This article seeks to introduce the concept of counter-framing (i.e. a frame that contradicts the original frame and is introduced at a later date than the original) to the public relations literature so that scholars might more accurately examine the democratic environment where competitive debate is expected and meaning is negotiated. The article begins with a summary of how public relations scholars have studied framing before highlighting research from political science researchers on counter-framing. A case study of the battle for gun control legislation in the United States is then used to examine and contextualize the framing/counter-framing dynamic. This study adds the duration of time between messages as a possible factor that might influence framing effects.
AmadorJCollignon-DelmarSBenoitKet al. (2017) Predicting the Brexit vote by tracking and classifying public opinion using Twitter data. Statistics, Politics and Policy8: 85–104.
2.
AmentaENealCSheeraJOet al. (2009) All the movements fit to print: Who, what, when, where, and why SMO families appeared in the New York Times in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review74: 636–656.
3.
AndersonLB (2013) How frames present BMW as embracing an aging workforce. Public Relations Review39: 484–490.
4.
AndersonWB (2001) The media battle between Celebrex and Vioxx: Influencing media coverage but not content. Public Relations Preview27: 449–460.
5.
BarnettB (2005) Feminists shaping news: A framing analysis of news releases from the National Organization for Women. Journal of Public Relations Research17: 341–362.
6.
BentonAHancockBCoppersmithGet al. (2016) After Sandy Hook Elementary: A year in the gun control debate on Twitter. In: Bloomberg data for good exchange 2016 conference, New York, 25 September. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.02060.pdf (accessed 12 April 2017).
7.
BortreeDSAhernLSmithANet al. (2013) Framing environmental responsibility: 30 years of CSR messages in National Geographic Magazine. Public Relations Review39: 491–496.
8.
BowenSAZhengY (2015) Auto recall crisis, framing, and ethical response: Toyota’s missteps. Public Relations Review41: 40–49.
9.
BraunS (2014) Can we all agree? Building the case for symbolic interactionism as the theoretical origins of public relations. Journal of Professional Communication4: 49–70.
10.
ChongDDruckmanJN (2007a) Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review101: 637–655.
11.
ChongDDruckmanJN (2007b) Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science10: 103–126.
12.
ChongDDruckmanJN (2007c) A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication57: 99–118.
13.
ChongDDruckmanJN (2010) Dynamic public opinion: Communication effects over time. American Political Science Review104: 663–680.
CoombsWTHolladaySJ (2012) Fringe public relations: How activism moves critical PR toward the mainstream. Public Relations Review38: 880–887.
16.
CurtinPAGaitherTKCiszekE (2015) Articulating public relations practice and critical/cultural theory through a cultural-economic lens. In: L’EtangJMcKieDSnowNet al. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Public Relations. New York: Routledge, pp.41–53.
17.
DarmonKFitzpatrickKBronsteinC (2008) Krafting the obesity message: A case study in framing and issues management. Public Relations Review34: 373–379.
18.
DruckmanJN (2004) Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review98: 671–686.
19.
EntmanRM (1993) Framing: Toward a clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43: 51–58.
20.
EntmanRMMatthesJPellicanoL (2009) Nature, sources, and effects of news framing. In: Wahl-JorgensenKHanitzschT (eds) Handbook of Journalism Studies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.175–190.
21.
EsrockSHartJD’SilvaMet al. (2002) The saga of the Crown Pilot: Framing, reframing, and reconsideration. Public Relations Review28: 209–227.
FoucaultM (1980) Truth and power (trans. GordonC). In: GordonC (ed.) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings by Michel Foucault, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon, pp.109–134.
24.
FroehlichRRüdigerB (2006) Framing political public relations: Measuring success of political communication strategies in Germany. Public Relations Review32: 18–25.
GarciaMM (2011) Perception is truth: How U.S. newspapers framed the “Go Green” conflict between BP and Greenpeace. Public Relations Review37: 57–59.
28.
Gil de ZúñigaHJungNValenzuelaS (2012) Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17: 319–336.
29.
GoffmanE (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
30.
HallahanK (1999) Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research11: 205–242.
31.
HartleyJ (2009) Journalism and popular culture. In: Wahl-JorgensenKHanitzschT (eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, pp.310–324.
32.
HiebertR (2003) Public relations and propaganda in framing the Iraq war: A preliminary review. Public Relations Review29: 243–255.
33.
HonL (2016) Social media framing within the Million Hoodies movement for justice. Public Relations Review42: 9–19.
34.
HopkinsDKingG (2010) A method of automated nonparametric content analysis for social science. American Journal of Political Science54: 229–247.
