Abstract
Increasing evidence indicates that remarkable differences in cardiovascular risk between ethnic groups cannot be fully explained by traditional risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes or dislipidemia measured in midlife. Therefore, the underlying pathophysiology leading to this “excess risk” in ethnic minority groups is still poorly understood, and one way to address this issue is to shift the focus from “risk” to examine target organs, particularly blood vessels and their arterial properties more directly. In fact, structural and functional changes of the vascular system may be identifiable at very early stages of life when traditional factors are not yet developed. Arterial stiffening, measured as aortic pulse wave velocity, and wave reflection parameters, especially augmentation index, seem to be an important pathophysiological mechanism for the development of cardiovascular disease and predict mortality independent of other risk factors. However, data regarding these arterial indices in ethnic minorities are relatively rare and the heterogeneity between populations, techniques and statistical methods make it difficult to fully understand their role.
Introduction
Europe’s population is undergoing a significant and rapid growth in its ethnic diversity. As an example, latest updated census data in the UK 1 showed that the White European ethnic group accounted for 86.0% of the usual resident population in England and Wales in 2011, a decrease from 91.3% in 2001 and 94.1% compared to 25 years before. Meanwhile over the last decades, ethnic minority groups (South Asian, African-Caribbean and Black African) continued to rise, and in metropolitan areas like London, proportions increased up to 40% of the total. These population data may continue to have long-term influences on health profiles, particularly ethnic differences in cardiovascular (CV) and metabolic diseases, noted over the last 40 years.
CV disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide with the burden of stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD) most relevant. Both are the major continuing, yet preventable, causes of morbidity and mortality in the Western world and are rapidly reaching or have reached epidemic proportions in modernizing countries. Stroke and CHD clearly show ethnic differences and a particular pattern of incidence between resident and migrant populations from different backgrounds; therefore, evaluation and management of CV risk have become essential globally.
Examples studied over several decades which include mortality from CHD and stroke in South Asian migrants to the UK show that it is between 50% and 100% higher than the White British population. 2 Interestingly, stroke was and is not more common in resident South Asians, but its incidence is now higher for migrants coming from that area and living in the UK. 3 At the same time, people of Black African and African Caribbean origin are still significantly protected from CHD, although mortality from stroke is even more relevant than in South Asians. 2
Higher CV risk in migrant populations is not just a British issue; similar results have occurred in different European countries like Norway, Sweden or the Netherlands. Prevalence and incidence of CVD have also long varied in the US between African-Americans, in whom hypertension and subsequent stroke are notably more frequent but where the cross-over from lower to gradually higher rates of CHD than in White Americans occurred in the mid-1960s, indicating its environmental origins. However, here our discussion is mainly restricted to European data.
Increasing evidence indicates that these remarkable differences between ethnic groups cannot be fully explained by traditional CV and metabolic risk factors, such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, central adiposity or insulin resistance, measured in midlife. 4 In fact, the underlying pathophysiology leading to this “excess risk” in ethnic minority groups is still poorly understood.
There are different rates of hypertension, type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia, among ethnic groups, with diabetes greatest in South Asians, marginally less in Black Caribbeans or (west) Africans and vice versa for hypertension, compared with White Europeans. 5 Recent emphasis that cultural and socio-economic factors might account, at least in part, for excess of both CVD itself and these risk factors is still a matter of debate. Socio-economic circumstances is an umbrella term for many lifestyle and living conditions that can be seen as risk factors per se 6 or which can contribute to marginalization and perpetuate a vicious cycle of increasing CV risk through changes in health behaviors. 7
Therefore, one way to address the issue of ethnic variability in CV risk is to shift the focus from “risk” to examine target organs, particularly blood vessels and their arterial properties more directly. Structural and functional changes of the vascular system may be identifiable at very early stages of life when traditional factors are not yet developed.
