Understanding Polarized Reactions to Sport CSR and Sustainability Communication on Social Media Through Dialogic Openness

Abstract

Dialogic openness suggests that organizations should employ an agonistic approach to conversation, discussion, and listening when communicating with activist groups. This study applies this theoretical premise to corporate social responsibility communication in motorsport, specifically Formula 1, which has been increasingly communicating about sustainable initiatives on social media. Through quantitative content analysis, we analyzed 820 responses to 10 CSR-related tweets during the 2021 season. We found that reactions to the messages were mostly critical, from both the left and right political perspectives. More liberal viewpoints indicated that Formula 1 should do more to address sustainability, while more conservative viewpoints complained that Formula 1 should “stick to sports” and stop engaging in social issues. Both sides showed high levels of skepticism for the intentions behind the messages. Based on our findings, we suggest that sport organizations should use principles of dialogic openness foster deliberative communication around sustainability in sport.

Keywords

sustainability sport social media dialogue

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amspaugh

(2022, December 20). How do the economics of Formula 1 compare to other sports? Michigan Journal of Economics. https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mje/2022/12/20/how-do-the-economics-of-formula-1-compare-to-other-sports/

Arrigo

Di Vaio

Hassan

Palladino

(2022). Followership behavior and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Analysis and implications for sustainability research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 360, 132151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132151

Babiak

Kihl

L. A.

(2018). A case study of stakeholder dialogue in professional sport: An example of CSR engagement. Business and Society Review, 123(1), 119–149.

Babiak

Trendafilova

(2011). CSR and environmental responsibility: Motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.229

Bachmann

Ingenhoff

(2016). Legitimacy through CSR disclosures? The advantage outweighs the disadvantages. Public Relations Review, 42(3), 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.02.008

Billings

A. C.

Moscowitz

L. M.

Rae

Brown-Devlin

(2015). The art of coming out: Traditional and social media frames surrounding the NBA’s Jason Collins. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(1), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014560516

Bortree

D. S.

Seltzer

(2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 317–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002

Brown

(2023, March 29). Inside the numbers that show Formula 1’s popularity and financial growth. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/maurybrown/2023/03/29/inside-the-numbers-that-show-formula-1s-popularity-and-financial-growth/?sh=69e125954df6

Browning

Lee

Park

Y. E.

Kim

Collins

(2020). Muting or meddling? Advocacy as a relational communication strategy affecting organization–public relationships and stakeholder response. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(4), 1026–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020916810

10.

Capizzo

Feinman

(2022). Extending civic values in architectures of listening: Arendt, Mouffe and the pluralistic imperative for organizational listening. Journal of Public Relations Research, 34(6), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2022.2127728

11.

Davidson

(2016). Public relations theory: An agonistic critique of the turns to dialogue and symmetry. Public Relations Inquiry, 5(2), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X16649007

12.

Dawson

V. R.

Brunner

(2020). Corporate social responsibility on wild public networks: Communicating to disparate and multivocal stakeholders. Management Communication Quarterly, 34(1), 58–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318919884920

13.

Dhanesh

G. S.

Nekmat

(2019). Facts over stories for involved publics: Framing effects in CSR messaging and the roles of issue involvement, message elaboration, affect, and skepticism. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(1), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918793941

14.

Dodd

M. D.

Supa

D. W.

(2014). Conceptualizing and measuring “corporate social advocacy” communication: Examining the impact on corporate financial performance. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 2–23. https://www.prsa.org/Intelligence/PRJournal/Vol8/No3/

15.

Vieira

E. T.

(2012). Striving for legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: Insights from oil companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1490-4

16.

Elving

W. J. L.

(2013). Scepticism and corporate social responsibility communications: The influence of fit and reputation. Journal of Marketing Communications, 19(4), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2011.631569

17.

Elving

W. J. L.

(2023). Controversial corporate social responsibility. In O’Connor

(Ed.), The routledge handbook of corporate social responsibility communication (pp. 346–356). Routledge.

18.

Esteve Del Valle

Broersma

Ponsioen

(2022). Political interaction beyond party lines: Communication ties and party polarization in parliamentary twitter networks. Social Science Computer Review, 40(3), 736–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320987569

19.

F1 . (2020, June 22). Formula 1 launches #WeRaceAsOne initiative to fight challenges of COVID-19 and global inequality. https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.formula-1-launches-we-race-as-one-initiative.3s2AhNDApNDzrCoQDc1RY8.html

20.

