The treatment of tooth surface loss (TSL) is becoming more common in primary health care and a diverse variety of patients are presenting with this condition are often being treated by general dental practitioners. This article highlights the importance of comprehensive planning and adept execution that can enhance the patient's outcome and experience. Stages of clinical planning and treatment approaches using a selection of restorative materials utilising various established adhesive clinical techniques will be presented and discussed.
BenazziS, GrosseIR, GruppioniG, WeberGW, KullmerO.Comparison of occlusal loading conditions in a lower second premolar using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clinical Oral Investigations2014;18(2): 369–75.
3.
SmithBG, KnightJK.An index for measuring the wear of teeth. British Dental Journal1984;156(12):435–8.
4.
BartlettD, GanssC, LussiA.Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE): a new scoring system for scientific and clinical needs. Clinical Oral Investigations2008;12:(Suppl 1): 65–8.
VailatiF, BelserUC.Classification and treatment of the anterior maxillary dentition affected by dental erosion: the ACE classification. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent2010;30:559–571.
7.
PatelM, AlaniA.Clinical Issues in Occlusion - Part II. Singapore Dental Journal2015;35:31–38.
8.
LuciaVO.A technique for recording centric relation. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry1964;14;492–505.
9.
HothiGS.The ABC of the ESIPC Jig: The ‘Elegantly Simple Incisal Platform, Customized’ (ESIPC) Jig for Capturing/Recording Centric Relation. Dental Update2015;42(2):195.
10.
RamfjordSP, Ash MajM.Reflections on the Michigan occlusal splint. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation1994;21(5):491–500.
11.
BreschiaL, MazzonibA, RuggeribA, CadenaroaM, Di LenardaaR, DorigoaEDS.Dental adhesion review: Aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dental Materials2008;24(1):90–101.
12.
HemmingsKW, DarbarUR, VaughanS.Tooth wear treated with direct composite restorations at an increased vertical dimension: Results at 30 months. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry2000; 83(3):287–293.
13.
GulamaliAB, HemmingsKW, TredwinCJ, PetrieA.Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up). British Dental Journal2011;211,E9.
14.
MilosevicA, BurnsideG.The survival of direct composite restorations in the management of severe tooth wear including attrition and erosion: A prospective 8-year study. Journal of Dentistry2016;44:13–19.
15.
Al-KhayattAS, Ray-ChaudhuriA, PoyserNJ, BriggsPFA, PorterRWJ, KelleherMGD, EliyasS.Direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition: a 7-year follow-up of a prospective randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation2013;40(5):389–401.
16.
GregoryWA, BerryS, DukeE, DennisonJB.Physical properties and repair bond strength of direct and indirect composite resins. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry1992;68(3):406–411.