35.
IhlenØVan RulerB (2009) Introduction: Applying social theory to public relations. In: IhlenØVan RulerBFredrikssonM (eds) Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts. New York: Routledge, pp.1–20.
JungNKimYGil de ZúñigaH (2011) The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication & Society14: 407–430.
KimY (2016) Understanding publics’ perception and behaviors in crisis communication: Effects of crisis news framing and publics’ acquisition, selection, and transmission of information in crisis situations. Journal of Public Relations Research28: 35–50.
42.
LaMarreHLSuzuki-LambrechtY (2013) Tweeting democracy? Examining Twitter as an online public relations strategy for congressional campaigns’. Public Relations Review39: 360–368.
43.
LengauerGHöllerI (2013) Generic frame building in the 2008 Austrian elections. Public Relations Review39: 303–314.
44.
LimJJonesL (2010) A baseline summary of framing research in public relations from 1990 to 2009. Public Relations Review36: 292–297.
45.
LiuBFKimS (2011) How organizations framed the 2009 H1N1 pandemic via social and traditional media: Implications for U.S. health communicators. Public Relations Review37: 233–244.
46.
LockwoodM (2011) Does the framing of climate policies make a difference to public support? Evidence from UK marginal constituencies. Climate Policy11: 1097–1112.
47.
MerazSPapacharissiZ (2013) Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics18: 138–166.
48.
MotionJLeitchS (2009) On Foucault: A toolbox for public relations. In: IhlenØVan RulerBFredrikssonM (eds) Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts. New York: Routledge, pp.83–102.
49.
NijkrakeJGosseltJFGuttelingJM (2015) Competing frames and tone in corporate communication versus media coverage during a crisis. Public Relations Review41: 80–88.
50.
NisbetMCSchefeleDA (2009) What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany96: 1767–1778.
51.
NRA (2013) Rep. @janschakowsky said plans for a ban on semi-auto rifles was only the beginning of a broader #guncontrol agenda. Available at: https://twitter.com/NRA/status/311486771168940032 (accessed 1 July 2017).
OlssonENordLWFalkheimerJ (2015) Media coverage crisis exploitation characteristics: A case comparison study. Journal of Public Relations Research27: 158–174.
PattonMQ (1980) Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56.
PerkinsS (2005) Un-presidented: A qualitative framing analysis of the NAACP’s public relations response to the 2000 presidential election. Public Relations Review31: 63–71.
57.
RadfordGP (2012) Public relations in a postmodern world. Public Relations Inquiry1: 49–67.
ReberBBergerB (2005) Framing analysis of activist rhetoric: How the Sierra Club succeeds or fails at creating salient messages. Public Relations Review31: 185–195.
60.
RussellKMLammeMO (2016) Theorizing public relations history: The roles of strategic intent and human agency. Public Relations Review42: 741–747.
61.
SchultzFKleinnijenhuisJOegemaDet al. (2012) Strategic framing in the BP crisis: A semantic network analysis of associative frames. Public Relations Review38: 97–107.
62.
SnidermanPMTheriaultSM (2004) The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In: SarisWESnidermanPM (eds) Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Non-attitudes, Measurement Error, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, pp.133–165.
63.
SpitzerRJ (2016) Politics of Gun Control. New York: Routledge.
64.
SteltenpoolGVerhoevenP (2012) Sector-dependent framing effects of corporate social responsibility messages: An experiment with non-alcoholic and alcoholic drinks. Public Relations Review38: 627–629.
65.
SweetserKD (2011) Digital political public relations. In: StrombackJKiousisS (eds) Political Public Relations Principles and Applications. New York: Routledge, pp.293–313.
66.
TsetsuraK (2013) Challenges in framing women’s rights as human rights at the domestic level: A case study of NGOs in the post-Soviet countries. Public Relations Review39: 406–416.
67.
Van der MeerTVerhoevenPBeentjesHet al. (2014) When frames align: The interplay between PR, news media, and the public in times of crisis. Public Relations Review40: 751–761.
68.
Van GorpB (2007) The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication57: 60–78.
69.
WangYLuoJNiemiR, et al. (2016) Catching fire via Likes: Inferring topic preferences of Trump followers on Twitter. In: Proceedings of 10th international AAAI conference on web and social media, 9 March. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.03099.pdf (accessed 12 June 2016).
70.
ZochLCollinsESiscoHet al. (2008) Empowering the activist: Using framing devices on activist organizations’ web sites. Public Relations Review34: 351–358.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
