This article presents an autoethnography, which emerged as I shifted from being a journalist to an academic researcher investigating the role of power and communication in pharmaceutical regulation. It presents a critical, personal and reflexive account of the opportunities and challenges faced while gathering and presenting data for a doctoral thesis in my dual role as a ‘hackademic’. It also traces my subjective experiences as I made sense of my hybrid professional identity, and explains how analytical autoethnography may be used as a research method to enable the researcher’s experiences to become the topic under investigation. The aim of this research is to explore the tensions that may arise when a journalist becomes an academic, and the relationship between the public relations (PR) practitioner and the journalist. My work flags up differences between codes of ethics for research, PR and journalism, and details the challenges I encountered navigating my way through these differences. The articles also contributes to the hybrid identity and careers literature by expounding some of the struggles that may be encountered during the transition from practitioner to academic.
AndersonL (2006) Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography35(4): 373–395.
2.
AndersonL (2011) Time is of the essence: An analytic autoethnography of family, work, and serious leisure. Symbolic Interaction34(2): 133–157.
3.
AustinLLTothEL (2011) Exploring ethics education in global public relations curricula: Analysis of international curricula descriptions and interviews with public relations educators. Public Relations Review37(5): 506–512.
4.
BeltzATalbottADStarckK (1984) Cross perceptions: Journalists and public relations practitioners go eyeball to eyeball. Public Relations Review10: 44–45.
5.
BlenkinsoppJStalkerB (2004) Identity work in the transition from manager to management academic. Management Decision42(3/4): 418–429.
6.
BromleyM (2013) The ‘new majority’ and the academization of journalism. Journalism (4)5: 569–586.
7.
BulloughRV.PinnegarS (2001) Guidelines for quality autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher30: 3–21.
8.
BurtonBRowellA (2003) Unhealthy spin. British Medical Journal326(7400): 1205–1207.
ClandininDJConnellyM (2000) Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
CoffeyP (1999) The Ethnographic Self. London: Sage.
13.
CristP (1999) Career transition from clinician to academician: Responsibilities and reflections. American Journal of Occupational Therapy53: 14–19.
14.
DaviesCA (1999) Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others. London: Routledge.
15.
DelamontS (2007) Arguments against auto-ethnography. Qualitative Researcher4 (February): 2–4.
16.
DenzinNKLincolnYS (1994) Entering the field of qualitative research. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.1–17.
17.
DenzinNKLincolnYS (2000) Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage, pp.1–29.
18.
DinanWMillerD (eds) (2007) Thinker, Faker, Spinner, Spy: Corporate PR and the Assault on Democracy. London: Pluto Press.
19.
DuncanM (2004) Autoethnography: Critical appreciation of an emerging art. International Journal of Qualitative Methods3(4): Article 3. Available at: www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/3_4/pdf/duncan.pdf (accessed 12 December 2012).
EllisC (2007) Telling secrets, revealing lies: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry13(1): 3–29.
22.
EllisC (2011) Jumping on and off the runaway train of success: Stress and committed intensity in an academic life. Symbolic Interaction34(2): 158–172.
23.
EllisCBochnerAP (2000) Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflectivity: Researcher as subject. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.733–768.
24.
EntmanRM (2004) Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy – Studies in Communication, Media, & Public Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
ErrigoJFranklinB (2004) Surviving the Hackademy. British Journalism Review15(2): 43–48.
26.
EtheringtonK (2004. Becoming a Reflexive Researcher: Using Our Selves in Research. London: Jessica Kingsley.
27.
EwenS (1996) PR! A Social History of Spin. New York: Basic Books.
28.
FawkesJ (2012) Saintsandsinners: Competing identities in public relations ethics. Public Relations Review38: 865–872.
29.
FournillierJ (2011) Working within and in-between frames: An academic tourist/midnight robber and the academy. Qualitative Inquiry17(6): 558–567.
30.
GandyOHJ (1982) Beyond Agenda Setting: Information Subsidies and Public Policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
31.
GeertzC (1979) Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight. In: RainbowPSullivanM (eds) Interpretive Social Science: A Reader. Berkeley, CA: University California Press, pp.195–240.
32.
GoffmanE (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
GrunigJDozierD (eds) (1992) Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
GrunigJHuntT (1984) Managing Public Relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
36.
HarcupT (2011a) Confessions of a Hackademic. Journalism Education1(1): 87–91.
37.
HarcupT (2011b) Hacademics at the chalkface, Journalism Practice5(1): 34–50.
38.