Arterial stiffness in ethnic minorities
Arterial stiffening, measured as aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), seems to be an important pathophysiological mechanism for the development of CVD. When the artery wall is stiffer, the forward pulse wave travels faster, and the arterial waves reflected from the periphery reach the heart early during systole leading to an increase in systolic blood pressure (BP), augmentation pressure and cardiac workload, whereas diastolic BP decreases resulting in reduced diastolic coronary perfusion. Furthermore, arterial stiffness contributes to increase in the transmission of pulsatile energy into smaller arteries and peripheral microcirculation, thus causing microvascular damage in parenchymal organs such as heart, kidney and the brain. 8 Nowadays, PWV is recognized as the most useful and robust index of arterial stiffness and independent predictor of vascular morbidity and mortality in the general population or in patients with hypertension, diabetes mellitus or end-stage renal disease. 9 At the same time, other arterial properties are becoming important: arterial wave reflection parameters 10 have emerged as important markers of vascular health and predict CV risk independent of conventional risk factors including BP.
Consequently, knowledge on ethnic differences in these other arterial properties may help to understand better the pathophysiology of underlying ethnic differences in CV risk. As yet, data regarding these arterial indices in ethnic minorities are relatively rare, and the heterogeneity between populations, techniques and statistical methods makes it difficult to fully understand their role.
Summary of the studies regarding arterial stiffness.
BP: blood pressure; BMI: body mass index; CV: cardiovascular.
In another later study of a middle-aged population (202 subjects, 40–64 years) in west London, carotid-femoral PWV in African-origin subjects (both Black African and African Caribbean) showed higher values compared to Europeans (12.7 m/s vs. 11.2 m/s). That difference was statistically significant after adjusting for confounding factors, particularly mean arterial pressure which was considerably higher in the African-origin groups (102 mmHg vs. 95 mmHg). 17
The US Cardiovascular Health Study 18 collected data of a longitudinal study designed to describe the relationship between aortic stiffness and CV risk factors in 356 elderly individuals. In that cohort, no ethnicity or sex effects were detected on PWV. However, the lack of correlation in this case could have been due to a survivor effect as the mean age in the cohort was 78 years; therefore, individuals with elevated values of PWV may have not survived up to that age.
Interestingly, cross-sectional data in a Dutch multi-ethnic population-based sample (more than 7000 subjects) with a wide age range (18–70 years) from HELIUS study 19 found that unadjusted PWVs in African and South Asian-origin groups were higher as compared with those of resident population (Dutch descent), but these differences largely disappeared after adjustment for conventional CV risk factors. These results support the hypothesis that early exposure to CV risk factors, including in utero, may be the main driving force for differences in arterial stiffness.
Similar conclusions can be derived by the analysis of “DASH study,” 6 which collected data on PWV in a multi-ethnic cohort of young adults (aged 21–23 years) in the UK where unadjusted values and regression models for PWVs were similar or lower in ethnic minorities than in White Europeans. At similar BPs (120 mmHg), Black Caribbean and White UK young men had similar PWV values while South Asians had lower PWVs. Fully adjusted models for gender, age, BP, ethnicity, waist–height ratio (an index of body “fat”) showed that none of the ethnic minorities increased PWVs compared to White UK. Therefore, PWV at least in early adulthood seemed not to provide additional information for evaluating CV risk. Interestingly, earlier BP had no predictive value for current PWV, which was only related to current (“distending”) BP.
That observation is still a matter of debate, however data from an older European cohort suggest that BP does not cause the progressive increase in arterial stiffening but rather vice versa, arterial wall properties modulate BP change over time. 21
Taking all these results into account, the role of arterial stiffness as “predictor” of CV risk in ethnic minorities remains largely unclear, especially after considering the role of BP.
Wave reflection in ethnic minorities
Summary of the studies regarding wave reflection parameters.
