62–5.62)	0.270
ARB	0.57 (0.20–1.60)	0.282
ACE inhibitor	0.24 (0.02–2.44)	0.226
HMG-Co A reductase inhibitor	0.84 (0.28–2.50)	0.749
Corticosteroid	1.75 (0.16–19.28)	0.646
Gastric mucosal atrophy	0.69 (0.26–1.83)	0.458
LDA noncessation	0.79 (0.23–2.69)	0.706

ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, AT1-receptor blocker; H2RA, H2-receptor antagonist; HMG-Co A, 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A; LDA, low-dose aspirin; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PPI, proton pump inhibitor.

We compared gastric mucosal injury between the LDA cessation and noncessation groups using the MLS (Table 4). The MLS in the LDA cessation group was significantly lower than that in the LDA noncessation group (0.53 vs. 1.02; p < 0.01). In the LDA noncessation group, the MLS of the PPI users was significantly lower than that in the nongastric agent group (0.50 vs. 1.66; p < 0.001). However, the MLS of cytoprotective agents or H2RA users was the similar as that of the nongastric agent users. In the LDA cessation group, there was no significant difference in the MLS between the nongastric agent users and the gastric agents (cytoprotective agent or H2RA or PPI) users. Among the nongastric agent users, the MLS of the LDA noncessation group was significantly higher than that of the LDA cessation group (1.66 vs. 0.59; p < 0.01).

Table 4.

MLS and LDA-induced gastric ulcer in the LDA cessation and noncessation groups

LDA before endoscopy	Drug	Total (n = 284)	Mean MLS	Ulcer
Cessation	Gastric agent	113 (39.8)	0.53	7 (6.2)
	None	49 (43.4)	0.59	4 (8.2)
	Cytoprotective agents	15 (13.3)	0.33	1 (6.7)
	H2RA	17 (15.0)	0.58	1 (5.9)
	PPI	37 (32.7)	0.43	1 (2.7)
Noncessation	Gastric agent	171 (41.2)	1.02*	20 (11.7)
	None	65 (38.0)	1.66^#	16 (24.6)^#
	Cytoprotective agents	23 (13.5)	0.78	1 (4.4)
	H2RA	33 (19.3)	0.76	2 (6.1)
	PPI	68 (39.8)	0.50	2 (2.9)**

Values are n (%) unless otherwise stated.

*p < 0.01 vs. cessation; **, p < 0.001 vs. no gastric agent. ^#p<0.01 vs. none of cessation

H2RA, H2-receptor antagonist; MLS, modified Lanza score; PPI, proton pomp inhibitor.

Discussion

In the present retrospective study, we focused on gastroduodenal ulcers requiring treatment and investigated the association between LDA-induced gastroduodenal ulcers and clinical parameters, including combinations of medications, both antacids or other antithrombotic medicines and antihypertensive or antilipidaemic medications. The ulcer lesions were endoscopically identified in 29 (10.2%) of 284 patients who were administered LDA, and this incidence rate is similar to the results of a former prospective Japanese study.¹⁴

Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that male gender, a history of peptic ulcer, the presence of abdominal symptoms, and concomitant medication with NSAIDs were significant risk factors of LDA-induced gastroduodenal ulcers. These results are consistent with those of previous reports.^15,16 However, in this study, the possible risk factors (i.e. advanced age, concomitant anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs, and corticosteroids) that have been previously reported¹⁶ were not associated with LDA-associated peptic ulcers. Gender difference has been reported to affect the clinical features and the risk factors of LDA-induced peptic ulcers, which revealed advanced age was significant risk factor only in female.¹⁷ In the present study, the number of men with gastroduodenal ulcers was twice that of women with gastroduodenal ulcers; therefore, advanced age was not considered a risk factor for LDA-associated ulcers. Anticoagulant and corticosteroid use was not identified as a risk factor because of the small number of patients. There was a strong correlation between sex and concomitant antiplatelet use, which may be the reason for the association between male gender and LDA-induced peptic ulcer.

