The Martini Effect refers to being constantly connected to people through mobile devices; research into mobile phone use reports that its use may be related to feelings of connectedness. Social Networking Sites (SNSs) are becoming increasingly popular among early adolescents with the majority using them to stay in contact with existing friends. In addition, many adolescents use a range of mobile devices to access these sites. The present study compared feelings of belonging to the friendship group between SNS users who used a mobile device and those who did not. A self-report questionnaire was completed by 337 early adolescent SNS users (11–13 years, mean age = 12.28 years, SD = 0.73). Mobile device users were found to have significantly higher levels of belonging than non-mobile device users and this relationship was partially mediated by the frequency of use of SNSs. It is suggested that these mobile devices not only afford an opportunity for increased use of SNSs and therefore increased interaction with friends but that mobile device SNS users feel constantly connected to their friends.
Anderson-ButcherD.ConroyD. E. (2002). Factorial and criterion validity of scores of a measure of belonging in youth development programs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(5), 857–876. doi: 10.1177/001316402236882
2.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong – desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human-motiovation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
3.
BlairB. L.FletcherA. C. (2011). “The Only 13-Year-Old on Planet Earth Without a Cell Phone”: Meanings of cell phones in early adolescents’ everyday lives. Journal of Adolescent Research, 26(2), 155–177. doi: 10.1177/0743558410371127
4.
BornholtL. J. (2000). Social and personal aspects of self knowledge: A balance of individuality and belonging. Learning and Instruction, 10(5), 415–429.
5.
BrennanM. (2006). Understanding online social network services and risks to youth. London: Child Exploitation and Online Protection (CEOP) Centre.
6.
BrownB. B. (1990). Peer groups and peer culture. In FeldmanS. S.ElliottG. R. (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 171–196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BussA. H.PlominR. (1984). Temperament: Early developing personality traits. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
CastellsM.Fernandez-ArdevolM.QiuJ. L.SeyA. (2007). Mobile communication and society. London, UK: MIT Press.
9.
CharltonT.PantingC.HannanA. (2002). Mobile telephone ownership and usage among 10 and 11 year olds. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 7(3), 152–163.
10.
ClarkeB. (2009). Friends forever: How young adolescents use social-networking sites. Ieee Intelligent Systems, 24(6), 22–26.
11.
CollinsW. A.RepinskiD. J. (1994). Continuity and change in interpersonal perspective. In AdamsG. R.GullottaT. P. (Eds.), Personal relationships during adolescence (pp. 7–36). London: Sage Publications.
12.
DavieR.PantingC.CharltonT. (2004). Mobile phone ownership and usage among preadolescents. Telematics and Informatics, 21(4), 359–373.
FiskeS. (2010). Social beings: Core motives in social psychology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
HallimanM. T. (1995). Patterns of cliquing among youth. In FootH. C.ChapmanA. J.SmithJ. R. (Eds.), Friendship and social relations in children (pp. 321–342). Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
16.
HowellD. C. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
17.
KrautR.KieslerS.BonevaB.CummingsJ.HelgesonV.CrawfordA. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49–74. doi: 10.1111/1540–4560.00248
18.
KrogerJ. (2000). Identity development. Adolescence through adulthood. London, UK: Sage.
19.
LearyM.KellyK. M.CottrellC. A.SchreindorferL. S. (2007). Individual differences in the need to belong: Mapping the nomological network. Unpublished manuscript, Duke University.
20.
LearyM. R.KellyK. M. (2009). Belonging motivation. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behaviour. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
21.
LingR. (2004). The mobile connection. The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
22.
LivingstoneS.BrakeD. R. (2010). On the rapid rise of social networking sites: New findings and policy implications. Children & Society, 24(1), 75–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1099–0860.2009.00243.x
23.
LivingstoneS.HaddonL.GorzigA.OlafssonK. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Full findings. LSE, London, UK: EU Kids Online.
24.
LivingstoneS.OlafssonK.StaksrudE. (2011). Social networking, age and privacy. London, UK: EU Kids Online.
ParkeR. D.SlabyR. G. (1983). The development of aggression. In MussenP. H. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. socialization, personality and social development (Vol. IV). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
27.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS pocedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36(4), 717–731.
28.
QuinnS.OldmeadowJ.A. (2012). Is the iGeneration a ‘we’ generation? Social Networking use among 9–13 year olds and belonging. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. DOI: 10.1111/bjdp.12007.
29.
ReichS. M. (2010). Adolescents’ sense of community on MySpace and Facebook: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(6), 688–705. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20389
30.
SchneiderB. H. (2000). Friends and enemies. Peer relations in childhood. London, UK: Arnold Publishers.
31.
SkierkowskiD.WoodR. M. (2012). To text or not to text? The importance of text messaging among college-aged youth. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 744–756. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.023
32.
SmithA.WilliamsK. D. (2004). R U there? Ostracism by cell phone text messages. Group Dynamics –Theory Research and Practice, 8(4), 291–301. doi: 10.1037/1089–2699.8.4.291
33.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267–277. doi: 10.1037/0012–1649.43.2.267
34.
ValkenburgP. M.SumterS. R.PeterJ. (2011). Gender differences in online and offline self-disclosure in pre-adolescence and adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 253–269. doi: 10.1348/2044–835x.002001
35.
WalshS. P.WhiteK. M.YoungR. M. (2008). Over-connected? A qualitative exploration of the relationship between Australian youth and their mobile phones. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 77–92. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.04.004
36.
WalshS. P.WhiteK. M.YoungR. M. (2009). The phone connection: A qualitative exploration of how belongingness and social identification relate to mobile phone use amongst Australian youth. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(3), 225–240. doi: 10.1002/casp.983
37.
WalshS. P.WhiteK. M.YoungR. M. (2010). Needing to connect: The effect of self and others on young people’s involvement with their mobile phones. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 194–203. doi: Pii 92910872310.1080/00049530903567229
38.
WeiR.LoV. (2006). Staying connected while on the move: Cell phone use and social connectedness. New Media and Society, 8(1), 53–72.
