This is a response to Russell McCutcheon’s (2018) book chapter titled “On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship” in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that critical religion (the approach of McCutcheon and others) is also value-driven and not non-normative as he claims, but that this is what makes it critical.
AfaryJanet and Kevin B. Anderson. 2005. Foucault and the Iranian Revolution: Gender and the Seductions of Islamism.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
2.
ArnalWilliam E. and Russell T. McCutcheon. 2013. The Sacred is the Profane: The Nature of “Religion.”Oxford and New York:
Oxford University Press.
3.
AsadTalal.1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam.
Baltimore:
John Hopkins University Press.
4.
BenjaminWalter.1968. Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Translated by Harry Zohn.
New York:
Schocken Books.
5.
FitzgeraldTimothy.2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies.
New York and Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
6.
FitzgeraldTimothy.2015.
“Critical Religion and Critical Research on Religion: Religion and Politics as Modern fictions.”Critical Research on Religion3, no. 3: 303–319.
7.
FitzgeraldTimothy.2016.
“Critical Religion and Critical Research on Religion: A Response to the April 2016 Editorial.”Critical Research on Religion4, no. 3: 307–313.
8.
FoucaultMichel.1965. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason.
New York:
Vintage Books.
9.
FoucaultMichel.1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
New York:
Vintage Books.
10.
FoucaultMichel.1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972-1977.
New York:
Vintage Books.
11.
FoucaultMichel.1990. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction,
Volume I.
New York:
Vintage Books.
12.
FoucaultMichel.1996. “What is Critique?” in What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions, edited by JamesSchmidt, 382–398.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
13.
GoldsteinWarren S., Roland Boer, Rebekka King, and Jonathan Boyarin. 2015.
“How Can Mainstream Approaches Become More Critical?”Critical Research on Religion3, no. 1: 3–12.
14.
GoldsteinWarren S., Jonathan Boyarin and Roland Boer. 2014.
“Can a Religious Approach be Critical?”Critical Research on Religion1, no. 1: 3–5.
15.
GoldsteinWarren S., Rebekka King, and Jonathan Boyarin. 2016.
“Critical Theory of Religion vs. Critical Religion.”Critical Research on Religion4, no. 1: 3–7.
16.
GoldsteinWarren S., Rebekka King, and Jonathan Boyarin. 2017.
“On a Balanced Critique: (or On the Limits of Critique).”Critical Research on Religion5, no. 1: 3–8
17.
HammerJuliana.2016.
“Roundtable on Normativity in Islamic Studies: Introduction.”Journal of the American Academy of Religion84, no 1: 44–59.
18.
HoriiMitsutoshi.2019.
“Historicizing the Category of “Religion” in Sociological Theories: Max Weber and Emile Durkheim.”Critical Research on Religion,
7, no. 1: 24–37.
19.
HorkheimerMax.1982. Critical Theory: Selected Essays.
New York:
Continuum.
20.
JosephsonJason Ananda.2012. The Invention of Religion in Japan.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
21.
KingRichard.1999. Orientalism and Religion: Postcolonial Theory, India and ‘The Mystic East’.
London and New York:
Routledge.
22.
MartinCraig.2015a.
“Theses on the Critique of “Religion.”Critical Research on Religion3, no. 1: 297–302.
MartinCraig, Russell McCutcheon, Monica Miller, Steve Ramey, K. Merinda Simmons, Leslie Dorrough Smith, and Via Touna. 2014.
Keeping “Critical” Critical: A Conversation from Culture on the Edge. Critical Research on Religion2, no. 3: 299–312.
26.
MasuzawaTomoko.2005. The Invention of World Religions: Or How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism.
Chicago and London:
University of Chicago Press.
27.
McCutcheonRussell T.1997. Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia.
Oxford and New York:
Oxford University Press.
28.
McCutcheonRussell T.2001. Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion.
Albany:
State University of New York Press.
29.
McCutcheonRussell T.2003. The Discipline of Religion: Structure, Meaning, Rhetoric.
London and New York:
Routledge.
30.
McCutcheonRussell T.2005. Religion and the Domestication of Dissent: Or, How to Live in a Less than Perfect Nation.
London and New York:
Routledge.
31.
McCutcheonRussell T.2018. Fabricating Religion: Fanfare for the CommonE.G. Berlin and Boston:
Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
32.
SaidEdward. (1978) 1994. Orientalism.
New York:
Vintage Books.
33.
SchilbrackKevin.2020.
“A Metaphysics for the Study of Religion: A Critical Reading of Russell McCutcheon.”Critical Research on Religion8, no. 1: 86–99.
34.
SmithJ.Z.1982. Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
35.
SmithWilfred Cantwell. (1962) 1991. The Meaning and End of Religion.
Minneapolis:
Fortress Press.
36.
StoddardBrad.2018. “Introduction.”In Method Today: Redescribing Approaches to the Study of Religion, edited by BradStoddard, 1–11.
Sheffield, UK and Bristol, CT:
Equinox.
37.
Weber, Max. 1978. Max Weber: Selections in Translation. Edited by W.G. Runciman; Translated bu Eric Matthews. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
