Gender differences exist in both general and specific uses of information and communication technologies (ICTs). Most of this research has focused on computers and the internet to the exclusion of mobile phones. Little research has examined gender differences in specific types of mobile phone usage, especially among youth. This issue is examined using data from a random sample of middle-school students. Although gender differences exist at the bivariate level, the picture changes in multivariate models. Boys exhibited greater frequency of use for non-social, gadget-like features of mobile phones; no gender differences existed in more traditional communicative mobile phone uses.
American Association of University Women Educational Foundation (2000) Tech-Savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
2.
Bain, C. and M. Rice ( 2006) ‘The Influence of Gender on Attitudes, Perceptions and Uses of Technology’, Journal of Research on Technology in Education39(2): 119-32.
3.
Berenson, S., M. Vouk, J. Michael, P. Greenspon and A. Person ( 2004) ‘Women and Information Technology: A Seven Year Longitudinal Study of Young Women from Middle Grades into College’, URL (consulted December 2006): http://research.csc.ncsu.edu/ontrack/Documents/Berenson04AERAPoster.ppt
4.
Boneva, B. ( 2001) ‘Using E-mail for Personal Relationships: The Difference Gender Makes’, American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 530-49.
5.
Brodie, M., R.E. Flournoy, D.E. Altman, R.J. Blendon, J.M. Benson and M.D. Rosenbaum ( 2000) ‘Health Information, the Internet and the Digital Divide’, Health Affairs19(6): 255-65.
6.
Broos, A. ( 2005) ‘Gender and Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Anxiety: Male Self-assurance and Female Hesitation’, Cyberpsychology & Behavior8(1): 21-31.
7.
Campbell, M. ( 2005) ‘The Impact of the Mobile Phone on Young People’s Social Life’, paper presented at the Social Change in the 21st Century Conference, Queensland University of Technology, 28 October.
8.
Campbell, S. ( 2007) ‘A Cross-cultural Comparison of Perceptions and Uses of Mobile Telephony’, New Media & Society9(2): 343-63.
9.
Cassell, J. and H. Jenkins ( 1998) From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and Computer Games . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Charles, M. and K. Bradley ( 2006) ‘A Matter of Degree: Female Underrepresentation in Computer Science Programs Cross-nationally’, in J. Cohoon and W. Aspray (eds) Women and Information Technology, pp. 183-204. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
11.
Cockburn, C. and S. Ormrod ( 1993) Gender and Technology in the Making. London: Sage.
12.
Cooper, J. ( 2006) ‘The Digital Divide: The Special Case of Gender’ , Journal of Computer Assisted Learning22(5): 320-34.
13.
Creamer, E.G., C.J. Burger and P.S. Meszaros ( 2004) ‘Characteristics of High School and College Women Interested in Information Technology’, Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering10(1): 67-78.
14.
Davie, R., C. Panting and T. Charlton ( 2004) ‘Mobile Phone Ownership and Usage among Pre-adolescents’ , Telematics and Informatics21(4): 359-73.
15.
Davison, E. and S.R. Cotten ( 2003) ‘Connection Discrepancies: Unmasking Further Layers of the Digital Divide’, First Monday8(3), URL (consulted 10 November 2007): http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/issue/view/155
16.
Durndell, A., P. Glissov and G. Siann ( 1995) ‘Gender and Computing: Persisting Differences’ , Educational Research37(3): 219-27.
17.
Eccles, J. ( 2005) ‘Studying Gender and Ethnic Differences in Participation in Math, Physical Science and Information Technology’, New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development110: 7-14.
18.
Fallows, D. ( 2005) ‘How Women and Men Use the Internet.’Pew Internet & American Life Project, URL (consulted 10 November 2007): http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2005/How-Women-and-Men-Use-the-Internet.aspx
19.
Faulkner, W. ( 2001) ‘The Technology Question in Feminism’, Women’s Studies International Forum24(1): 79-95.
20.
Fisher, C.S. ( 1992) America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
Freeman, C.E. ( 2004) Trends in Educational Equity of Girls and Women: 2004, No. NCES 2005-016. Washington, DC: National Center of Education Statistics, US Department of Education.
22.
French, S. and H. Richardson ( 2005) ‘Opting Out? Women and On-line Learning’’ , ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society34(5): 2-2, URL (consulted 7 December 2007): http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1111648
23.
