Smartphones offer multimedia convergence in a single device, ubiquitous access to media, and constant connections with others. The rapid rise of smartphone use calls for more scholarly attention paid to users’ media usage and time expenditure. This study aims to (a) understand smartphone usage patterns by examining time spent using smartphones and task switching between mobile applications (apps), and (b) test the validity of self-reported measures of these behaviors by comparing self-reports with log data from the smartphone. Data were collected from 50 participants over 1 week. Results show that on average participants spent 2 hours 39 minutes on their smartphone and made 101 app switches per day. Among other findings, social networking was the most used app category, age was a significant demographic factor, and participants, especially heavy smartphone users, overestimated their mobile app usage. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
AbeeleM. V.BeullensK.RoeK. (2013). Measuring mobile phone use: Gender, age and real usage level in relation to the accuracy and validity of self-reported mobile phone use. Mobile Media & Communication, 1, 213–236.
2.
AtkinD. J. (2002). Convergence across media. In LinC. A.AtkinD. J. (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 23–42). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
3.
BeroloS.SteenstraI.AmickB. C.IIIWellsR. P. (2015). A comparison of two methods to assess the usage of mobile hand-held communication devices. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 12, 276–285.
4.
BoaseJ.LingR. (2013). Measuring mobile phone use: Self-report versus log data. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 508–519.
5.
BöhmerM.HechtB.SchöningJ.KrügerA.BauerG. (2011). Falling asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle: A large scale study on mobile application usage. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (pp. 47–56). New York, NY: ACM.
CohenA. A.LemishD. (2003). Real time and recall measures of mobile phone use: Some methodological concerns and empirical applications. New Media & Society, 5, 167–183.
8.
CollopyF. (1996). Biases in retrospective self-reports of time use: An empirical study of computer users. Management Science, 42, 758–767.
9.
DavidP.KimJ. H.BrickmanJ. S.RanW.CurtisC. M. (2015). Mobile phone distraction while studying. New Media & Society, 17, 1661–1679.
10.
De ReuverM.BouwmanH. (2015). Dealing with self-report bias in mobile Internet acceptance and usage studies. Information & Management, 52, 287–294.
11.
DeuzeM. (2011). Media life. Media, Culture & Society, 33, 137–148.
12.
FlanaginA. J.MetzgerM. J. (2001). Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research, 27, 153–181.
13.
FoehrU. G. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors and pairings (Kaiser Family Foundation report). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED527858.pdf
14.
GravetterF. J.WallnauL. B.ForzanoL. A. B. (2017). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
15.
HornikJ. (1984). Subjective vs. objective time measures: A note on the perception of time in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 615–618.
16.
JenkinsH. (2004). The cultural logic of media convergence. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7, 33–43.
17.
JeongS. H.HwangY. (2016). Media multitasking effects on cognitive vs. attitudinal outcomes: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 42, 599–618.
18.
JungJ.Chan-OlmstedS.KimY. (2013). From access to utilization: Factors affecting smartphone application use and its impacts on social and human capital acquisition in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90, 715–735.
19.
KononovaA.JooE.YuanS. (2016). If I choose when to switch: Heavy multitaskers remember online content better than light multitaskers when they have the freedom to multitask. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 567–575. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.011
20.
LangA. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50, 46–70.
21.
LangA. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56, S57–S80.
22.
LangA.ChrzanJ. (2015). Media multitasking: Good, bad, or ugly?Annals of the International Communication Association, 39, 99–128.
23.
LaRoseR.EastinM. S. (2004). A social cognitive theory of Internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 358–377.
LeungL.WeiR. (2000). More than just talk on the move: Uses and gratifications of the cellular phone. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 308–320.
26.
LinnhoffS.SmithK. T. (2016). An examination of mobile app usage and the user’s life satisfaction. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25, 581–617.
27.
MarkG.VoidaS.CardelloA. (2012). “A pace not dictated by electrons”: An empirical study of work without email. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 555–564). New York, NY: ACM.
28.
MooneyC. Z.DuvalR. D. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
OulasvirtaA.RattenburyT.MaL.RaitaE. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16, 105–114.
31.
PalmgreenP.WennerL. A.RosengrenK. E. (1985). Uses and gratifications research: The past ten years. In RosengrenK. E.WennerL. A.PalmgreenP. (Eds.), Media gratifications research: Current perspectives (pp. 11–37). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
32.
PantzarM. (2010). Future shock: Discussing the changing temporal architecture of daily life. Journal of Futures Studies, 14(4), 1–22.
33.
ParslowR. C.HepworthS. J.McKinneyP. A. (2003). Recall of past use of mobile phone headsets. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 106, 233–240. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006354
34.
PashlerH. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244.
35.
PearceK. E. (2011). Convergence through mobile peer-to-peer file sharing in the Republic of Armenia. International Journal of Communication, 5, 511–528.
36.
RogersY.ConnellyK.HazlewoodW.TedescoL. (2010). Enhance learning: A study of how mobile devices can facilitate sensemaking. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14, 111–124.
37.
SalvucciD. D.TaatgenN. A. (2011). Toward a unified view of cognitive control. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 227–230.
38.
SchrockA. R. (2015). Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1229–1246.
SzajnaB. (1993). Determining information system usage: Some issues and examples. Information & Management, 25, 147–154.
44.
TimotijevicL.BarnettJ.ShepherdR.SeniorV. (2009). Factors influencing self-report of mobile phone use: The role of response prompt, time reference and mobile phone use in recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 664–683.
45.
TowersI.DuxburyL.HigginsC.ThomasJ. (2006). Time thieves and space invaders: Technology, work and the organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19, 593–618.
46.
TuckelP.O’NeillH. (2005, May). Ownership and usage patterns of cell phones: 2000–2005. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Association, Miami Beach, FL.
47.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016). American time use survey. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/tus/
48.
WaltherJ. B.ValkenburgP. M. (2017). Merging mass and interpersonal communication via interactive communication technology: A symposium. Human Communication Research, 43, 415–423.
49.
YeykelisL.CummingsJ. J.ReevesB. (2014). Multitasking on a single device: Arousal and the frequency, anticipation, and prediction of switching between media content on a computer. Journal of Communication, 64, 167–192.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
