This article is a critical exploration of the professionalization of public relations as a struggle or contest over the meaning of work, and it engages with a question about the driving forces behind the long-standing professional project of public relations. The article will use the concepts of ‘dirty work’ and ‘occupational branding’ to address the relation between the role actually performed, normative ideals, and the image of the occupation. The article analyzes op-eds authored by public relations practitioners, scholars, and representatives from professional organizations in newspapers and trade media in order to explore the ways in which the meaning of public relations work is described, contested, and framed, and, consequently, the occupational brand of public relations is formed.
AlvessonM (2000) Social identity and the problem of loyalty in knowledge-intensive companies. Journal of Management Studies37(8): 1101–1124.
2.
AlvessonM (2013) The Triumph of Emptiness: Consumption, Higher Education, and Work Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
AlvessonMRobertsonM (2015) Money matters: Teflonic identity manoeuvring in the investment banking sector. Organization Studies37(8): 7–34.
4.
AndriopoulosCLewisMW (2009) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science20(4): 696–717.
5.
AshcraftKL (2007) Appreciating the ‘work’ of discourse: Occupational identity and difference as organizing mechanisms in the case of commercial airline pilots. Discourse & Communication1(1): 9–36.
6.
AshcraftKL (2013) The glass slipper: ‘Incorporating’ occupational identity in management studies. Academy of Management Review38(1): 6–31.
7.
AshcraftKLMuhrSLRennstamJ. (2012) Professionalization as a branding activity: Occupational identity and the dialectic of inclusivity-exclusivity. Gender, Work & Organization19(5): 467–488.
8.
AshforthBEKreinerGE (1999) ‘How can you do it?’: Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Academy of Management Review24(3): 413–434.
9.
AshforthBEKreinerGE (2014) Dirty work and dirtier work: Differences in countering physical. Social, and Moral Stigma Management and Organization Review10(1): 81–108.
10.
BatesonGJacksonDDHaleyJ. (1963) A note on the double bind – 1962. Family Process2(1): 154–161.
11.
BoltonSMuzioD (2008) The paradoxical processes of feminization in the professions: The case of established, aspiring and semi-professions. Work, Employment & Society22(2): 281–299.
12.
CornelissenJPHaslamSABalmerJM (2007) Social identity, organizational identity and corporate identity: Towards an integrated understanding of processes, patternings and products. British Journal of Management18(1): 1–16.
13.
DownsABessonDLouartP. (2006) The social construction of organizational change paradoxes. Journal of Organizational Change Management19(4): 491–502.
14.
DrewSKMillsMGassawayBM (2007) Dirty Work: The Social Construction of Taint. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
15.
EdwardsL (2008) PR practitioners’ cultural capital: An initial study and implications for research and practice. Public Relations Review34(4): 367–372.
16.
EdwardsL (2009) Symbolic power and public relations practice: Locating individual practitioners in their social context. Journal of Public Relations Research21(3): 251–272.
17.
EdwardsLPieczkaM (2013) Public relations and ‘its’ media: Exploring the role of trade media in the enactment of public relations’ professional project. Public Relations Inquiry2(1): 5–25.
18.
FairhurstGTPutnamL (2004) Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory14(1): 5–26.
19.
FawkesJ (2012) Saints and sinners: Competing identities in public relations ethics. Public Relations Review38(5): 865–872.
20.
FitchKThirdA (2010) Working girls: Revisiting the gendering of public relations. Prism7(4): 1–13.
21.
FitchKThirdA (2013) Ex-journos and promo girls: Feminization and professionalization in the Australian public relations industry. In: DaymonCDemetriousK (eds) Gender and Public Relations: Critical Perspectives on Voice, Image and Identity. London: Routledge, pp.247–268.
22.
FitchKJamesMMotionJ (2016) Talking back: Reflecting on feminism, public relations and research. Public Relations Review42(2): 279–287.
23.
FitzpatrickKBronsteinC (2006) Ethics in Public Relations: Responsible Advocacy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
FitzpatrickKGauthierC (2001) Toward a professional responsibility theory of public relations ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics16(2–3): 193–212.
25.
FrandsenFJohansenW (2010) Strategy, management, leadership, and public relations. In: HeathRL (ed.) The Sage handbook of public relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.293–306.
26.
FürsichE (2009) In defense of textual analysis: Restoring a challenged method for journalism and media studies. Journalism Studies10(2): 238–252.
27.
GrunigJE (2000) Collectivism, collaboration, and societal corporatism as core professional values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research12(1): 23–48.
28.
GrunigJE (2006) Furnishing the edifice: Ongoing research on public relations as a strategic management function. Journal of Public Relations Research18(2): 151–176.
29.
HoltzhausenDR (2000) Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research12(1): 93–114.
30.
HoltzhausenDRVotoR (2002) Resistance from the margins: The postmodern public relations practitioner as organizational activist. Journal of Public Relations Research14(1): 57–84.
31.
HughesE (1951) Work and the self. In: RohrerJSherifM (eds) Social Psychology at the Crossroads. New York: Harper & Brothers, pp.313–323.
32.
HughesE (1958) Men and Their Work. New York: Free Press.
33.
HughesE (1962) Good people and dirty work. Social Problems10(1): 3–11.
34.
IhlenØ (2007) Building on Bourdieu: A sociological grasp of public relations. Public Relations Review33(3): 269–274.
35.
IhlenØVerhoevenP (2012) A public relations identity for the 2010s. Public Relations Inquiry1(2): 159–176.
