Expectations of technology use during meetings: An experimental test of manager policy,device use,and task-acknowledgment

Abstract

In organizational meetings, mobile media are commonly used to hold multiple simultaneous conversations (i.e., multicommunication). This experiment uses video vignettes to test how manager policy (no policy, pro-technology, anti-technology), device use (notepad, laptop, cell phone) and task-acknowledgment (no task-acknowledgment, task-acknowledgment) affect perceptions of meeting multicommunication behavior. US workers (N = 243) who worked at least 30 hours per week and attended at least one weekly meeting rated relevant outcomes: expectancy violation, communicator evaluation, perceived competence, and meeting effectiveness. Results reveal manager policy and device use both affect multicommunication perceptions, with mobile phones generating the highest expectancy violation and lowest evaluation of the communicator and meeting effectiveness. Surprisingly, there was no effect for task-acknowledgment; however, a match between manager policy and task-acknowledgment affected evaluations. This paper unifies past evidence about multicommunication under the expectancy violations framework, extends theoretical understandings of mobile media use at work, and suggests practical implications for technology use in unfamiliar workplace situations.

Keywords

expectancy violations theory experiment materiality meetings multicommunication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Raine

(2018, July 3). Stories from experts about the impact of digital life. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/07/03/stories-from-experts-about-the-impact-of-digital-life/

Bajko

(2012). Mobile telephone usage, attitude, and behavior during group meetings. Journal of Information Systems Applied Research, 5(2), 4–13. http://jisar.org/2012-5/

Böhmer

Saponas

T. S.

Teevan

(2013, August). Smartphone use does not have to be rude: Making phones a collaborative presence in meetings. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 342–351).

Burgoon

J. K.

(1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12(1-2), 30–48. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0261927x93121003

Burgoon

J. K.

Hale

J. L.

(1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs, 55, 58–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376158

Burgoon

J. K.

Walther

J. B.

(1990). Nonverbal expectancies and the evaluative consequences of violations. Human Communication Research, 17, 232–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1990.tb00232.x

Cameron

A. F.

Barki

Ortiz de Guinea

Coulon

Moshki

(2018). Multicommunicating in meetings: Effects of locus, topic relatedness, and meeting medium. Management Communication Quarterly, 32, 303–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918759437

Cameron

A. F.

Webster

(2011). Relational outcomes of multicommunicating: Integrating incivility and social exchange perspectives. Organization Science, 22, 754–771. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0540

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

10.

De Bruin

Barber

L. K.

(2019). Social judgments of electronic multitasking in the workplace: The role of contextual and individual factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.014

11.

Dennis

A. R.

Rennecker

J. A.

Hansen

(2010). Invisible whispering: Restructuring collaborative decision making with instant messaging. Decision Sciences, 41, 845–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00290.x

12.

Fink

E. L.

(2009). The FAQs on data transformation. Communication Monographs, 76, 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310352

13.

Hale

J. L.

Stiff

J. B.

(1990). Nonverbal primacy in veracity judgments. Communication Reports, 3, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219009367507

14.

Hall

J. A.

Baym

N. K.

Miltner

K. M.

(2014). Put down that phone and talk to me: Understanding the roles of mobile phone norm adherence and similarity in relationships. Mobile Media & Communication, 2, 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157913517684

15.

Jarvenpaa

S. L.

Lang

K. R.

(2005). Managing the paradoxes of mobile technology. Information Systems Management, 22, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1201/1078.10580530/45520.22.4.20050901/90026.2

16.

Kadylak

(2020). An investigation of perceived family phubbing expectancy violations and well-being among U.S. older adults. Mobile Media & Communication, 8, 247–267 https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157919872238

17.

Levay

K. E.

Freese

Druckman

J. N.

(2016). The demographic and political composition of Mechanical Turk samples. Sage Open, 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016636433

18.

Mannell

(2019). A typology of mobile messaging’s disconnective affordances. Mobile Media & Communication, 7, 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918772864

19.

Mascheroni

Vincent

(2016). Perpetual contact as a communicative affordance: Opportunities, constraints, and emotions. Mobile Media & Communication, 4, 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916639347

20.

Mazmanian

Orlikowski

W. J.

Yates

(2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24, 1337–1357. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0806

21.

McCroskey

J. C.

Teven

J. J.

(1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464

22.

Paskewitz

E. A.

Beck

S. J.

(2019). Exploring perceptions of multicommunicator texting during meetings. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 23–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.032

23.

Pronin, E., Gilovich, T., & Ross, L. (2004). Objectivity in the Eye of the Beholder: Divergent Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others. Psychological Review, 111, 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.781

24.

Reinsch

N. L.

Turner

J. W.

Tinsley

C. H.

(2008). Multicommunicating: A practice whose time has come? Academy of Management Review, 33, 391–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193450

25.

Reinsch

N. L.

Turner

J. W.

(2019). Multicommunicator aspirational stress, suggestions for teaching and research, and other insights after 10 years of multicommunication research. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33, 141–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651918816356

26.

Roberts

J. A.

David

M. E.

(2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058

27.

Rouse

S. V.

(2015). A reliability analysis of Mechanical Turk data. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 304–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.004

28.

Schrock

A. R.

(2015). Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1229–1246.

29.

Sheehan

K. B.

(2018). Crowdsourcing research: data collection with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Communication Monographs, 85, 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/0637751.2017.1342043

30.

Smith

Anderson

(2017, October 4). Automation in everyday life. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org/

31.

Stephens

K. K.

(2017). Multicommunicating in organizations. In Scott

C. R.

Lewis

L. K.

(Eds). Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication. The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication (pp. 1654–1658), Wiley Blackwell.

32.

Stephens

K. K.

(2018). Negotiating control: Organizations and mobile communication. Oxford University Press.

33.

Stephens

K. K.

Davis

(2009). The social influences on electronic multitasking in organizational meetings. Management Communication Quarterly, 23, 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335417

34.

Syntonic. (2016). Syntonic 2016 employer report: BYOD usage in the enterprise. Syntonic.com. https://syntonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Syntonic-2016-BYOD-Usage-in-the-Enterprise.pdf

35.

Tabachnik

B. G.

Fidell

S. L.

(2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th Ed). Pearson Education.

36.

Turner

J. W.

Reinsch

N. L.

(2007). The business communicator as presence allocator: Multicommunicating, equivocality, and status at work. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943606295779

37.

Turner

J. W.

Reinsch

N. L.

(2010). Successful and unsuccessful multicommunication episodes: Engaging in dialogue or juggling messages? Information Systems Frontiers, 12, 277–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9175-y

38.

Washington

M. C.

Okoro

E. A.

Cardon

P. W.

(2014). Perceptions of civility for mobile phone use in formal and informal meetings. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569913501862

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB