Mainstream Public Relations literature concerns primarily with individuating, positive evaluation of organizations, such as relationship or reputation management. Comparatively, limited attention has been paid to the case when publics do not evaluate organizations as individual entities but based on the categories they belong or associate with, such as industry, country of origin, political orientation. In this regard, the organizational stigma perspective facilitates a more comprehensive understanding of publics’ evaluation of organizations. The case of Hong Kong real estate developers was examined from this theoretical lens. Basic and interpretative content analysis of related discussion forum and media content illustrates the coexistence of individuating and deindividuating evaluation in the light of various normative expectations. Analysis of stigma labels in circulation uncovers conditions accelerating transmission of deindividuating, negative stereotypes. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
BroomGMCaseySRitcheyJ (1997) Toward a concept and theory of organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research9(2): 83–98. DOI: 10.1207/s1532754xjprr0902_01.
ConnellyBLCertoSTIrelandRD, et al (2011) Signaling theory: a review and assessment. Journal of Management37(1): 39–67. DOI: 10.1177/0149206310388419.
9.
DeversCEDewettTMishinaY, et al (2009) A general theory of organizational stigma. Organization Science20(1): 154–171. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0367.
10.
DejordyR (2008) Just passing through: stigma, passing, and identity decoupling in the work place. Group & Organization Management33(5): 504–531. DOI: 10.1177/1059601108324879.
11.
DriskoJWMaschiT (2015) Content Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
ElsbachKDBhattacharyaCB (2001) Defining who you are by what you’re not: organizational disidentification and the national rifle association. Organization Science12(4): 393–413. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.12.4.393.10638.
13.
FombrunCShanleyM (1990) What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal33(2): 233–258. DOI: 10.2307/256324.
GoffmanE (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Penguin Books.
16.
GrougiouVDedoulisELeventisS (2016) Corporate social responsibility reporting and organizational stigma: The case of “sin” industries. Journal of Business Research69(2): 905–914. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.041.
17.
HampelCETraceyP (2017) How organizations move from stigma to legitimacy: the case of cook’s travel agency in Victorian Britain. Academy of Management Journal60(6): 2175–2207. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2015.0365.
18.
HelmsWSPattersonKDW (2014) eliciting acceptance for “illicit” organizations: the positive implications of Stigma for MMA organizations. Academy of Management Journal57(5): 1453–1484. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2012.0088.
19.
HudsonBA (2008) Against all odds: a consideration of core-stigmatized organizations. Academy of Management Review33(1): 252–266. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2008.27752775.
20.
HuangY-H (2001) OPRA: a cross-cultural, multiple-item scale for measuring organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research13(1): 61–90. DOI: 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1301_4.
21.
HungC-jF (2005) Exploring types of organization-public relationships and their implications for relationship management in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research17(4): 393–426. DOI: 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1704_4.
22.
KitsuseJI (1962) Societal reaction to deviant behavior: problems of theory and method. Social Problems9(3): 247–256. DOI: 10.2307/799235.
23.
KulikCTBainbridgeHTJCreganC (2008) Known by the company we keep: stigma-by-association effects in the workplace. Academy of Management Review33(1): 216–230. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2008.27752765.
24.
KraftJM (2010) Surviving the “Made in China” Stigma: Challenges for Chinese Multinational Corporations. Thesis MA. University of Southern California.
25.
LaiJYMChanKWLamLW (2013) Defining who you are not: the roles of moral dirtiness and occupational and organizational disidentification in affecting casino employee turnover intention. Journal of Business Research66(9): 1659–1666. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.012.
26.
LinkBGPhelanJC (2013) Labeling and stigma. In: AneshenselCSPhelanJCBiermanA (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health. 2nd edition. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 525–541.
27.
McCombsMEShawDLWeaverDH (2014) New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Communication and Society17(6): 781–802. DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2014.964871.
28.
MillerTdel Carmen TrianaM (2009) Demographic diversity in the boardroom: mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies46(5): 755–786. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00839.x.
29.
MishinaYDeversC (2012) On being bad: why stigma is not the same as a bad reputation. In: PollockTGBarnettML (eds) The Oxford Handbook Of Corporate Reputation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
MoonBBRheeY (2013) Exploring negative dimensions of organization-public relationships (NOPR) in public relations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly90(4): 691–714. DOI: 10.1177/1077699013503161.
PaetzoldRLDipboyeRLElsbachKD (2008) A new look at stigmatization in and of organizations. Academy of Management Review33(1): 186–193. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2008.27752576.
33.
PiazzaAPerrettiF (2015) Categorical stigma and firm disengagement: nuclear power generation in the United States, 1970-2000. Organization Science26(3): 724–742. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0964.
PoonA (2010) Land and the Ruling Class in Hong Kong. 2nd edition. Honolulu: Enrich Professional Publishing S Private, Limited.
36.
PoznerJ-E (2008) Stigma and settling up: an Integrated approach to the consequences of organizational misconduct for organizational elites. Journal of Business Ethics80(1): 141–150. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9446-9.
37.
PressgroveGNMckeeverBW (2016) Nonprofit relationship management: extending the organization-public relationship to loyalty and behaviors. Journal of Public Relations Research28(3–4): 193–211. DOI: 10.1080/1062726X.2016.1233106.
38.
RindovaVPWilliamsonIOPetkovaAP, et al (2005) Being good or being known: an Empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal48(6): 1033–1049. DOI: 10.2307/20159728.
39.
RouletT (2015) “What good is wall street?” institutional contradiction and the diffusion of the stigma over the finance industry. Journal of Business Ethics130(2): 389–402. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2237-1.
40.
SpenceM (2002) Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review92(3): 434–459. DOI: 10.1257/00028280260136200.
41.
SweetserKDKelleherT (2016) Communicated commitment and conversational voice: abbreviated measures of communicative strategies for maintaining organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research28(5–6): 217–231. DOI: 10.1080/1062726X.2016.1237359.
42.
SuttonRICallahanAL (1987) The stigma of bankruptcy: spoiled organizational image and its management. Academy of Management Journal30(3): 405–436. DOI: 10.2307/256007.
43.
ThomsonSBGrandyG (2018) Introduction. In: ThomsonSBGrandyG (eds) Stigmas, Work and Organizations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 1–8.
44.
ThomsonSBNylandCMewettHF (2018) Stigma and multinational corporations. In: ThomsonSBGrandyG (eds) Stigmas, Work and Organizations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 207–228.
45.
VergneJ-P (2012) Stigmatized categories and public disapproval of organizations: a mixed-methods study of the global arms industry, 1996-2007. Academy of Management Journal55(5): 1027–1052. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.0599.
46.
WartickSL (2002) Measuring corporate reputation: definition and data. Business & Society41(4): 371–392. DOI: 10.1177/0007650302238774.
47.
WeigeltKCamererC (1988) Reputation and corporate strategy: a review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management Journal9(5): 443–454. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250090505.
48.
WiesenfeldBMWurthmannKAHambrickDC (2008) The stigmatization and devaluation of elites associated with corporate failures: a process model. Academy of Management Review33(1): 231–251. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2008.27752771.
49.
XuJWeiJLuL (2019) Strategic stakeholder management, environmental corporate social responsibility engagement, and financial performance of stigmatized firms derived from Chinese special environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment28(6): 1027–1044. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2299.
50.
YangLHLinkBGPhelanJC (2008) Stigma measurement approaches: conceptual origins and current applications. In: Arboleda-FlórezJSartoriusN (eds) Understanding the Stigma of Mental Illness: Theory and Interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 175–192.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
