In this article, I discuss camera drones as mobile media that help access, collect, and shape physical, digital, and social spaces. As such, consumer drones afford “communication on the fly” in their medium-specific configuration of aerial navigation, visual production, and networked communication. Drawing on in-depth interviews with drone users and auto-ethnographic drone practices, I first highlight what physical-material conditions the flying camera mediates. An analysis of what digital-intangible formations the sensor medium collects and creates follows, before I turn to the sociospatial relations the buzzing mobile interface can establish and disrupt. I show how these conditions of communication on the fly shape user practices of place-sensing and place-making. Through the lenses of mobile communication research, media ecology, and mobilities studies, I ultimately illuminate how the ambiguous aerial system helps expand our thinking of and with notions of communication on the move.
AndrejevicM. (2015). Becoming drones: Smartphone probes and distributed sensing. In WilkenR.GogginG. (Eds.), Locative media (pp. 193–206). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
2.
BartschR.CoyneJ.GrayK. (2016). Drones in society: Exploring the strange new world of unmanned aircraft. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
3.
BenderH. (2018). The new aerial age: Die wechselseitige Verfertigung gemeinsamer Raum- und Medienpraktiken am Beispiel von Drohnen-Communities. In GhanbariN.OttoI.SchrammS.ThielmannT. (Eds.), Kollaboration: Beiträge zur Medientheorie und Kulturgeschichte der Zusammenarbeit (pp. 131–145). Paderborn, Germany: Wilhelm Fink.
Choi-FitzpatrickA.ChavarriaD.CychoszE.DingensJ. P.DuffeyM.KoebelK.. . . AlmquistL. (2016). Up in the air: A global estimate of non-violent drone use 2009–2015. Retrieved from http://digital.sandiego.edu/gdl2016report/1/
10.
CustersB. (2016). The future of drone use: Opportunities and threats from ethical and legal perspectives. The Hague, the Netherlands: T.M.C. Asser Press.
11.
De LangeM. (2009). From always-on to always-there: Locative media as playful technologies. In de Souza e SilvaA.SutkoD. M. (Eds.), Digital cityscapes: Merging digital and urban playspaces (pp. 55–70). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
12.
De Souza e SilvaA. (2006). From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261–278.
13.
De Souza e SilvaA.FrithJ. (2012). Mobile interfaces in public spaces: Locational privacy, control, and urban sociability. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
FarmanJ. (2011). Mobile interface theory: Embodied space and locative media. New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
FarmanJ. (Ed.). (2016). Foundations of mobile media studies: Essential texts on the formation of a field. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
16.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (n.d.). Unmanned aircraft systems. Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/uas/
FrithJ. (2015). Smartphones as locative media. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
19.
GibsonJ. (1977). The theory of affordances. In ShawR.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20.
GogginG.HjorthL. (Eds.). (2009). Mobile technologies: From telecommunications to media. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
GrahamS. (2016). Vertical: The city from satellites to bunkers. London, UK: Verso.
22.
HildebrandJ. M. (2017). Situating hobby drone practices. Digital Culture & Society, 3(2), 207–218.
23.
HildebrandJ. M. (2018). Modal media: Connecting media ecology and mobilities research. Media, Culture, & Society, 40(3), 348–364.
24.
HjorthL. (2016). Mobile art: Rethinking intersections between art, user created content (UCC), and the quotidian. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(2), 169–185.
25.
HjorthL.PinkS. (2014). New visualities and the digital wayfarer: Reconceptualizing camera phone photography and locative media. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(1), 40–57.
26.
InnisH. A. (1999). The bias of communication. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
JensenK. B. (2013). What’s mobile in mobile communication?Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 26–31.
30.
KatzJ. E. (2007). Mobile media and communication: Some important questions. Communication Monographs, 74(3), 389–394.
31.
KlauserF.PedrozoS. (2015). Power and space in the drone age: A literature review and politico-geographical research agenda. Geographica Helvetica, 70(4), 285–293.
32.
LingR.CampbellS. W. (Eds.). (2009). The reconstruction of space and time: Mobile communication practices. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
33.
LuvaasB. (2016). Urban fieldnotes: An auto-ethnography of street style blogging. In JenssH. (Ed.), Fashion studies: Research methods, sites and practices (pp. 83–100). London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
McLuhanM. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
36.
MumfordL. (2010). Technics and civilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
ÖzkulD. (2014). Mobile communication technologies and spatial perception: Mapping London. In WilkenR.GogginG. (Eds.), Locative media (pp. 39–51). London, UK: Routledge.
38.
PostmanN. (1970). The reformed English curriculum. In EurichA. C. (Ed.), High school 1980: The shape of the future in American secondary education (pp. 160–168). New York, NY: Pitman.
39.
RothsteinA. (2015). Drone. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
ShellerM. (2013). Mobile mediality: Location, dislocation, augmentation. In VoglG.WitzgallS.KesselringS. (Eds.), New mobilities regimes in art and social sciences (pp. 309–326). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
42.
ShellerM. (2014). Mobile art: Out of your pocket. In GogginG.HjorthL. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to mobile media (pp. 197–205). New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
ShellerM.UrryJ. (2003). Mobile transformations of “public” and “private” life. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(3), 107–125.
44.
StrateL. (2017). Media ecology: An approach to understanding the human condition. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
