Socioeconomic status and demographic determinants are the most commonly examined factors in the study of the second-order digital divide regarding the differences associated with Internet use. The role of motivation in digital inequalities is comparatively less studied. We examine motivation and access variables in this paper. Statistical analysis based on a representative survey conducted in China indicates that motivation is a salient predictor of Internet use when other factors are controlled. In addition, device access significantly moderates the association between motivation and certain types of Internet use. While mobile-only users show the same, if not stronger, motivation for using the Internet for the purposes of study, entertainment, and e-commerce, they actually use those functions to a lesser extent than multimodal users. Hence, the digital divide is a multifaceted issue that requires a comprehensive solution.
ClarkL. S.Demont-HeinrichC.WebberS. A. (2004). Ethnographic interviews on the digital divide. New Media & Society,6(4), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144804044333
4.
CorreaT. (2016). Digital skills and social media use: How internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among ‘digital natives’. Information, Communication & Society,19(8), 1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084023
5.
CorreaT.PavezI.ContrerasJ. (2020). Digital inclusion through mobile phones? A comparison between mobile-only and computer users in internet access, skills and use. Information, Communication & Society,23(7), 1074–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1555270
6.
DiMaggioP.HargittaiE.CelesteC.ShaferS. (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. In NeckermanK. M. (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355–400). Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
DonnerJ. (2015). After access: Inclusion, development, and a more mobile internet. MIT Press.
8.
DonnerJ.GitauS.MarsdenG. (2011). Exploring mobile-only internet use: Results of a training study in urban South Africa. International Journal of Communication,5, 574–597.
9.
DunawayJ.SearlesK.SuiM.PaulN. (2018). News attention in a mobile era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,23(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy004
10.
EichhornT.JürssS.HoffmannC. P. (2020). Dimensions of digital inequality in the sharing economy. Information, Communication & Society,1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1791218
11.
EttemaJ. S.KlineF. G. (1977). Deficits, differences, and ceilings: Contingent conditions for understanding the knowledge Gap. Communication Research,4(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027700400204
12.
GenovaB.GreenbergB. (1979). Interests in news and the knowledge gap. Public Opinion Quarterly,43(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1086/268493
13.
GitauS.MarsdenG.DonnerJ. (2010). After access: Challenges facing mobile-only internet users in the developing world. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010), New York, NY.
HargittaiE. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”*. Sociological Inquiry,80(1), 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
16.
HargittaiE.HinnantA. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the internet. Communication Research,35(5), 602–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321782
17.
KreutzerT. (2009). Internet and online media usage on mobile phones among low-income urban youth in Cape Town. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT,5(5), 1–21.
18.
KwakN. (1999). Revisiting the knowledge gap hypothesis: Education, motivation, and media use. Communication Research,26(4), 385–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026004002
19.
LevinsonP. (1997). The soft edge: A natural history and future of the information revolution. Routledge.
20.
LinW.-Y.ZhangX.JungJ.-Y.KimY.-C. (2013). From the wired to wireless generation? Investigating teens’ internet use through the mobile phone. Telecommunications Policy,37(8), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.09.008
21.
MossbergerK.TolbertC. J.HamiltonA. (2012). Measuring digital citizenship: Mobile access and broadband. International Journal of Communication,6, 2492–2528.
22.
NapoliP. M.ObarJ. A. (2014). The emerging mobile internet underclass: A critique of mobile internet access. The Information Society,30(5), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.944726
23.
NewlandsG.LutzC. (2020). Crowdwork and the mobile underclass: Barriers to participation in India and the United States. New Media & Society,23(6), 1341–1361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820901847
24.
PavezI.CorreaT. (2020). “I don’t use the internet”: Exploring perceptions and practices among mobile-only and hybrid internet users. International Journal of Communication,14, 1–19.
25.
PearceK. E.RiceR. E. (2013). Digital divides from access to activities: Comparing mobile and personal computer internet users. Journal of Communication,63(4), 721–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12045
26.
ReisdorfB. C.FernandezL.HamptonK. N.ShinI.DuttonW. H. (2020). Mobile phones will not eliminate digital and social divides: How variation in internet activities mediates the relationship between type of internet access and local social capital in Detroit. Social Science Computer Review,0894439320909446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320909446
27.
ReisdorfB. C.GroseljD. (2017). Internet (non-)use types and motivational access: Implications for digital inequalities research. New Media & Society,19(8), 1157–1176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815621539
28.
ScheerderA.van DeursenA.van DijkJ. (2017). Determinants of internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics,34(8), 1607–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
29.
ShawA.HargittaiE. (2018). The pipeline of online participation inequalities: The case of Wikipedia editing. Journal of Communication,68(1), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx003
30.
Tirado-MoruetaR.Aguaded-GómezJ. I.Hernando-GómezÁ (2018). The socio-demographic divide in internet usage moderated by digital literacy support. Technology in Society,55, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.001
31.
van DeursenA.HelsperE. (2015). A nuanced understanding of internet use and non-use among the elderly. European Journal of Communication,30(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115578059
32.
Van DeursenA.HelsperE. (2018). Collateral benefits of internet use: Explaining the diverse outcomes of engaging with the internet. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2333–2351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817715282
33.
Van DeursenA.HelsperE.EynonR.Van DijkJ. (2017). The compoundness and sequentiality of digital inequality. International Journal of Communication,11, 452–473.
34.
van DeursenA.van DijkJ. (2009). Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly,26(2), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.11.002
van DeursenA.van DijkJ. (2015). Toward a multifaceted model of internet access for understanding digital divides: An empirical investigation. The Information Society,31(5), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.1069770
37.
van DeursenA.van DijkJ.ten KloosterP. (2015). Increasing inequalities in what we do online: A longitudinal cross sectional analysis of internet activities among the Dutch population (2010 to 2013) over gender, age, education, and income. Telematics and Informatics,32(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.09.003
38.
van DijkJ. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Sage Publications.
39.
van DijkJ.HackerK. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society,19(4), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240309487
40.
ViswanathK.KahnE.FinneganJ. R.HertogJ.PotterJ. D. (1993). Motivation and the knowledge gap: Effects of a campaign to reduce diet-related cancer risk. Communication Research,20(4), 546–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365093020004003
41.
WangL.LiuC. (2018). The mobile internet underclass: Reality or hyperbole?Journal of Information Science,44(5), 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551517690083
XieY.LuP. (2015). The sampling design of the China family panel studies (CFPS). Chinese Journal of Sociology,1(4), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150X15614535