The arterial pulse wave form is the sum of the forward pressure wave and the backward wave that is reflected from the peripheral sites. AIx is calculated as the ratio of the central augmented pressure to the central pulse pressure and, because of its nature, it is a complex composite measurement influenced by age, gender, height, BP, reflectance points, and left ventricular ejection characteristics (such as heart rate and contractility). 8
In a small cohort of healthy young African-American men in the US, AIx was greater, despite comparable brachial BP, compared with White comparators. 23 Similarly, a Belgian study reported that smoking acutely increased arterial stiffness and wave reflection in Black people (mainly directly of African origin) more than in Whites. 24
However, no studies considered all confounding factors, especially anthropometric data, in their regression analysis. In another large US, multi-ethnic cohort (n = 951), average AIx values were higher for African-Americans compared to Whites (23 vs. 20%); and in regression models (in subjects without metabolic syndrome), ethnicity was an independent predictor of AIx. 25 The final model included waist circumference (as a parameter of “fat”) and not height, and this approach may lead to misleading results, because shorter individuals have a “shortened return time” for reflected waves, leading to increased central pressure augmentation. For example, another study found no significant differences in AIx between 94 East-Asian and 47 age-matched White peers after adjusting for height. 26
Conversely, in a composite of five large population-based studies from Britain, American Indian, Peruvian highlanders, South Africa and China (total > 10,000 participants), after standardized adjustment with z-scores for confounding factors (age, heart rate, BP and body size), Black South Africans had markedly higher AIx than British Whites, 27 using the same (“Sphygmocor”-based) methods. The study concluded that marked ethnic effects on AIx do exist and may contribute to the well-established ethnic differences in hypertensive organ damage. Similarly, in a wide age range (21–90 years) diabetic population in multi-ethnic Singapore, AIx was significantly higher in Indians (28.1 ± 10.8%) compared to Chinese (26.1 ± 10.7%) and Malays (25.9 ± 10.1%) while PWV showed an opposite trend. 20 Of note, in regression analysis, Indians remained associated with higher AIx after adjustment for confounding (age, gender, BMI, BP, height) which also independently predicted AIx itself. Interestingly, epidemiological data in the same area found that mortality related to CVD was higher in the Indian and Malay population compared to the Chinese one supporting the idea that wave reflection (and arterial stiffness) may contribute to differences in outcome. 29 In that sample, systolic BP was lower for Indians compared to Chinese (132.3 mmHg vs. 135.8 mmHg), stressing the concept that some ethnic differences in central hemodynamics may not be fully assessed with conventional sphygmomanometry by BP alone.
Therefore, it does seem possible that wave reflection may act as an independent contributing factor to development of organ damage like left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and that this relationship could explain higher rates of hypertensive target organ damage in some ethnic minorities (as it was found in African-Americans as above, and in African-Caribbeans in Britain). 30
In this scenario, increased central wave reflection since early adulthood in ethnic minorities groups could determine target organ damage before the onset of other well-established risk factors, particularly BP. In such context, discrepancy between the results of PWV and AIx is not surprising since AIx is not a surrogate marker of arterial stiffness. 22
There are still aspects which need further investigation. For example, AIx derived from radial applanation tonometry was independently associated with LVH in a sample of 808 subjects of Black African descent 28 only among men and not in women, suggesting the origin of gender differences need attention. In the long-term follow-up of the UK “SABRE” study above, the latter’s 3-D echo analysis showed that cardiac remodeling rather than hypertrophy per se was the main issue in prognosis. 30
Finally, it is still unclear whether AIx should be considered a genuine marker of wave reflection because both amplified Windkessel-like effects and excess (aortic) “reservoir” pressure may be additional, or even replacement, causes of these apparent wave reflections
Conclusions
To summarize, CV risk between ethnic groups varies and is unaccounted for by traditional CV or metabolic risk factors measured in midlife. Increasing evidence suggests that arterial stiffness and central hemodynamics could be important contributing risk factors especially in early stages of life when other well-established conventional risk factor, like BP fail to predict further burden of CV disease. Of note AIx, the most widely used index for wave reflection, rather than PWV, which indicates arterial stiffness, appears to provide the best additional information. However, the evidence is still very limited and mainly based on cross-sectional data with no long-term follow-up available.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical approval
None.
Guarantor
None.
Contributorship
None.
