Integrating digital divide and diffusion of innovations approaches, this study analyzes individual-level and market-level influences on the 8-year cumulative adoption of the mobile phone in one developing country. Considering each year separately, as tests of the typical digital divide model, age, education, economic condition, Internet access, and household size were significant divides in all years; employment, marital status, and urbanness were so only in about half the years, and sex in none of the years. However, a diffusion of innovations approach revealed some differences in demographic influences on mobile phone adoption across three adoption categories. Changing mobile phone market conditions were associated with varying adoption levels, and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita correlated with percent adoption except during the global economic crisis.
AdhiarnaN.HwangY.-M.RhoJ.-J. (2011). A two-dimensional framework for RFID adoption and diffusion: Strategic implications for developing countries. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(2), 189–202.
2.
AllenD. (1988). New telecommunications services: Network externalities and critical mass. Telecommunications Policy, 12(3), 257–271. doi:10.1016/0308-5961(88)90024-9
3.
AnnafariM. T.AxelssonA.-S.BohlinE. (2013). A socio-economic exploration of mobile phone service have-nots in Sweden. New Media & Society, 16(3), 415–433. doi:10.1177/1461444813487954
4.
BeiseM. (2004). Lead markets: Country-specific drivers of the global diffusion of innovations. Research Policy, 33, 997–1018. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.03.003
5.
BuckleyC. (1998). Rural/urban differentials in demographic processes: The Central Asian states. Population Research and Policy Review, 17, 71–89. doi:10.1023/A:1005899920710
6.
BurrellJ. (2010). Evaluating shared access: Social equality and the circulation of mobile phones in rural Uganda. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 230–250. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01518.x
7.
CastellsM.Fernandez-ArdevolM.QiuJ. L.SeyA. (2007). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
8.
Caucasus Research Resource Centers. (n.d.) Caucasus barometer. Retrieved from http://www.crrccenters.org
9.
CossmanR. E.CossmanJ. S.CosbyA. G.ReavisR. M. (2008). Reconsidering the rural–urban continuum in rural health research. Population Research and Policy Review, 27(4), 459–476. doi:10.1007/s11113-008-9069-6
10.
DonnerJ. (2008). Research approaches to mobile use in the developing world: A review of the literature. The Information Society, 24(3), 140–159. doi:10.1080/01972240802019970
11.
DonnerJ. (2015). After access: Inclusion, global development, and a more mobile Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
DuncombeR. A. (2014). Understanding the impact of mobile phones on livelihoods in developing countries. Development Policy Review, 32(5), 567–588. doi:10.1111/dpr.12073
GonzalesA. L. (2014). Health benefits and barriers to cell phone use in low-income urban U.S. neighborhoods: Indications of technology maintenance. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(3), 233–248. doi:10.1177/2050157914530297
15.
GrigorianD. A.MelkonyanT. A. (2011). Destined to receive: The impact of remittances on household decisions in Armenia. Review of Development Economics, 15(1), 139–153. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9361.2010.00598.x
16.
HargittaiE.HsiehY. P. (2013). Digital inequality. In DuttonW. H. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Internet studies (pp. 129–150). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
HelsperE. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403–426. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x
HilbertM. (2011). The end justifies the definition: The manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making. Telecommunications Policy, 35, 715–736. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2011.06.012
JamesF. (2009). Leapfrogging in mobile telephony: A measure for comparing country performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(7), 991–998. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.09.002
23.
KandiyotiD. (1999). Poverty in transition: An ethnographic critique of household surveys in post-Soviet Central Asia. Development and Change, 30(3), 499–524. doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00127
24.
KatzJ. E.RiceR. E. (2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
LeeJ. H.KimJ. (2014). Socio-demographic gaps in mobile use, causes, and consequences: A multi-group analysis of the mobile divide model. Information, Communication & Society, 17(8), 917–936. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.860182
26.
LooB. P. Y.NganY. L. (2012). Developing mobile telecommunications to narrow digital divide in developing countries? Some lessons from China. Telecommunications Policy, 36(10–11), 888–900. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2012.07.015
27.
