AalbersG.vanden AbeeleM. M. P.HendricksonA. T.de MarezL.KeijsersL. (2021). Caught in the moment: Are there person-specific associations between momentary procrastination and passively measured smartphone use?Mobile Media & Communication, 10(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157921993896
2.
AnderssonL.SundinE. (2021). Mobile bystanders and rubbernecks, disaster tourists, and helpers. Towards a theoretical framework for critically studying action possibilities at accident sites. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(3), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920984828
3.
AsanteR. K. B. (2019). Exploration of the forms of mobile phone attachment among traders in Ghana. Mobile Media and Communication, 7(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918764015
4.
BayerJ. B.CampbellS. W. (2012). Texting while driving on automatic: Considering the frequency-independent side of habit. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2083–2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.012
5.
BayerJ. B.Dal CinS.CampbellS. W.PanekE. (2016). Consciousness and self-regulation in mobile communication. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12067
6.
BayerJ. B.EllisonN. B.SchoenebeckS.BradyE.FalkE. B. (2018). Facebook in context(s): Measuring emotional responses across time and space. New Media and Society, 20(3), 1047–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816681522
7.
BeyensI.PouwelsJ. L.van DrielI. I.KeijsersL.ValkenburgP. M. (2020). The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211038196
8.
BroekmanF. L.PiotrowskiJ. T.BeentjesH. W. J.ValkenburgP. M. (2018). App features that fulfill parents’ needs in apps for children. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(3), 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918759571
9.
BurgersC.EdenA.de JongR.BuninghS. (2016). Rousing reviews and instigative images: The impact of online reviews and visual design characteristics on app downloads. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(3), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916639348
10.
BüttnerC. M.GlosterA. T.GreifenederR. (2021). Your phone ruins our lunch: Attitudes, norms, and valuing the interaction predict phone use and phubbing in dyadic social interactions. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(3).https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211059914
11.
CampbellS. W. (2013). Mobile media and communication: A new field, or just a new journal?Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 8–13.
12.
CampbellS. W.LingR. (2008). Effects of mobile communication. In J. Bryant & M. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 592–606). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
ChinK.EdelsteinR. S.VernonP. A. (2018). Attached to dating apps: Attachment orientations and preferences for dating apps. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918770696
14.
CorrieroE. F.TongS. T. (2015). Managing uncertainty in mobile dating applications: Goals, concerns of use, and information seeking in Grindr. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157915614872
15.
CumiskeyK. M.LingR. (2015). The social psychology of mobile communication. In S.Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 228–246). John Wiley & Sons.
16.
CummingsR.ReimerT. (2020). Cellphone relevance in face-to-face interactions: The effects of cellphone use on conversational satisfaction. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 274–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920958437
17.
CutinoC. M.NeesM. A. (2016). Restricting mobile phone access during homework increases attainment of study goals. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916664558
18.
DamásioM. J.HenriquesS.Teixeira-BotelhoI.DiasP. (2013). Social activities and mobile Internet diffusion: A search for the Holy Grail?Mobile Media & Communication, 1(3), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157913495690
19.
DavidsonB. I.ShawH.EllisD. A. (2022). Fuzzy constructs in technology usage scales. Computers in Human Behavior, 133, 107206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107206
20.
DogruelL.JoeckelS.BowmanN. D. (2014). Choosing the right app: An exploratory perspective on heuristic decision processes for smartphone app selection. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157914557509
21.
DogruelL.Schnauber-StockmannA. (2020). What determines instant messaging communication? Examining the impact of person- and situation-level factors on IM responsiveness. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920943926
22.
EllisD. A. (2020). Smartphones within psychological science. Cambridge University Press.
23.
FigeacJ.ChauletJ. (2018). Video-ethnography of social media apps’ connection cues in public settings. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(3), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917747642
24.
GonzalesA. L. (2014). Health benefits and barriers to cell phone use in low-income urban U.S. neighborhoods: Indications of technology maintenance. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157914530297
25.
GrieveR.MarchE. (2020). ‘Just checking’: Vulnerable and grandiose narcissism subtypes as predictors of phubbing. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920942276
26.
JoeckelS.DogruelL. (2019). Default effects in app selection: German adolescents’ tendency to adhere to privacy or social relatedness features in smartphone apps. Mobile Media & Communication, 8(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918819616
27.
KadylakT. (2019). An investigation of perceived family phubbing expectancy violations and well-being among U.S. older adults. Mobile Media & Communication, 8(2), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157919872238
28.
KimK. J.SundarS. S. (2016). Mobile persuasion: Can screen size and presentation mode make a difference to trust?Human Communication Research, 42(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12064
29.
KlenkS.ReifegersteD.RenatusR. (2017). Gender differences in gratifications from fitness app use and implications for health interventions. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(2), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917691557
30.
KuruO.BayerJ. B.PasekJ.CampbellS. W. (2017). Understanding and measuring mobile Facebook use: Who, why, and how?Mobile Media & Communication, 5, 102–120.
31.
KushlevK.LeitaoM. R. (2020). The effects of smartphones on well-being: Theoretical integration and research agenda. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.001
32.
LaorT.RosenbergH.SteinfeldN. (2021). Oh, no, Pokémon GO! Media panic and fear of mobility in news coverage of an augmented reality phenomenon. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211052227
33.
LemishD.EliasN.FloegelD. (2019). “Look at me!” Parental use of mobile phones at the playground. Mobile Media & Communication, 8(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157919846916
34.
LinT. T. C.YounboJ.SimC. (2014). Towards an understanding of intention to use mobile videos: Impression management, perceived facilitation, and social norms. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(1), 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157914555426
35.
