This article discusses actor-network theory (ANT) as an approach in empirical public relations research. It is foremost a methodological reflection, but uses a case study to illustrate key points. The case, published as a full study elsewhere, revolved around the plagiarisms in the PhD-dissertation of former German Defence Minister zu Guttenberg and places special emphasis on the work of anonymous ‘plagiarism hunters’ organized in a so-called ‘swarm’. Here, the events that led to the minister’s resignation are discussed with an explicit reference to ANT and especially Bruno Latour’s approach. This article discusses the research questions inspired by the approach as well as observations leading to a new understanding of publics as actor-networks. It thus contributes to rare theoretical discussions of ANT’s relevance for public relations research.
BenhabibS (1990) Models of public space: Hannah Arendt, the liberal tradition, and Jürgen Habermas. In: CalhounC (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.73–98.
2.
BenteleGNothhaftH (2010) Strategic communication and the public sphere from a European perspective. International Journal of Strategic Communication4(2): 93–116.
CallonM (1986) The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In: CallonMLawJRipA (eds) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. London: Macmillan, pp.19–34.
5.
CallonMLascoumesPBartheY (2011) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
CastellsM (1996) The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.
7.
CastellsM (1997) The Power of Identity: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, vol. II. Oxford: Blackwell.
8.
CastellsM (1998) End of Millennium: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, vol. III. Oxford: Blackwell.
9.
ChadwickA (2013) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
FraserN (1990) Rethinking the public sphere. A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In: CalhounC (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.109–142.
11.
GiddensA (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press; Blackwell.
12.
GripsrudJMoeHMolanderA. (2011) The Public Sphere, Four vols.Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
13.
GrunigJE (1997) A situational theory of publics: Conceptual history, recent challenges and new research. In: MossDMacManusTVercicD (eds) Public Relations Research: An International Perspective. Boston, MA: International Thompson Press, pp.3–48.
14.
HabermasJ (1992) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
HoltzhausenDZerfassA (eds) (2015) The Routledge Handbook of Strategic Communication. New York and London: Routledge.
16.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
LatourB (1999) ‘Do You Believe in Reality?’ News from the trenches of the science wars. In: LatourB (ed.) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp.1–23.
18.
LatourB (2003) What if we talked politics a little?Contemporary Political Theory2(2): 143–164.
19.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
LatourB (2008) Le Fantôme de l’esprit public. Des illusions de la démocratie aux réalités de ses apparitions. In: LippmannW (ed.) Le Public Fantôme [The Phantom Public]. Paris: Editions Demopolis, pp.3–49.
21.
LatourB (2010) An attempt at a ‘Compositionist Manifesto’. New Literary History41(3): 471–490.
22.
LatourB (2013) An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
LatourBWeibelP (eds) (2005) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
LatourBWoolgarS (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.
25.
LatourBJensenPVenturiniT. (2012) ‘The whole is always smaller than its parts’ – A digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads. British Journal of Sociology63(4): 590–615.
26.
LawJ (2008) Actor-Network Theory and material semiotics. In: TurnerBS (ed.) The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (3rd edition). Oxford: Blackwell, pp.141–158.
27.
MarresN (2012) Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
SchölzelHNothhaftH (2016) ‘Swarming’ for democracy: Karl-Theodor Guttenberg’s plagiarism case, the court of public opinion and the parliament of things. In: CoombsWTFalkheimerJHeideM. (eds) Strategic Communication, Social Media and Democracy: The challenge of the digital naturals. London and New York: Routledge, pp.106–118.
29.
SloterdijkP (2012) Zeilen und Tage. Notizen 2008–2011 [Lines and Days: Notes 2008–2011]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
30.
SomervilleI (1999) Agency versus identity: Actor-network-theory meets public relations. Corporate Communications: An International Journal4(1): 6–13.
Van DijkJ (1999) The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
VerhoevenP (2009) On Latour: Actor-Network-Theory (ANT) and public relations. In: IhlenØVan RulerBFredrikssonM (eds) Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts. New York; London: Routledge, pp.166–186.
