Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Public relations (PR) is caught up in a seemingly endless quest to define its identity through locating the essence of its practice. This article not only questions the value of the quest but also offers an alternative ‘apophatic’ path – one based on what may not be said about the profession. This way of building understanding through negation is found in various religious traditions and also in the works of some modern philosophers and poets. Rather than adding to the multiple efforts to define PR’s essence – most recently by the Public Relations Society of America – an apophatic approach could help clear the profession’s field of vision by removing some accumulated definitional debris. In this way, it could serve as an alternative strategy to assist those both inside and outside the profession to better describe what PR does.

Keywords

Apophatic cataphatic definitions public relations (PR)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

‘Apophasis’. (n.d.) Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Available at: www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/apophasis (accessed 2 July 2012).

‘Apophatic’. (n.d.a) The Free Dictionary. Available at: www.thefreedictionary.com/apophatic (accessed 28 June 2012).

‘Apophatic’. (n.d.b) Oxford English Dictionary Online. Available at: oed.com/view/Entry/9351?redirectedFrom=apophatic#eid (accessed 28 June 2012).

Beck

(1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (trans. Ritter

). London: Sage.

Bengtsson

Weis

Zyczkowski

(2011). Geometry of the mixed quantum states: An apophatic approach. Available at: arxiv.org/abs/1112.2347 (accessed 28 June 2012).

Biletzki

Matar

(2011) Ludwig Wittgenstein. In: Zalta

(ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2011 Edition). Available at: plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/wittgenstein/ (accessed 28 June 2012).

Brown

(2004) The propagation of awe: Public relations, art and belief in Reformation Europe. Public Relations Review 30(4): 381–389.

‘Cataphatic theology’. (n.d.) Orthodox Wiki. Available at: orthodoxwiki.org/Cataphatic_theology (accessed 28 June 2012).

C.S. Lewis Institute (n.d.) Letters to Malcolm Chiefly on Prayer Study Guide. The CS Lewis Study Program. Available at: www.cslewisinstitute.org/webfm_send/897 (accessed 2 July 2012).

10.

Curtin

(2012) Public relations and philosophy: Parsing paradigms. Public Relations Inquiry 1: 31–47.

11.

Cutlip

(1994) The Unseen Power: Public Relations. A History. Hillsdale, NJ and Hove, UK: Erlbaum.

12.

Edwards

(2012) Defining the ‘object’ of public relations research: A new starting point. Public Relations Inquiry 1: 7–30.

13.

Elliott

(2012) Public relations defined, after an energetic discussion. New York Times,1 March. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/02/business/media/public-relations-a-topic-that-is-tricky-to-define.html? (accessed 28 June 2012).

14.

Gibbons

(2007) On Apophatic Poetics. Available at: mail.google.com/mail/?ui=0.1&disp=vah&view=att&h=115bf76ec365b7c4 (accessed 26 June 2012).

15.

Harlow

(1976) Building a public relations definition. Public Relations Review 10(4): 34–42.

16.

Harlow

(1977) Public relations definitions through the years. Public Relations Review 3(1): 49–63.

17.

Harrison

(2003) Strategic Public Relations: A Practical Guide to Success (3rd edition). Perth: Century Ventures.

18.

Heath

(2005a) Preface. In Heath

(ed.) Encyclopedia of Public Relations: Volume 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, p.xxiii.

19.

Heath

(ed.) (2005b) Encyclopedia of Public Relations: Volume 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

20.

Henderson

(2003) Carl Jung and Thomas Merton: Apophatic and kataphatic traditions in the 20th Century. Studies in Spirituality 13: 269–291.

21.

Henzell-Thomas

(2005) Spirituality colloquium: Difference between cataphatic and apophatic theology. Available at: theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php/features/articles/spirituality_colloquium_difference_between_cataphatic_and_apophatic_theolog (accessed 29 June 2012).

22.

Ihlen

Verhoeven

(2012) A public relations identity for the 2010s. Public Relations Inquiry, 1: 159–176.

23.

‘Incarnation’. (n.d.) Oxford English Dictionary Online. Available at: oed.com/view/Entry/93332?redirectedFrom=incarnation#eid (accessed 28 June 2012).

24.

Judge

(2008) Being what you want: Problematic kataphatic identity vs potential of apophatic identity? Laetus in Praesens, 3 August. Available at: www.laetusinpraesens.org/docs00s/apophat.php (accessed 15 June 2012).

25.

Kangas

(1998) Kierkegaard, the apophatic theologian. Enrahonar 29: 119–123.

26.

Kenny

(2008) Wittgenstein (rev. ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

27.

Kimmons

(2010) What do we NOT mean by ‘constructivism’? Available at: kimmonsdesign.com/node/9 (accessed 29 June 2012).

28.

L’Etang

(2008) Public relations, persuasion and propaganda: Truth, knowledge, spirituality and mystique. In Zerfuss

van Ruler

Sriramesh

(eds) Public Relations Research – Innovative Approaches, European Perspectives and International Challenges. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften, pp.251–269.

29.

Ledingham

(2003) Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research 19(2): 181–198.

30.

Lloyds. (2010) Reputation on the line – why communication is key to managing reputational risk. Available at: www.lloyds.com/News-and-Insight/News-and-Features/360-News/Business-360/Reputation_on_the_line (accessed 26 June 2012).

31.

Mackey

(2003) Changing vistas in public relations theory. Prism 1(1). Available at: www.prismjournal.org/fileadmin/Praxis/Files/Journal_Files/issue1/refereed_articles_paper3.pdf (accessed 15 June 2012).

32.

McKie

Munshi

(2007) Reconfiguring Public Relations: Ecology, Equity and Enterprise. Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.

33.

McKie

Willis

(2012) Renegotiating the terms of engagement: Public relations, marketing, and contemporary challenges. Public Relations Review (2012). Available at: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.03.08 (accessed 12 March 2013).

34.

Martin

(1985) The negative structures of American literature. American Literature 57(1): 1–22.

35.

Medina

(2010) The Knowable–Unknowable Triune God: Gregory Palamas’s Essence–Energy Distinction from the Perspectives of Vladimir Lossky and Catherine Mowry LaCugna. Available at: rdtwot.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/medina_the-knowable-unknowable-triune-god.pdf (accessed 15 June 2012).

36.

Mintzberg

(1994)The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York, NY: The Free Press.

37.

Moloney

(2006) Rethinking Public Relations: PR, Propaganda and Democracy (2nd edition). New York: Routledge.

38.

Mouzelis

(2010) Self and self-other reflexivity: The apophatic dimension. European Journal of Social Theory 13(2): 271–284.

39.

Pessin

(2008) The influence of Islamic thought on Maimonides. In: Zalta

(ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/maimonides-islamic/ (accessed 20 June 2012).

40.

PRSA. (2012) What is public relations? PRSA’s widely accepted definition. Available at: www.prsa.org/AboutPRSA/PublicRelationsDefined (accessed 1 June 2012).

41.

Radford

(2012) Public relations in a postmodern world. Public Relations Inquiry 1: 49–67.

42.

Raymond

(2010) Protestant culture: Milton’s angels. History Today 60(12). Available at: www.historytoday.com/joad-raymond/protestant-culture-miltons-angels (accessed 1 June 2012).

43.

Reber

Harriss

(2003) Building public relations definitions: Identifying definitional typologies among practitioners and educators. Paper presented to the Public Relations Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Kansas City, MO, 30 July–2 August.

44.

Rittel

HWJ

Webber

(1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4(1973): 155–169.

45.

Sriramesh

Verčic

(2009) The Global Public Relations Handbook, