The existing literature on “friending” parents on mobile social media has focused on the momentary decision of accepting the “friending” requests. In addition, a major body of research on privacy management online focuses on predicting privacy protection behaviors based on samples primarily from the United States. This in-depth qualitative study employs focus groups to explore how Chinese young people interact with their parents after accepting them as friends on WeChat, a popular mobile social application in China. Many participants reported privacy turbulence due to parental interference with young adults’ expression of their own values and behaviors on WeChat, which reflects the deep conflict between the collectivistic culture (the parental generation) and the individualistic culture (young adults) in contemporary Chinese society. This study also finds that a family’s offline communication is generally parallel to its online communication on mobile social media after young people’s friending of parents.
BallH.WanzerM.ServossT. (2013). Parent–child communication on Facebook: Family communication patterns and young adults’ decisions to “friend” parents. Communication Quarterly, 61(5), 615–629.
2.
BaruhL.SecintiE.CemalcilarZ. (2017). Online privacy concerns and privacy management: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 26–53.
3.
BazarovaN. N.ChoiY. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 635–657.
4.
BélangerF.CrosslerR. E. (2011). Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 1017–1042.
5.
BridgeM. C.SchrodtP. (2013). Privacy orientations as a function of family communication patterns. Communication Reports, 26(1), 1–12. doi:10.1080/08934215.2013.773054
CabalquintoE. C. B. (2018). “We’re not only here but we’re there in spirit”: Asymmetrical mobile intimacy and the transnational Filipino family. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(1), 37–52.
8.
ChaoR. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65(4), 1111–1119.
9.
ChenG. M. (2015). Why do women bloggers use social media? Recreation and information motivations outweigh engagement motivations. New Media & Society, 17(1), 24–40.
10.
ChenR.SharmaS. K. (2017). Learning and self-disclosure behavior on social networking sites: The case of Facebook users. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(1), 93–106.
11.
CheungM.SheJ.JieZ. (2015). Connection discovery using big data of user-shared images in social media. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 17(9), 1417–1428.
12.
ChildJ. T.DuckA. R.AndrewsL. A.ButauskiM.PetronioS. (2015). Young adults’ management of privacy on Facebook with multiple generations of family members. Journal of Family Communication, 15(4), 349–367.
13.
ChildJ. T.HaridakisP. M.PetronioS. (2012). Blogging privacy rule orientations, privacy management, and content deletion practices: The variability of online privacy management activity at different stages of social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1859–1872.
14.
ChildJ. T.WestermannD. A. (2013). Let’s be Facebook friends: Exploring parental Facebook friend requests from a communication privacy management (CPM) perspective. Journal of Family Communication, 13(1), 46–59.
15.
ChristofidesE.MuiseA.DesmaraisS. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes?Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 12(3), 341–345.
16.
ChuS.ChoiS. M. (2010). Social capital and self-presentation on social networking sites: A comparative study of Chinese and American young generations. Chinese Journal of Communication, 3(4), 402–420.
17.
DotyJ.DworkinJ. (2014). Parents’ of adolescents use of social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 349–355.
18.
FengW.CaiY.GuB. (2013). Population, policy, and politics: How will history judge China’s one-child policy?Population and Development Review, 38(1), 115–129.
19.
FengW.XieY. (2014). Teens’ concern for privacy when using social networking sites: An analysis of socialization agents and relationships with privacy-protecting behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 153–162.
20.
FrenchA. M.ReadA. (2013). My mom’s on Facebook: An evaluation of information sharing depth in social networking. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(10), 1049–1059.
21.
HawkS. T.KeijsersL.HaleW. W.IIIMeeusW. (2009). Mind your own business! Longitudinal relations between perceived privacy invasion and adolescent–parent conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(4), 511–520.
22.
HesseC.RauscherE. A.GoodmanR. B.CouvretteM. A. (2017). Reconceptualizing the role of conformity behaviors in family communication patterns theory. Journal of Family Communication, 17(4), 319–337.
23.
HofstedeG. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1(2), 81–99.
24.
HoganB. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 377–386.
25.
HuangY. (2010). Family communication patterns, communication apprehension and soci-communicative orientative orientation: A study of Chinese students (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Akron, Akron, OH.
26.
HumphreysL. (2013). Mobile social media: Future challenges and opportunities. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 20–25.
27.
JoinsonA. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1027–1036). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1357054.1357213
28.
KanterM.AfifiT.RobbinsS. (2012). The impact of parents “friending” their young adult child on Facebook on perceptions of parental privacy invasions and parent–child relationship quality. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 900–917.
29.
Kennedy-LightseyC. D.FrisbyB. N. (2016). Parental privacy invasion, family communication patterns, and perceived ownership of private information. Communication Reports, 29(2), 75–86.
30.
KimY.SohnD.ChoiS. M. (2011). Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 365–372.
31.
KoernerA. F.FitzpatrickM. A. (1997). Family type and conflict: The impact of conversation orientation and conformity orientation on conflict in the family. Communication Studies, 48(1), 59–75.
32.
KoernerA. F.FitzpatrickM. A. (2002). Toward a theory of family communication. Communication Theory, 12(1), 70–91.
33.
KoernerA. F.FitzpatrickM. A. (2006). Family communication patterns theory: A social cognitive approach. In BraithwaiteD. O.BaxterL. A. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 50–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
KoernerA. F.SchrodtP. (2014). An introduction to the special issue on family communication patterns theory. Journal of Family Communication, 14(1), 1–15. doi:10.1080/15267431.2013.857328
35.
LamS. S. (2013). ICT’s impact on family solidarity and upward mobility in translocal China. Asian Journal of Communication, 23(3), 322–340.
36.
LeeS. J. (2009). Online communication and adolescent social ties: Who benefits more from Internet use?Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 509–531.
37.
LewisJ.WestA. (2009). “Friending”: London-based undergraduates’ experience of Facebook. New Media & Society, 11(7), 1209–1229.
38.
LienC.CaoY. (2014). Examining WeChat users’ motivations, trust, attitudes, and positive word-of-mouth: Evidence from China. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 104–111.
39.
LindlofT. R.TaylorB. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
MarwickA. E.BoydD. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051–1067.
42.
NefT.GaneaR. L.MüriR. M.MosimannU. P. (2013). Social networking sites and older users – A systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 25(7), 1041–1053.
43.
NissenbaumH. (2009). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.CoyneS. M.FraserA. M. (2012). Getting a high-speed family connection: Associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61(3), 426–440.
45.
PetronioS. (2010). Communication privacy management theory: What do we know about family privacy regulation?Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(3), 175–196.
46.
PetronioS. (2013). Brief status report on communication privacy management theory. Journal of Family Communication, 13(1), 6–14.
47.
PetronioS. (2017). Communication privacy management theory: Understanding families. In BraithwaiteD.SuterE.FloydK. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 87–97). New York, NY: Routledge.
48.
PetronioS.AltmanI. (2002). Boundaries of privacy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
SchrodtP.WittP. L.MessersmithA. S. (2008). A meta-analytical review of family communication patterns and their associations with information processing, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. Communication Monographs, 75(3), 248–269.
51.
ShinW. (2015). Parental socialization of children’s Internet use: A qualitative approach. New Media & Society, 17(5), 649–665.
52.
SpiekermannS.KrasnovaH.KorolevaK.HildebrandT. (2010). Online social networks: Why we disclose. Journal of Information Technology, 25, 109–125.
53.
StorchS. L.Ortiz Juarez-PazA. V. (2019). The role of mobile devices in 21st-century family communication. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(2), 248–264.
54.
TazanuP. M. (2015). On the liveness of mobile phone mediation: Youth expectations of remittances and narratives of discontent in the Cameroonian transnational family. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(1), 20–35.
55.
TriandisH.BontempoR.VillarealM.AsaiM.LuccaN. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self–ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323–338.
56.
TrottierD. (2012). Interpersonal surveillance on social media. Canadian Journal of Communication, 37(2), 319–332. doi:10.22230/cjc.2012v37n2a2536
57.
TwengeJ. M.MillerJ. D.CampbellW. K. (2014). The narcissism epidemic: Commentary on modernity and narcissistic personality disorder. Personal Disorder, 5(2), 227–229.
58.
UrB.WangY. (2013). A cross-cultural framework for protecting user privacy in online social media. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 755–762). New York, NY: ACM.
59.
WestA.LewisJ.CurrieP. (2009). Students’ Facebook “friends”: Public and private spheres. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(6), 615–627.
60.
WilliamsA. L.MertenM. J. (2014). Linking community, parenting, and depressive symptom trajectories: Testing resilience models of adolescent agency based on race/ethnicity and gender. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 43(9), 1563–1575.
61.
YuQ.HuangP.LiuL. (2017). From “connected presence” to “panoptic presence”: Reframing the parent–child relationship on mobile instant messaging uses in the Chinese translocal context. Mobile Media and Communication, 5(2), 123–138.
62.
ZhangQ. (2007). Family communication patterns and conflict styles in Chinese parent–child relationships. Communication Quarterly, 55(1), 113–128.