MarsdenG. (2007). What is the mobile Internet?Interactions, 14, 24–25. doi:10.1145/1300655.1300672
28.
MooreG. A. (2002). Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling disruptive products to mainstream customers. New York, NY: Collins Business Essentials.
29.
NapoliP. M.ObarJ. A. (2014). The emerging mobile Internet underclass: A critique of mobile Internet access. The Information Society, 39(5), 323–334. doi:10.1080/01972243.2014.944726
30.
NeumayerC.StaldG. (2014). The mobile phone in street protest: Texting, tweeting, tracking, and tracing. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(2), 117–133. doi:10.1177/2050157913513255
31.
NishidaT.PickJ. B.SarkarA. (2014). Japan’s prefectural digital divide: A multivariate and spatial analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 38(11), 992–1010. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2014.05.004
32.
PearceK. E. (2013). Phoning it in: Theory in mobile media and communication in developing countries. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 76–82. doi:10.1177/2050157912459182
33.
PearceK. E.RiceR. E. (2013). Digital divides from access to activities: Comparing mobile and PC Internet users. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 721–744. doi:10.1111/jcom.12045
34.
PearceK. E.RiceR. E. (2014). The language divide—The persistence of English proficiency as a gateway to the Internet: The cases of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2834–2859.
35.
PedersenP. E.LingR. (2003). Modifying adoption research for mobile Internet service adoption: Cross-disciplinary interactions. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=821477
36.
RiceR. E. (2009). Diffusion of innovations: Theoretical extensions. In NabiR.OliverM. B. (Eds.), Handbook of media effects (pp. 489–503). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
RiceR. E.HagenI. (2010). Young adults’ perpetual contact, social connection, and social control through the Internet and mobile phones. In SalmonC. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 34 (pp. 2–39). London, UK: Routledge.
38.
RiceR. E.KatzJ. E. (2003). Comparing Internet and mobile phone usage: Digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts. Telecommunications Policy, 27, 597–623. doi:10.1016/S0308-5961(03)00068-5
39.
RingenS. (1988). Direct and indirect measures of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 17(2), 351–365. doi:10.1017/S0047279400016858
40.
RogersE. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
41.
RouvinenP. (2006). Diffusion of digital mobile telephony: Are developing countries different?Telecommunications Policy, 30, 46–63. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2005.06.014
42.
StumpR. L.GongW.LiZ. (2008). Exploring the digital divide in mobile-phone adoption levels across countries: Do population socioeconomic traits operate in the same manner as their individual-level demographic counterparts?Journal of Macromarketing, 28(4), 397–412. doi:10.1177/0276146708325386
43.
ToyamaK. (2010). Human–computer interaction and global development. Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction, 4(1), 1–79. doi:10.1561/1100000021
Van DeursenA.van DijkJ. A. G. M. (2013). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526. doi:10.1177/1461444813487959
46.
Van DeursenA.van DijkJ. A. G. M. (2014). Modeling traditional literacy, Internet skills and Internet usage: An empirical study. Interacting with Computers. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/iwc/iwu027
47.
van DijkJ. A. G. M. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
VelgheF. (2014). “I wanna go in the phone”: Literacy acquisition, informal learning processes, “voice” and mobile phone appropriation in a South African township. Ethnography and Education, 9(1), 111–126. doi:10.1080/17457823.2013.836456
49.
VishwanathA.GoldhaberG. M. (2003). An examination of the factors contributing to adoption decisions among late-diffused technology products. New Media & Society, 5(4), 547–572. doi:10.1177/146144480354005
50.
WarehamJ.LevyA.ShiW. (2004). Wireless diffusion and mobile computing: Implications for the digital divide. Telecommunications Policy, 28(5–6), 438–467. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2003.11.005
51.
WeiR. (2001). From luxury to utility: A longitudinal analysis of cell phone laggards. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(4), 702–719. doi:10.1177/107769900107800406
YamakawaP.ReesG. H.SalaJ. M.AlvaN. (2013). The diffusion of mobile telephones: An empirical analysis for Peru. Telecommunications Policy, 27, 594–606. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2012.12.010
