Drawing upon critical public relations literature, this article calls for public relations research to critically examine the content in national narratives as the precursor to reconstructing a more tenable discourse on nation building and national interests. In the culture-centred approach, a deconstruction of the dominant discourse is the initial step to opening the space for participation. In line with the culture-centred approach, I conducted a critical metaphor analysis on 58 speeches delivered by Singapore government leaders on the necessity of national education for national survival. The analysis reveals eight metaphoric themes: CONTAINER, with BUILDING as a subset of that theme, JOURNEY, REMEMBERING, SEEING, MORALITY, CULTIVATION and LABOUR. This article discusses the four most salient themes of CONTAINER, BUILDING, REMEMBERING and MORALITY. Locating these themes in the socio-political context of a semi-authoritarian democracy reveals the ideational preoccupations of the government as the agent-organisation seeking to preserve its hegemonic leadership. The research highlights the usefulness of critical metaphor analysis for critical culture public relations practitioners and researchers in uncovering the propositions and agenda latent in naturalised discourse pervading a society.
AdlerSASimJ (2005) Social studies in Singapore: Contradictions and control. In: Paper presented at the Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Practice and Policy conference, 30 May–11 June. Singapore: Centre for Research in Practice and Pedagogy, National Institute of Education.
2.
AdnanMH (1986) Public relations for neighborliness: Malaysian experiences. International Public Relations Review10: 41–45.
3.
AlthusserL (1970) Reading Capital. London: New Left Books.
4.
AndersonB (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.
5.
Aristotle (1952) Politics: A Treatise on Government (Trans. Ellis). London: Dent & Sons.
6.
BanZDuttaM (2012) Minding their business: Discourses of colonialism and neoliberalism in the commercial guide for US companies in China. Public Relations Inquiry1(2): 197–220.
7.
BergerB (1999) The Halcion affair: Public relations and the construction of ideological world view. Journal of Public Relations Research11(3): 185–204.
8.
BilligM (1995) Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
9.
BurkeK (1972) Dramatism and Development. Barre, MA: Clark University Press.
10.
CameronLLowG (eds) (1999) Researching and Applying Metaphor. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Charteris-BlackJ (2004) Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
12.
Charteris-BlackJ (2005) Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
13.
Charteris-BlackJ (2007) The Communication of Leadership: Leadership and Metaphor beyond the West. London: Routledge.
14.
Charteris-BlackJ (2008) Rogue states and rampant bodies: Metaphors of control in public and private worlds. In: Plenary presentation at Critical Approaches to Discourse across Disciplines (CADAAD) 2008, July, University of Hertfordshire. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixzBGV62qY4 (accessed 10 July 2014).
15.
Charteris-BlackJ (2012) Shattering the bell jar: Metaphor, gender and depression. Metaphor and Symbol27(3): 199–216.
16.
ChiltonP (1996) Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York: Peter Lang.
17.
ChongT (2010) Fluid nation: The perpetual renovation of nation and national identities in Singapore. In: ChongT (ed.) Management of Success: Singapore Revisited. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp.504–520.
DeignanA (2005) Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
20.
DuttaM (2007) Communicating about culture and health: Theorizing culture-centered and cultural-sensitivity approaches. Communication Theory17: 304–328.
21.
DuttaM (2008) A critical response to Storey and Jacobson: The co-optive possibilities of participatory discourse. Communication for Development and Social Change: A Global Journal2: 81–90.
22.
DuttaM (2011) Communicating Social Change: Structure, Culture, Agency. New York: Routledge.
23.
DuttaM (2012) Voices of Resistance, Communication and Social Change. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press e-books, Book 23.
24.
DuttaM (2014) A culture-centred approach to listening: Voices of social change. In: CCA Concept Series [Video file], 9July. Available at: http://www.care-cca.com (accessed 10 Jiuly 2014)
Dutta-BergmanM (2004a) Poverty, structural barriers and health: A Santali narrative of health communication. Qualitative Health Research14: 1–16.
27.
Dutta-BergmanM (2004b) The unheard voices of Santalis: Communicating about health from the margins of India. Communication Theory14: 237–263.
28.
Dutta-BergmanM (2005) Civil society and communication: Not so civil after all. Journal of Public Relations Research17(3): 267–289.
29.
EllulJ (1973) Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes (trans. KellenK). New York: Random House, Vintage.
30.
