Background: Not all segments of society might have equal access to screening. We determined predictors for regular cardiovascular health screening at baseline amongst those of low socioeconomic status (SES) and evaluated the effectiveness of a 6-month intervention on screening in this group compared to a high-SES group. Methods: The study population involved all residents aged ≥40 years in two housing estates comprising owner-occupied housing (high SES) and rental flats (low SES) in Singapore. From 2009 to 2011, residents not being screened regularly at baseline for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia were offered free and convenient blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and lipid testing over 6 months. Chi-squared and multi-level logistic regression identified predictors of regular screening at baseline; likelihood ratio and Cox regression analysis identified predictors of screening participation post intervention. Results: Participation was 78.2% (1081/1383). At baseline, in the low-SES group, 41.7% (150/360), 38.8% (177/456), and 30.8% (128/416) had gone for regular hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia screening, respectively; compared with higher numbers in the high-SES group. Sociodemographic factors predicting regular screening in the low-SES community included being married and not smoking. Post intervention, screening rates rose significantly (p < 0.001) by similar proportions in both communities. Staying in a lower-SES community (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.61, 95% CI 0.37⊟0.99, p = 0.048) and having hypertension (aRR 0.45, 95% CI 0.18⊟0.98, p = 0.049) was associated with lower take-up; Chinese ethnicity (aRR 1.84, 95% CI 1.00⊟3.43, p = 0.050) and employment associated with higher take-up (aRR 1.57, 95% CI 1.03⊟2.60, p = 0.040). Conclusion: Participation in cardiovascular health screening was poor amongst those of low SES; a 6-month intervention programme improved participation in this population.
LenfantCChobanianAVJonesDW. Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7): resetting the hypertension sails. Hypertension2003; 41(6): 1178–1179.
2.
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA2001; 285(19): 2486–2497.
3.
BorrelCRohlfsIFerrandoJ. Social inequalities in perceived health and the use of health services in a southern Europe urban area. Int J Health Serv1999; 29(4): 743–764.
4.
BroylesRWNarineLBrandtEN. Health risks, ability to pay, and use of primary care: is the distribution of service effective and equitable. Prev Med2000; 30(6): 453–462.
5.
CarrasquilloOLantiguaRASheaS. Preventive services among beneficiarı´es with supplemental coverage versus HMO enrollees, Medicaid recipients, and elders with no additional coverage. Med Care2001; 39(6): 616–626.
6.
RossJSBradleyEHBuschSH. Use of health care services by lower-income and higher-income uninsured adults. JAMA2006; 295(17): 2027–2036.
7.
KaplanGAKeilJE. Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature. Circulation1993; 88(4): 1973–1998.
8.
ClarkAMDesMeulesMLuoW. Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: risks and implications for care. Nat Rev Cardiol2009; 6(11): 712–722.
9.
RamsaySEMorrisRWWhincupPH. Prediction of coronary heart disease risk by Framingham and SCORE risk assessments varies by socioeconomic position: results from a study in British men. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2011; 18(2): 186–193.
10.
ThomasAJEberlyLEDavey SmithG. Race/ethnicity, income, major risk factors, and cardiovascular disease mortality. Am J Public Health2005; 95(8): 1417–1423.
11.
Rodríguez-ArtalejoFDíez-GañánLBasaldua ArtiñanoA. Effectiveness and equity of serum cholesterol and blood pressure testing: a population-based study in Spain. Prev Med2003; 37(2): 82–91.
12.
WilsonSERosellaLCLipscombeLL. The effectiveness and efficiency of diabetes screening in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study. BMC Public Health2010; 10(1): 506–506.
13.
BrownDWGilesWHGreenlundKJ. Disparities in cholesterol screening: falling short of a national health objective. Prev Med2001; 33(6): 517–522.
14.
Dalsgaard EM, Lauritzen T, Christiansen T, et al. Socioeconomic factors related to attendance at a Type 2 diabetes screening programme. Diabet Med 2009; 26(5): 518–525.
15.
WangPEWangTTChiuYH. Evolution of multiple disease screening in Keelung: a model for community involvement in health interventions?J Med Screen2006; 13(Suppl 1): S54–S58.
16.
SinghRBSharmaJPRastogiV. Prevalence of coronary artery disease and coronary risk factors in rural and urban populations of north India. Eur Heart J1997; 18(11): 1728–1735.
17.
MarshallTWesterbyPChenJ. The Sandwell Project: a controlled evaluation of a programme of targeted screening for prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care. BMC Public Health2008; 8(1): 73–73.
18.
LowAKGrotheKBWoffordTS. Addressing disparities in cardiovascular risk through community-based interventions. Ethn Dis2007; 17(Suppl 2): S55–S59.
19.