F1 . (2021, February 10). Formula 1 update on #WeRaceAsOne initiative. Formula 1. https://corp.formula1.com/formula-1-update-on-weraceasone-initiative/

21.

F1 . (2022). Sustainability: Formula 1 aims to be net zero carbon by 2030. https://corp.formula1.com/sustainability/

22.

Forehand

M. R.

Grier

(2003). When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–356.

23.

Freelon

(2010). ReCal: Intercoder reliability calculation as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 5(1), 20–33.

24.

Ganesh

Zoller

H. M.

(2012). Dialogue, activism, and democratic social change. Communication Theory, 22(1), 66–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01396.x

25.

Giulianotti

(2015). Corporate social responsibility in sport: Critical issues and future possibilities. Corporate Governance, 15(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-10-2014-0120

26.

Godfrey

P. C.

(2009). Corporate social responsibility in sport: An overview and key issues. Journal of Sport Management, 23(6), 698–716.

27.

Göker

Z. G.

Çelik

A. B.

(2022). Women’s dialogic encounters: Agonistic listening and emotions in multiple-identity conflicts. Third World Quarterly, 43(6), 1251–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1977621

28.

Harrison

V. S.

Boehmer

(2020). Sport for development and peace: Framing the global conversation. Communication & Sport, 8(3), 291–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479519831317

29.

Heath

R. L.

Saffer

A. J.

Waymer

(2017). “The Devil’s in the details”: Contested standards of corporate social responsibility in social media. In Lindgreen

Vanhamme

Watkins

Maon

(Eds.), Communicating corporate social responsibility in the digital era (pp. 50–66). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315577234

30.

Heiss

von Sikorski

Matthes

(2019). Populist Twitter posts in news stories: Statement recognition and the polarizing effects on candidate evaluation and anti-immigrant attitudes. Journalism Practice, 13(6), 742–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1564883

31.

Hong

(2020). To support or to boycott: A public segmentation model in corporate social advocacy. Journal of Public Relations Research, 32(5-6), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2020.1848841

32.

Joo

Koo

Nichols

B. S.

(2021). Understanding consumer attitudes in cause-brand alliances in sports: The role of sport entity attitudes. International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, 22(3), 507–528. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-12-2019-0142

33.

Kassing

J. W.

Sanderson

(2015). Playing in the new media game or riding the virtual bench: Confirming and disconfirming membership in the community of sport. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 39(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723512458931

34.

Kearney

M. W.

(2019). Analyzing change in network polarization. New Media & Society, 21(6), 1380–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818822813

35.

Kent

M. L.

(2011). Public relations rhetoric: Criticism, dialogue, and the long now. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(3), 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911409881

36.

Kent

M. L.

Lane

(2021). Two-way communication, symmetry, negative spaces, and dialogue. Public Relations Review, 47(2), 102014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102014

37.

Kent

M. L.

Taylor

(1998). Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321–334.

38.

Kent

M. L.

Taylor

(2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 21–37.

39.

Kent

M. L.

Taylor

(2016). From Homo Economicus to Homo dialogicus: Rethinking social media use in CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.11.003

40.

Kim

J. K.

Ott

H. K.

Hull

Choi

(2017). Double play! Examining the relationship between MLB’s corporate social responsibility and sport spectators’ behavioral intentions. International Journal of Sport Communication, 10(4), 508–530. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2017-0081

41.

Kim

J. K.

Overton

Bhalla

J. Y.

(2020). Nike, Colin Kaepernick, and the politicization of sports: Examining perceived organizational motives and public responses. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 101856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101856

42.

Kim

(2014). Strategic communication of corporate social responsibility (CSR): Effects of stated motives and corporate reputation on stakeholder responses. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 838–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.005

43.

Kitchens

Johnson

S. L.

Gray

(2020). Understanding echo chambers and filter bubbles: The impact of social media on diversification and partisan shifts in news consumption. MIS Quarterly, 44(4).

44.

Koseoglu

M.A.

Uyar

Kilic

Kuzey

Karaman

A.S.

(2021). Exploring the connections among CSR performance, reporting, and external assurance: Evidence from the hospitality and tourism industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102819

45.

Lane

A. B.

(2020). The dialogic ladder: Toward a framework of dialogue. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 101870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101870

46.

Lorenzo-Rodríguez

Torcal

(2022). Twitter and affective polarisation: Following political leaders in Spain. South European Society & Politics, 17, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2022.2047554

47.