EngleSOchoaA (1988) Education for Democratic Citizenship: Decision Making in the Social Studies. New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
FoucaultM (1981) The order of discourse. In: YoungR (ed.) Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader. London: Routledge & Kegan-Paul, pp.48–79.
32.
FoucaultM (1991) Politics and the study of discourse. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp.53–72.
33.
GohCT (1996) Prepare our children for the new century: Teach them well. In: Address at Teachers’ Day Rally, September. Singapore.
34.
GramsciA (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks (Trans. HoareQSmithGN). New York: International Publishers.
35.
HallS (1985) Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post-structuralist debates. Critical Studies in Mass Communication2(2): 91–114.
36.
HallS (ed.) (1997) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage.
37.
HaqueMS (2004) Governance and bureaucracy in Singapore: Contemporary reforms and implications. International Political Science Review25(2): 227–240.
38.
HongLHuangJL (2008) The Scripting of a National History: Singapore and Its Pasts. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.
39.
KarimH (1989) Development of public relations in Asia/Pacific: A Malaysian view. International Public Relations Review12: 17–24.
LakoffGJohnsonM (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
LakoffGTurnerM (1989) More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
LauA (1992) The national past and the writing of the history of Singapore. In: BanKCPakirATongCK (eds) Imagining Singapore. Singapore: Times Academic Press. pp.46–68.
LeeT (2010) The Media, Cultural Control and Government in Singapore. London: Routledge.
46.
L’EtangJPieczkaM (1996) Critical Perspectives in Public Relations. London: International Thomson Business Press.
47.
L’EtangJPieczkaM (2006) Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
LohKSLiewKK (eds) (2010) Makers and Keepers of Singapore History. Singapore: Singapore Heritage Society & Ethos Books.
49.
MackeyS (2011) Pragmatism, semiotics and sacred truth. In: EdwardsLHodgesC (eds) Public Relations, Society and Culture: Theoretical and Empirical Explorations. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp.105–117.
50.
MauzyDMilneRS (2002) Singapore Politics under the People’s Action Party. New York: Routledge.
51.
MotionJLeitchS (1996) A discursive perspective from New Zealand: Another world view. Public Relations Review22(3): 297–309.
52.
MotionJWeaverK (2005) A discourse model for critical public relations research: Life sciences network and the battle for truth. Journal of Public Relations Research17(1): 49–67.
53.
PalMDuttaM (2008) Public relations in a global context: The relevance of critical modernism as a theoretical lens. Journal of Public Relations Research20: 159–179.
54.
PedersenOK (2009) Discourse analysis. Working paper no. 65. Denmark: International Center for Business and Politics, Copenhagen Business School.
55.
PrattC (1985) The African context. Public Relations Journal41: 11–16.
56.
PrattC (1986) Professionalism in Nigerian public relations. Public Relations Review10: 27–40.
57.
RicoeurP (1986) Lectures on Ideology and Utopia (ed TaylorGH). New York: Columbia University Press.
58.
RodanG (2004) Transparency and Authoritarian Rule in Southeast Asia: Singapore and Malaysia. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
59.
RohrerT (1995) The metaphoric logic of (political) rape: The new wor(l)d order. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(2) 115–137.
60.
SaidE (1979) Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books, Random House.
TanKP (2009) Who’s afraid of Catherine Lim? The state in patriarchal Singapore. Asian Studies Review33(1): 43–62.
63.
TaylorM (2000) Toward a public relations approach to nation building. Journal of Public Relations Research12(2): 179–210.
64.
TaylorMBotanCH (1997) Public relations campaigns for national development in the Pacific Rim: The case of public education in Malaysia. Australian Journal of Communication24: 115–130.
65.
TaylorMKentM (2006) Public relations for nation building. In: HazeltonVBotanC (eds) Public Relations Theory II. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.341–359.
66.
ToledanoMMcKieD (2007) Social integration and public relations: Global lessons from an Israeli experience. Public Relations Review33(4): 387–397.
67.
WalterJHelmigJ (2008) Discursive metaphor analysis: (De)construction(s) of Europe. In: CarverTPikaloJ (eds) Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World. New York: Routledge, pp.119–131.
68.
WeaverK (2001) Dressing for battle in the new global economy: Putting power, identity, and discourse into public relations theory. Management Communication Quarterly15(2): 279–288.
69.
WeldesJ (1996) Constructing national interests. European Journal of International Relations2(3): 275–318.
