Research in the field of mobile communication studies (MCS) has generally moved away from focusing on how mobile phones distract users from their physical environment to considering how the experience of space and place can be enhanced by locative smartphone applications. This article argues that trajectory may be complicated by the emergence of a new type of mobile technology: mobile virtual reality (MVR). While an increasing number of handsets are specifically developed with MVR in mind, there is little to no research that situates this phenomenon within the continuum of MCS. The intention of this paper is accordingly twofold. First, the article conceptualizes MVR as a connective tissue between the two sequential tropes of MCS: physical distraction and spatial enhancement. Second, the article introduces the concept of ‘dislocated space’ as a way of understanding the embodied space MVR might configure.
BullM (2000) Sounding Out the City: Personal Stereos and the Management of Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.
3.
CampbellS (2018) From frontier to field: old and new theoretical directions in mobile communication studies. Communication Theory. Epub ahead of print 15 August 2018. DOI: 10.1093/ct/qty021.
4.
CampbellSKwakN (2011) Mobile communication and civil society: linking patterns and places of use to engagement with others in public. Human Communication Research37(2): 207–222.
De GournayC (2002) Pretense of intamcy in France. In: KatzJEAkkhusM (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge Univerity Press, pp. 193–205.
7.
De Souza e SilvaA (2006) From cyber to hybrid: mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture9(3): 261–278.
8.
De Souza e SilvaA (2013) Location-aware mobile technologies: historical, social and spatial approaches. Mobile Media & Communication1(1): 116–121.
9.
De Souza e SilvaA (ed.) (2016) Dialogues on Mobile Communication. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
10.
De Souza e SilvaAFrithJ (2012) Mobile Interfaces in Public Spaces: Locational Privacy, Control, and Urban Sociability. New York: Routledge.
EvansL (2015) Locative Social Media: Place in the Digital Age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
EvansLSakerM (2017) Location-based Social Media: Space, Time and Identity. Cham: Springer.
14.
FarmanJ (2013) Mobile Interface Theory: Embodied Space and Locative Media. London: Routledge.
15.
FarmanJ (2018) Waiting for Word. New York: Yale University Press.
16.
FarmanJFrithJ (2016) Location-based media. In: De Souza e SilvaA (ed.) Dialogues on Mobile Communication. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, pp. 139–155.
17.
FrithJ (2013) Turning life into a game: foursquare, gamification, and personal mobility. Mobile Media & Communication1(2): 248–262.
18.
FrithJ (2015) Smartphones as Locative Media. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
19.
FrithJSakerM (2017) Understanding Yik Yak: location-based sociability and the communication of place. First Monday22(10).
20.
GergenKJ (2002) The challenge of absent presence. In: KatzJEAakhusM (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 227–241.
21.
GergenKJ (2008) Mobile communication and the transformation of the democratic process. In: KatzJE (ed.) Handbook of Mobile Communication Studies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 297–309.
22.
HabuchiI (2005) Accelerating reflexivity. In: ItoMOkabeDMatsudaM (eds) Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 165–182.
23.
HjorthL (2011) Games and Gaming: An Introduction to New Media. Oxford: Berg.
24.
HjorthLRichardsonI (2017) Pokémon Go: mobile media play, place-making, and the digital wayfarer. Mobile Media & Communication5: 3–14.
25.
HosokawaS (1984) The Walkman effect. Popular Music4: 165–180.
26.
HumphreysL (2005) Social topography in a wireless era: the negotiation of public and private space. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication35(4): 367–384.
LambergEMMuratoriLM (2012) Cell phones change the way we walk. Gait & Posture35(4): 688–690.
30.
LicoppeC (2004) ‘Connected’ presence: the emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22(1): 135–156.
31.
LicoppeCInadaY (2006) Emergent uses of a multiplayer location-aware mobile game: the interactional consequences of mediated encounters. Mobilities1(1): 39–61.
32.
LingR (2004) The Mobile Connection: The Cell Phone’s Impact on Society. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
OzkulD (2015) Mobile communication technologies and spatial perception: mapping London. In: WilkenRGogginG (eds) Locative Media. New York: Routledge, pp. 39–51.
SakerMEvansL (2016) Everyday life and locative play: an exploration of Foursquare and playful engagements with space and place. Media, Culture & Society38(8): 1169–1183.
46.
SchivelbuschW (1986) The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the 19th Century. Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
47.
SeymourNEGallagherAGRomanSAet al. (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Annals of Surgery236(4): 458–463.
48.
ShieldsR (2005) The Virtual. London: Routledge.
49.
StavrinosDByingtonKWSchwebelDC (2011) Distracted walking: cell phones increase injury risk for college pedestrians. Journal of Safety Research42(2): 101–107.
WeintraubJ (1997) The theory and politics of the public/private distinction. In: WeintraubJKumarK (eds) Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy. Chicago, IL; London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–42.
52.
WellmanB (2002) Little boxes, glocalization, and networked individualism. In: TanabeMVan den BesselaarPIshidaT (eds) Digital Cities II: Computational and Sociological Approaches. Berlin: Springer, pp. 10–26.