LiuP. L.YeoT. E. D. (2021). Weak ties matter: Social network dynamics of mobile media multiplexity and their impact on the social support and psychological well-being experienced by migrant workers. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211001106
36.
LiuX.LiuX.WeiR. (2014). Maintaining social connectedness in a fast-changing world: Examining the effects of mobile phone uses on loneliness among teens in Tibet. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(3), 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157914535390
37.
Lopez-GonzalezH.Jiménez-MurciaS.GriffithsM. D. (2020). The erosion of nongambling spheres by smartphone gambling: A qualitative study on workplace and domestic disordered gambling. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920952127
38.
MascheroniG.VincentJ. (2016). Perpetual contact as a communicative affordance: Opportunities, constraints, and emotions. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(3), 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916639347
39.
MeierA. (2021). Studying problems, not problematic usage: Do mobile checking habits increase procrastination and decrease well-being?Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 272–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211029326
40.
MelumadS.InmanJ. J.PhamM. T. (2019). Selectively emotional: How smartphone use changes user-generated content. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243718815429
41.
MelumadS.PhamM. T. (2020). The smartphone as a pacifying technology. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa005
42.
MüllerS. R.BayerJ. B.RossM. Q.MountJ.StachlC.HarariG. M.ChangY.-J.LeH. T. K. (2022). Analyzing GPS Data for Psychological Research: A Tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 5(2), 25152459221082680.
43.
OhJ.KangH. (2020). User engagement with smart wearables: Four defining factors and a process model. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 314–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920958440
44.
PanekE. T.BayerJ. B.Dal CinS.CampbellS. W. (2015). Automaticity, mindfulness, and self-control as predictors of dangerous texting behavior. Mobile Media and Communication, 3(3), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157915576046
45.
PilaS.LauricellaA. R.WartellaE. (2018). Using short message (SMS) and multimedia messaging (MMS) to encourage positive parent–child engagement around literacy and language development. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918812224
46.
PoelsK.RudnickiK.VandeboschH. (2022). The media psychology of boredom and mobile media use: Theoretical and methodological innovations. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 34(2), 113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000340
47.
RadtkeT.ApelT.SchenkelK.KellerJ.von LindernE. (2021). Digital detox: An effective solution in the smartphone era? A systematic literature review. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 190–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211028647
48.
RanziniG.LutzC. (2016). Love at first swipe? Explaining Tinder self-presentation and motives. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916664559
49.
RaoN.LingamL. (2020). Smartphones, youth and moral panics: Exploring print and online media narratives in India. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(1), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920922262
50.
ReichowD.FriemelT. N. (2019). Mobile communication, social presence, and perceived security on public transport. Mobile Media & Communication, 8(2), 268–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157919878759
51.
RiegerD.HefnerD.VordererP. (2017). Mobile recovery? The impact of smartphone use on recovery experiences in waiting situations. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917691556
52.
RosenbergH.Vogelman-NatanK. (2021). The (other) two percent also matter: The construction of mobile phone refusers. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211033885
53.
RossM. Q.BayerJ. B. (2021). Explicating self-phones: Dimensions and correlates of smartphone self-extension. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(3), 488–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920980508
54.
RossM. Q.CampbellS. W. (2021). Thinking and feeling through mobile media and communication: A review of cognitive and affective implications. Review of Communication Research, 9, 147–166.
55.
RozgonjukD.PruunsildP.JürimäeK.SchwarzR.-J.AruJ. (2020). Instagram use frequency is associated with problematic smartphone use, but not with depression and anxiety symptom severity. Mobile Media & Communication, 8(3), 400–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920910190
56.
SauerV. J.EimlerS. C.MaafiS.PietrekM.KrämerN. C. (2015). The phantom in my pocket: Determinants of phantom phone sensations. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(3), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157914562656
57.
SchneiderF. M.LutzS.HalfmannA.MeierA.ReineckeL. (2021). How and when do mobile media demands impact well-being? Explicating the Integrative Model of Mobile Media Use and Need Experiences (IM3UNE). Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211054928
58.
SewallC. J. R.BearT. M.MerrankoJ.RosenD. (2020). How psychosocial well-being and usage amount predict inaccuracies in retrospective estimates of digital technology use. Mobile Media & Communication, 8(3), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920902830
59.
StevicA.KobanK.BinderA.MatthesJ. (2021). You are not alone: Smartphone use, friendship satisfaction, and anxiety during the COVID-19 crisis. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 294–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211051820
60.
ThorsonE.ShoenbergerH.KaraliovaT.KimE. (Anna)FidlerR. (2015). News use of mobile media: A contingency model. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(2), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157914557692
61.
ValasekC. J. (2021). Disciplining the Akratic user: Constructing digital (un)wellness. Mobile Media and Communication, 10(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211038796
62.
Vanden AbeeleM. M. P.NguyenM. H. (2022). Digital well-being in an age of mobile connectivity: An introduction to the Special Issue. Mobile Media and Communication, 10(2), 174–189.
63.
WangK.ScherrS. (2021). Dance the night away: How automatic TikTok use creates pre-sleep cognitive arousal and daytime fatigue. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211056116
64.
WeiR.FanJ.LiuJ. (in press). Mobile communication research in 15 top-tier journals, 2006–2020: An updated review of trends, advances, and characteristics. Mobile Media & Communication, https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221110324
65.
WilmerH. H.ShermanL. E.CheinJ. M. (2017). Smartphones and cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00605
66.
YeoT. E. D.FungT. H. (2017). “Mr Right Now”: Temporality of relationship formation on gay mobile dating apps. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917718601
67.
ZhongL.HuangV.GuoS. (2022). Mobile phone paradox: A two-path model connecting mobile phone use and feeling of loneliness for Filipino domestic workers in Hong Kong. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(3),448–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221077525