As reported in a previous study,¹⁵ the OR of peptic ulcer history was high (6.6); therefore, since 2011, in Japan, the treatment of such patients with PPI has been permitted as a medical service by health insurance for the prevention of NSAID- or LDA-induced peptic ulcers. Shiotani et al.¹⁴ reported the association between LDA-induced peptic ulcer and AT1 receptor blocker or angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor. However, in the present study, there was no relation between LDA-induced peptic ulcer and antihypertensive agents, or antihyperlipidaemic agents.

A complete PPI dose and a half PPI dose are known to be effective in the treatment and prevention of aspirin-related or NSAID-related peptic ulcers.^18,19 In the present study, complete PPI dose and half PPI dose prevented the development of LDA-induced peptic ulcers. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, H2RA was effective in the prevention of gastroduodenal ulcers in patients taking LDA.²⁰ However, in the present retrospective study as well as in a previous study, no association was observed between H2RA and LDA-induced peptic ulcer.¹⁴

According to a Japanese epidemiological study, a minimal association was observed between H. pylori infection and NSAIDs with gastric bleeding.⁵ NSAIDs and H. pylori infection seem independent risk factors for peptic ulcer and bleeding. Because the current study is retrospective, in which H. pylori infection was examined in only 13 patients, the effect of H. pylori infection on peptic ulcer development could not be investigated. Previous eradication therapy was not confirmed in 280 (98.6%) patients, and 128 (45.1%) patients were suspected with gastric mucosal atrophy detected via endoscopy. This result suggests that the H. pylori infection rate seems high, because of which 15 (5.3%) of 284 patients had gastrointestinal bleeding.

In Japan, LDA treatment is often discontinued 3–7 days before endoscopy in order to decrease the risk associated with the endoscopic procedure. Tamura et al.¹⁵ presented the association of the LDA cessation and the prevalence of LDA-induced peptic ulcers. The 7-day LDA cessation improved gastroduodenal mucosal injuries such as erosion and ulcer. In the present study, LDA-induced gastroduodenal erosion improved after LDA cessation; however, gastrointestinal ulcer did not improve after discontinuing LDA using multivariate analysis in cases including and excluding of cessation of LDA. This may be due to the short period of LDA cessation, which was 3–5 days in this study compared with a 7-day cessation in Tamura’s study. In the present study, bleeding signs were endoscopically recognized in 12 cases, and in 10 cases LDA was not discontinued before endoscopy. On the basis of the results of both Tamura’s and our study, we can conclude that a short duration of cessation LDA improves gastroduodenal mucosal injury in patients treated with LDA. LDA-induced gastroduodenal mucosal injury might be underestimated in patients with LDA cessation before endoscopy, and this is clinically important because it may prevent the prescription of gastric agents that should be prescribed in high-risk LDA users.

The interpretation of results of this study has limitations. A selection bias may be present in the patients enrolled in this study because the data were collected from LDA users who had undergone oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and not from all LDA users. A drug-selection bias may be present in this study. Moreover, because this was a retrospective study, this bias may have affected the evaluation of risk factors for LDA-induced gastroduodenal mucosal lesions. Additionally, we did not evaluate H. pylori infection for LDA-induced gastroduodenal injury because H. pylori infection was investigated in only 13 patients (4.6%) because examination of H. pylori infection is not permitted under Japan health insurance if there is no peptic ulcer. Like former studies, complete PPI dose and half PPI dose prevented the development of LDA-induced peptic ulcers, which might be suggest that drug-selection bias is relatively small.

In summary, in this retrospective study, 10.2% of LDA users had gastroduodenal ulcers. Male gender, peptic ulcer history, the presence of abdominal symptoms, and concomitant NSAID use were significant risk factors, and the use of PPI was a prevention strategies for LDA-induced gastroduodenal ulcers. The cessation of LDA before endoscopy might lead to an underestimation of LDA-induced gastroduodenal injury. Further study will be necessary to demonstrate the improvement of peptic ulcer by LDA cessation before endoscopy.

