Editor’s Choice-Acute versus subacute angiography in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Abstract

Background:

The 2015 European Society of Cardiology non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) guidelines recommend angiography within 24 h in high-risk patients with NSTEMI. An organized STEMI-like approach with pre-hospital or immediate in-hospital triage for acute coronary angiography (CAG) may be of therapeutic benefit but it remains unknown whether the patients can be properly diagnosed in the pre-hospital setting. We aim to evaluate whether it is feasible to diagnose patients with NSTEMI in the pre-hospital phase or immediately upon admission.

Methods and results:

We randomized 250 patients to either acute or subacute CAG (i.e. <72 h of admission). Pre-hospital electrocardiogram acquisition and point-of-care troponin-T measurement ensured that 148 (59%) patients were identified already in the ambulance, whereas the remaining 102 (41%) patients were identified immediately after hospital admission. An acute coronary syndrome was verified in 215 (86%) and NSTEMI in 159 (64%) patients. The CAG rate was significantly higher in the acute CAG group (98% vs. 87%, p<0.001). A culprit lesion was identified in 74% and 64% of the patients underwent coronary revascularization: acute CAG group: 53% percutaneous coronary intervention, 5% hybrid, 7% coronary artery bypass grafting; conventional treatment: 48% percutaneous coronary intervention, 2% hybrid, 14% coronary artery bypass grafting, p=0.32. In patients randomized to acute CAG, time from randomization to CAG was 1.1 h; in patients randomized to subacute CAG it was two days. Time from randomization to initial revascularization was 1.3 h versus 2.4 days, and the median hospital stay was 4.0 days versus 4.5 days. Among patients randomized to subacute CAG, 17% crossed over to acute CAG and 5% developed STEMI before catheterization.

Conclusion:

Diagnosing NSTEMI patients in the pre-hospital phase or immediately upon hospital admission is feasible. Acute CAG may impact the mode of revascularization and is associated with earlier revascularization and shorter hospital stay. The clinical benefit of acute CAG in NSTEMI patients remains to be clarified.

Keywords

Non-ST-segment myocardial infarction troponin T ambulances early diagnosis telemedicine point-of-care systems

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Roffi

Patrono

Collet

J-P

et al . 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. Epub ahead of print 7 March 2016. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320.

Hamm

Bassand

Agewall

et al . ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2999–3054.

Navarese

Gurbel

Andreotti

et al . Optimal timing of coronary invasive strategy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158: 261–270.

Katritsis

Siontis

Kastrati

et al . Optimal timing of coronary angiography and potential intervention in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 32–40.

Sørensen

Terkelsen

Stengaard

et al . Prehospital troponin T testing in the diagnosis and triage of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 1436–1440.

Stengaard

Sorensen

Ladefoged

et al . Quantitative point-of-care troponin T measurement for diagnosis and prognosis in patients with a suspected acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2013; 112: 1361–1366.

Bertsch

Chapelle

Dempfle

et al . Multicentre analytical evaluation of a new point-of-care system for the determination of cardiac and thromboembolic markers. Clin Lab 2010; 56: 37–49.

Thygesen

Alpert

Jaffe

et al . Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2551–2567.

Thygesen

Mair

Giannitsis

et al . How to use high-sensitivity cardiac troponins in acute cardiac care. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2252–2257.

10.

Mehta

Granger

Boden

et al . Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2165–2175.

11.

Thiele

Rach

Klein

et al . Optimal timing of invasive angiography in stable non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: The Leipzig Immediate versus early and late PercutaneouS coronary Intervention triAl in NSTEMI (LIPSIA-NSTEMI Trial). Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2035–2043.

12.

Neumann

Kastrati

Pogatsa-Murray

et al . Evaluation of prolonged antithrombotic pretreatment (“cooling-off” strategy) before intervention in patients with unstable coronary syndromes: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 290: 1593–1599.

13.

Montalescot

Cayla

Collet

et al . Immediate vs delayed intervention for acute coronary syndromes: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2009; 302: 947–954.

14.

Windecker

Kolh

Alfonso

et al . 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2541–2619.

Editor’s Choice-Acute versus subacute angiography in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction – the NONSTEMI trial phase I