ZhuJDavisJTairaDA. Screening rates and characteristics of health plan members who respond to screening reminders. Prev Chronic Dis2006; 3(2): A56–A56.
20.
PhuaHPChuaAVMaS. Singapore’s burden of disease and injury 2004. Singapore Med J2009; 50(5): 468–478.
Ministry of Health. National Health Survey 2004, Singapore: Government of Singapore, 2005.
23.
Ministry of Health. National Health Surveillance Survey 2007, Singapore: Ministry of Health, 2009.
24.
Ministry of Health. Health Screening: Clinical practice guidelines, Singapore: Ministry of Health, 2003.
25.
Ministry of Health. Screening for Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Factors: Clinical practice guidelines, Singapore: Ministry of Health, 2011.
26.
WeeLEKohGCTohZJ. Multi-disease health screening in an urban low-income setting: a community-based study. Ann Acad Med Singapore2010; 39(10): 750–757.
27.
Department of Statistics. Press release: ‘Household income in 2009 lower than in 2008 but still higher than in earlier years’. Singapore: Government of Singapore, 2010. http://www.singstat.gov.sg/news/news/op19022010.pdf (accessed July 2011).
HeinzeGJüniP. An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses. Eur Heart J2011; 32(14): 1704–1708.
31.
AhmedAHusainALoveTE. Heart failure, chronic diuretic use, and increase in mortality and hospitalization: an observational study using propensity score methods. Eur Heart J2006; 27(12): 1431–1439.
32.
AustinPC. A critical appraisal of propensity score matching in the medical literature from 1996 to 2003. Stat Med2008; 27(12): 2037–2049.
33.
AustinPC. Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2007; 134(5): 1128–1135.
34.
AustinPC. The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies. Med Decis Making2009; 29(6): 661–677.
35.
WongLYTohMP. Understanding of diabetes mellitus and health-preventive behaviour among Singaporeans. Ann Acad Med Singapore2009; 38(6): 478–479.
36.
RossJSBernheimSMBradleyEH. Use of preventive care by the working poor in the United States. Prev Med2007; 44(3): 254–259.
37.
MetcalfPScraggRDavisP. Relationship of different measures of socioeconomic status with cardiovascular disease risk factors and lifestyle in a New Zealand workforce survey. N Z Med J2007; 120(1248): U2392–U2392.
38.
MarmotMGSmithGDStansfeldS. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet1991; 337(8754): 1387–1393.
39.
HataJDoiYNinomiyaT. Combined effects of smoking and hypercholesterolemia on the risk of stroke and coronary heart disease in Japanese: the Hisayama study. Cerebrovasc Dis2011; 31(5): 477–484.
40.
LiQHsiaJYangG. Prevalence of smoking in China in 2010. N Engl J Med2011; 364(25): 2469–2470.
41.
Ligthart SA, Richard E, van Gool WA, et al. Cardiovascular risk management in community-dwelling elderly: opportunities for prevention. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2011 (Epub ahead of print).
42.
WuYTaiESHengD. Risk factors associated with hypertension awareness, treatment, and control in a multi-ethnic Asian population. J Hypertens2009; 27(1): 190–197.
43.
EdelmanDJGaoQMoscaL. Predictors and barriers to timely medical follow-up after cardiovascular disease risk factor screening according to race/ethnicity. J Natl Med Assoc2008; 100(5): 534–539.
44.
SpadeaTBelliniSKunstA. The impact of interventions to improve attendance in female cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups: a review. Prev Med2010; 50(4): 159–164.
45.
PatelJVGunarathneALaneD. Widening access to cardiovascular healthcare: community screening among ethnic minorities in inner-city Britain - the Healthy Hearts Project. BMC Health Serv Res2007; 7(1): 192–192.
46.
BovetPGervasoniJPMkambaM. Low utilization of health care services following screening for hypertension in Dar es Salaam (Tanzania): a prospective population-based study. BMC Public Health2008; 8(1): 407–407.
47.
MendisS. Challenges for the management of hypertension in low-resource settings. Ethn Dis2003; 13(Suppl 2): S67–S70.
48.
MendisSAbegundeDOladapoO. Barriers to management of cardiovascular risk in a low-resource setting using hypertension as an entry point. J Hypertens2004; 22(1): 59–64.
49.
Schmitz R, Jordan S, Müters S, et al. Population-wide use of behavioural prevention and counselling programmes for lifestyle-related cardiovascular risk factors in Germany. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2011 (Epub ahead of print).
50.
BeauchampAPeetersATonkinA. Best practice for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease through an equity lens: a review. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2010; 17(5): 599–606.
51.
AmuzuACarsonCWattHC. Influence of area and individual lifecourse deprivation on health behaviours: findings from the British Women's Heart and Health Study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2009; 16(2): 169–173.