Lovejoy

Saxton

G. D.

(2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x

48.

Mendini

Peter

P. C.

Gibbert

(2018). The dual-process model of similarity in cause-related marketing: How taxonomic versus thematic partnerships reduce skepticism and increase purchase willingness. Journal of Business Research, 91, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.010

49.

Miller

(2016). Greenwashed sports and environmental activism: Formula 1 and FIFA. Environmental Communication, 10(6), 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1127850

50.

Millington

Giles

A. R.

van Luijk

Hayhurst

L. M.

(2021). Sport for sustainability? The extractives industry, sport, and sustainable development. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 46(3), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723521991413

51.

Mitra

Buzzanell

P. M.

(2018). Implementing sustainability in organizations: How practitioners discursively position work. Management Communication Quarterly, 32(2), 172–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917724234

52.

Moernaut

Mast

Temmerman

Broersma

(2022). Hot weather, hot topic. Polarization and sceptical framing in the climate debate on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 25(8), 1047–1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1834600

53.

NPR . (2021, December 4). Formula 1 race in Saudi Arabia draws accusations of ‘sportswashing’. All Things Considered. https://www.npr.org/2021/12/04/1061539864/formula-1-race-in-saudi-arabia-draws-accusations-of-sportswashing

54.

O’Connor

Gronewold

K. L.

(2012). Black gold, green earth: An analysis of the petroleum industry’s CSR environmental sustainability discourse. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(2), 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318912465189

55.

Osmundsen

Bor

Vahlstrup

P. B.

Bechmann

Petersen

M. B.

(2021). Partisan polarization is the primary psychological motivation behind political fake news sharing on Twitter. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 999–1015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000290

56.

Recuero

Zago

Soares

(2019). Using social network analysis and social capital to identify user roles on polarized political conversations on Twitter. Social Media + Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119848745

57.

Riffe

Lacy

Fico

(2014). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis.

58.

Saffer

A. J.

Yang

Taylor

(2018). Reconsidering power in multistakeholder relationship management. Management Communication Quarterly, 32(1), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917700510

59.

Saxton

G. D.

Gómez

Ngoh

Lin

Y. P.

Dietrich

(2019). Do CSR messages resonate? Examining public reactions to firms’ CSR efforts on social media. Journal of Business Ethics, 155, 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3464-z

60.

Seaton

Cranmer

G. A.

White

Bober

Humphrey

Obeng

(2022). “That’s it. i’m done with this team!”: Public reactions to NFL teams’ racial activism as a function of social identity management. Communication Quarterly, 70(5), 585–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2099295

61.

Shumate

O’Connor

(2010). The symbiotic sustainability model: Conceptualizing NGO–corporate alliance communication. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 577–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01498.x

62.

Smith

(2022, July 11). Hamilton: We Race as One was ‘just words’, more needed for change. https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/hamilton-we-race-as-one-was-just-words-more-needed-to-create-change/10336630/

63.

Sommerfeldt

E. J.

Kent

M. L.

Taylor

(2012). Activist practitioner perspectives of website public relations: Why aren’t activist websites fulfilling the dialogic promise? Public Relations Review, 38(2), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.001

64.

United Nations . (n.d.). Sport and the Sustainable Development Goals: An overview outlining the contribution of sport to the SDGs. https://www.un.org/sport/sites/www.un.org.sport/files/ckfiles/files/Sport_for_SDGs_finalversion9.pdf

65.

Urman

(2020). Context matters: Political polarization on twitter from a comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 42(6), 857–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876541

66.

Walfisz

(2022, May 14). How Netflix’s Drive to Survive is helping F1 ditch its ‘snooty’ European image and gain new US fans. EuroNews. https://www.euronews.com/culture/2022/05/14/how-netflix-s-drive-to-survive-is-helping-f1-ditch-its-snooty-european-image-and-gain-new-

67.

Walzel

Robertson

Anagnostopoulos

(2018). Corporate social responsibility in professional team sports organizations: An integrative review. Journal of Sport Management, 32(6), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2017-0227

68.

Woods

C. L.

Stokes

A. Q.

(2019). For the game, for the world’: An analysis of FIFA’s CSR initiatives. Public Relations Inquiry, 8(1), 49–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X18804286

69.

Yuan

Schuchard

R. J.

Crooks

A. T.

(2019). Examining emergent communities and social bots within the polarized online vaccination debate in Twitter. Social Media + Society, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119865465