HoltNL (2003) Representation, legitimation, and autoethnography: An autoethnographic writing story. International Journal of Qualitative Methods2(1): 1–22.
39.
HutchisonLL (2002) Teaching ethics across the public relations curriculum. Public Relations Review28: 301–309.
40.
KovachBRosenstielT (2007) The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York: Three Rivers Press.
41.
JamesM (2012) Autoethnography: The story of applying a conceptual framework for intentional positioning to public relations practice. Public Relations Review38: 555–564.
42.
JohnsonCRSEavesKL (2013) An ounce of time, a pound of responsibilities and a ton of weight to lose: An autoethnographic journey of barriers, message adherence and the weight-loss process. Public Relations Inquiry2: 95–116.
43.
L’EtangJ (2003. The myth of the ‘ethical guardian’: An examination of its origins, potency and illusions. Journal of Communication Management8(1): 53–67.
44.
L’EtangJ (2009a) Public relations and diplomacy in a globalized world: An issue of public communication. American Behavioral Scientist53(4): 607–626.
45.
L’EtangJ (2009b) ‘Radical PR’ – catalyst for change or an aporia?Radical PR Ethics6(2): 13–18.
46.
L’EtangJXifraJCoombsT (2012) Breaking boundaries. Public Relations Inquiry1(1): 3–6.
47.
McIlveenP (2007) The genuine scientist-practitioner in vocational psychology: An autoethnography. Qualitative Research in Psychology4(4): 295–311.
48.
McManusJ (1990) How local television learns what news is. Journalism Quarterly67(4): 672–683.
49.
MarcusGFischerM (eds) (1986) Anthropology as Cultural Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
MertonRK (1988) Some thoughts on the concept of sociological autobiography. In: RileyMW (ed.) Sociological Lives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 78–99.
51.
MillerDDinanW (2008) A Century of Spin: How Public Relations became the Cutting Edge of Corporate Power. London: Pluto Press.
52.
MillerDHarkinsC (2010) Corporate strategy, corporate capture: Food and alcohol industry lobbying and public health. Critical Social Policy30(4): 564–589.
PieczkaML’EtangJ (2001) Public relations and the question of professionalism. In: HeathRL (ed.) Handbook of Public Relations. London: Sage, pp.223–237.
57.
PrattCB (1993) Critique of the classical theory of situational ethics in US public relations. Public Relations Review19(3): 219–235.
58.
RichardsonJTE (1996) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences. Leicester: PBS Books.
59.
RothWM (2005) Auto/biography and auto/ethnography: Finding the generalized other in the self. In: RothWM (ed.) Auto/Biography and Auto/Ethnography: Praxis of Research Method. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp.3–16.
60.
SchickTA (1994) Truth, accuracy and withholding information. Public Relations Quarterly39(4): 7–10.
61.
SchwitzerG (1992) The magical medical media tour. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)267(14): 1969–1971.
62.
SimendingerEPuiaGMKraftKJaspersonM (2000) The career transition from practitioner to academic. Career Development International5(2): 106–111.
63.
StauberJRamptonR (1995) Toxic Sludge is Good for You: Lies, Damn Lies and the Public Relations Industry. Maine: Common Courage Press.
64.
SuchanJ (2004) Writing, authenticity, and knowledge creation: Why I write and you should too. Journal of Business Communication (41)3: 302–315.
65.
TannerAH (2004) Agenda building, source selection, and health news at local television stations: A nationwide survey of local television health reporters. Science Communication25(4): 350–363.
TraharS (2009) Beyond the story itself: Narrative inquiry and autoethnography in intercultural research in higher education. Qualitative Social Research10(1): Article 30.
68.
WalleM (2003) Commentary: What happened to public responsibility? The lack of society in public relations codes of ethics. Prism1: pp. 1–5.
69.
WaymerD (2012) Each one, reach one: An autobiographic account of a Black PR professor’s mentor–mentee relationships with Black graduate students. Public Relations Inquiry (1): 403–419.
70.
WaymerDDysonO (2011) The journey into an unfamiliar and uncomfortable territory: Exploring the role and approaches of race in PR education. Journal of Public Relations Research23(4): 458–477.
71.
WeickKE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72.
WilkensLBrennenB (2004) Conflicted interests, contested terrain: Journalism ethics codes then and now. Journalism Studies5(3): 297–309.
73.
WrightDK (1985) Age and moral values of practitioners. Public Relations Review11(1): 51–61.
74.
YoungSL (2009) Half and half: An (auto)ethnography of hybrid identities in a Korean American mother–daughter relationship. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication2(2): 139–167.
