Smartphone mothering and mediated family display: Transnational family practices in a polymedia environment among Indonesian mothers in Hong Kong

Abstract

Steady demand for migrant domestic workers from developing countries continues to normalize an intriguing form of geographically dispersed families from which the mothers migrate and become the breadwinners. Despite the distance, migrant mothers remain committed to the preservation of intimacy by utilizing communication media to perform and “display” family practices. Using polymedia and displaying family as theoretical frameworks, this ethnographic study examines how smartphones shape family practices among migrant mothers. Through participant observation and in-depth interviews with 30 Indonesian mothers in Hong Kong, it illustrates how smartphones transform the configuration of mothering practices and power structures underpinning family interaction in the process of mediated family display. Smartphones, as polymedia, enable migrant mothers to assert authority over the display of maternal roles, relationships, and rituals, both materially and discursively. Given that their relationships are experienced almost exclusively via smartphone communication, directing the communication effectively means defining the shape and characteristics of the family. The findings problematize the depiction of migrant mothers as victims of communication technologies, highlighting their authorial privilege when displaying family. This article also presents a critical reflection on mediated family practices by illustrating cases of failed display.

Keywords

Displaying family polymedia smartphones migrant mothers Indonesian domestic helpers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acedera

K. A.

Yeoh

B. S. A.

(2019). “Making time”: Long-distance marriages and the temporalities of the transnational family. Current Sociology, 62(2), 50–272.

Baldassar

(2016). De-demonizing distance in mobile family lives: Co-presence, care circulation and polymedia as vibrant matter. Global Networks, 16(2), 145–163.

Cabalquinto

E. C.

(2018). “We’re not only here but we’re there in spirit”: Asymmetrical mobile intimacy and the transnational Filipino family. Mobile Media and Communication, 6(1), 37–52.

Cabalquinto

E. C.

(2020). “They could picture me, or I could picture them”: “Displaying” family life beyond borders through mobile photography. Information Communication and Society, 23(11), 1608–1624.

Cabanes

J. V. A.

Acedera

K. A. F.

(2012). Of mobile phones and mother-fathers: Calls, text messages, and conjugal power relations in mother-away Filipino families. New Media and Society, 14(6), 916–930.

Census and Statistics Department (2019). Foreign domestic workers by nationality and sex. https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/FileManager/EN/Content_1149/T04_49.xlsx

Chan

(2014). Gendered morality and development narratives: The case of female labor migration from Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 6(10), 6949–6972.

Chib

Malik

Aricat

R. J.

Kadir

S. Z.

(2014). Migrant mothering and mobile phones: Negotiations of transnational identities. Mobile Media and Communication, 2(1), 73–93.

Collins

(2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton University Press.

10.

Constable

(2014). Born out of place: Migrant mothers and the politics of international labor. University of California Press.

11.

Dempsey

Lindsay

(2018). Surnaming children born to lesbian and heterosexual couples: Displaying family legitimacy to diverse audiences. Sociology, 52(5), 1017–1034.

12.

ENRICH (2019). The value of care: Key contribution of migrant domestic workers to economic growth and family well-being in Asia. https://enrichhk.org/sites/default/files/2019-09/Final_The-Value-of-Care_Full-Report.pdf

13.

Finch

(2007). Displaying families. Sociology, (41) 1, 65–81.

14.

Finch

(2011). Exploring the concept of display in family relationships. In Dermott

Seymour

(Eds.), Displaying families: A new concept for the sociology of family life (pp. 197–205). Palgrave Macmillan.

15.

Glaser

B. G.

(1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.

16.

Haynes

Dermott

(2011). Displaying mixedness: Differences and family relationships. In Dermott

Seymour

(Eds.), Displaying families: A new concept for the sociology of family life (pp. 145–159). Palgrave Macmillan.

17.

W. Y.

(2015). The emerging visibility of Islam through the powerless: Indonesian Muslim domestic helpers in Hong Kong. Asian Anthropology, 14(1), 79–90.

18.

Kang

(2012). Gendered media, changing intimacy: Internet-mediated transnational communication in the family sphere. Media, Culture and Society, 34(2), 146–161.

19.

Kang

(2018). New media, expectant motherhood, and transnational families: Power and resistance in birth tourism from Taiwan to the United States. Media, Culture, and Society, 40(7), 1070–1085.

20.

Kim

(2017). Digital media for intimacy? Asian nannies’ transnational mothering in Paris. Journal of International Communication, 23(2), 200–217.

21.

Langellier

K. M.

Peterson

E. E.

(1993). Family storytelling as a strategy of social control. In Mumby

D. K.

(Ed.), Narrative and social control: Critical perspectives (pp. 49–76). SAGE Publications.

22.

Ling

(2008). New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. MIT Press.

23.

Lorenzana

J. A.

(2016). Mediated recognition: The role of Facebook in identity and social formations of Filipino transnationals in Indian cities. New Media and Society, 18(10), 2189–2206.

24.

Madianou

(2012). Migration and the accentuated ambivalence of motherhood: The role of ICTs in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks, 12(3), 277–295.

25.

Madianou

(2014). Smartphones as polymedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 667–680.

26.

Madianou

(2015). Polymedia and ethnography: Understanding the social in social media. Social Media and Society, 1(1), 1–3.

27.

Madianou

Miller

(2011). Mobile phone parenting: Reconfiguring relationships between Filipina migrant mothers and their left-behind children. New Media and Society, 13(3), 457–470.

28.

Madianou

Miller

(2012). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187.

29.

Morgan

D. H. J.

(1996). Family connections: An introduction to family studies. Polity Press.

30.

Paragas

(2009). Migrant workers and mobile phones: Technological, temporal, and spatial simultaneity. In Ling

Campbell

S. W.

(Eds.), The reconstruction of space and time: Mobile communication practices (pp. 39–66). Transaction Publishers.

31.

Parreñas

(2005). Long-distance intimacy: Gender and intergenerational relations in transnational families. Global Networks, 5(4), 317–336.

32.

Parreñas

(2014). The intimate labor of transnational communication. Families, Relationships and Societies, 3(3), 425–442.

33.

Peng

(2016). Student migration and polymedia: Mainland Chinese students’ communication media use in Hong Kong. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(14), 2395–2412.

34.

Williams

Kerrins

(2018). Displaying and performing: Polish transnational families in Ireland Skyping grandparents in Poland. New Media and Society, 20(8), 3011–3028.

35.

Uy-Tioco

(2007). Overseas Filipino workers and text messaging: Reinventing transnational mothering. Continuum, 21(2), 253–265.

36.

Walsh

(2018). Migrant family display: A strategy for achieving recognition and validation in the host country. Sociological Research Online, 23(1), 67–83.