Footnotes

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

KK received research grants from Research Organization for Gastro-Enterological Disease Treatment (NPO-ROGET) and Daiich Sankyo, and lecture fees from Daiich Sankyo and Astra Zeneca. The other authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

Chan

Manson

Feskanich

. Long-term aspirin use and mortality in women. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 562–572.

Cryer

Feldman

. Effects of very low dose daily, long-term aspirin therapy on gastric, duodenal, and rectal prostaglandin levels and on mucosal injury in healthy humans. Gastroenterology 1999; 117: 17–25.

Garcia Rodriguez

Hernandez-Diaz

de Abajo

. Association between aspirin and upper gastrointestinal complications: systematic review of epidemiologic studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 52: 563–571.

Lanas

Bajador

Serrano

. Nitrovasodilators, low-dose aspirin, other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 834–839.

Sakamoto

Sugano

Ota

. Case–control study on the association of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Japan. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2006; 62: 765–772.

Laine

. Approaches to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in the high-risk patient. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 594–606.

Lanas

Perez-Aisa

Feu

. A nationwide study of mortality associated with hospital admission due to severe gastrointestinal events and those associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 1685–1693.

Moukarbel

Signorovitch

Pfeffer

. Gastrointestinal bleeding in high risk survivors of myocardial infarction: the VALIANT Trial. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 2226–2232.

Hawkey

Karrasch

Szczepanski

. Omeprazole compared with misoprostol for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Omeprazole versus Misoprostol for NSAID-induced Ulcer Management (OMNIUM) Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 727–734.

10.

Yeomans

Tulassay

Juhasz

. A comparison of omeprazole with ranitidine for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Acid Suppression Trial: Ranitidine versus Omeprazole for NSAID-associated Ulcer Treatment (ASTRONAUT) Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 719–726.

11.

Chan

Chung

Suen

. Preventing recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection who are taking low-dose aspirin or naproxen. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 967–973.

12.

Naito

Yoshikawa

Iinuma

. Rebamipide protects against indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal injury in healthy volunteers in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Dig Dis Sci 1998; 43: 83S–89S.

13.

Kimura

Takemot

. An endoscopic recognition of the atrophic border and its significance in chronic gastritis. Endoscopy 1969; 1: 87–97.

14.

Shiotani

Sakakibara

Yamanaka

. Upper gastrointestinal ulcer in Japanese patients taking low-dose aspirin. J Gastroenterol 2009; 44: 126–131.

15.

Tamura

Fujita

Tsumura

. Low-dose aspirin-induced gastroduodenal mucosal injury in Japanese patients with arteriosclerotic disease. Intern Med 2010; 49: 2537–2545.

16.

Shiotani

Kamada

Haruma

. Low-dose aspirin-induced gastrointestinal diseases: past, present, and future. J Gastroenterol 2008; 43: 581–588.

17.

Okada

Inamori

Imajyo

. Gender differences of low-dose aspirin-associated gastroduodenal ulcer in Japanese patients. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 1896–1900.

18.

Yeomans

Lanas

Labenz

. Efficacy of esomeprazole (20 mg once daily) for reducing the risk of gastroduodenal ulcers associated with continuous use of low-dose aspirin. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 2465–2473.

19.

Sugano

Matsumoto

Itabashi

. Lansoprazole for secondary prevention of gastric or duodenal ulcers associated with long-term low-dose aspirin therapy: results of a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, double-dummy, active-controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 2011; 46: 724–735.

20.

Taha

McCloskey

Prasad

. Famotidine for the prevention of peptic ulcers and oesophagitis in patients taking low-dose aspirin (FAMOUS): a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 374: 119–125.

Effect of aspirin cessation before endoscopy in Japanese patients with low-dose-aspirin-associated gastroduodenal mucosal injury

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Footnotes

Funding

Conflict of interest

References