Gupta, U.G. and L.E. Houtz ( 2000) ‘High School Students’ Perceptions of Information and Technology Skills and Careers’, Journal of Industrial Technology16(4): 2-8.
24.
Gurer, D. and T. Camp ( 2002) ‘An ACM-W Literature Review on Women in Computing’ , ACM SIGCSE Bulletin34(2): 121-7.
25.
Haddon, L.G. ( 2000) ‘Social Exclusion and Information and Communication Technologies: Lessons from Studies of Single Parents and the Young Elderly’ , New Media & Society2(4): 387-406.
26.
Hargittai, E. ( 2007) ‘Digital Na(t)ives: Skill and Internet Use’ , paper presented at the Berkman Center Luncheon Series, Cambridge, MA, 10 October.
27.
Hargittai, E. and S. Shafer ( 2006) ‘Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender’, Social Science Quarterly87(2): 432-48.
28.
Henwood, F. ( 1993) ‘Establishing Gender Perspectives on Information Technology: Problems, Issues and Opportunities’, in E. Green, J. Owen and D. Pain (eds) Gendered by Design? Information Technology and Office Systems, pp. 31-49. Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.
29.
Hou, W., M. Kaur, A. Komlodi, W.G. Lutters, L. Boot, S. Cotten, C. Morrell, A. Ozok and Z. Tufekci ( 2006) ‘"Girls Don’t Waste Time": Pre-adolescent Attitudes toward ICT’, in Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2006), pp. 875-80. New York: Association for Computing Machinery Press .
30.
Ito, M. ( 2004) ‘Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Lessons from Japanese Mobile Phone Use’, paper presented at Mobile Communication and Social Change: 2004 International Conference on Mobile Communications , Seoul, 18-19 October.
31.
Ito, M. ( 2005) ‘Mobile Phones, Japanese Youth and the Re-placement of Social Contact’, in R. Ling and P. Pedersen (eds) Mobile Communications: Re-negotiation of the Social Sphere, pp. 131-48. London: Springer.
32.
Kaiser Family Foundation (1999) ‘Kids & Media @ the New Millennium’, URL (consulted December 2006): http://www.kff.org/entmedia/1535-index.cfm
33.
Kelan, E.K. ( 2007) ‘Tools and Toys: Communicating Gendered Positions towards Technology’, Information, Communication & Society10(3): 358-83.
34.
Kim, J.S. and G.L. Sunderman ( 2005) ‘Measuring Academic Proficiency under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for Educational Equity’, Educational Researcher34(8): 3-13.
35.
King, J., T. Bond and S. Blandford ( 2002) ‘An Investigation of Computer Anxiety by Gender and Grade’, Computers in Human Behavior18(1): 69-84.
36.
Lenhart, A. ( 2007) ‘A Timeline of Teens and Technology’, paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 16 August.
37.
Lenhart, A. and M. Madden ( 2005) ‘Teen Content Creators and Consumers’, Pew Internet & American Life Project, URL (consulted 28 January 2008): http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_ContentCreation.pdf
38.
Lenhart, A., M. Madden and P. Hitlin ( 2005) Teens and Technology. Washington, DC : Pew Internet & American Life Project.
39.
Lenhart, A., S. Arafeh, A. Smith and A. Macgill ( 2008a) ‘Writing, Technology and Teens’, Pew Internet & American Life Project, URL (consulted 25 June 2009): http:// www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2008/Writing-Technology-and-Teens.aspx
40.
Lenhart, A., J. Kahne, E. Middaugh, A. Macgill, C. Evans and J. Vitak ( 2008b) ‘Teens, Video Games, and Civics’, Pew Internet & American Life Project, URL (consulted 25 June 2009): http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2008/PIP_Teens_ Games_and_Civics_Report_FINAL.pdf
41.
Lent, R., S. Brown and G. Hackett ( 1994) ‘Toward a Unified Social Cognitive Theory of Career Academic Interest, Choice and Performance’, Journal of Vocational Behavior45(1): 79-122.
42.
Ling, R. ( 2000) ‘"We Will Be Reached": The Use of Mobile Telephony among Norwegian Youth’, Information Technology and People13(2): 102-20.
43.
Ling, R. ( 2001) ‘"We Release Them Little by Little": Maturation and Gender Identity as Seen in the Use of Mobile Telephony’, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing5(2): 123-36.
44.