36.
JahansooziJ (2006) Relationships, transparency and evaluation: The implications for public relations. In: L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) Public Relations Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.61–91.
37.
JohanssonBLarssonL (2015) The complexity of public relations work. Nordicom Review36(1): 125–139.
38.
JohanssonCOttestigAT (2011) Communication executives in a changing world: Legitimacy beyond organizational borders. Journal of Communication Management15(2): 144–164.
39.
KentMLTaylorM (2002) Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review28(1): 21–37.
40.
KreinerGEAshforthBESlussDM (2006) Identity dynamics in occupational dirty work: Integrating social identity and system justification perspectives. Organization Science17(5): 619–636.
41.
LarsonMS (1979) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
42.
LarssonL (2004) Synen på PR- och reklamkonsulter. In: HolmbergSWeibullL (eds) Ju mer vi är tillsammans. Göteborg: SOM-intitutet, pp.81–92.
43.
LarssonL (2006) Public relations and democracy: A Swedish perspective. In: L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) Public Relations Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. London: Sage, pp.123–141.
44.
LarssonL (2007) Public trust in the PR industry and its actors. Journal of Communication Management11(3): 222–234.
45.
L’EtangJ (2004) Public Relations in Britain: A History of Professional Practice in the Twentieth Century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46.
L’EtangJ (2006) Public relations and propaganda: Conceptual issues, methodological problems, and public relations discourse. In: L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.23–40.
47.
L’EtangJ (2015) ‘It’s always been a sexless trade’: ‘It’s clean work’: ‘There’s very little velvet curtain’ Gender and public relations in post-Second World War Britain. Journal of Communication Management19(4): 354–370.
48.
Luoma-ahoVVosM (2010) Towards a more dynamic stakeholder model: Acknowledging multiple issue arenas. Corporate Communications: An International Journal15(3): 315–331.
49.
McDonaldJ (2010) Broadening CCO theory: Towards the communicative constitution of occupations. Paper presented at the 2010 NCA doctoral honors seminar, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 30 July–2 August.
50.
McKeeA (2003) Textual Analysis: A Beginner’s Guide. London: Sage.
51.
McMurrayRWardJ (2014) ‘Why would you want to do that?’: Defining emotional dirty work. Human Relations67(9): 1123–1143.
52.
MeisenbachRJ (2008) Working with tensions: Materiality, discourse, and (dis) empowerment in occupational identity negotiation among higher education fund-raisers. Management Communication Quarterly67(2): 258–287.
53.
MoralesJLambertC (2013) Dirty work and the construction of identity. An ethnographic study of management accounting practices. Accounting, Organizations and Society38(3): 228–244.
54.
MuzioDTomlinsonJ (2012) Editorial: Researching gender, inclusion and diversity in contemporary professions and professional organizations. Gender, Work & Organization19(5): 455–466.
55.
PepperGLLarsonGS (2006) Cultural identity tensions in a post-acquisition organization. Journal of Applied Communication Research34(1): 49–71.
PieczkaML’EtangJ (2006) Public relations and the question of professionalism. In: PieczkaML’EtangJ (eds) Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.265–278.
58.
PutnamLLFairhurstGT (2013) Discourse analysis in organizations. In: PutnamLLMumbyDK (eds) The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research and Methods (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.271–296.
59.
PutnamLLFairhurstGT (2015) Revisiting ‘organizations as discursive constructions’: 10 years later. Communication Theory25(4): 375–392.
60.
PutnamLLMyersKKGailliardBM (2014) Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations67(4): 413–440.
61.
RaynerCDjurkovicNMcCormackD (2014) Who are you calling ‘dirty’? Actors’ and observers’ perceptions of dirty work and implications for taint management. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion236(2): 209–222.
62.
SeoMPutnamLLBartunekJM (2004) Dualities and tensions of planned organizational change. In: PooleMSVan de VenAH (eds) Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.73–107.
63.
StrömbäckJ (2008) Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics13(3): 228–246.
64.
SvallforsS (2016) Out of the golden cage: PR and the career opportunities of policy professionals. Politics & Policy44(1): 56–73.
65.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations33(47): 74.
66.
TretheweyAAshcraftKL (2004) Special issue introduction: Practicing disorganization: The development of applied perspectives on living with tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research32(2): 81–88.
67.
TurnerJCOakesPJHaslamSA. (1994) Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and social psychology bulletin20: 454–463.
68.
TyllströmA (2013) Legitimacy for Sale: Constructing a Market for PR Consultancy. Uppsala: Department of Business Studies, Uppsala Universitet.
Van RulerBVerčičD (2008) Communication management in Europe – Challenges and opportunities. In: ZerfassAVan RulerBSrirameshK (eds) Public Relations Research: European and International Perspectives. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp.219–232.
71.
VásquezCSergiVCordelierB (2013) From being branded to doing branding: Studying representation practices from a communication-centered approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management29(2): 135–146.
72.
VerhoevenPZerfassATenchR (2011) Strategic orientation of communication professionals in Europe. International Journal of Strategic Communication5(2): 95–117.
73.
YeomansL (2010) Soft sell? Gendered experience of emotional labour in UK public relations firms. PRism7(4): 1–14.
74.
YeomansL (2014) Gendered performance and identity work in PR consulting relationships. In: DaymonDDemetriousK (eds) Gender and Public Relations: Critical Perspectives on Voice, Image, and Identity. New York: Routledge, pp.87–107.