Ling, R. and L. Haddon ( 2001) ‘Mobile Telephony, Mobility and the Coordination of Everyday Life’, paper presented at the Machines That Become Us Conference, Rutgers University , 18-19 April.
45.
Ling, R. and P. Helmersen ( 2000) ‘"It Must be Necessary, it Has to Cover a Need": The Adoption of Mobile Telephony among Pre-adolescents and Adolescents’ , paper presented at the Conference on the Social Consequences of Mobile Telephony, Oslo, 16 June.
46.
Livingstone, S. and E. Helsper ( 2007) ‘Gradations in Digital Inclusion: Children, Young People and the Digital Divide’, New Media & Society9(4): 671-96.
47.
Margolis, J. and A. Fisher ( 2002) Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
Miller, L.M., H. Schweingruber and C.L. Brandenburg ( 2001) ‘Middle School Students’ Technology Practices and Preferences: Re-examining Gender Differences’, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia10(2): 125-40.
49.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) (2002) A Nation Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration, US Department of Commerce.
50.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) (2004) A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Age. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration, US Department of Commerce.
51.
Puma, M.J., C. Jones, D. Rock and R. Fernandez ( 1993) ‘Prospects: The Congressionally Mandated Study of Educational Growth and Opportunity’, US Department of Education, URL (consulted 8 September 2008): http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED361466&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED361466
52.
Rees, H. and J.M. Noyes ( 2007) ‘Mobile Telephones, Computers and the Internet: Sex Differences in Adolescents’ Use and Attitudes’, Cyberpsychology & Behavior10(3): 482-4.
53.
Rice, R.E. and J.E. Katz ( 2003) ‘Digital Divides of the Internet and Mobile Phone’ , in J.E. Katz (ed.) Machines that Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology , pp. 91-104. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
54.
Robbins, K.A. and M.A. Turner ( 2002) ‘United States: Popular, Pragmatic and Problematic’ , in J.E. Katz and M.A. Aakhus (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance, pp. 80-93. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
55.
Roberts, D.F., U.G. Foehr and V.J. Rideout ( 2005) ‘Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8-18 year-olds’ , Kaiser Family Foundation, URL (consulted 6 June 2007): http:// www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/Generation-M-Media-in-the-Lives-of-8-18-Yearolds-Report.pdf
56.
Salaway, G., J.B. Caruso and M.R. Nelson ( 2007) ‘The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2007’, EDUCAUSECenter for Applied Research , URL (consulted 12 October 2007): http://connect.educause.edu/library/abstract/TheECARStudyofUnderg/45075
57.
Schumacher, P. and J. Morahan-Martin ( 2001) ‘Gender, Internet and Computer Attitudes and Experiences’ , Computers in Human Behavior17(1): 95-110.
58.
Selian, A.N. and L. Srivastava ( 2004). ‘Mobile Phones and Youth: A Look at the US Student Market’, paper presented at the ITU/MIC Workshop, ‘Shaping the Future Mobile Information Society’, Seoul, 4-5 March.
59.
Selwyn, N. ( 2007) ‘Hi-tech = Guy-tech? An Exploration of Undergraduate Students’ Gendered Perceptions of Information and Communication Technologies’ , Sex Roles56(7): 525-36.
60.
Shaw, L.H. and L.M. Gant ( 2002) ‘Users Divided? Exploring the Gender Gap in Internet Use’, Cyberpsychology & Behavior5(6): 517-27.
61.
Skelton, F. ( 1989) ‘Teenagers and the Telephone’, Australian Journal of Communications15: 21-4.
62.
Smoreda, Z. and C. Licoppe ( 2000) ‘Gender-specific Use of the Domestic Telephone’ , Social Psychology Quarterly63(3): 238-52.
63.
Sutton, R. ( 1991) ‘Equity and Computers in the Schools: A Decade of Research’, Review of Educational Research61(4): 475-503.
64.
Turkle, S. ( 1988) ‘Computational Reticence: Why Women Fear the Intimate Machine’, in C. Kramarae (ed.) Technology and Women’s Voices, pp. 41-61. London: Routledge.
65.
Venkatesh, V. and M.G. Morris ( 2000) ‘Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior’, Management Information Systems Quarterly24(1): 115-39.
66.
Volman, M. and E.V. Eck ( 2001) ‘Gender Equity and Information Technology in Education: The Second Decade’, Review of Educational Research71(4): 613-34.
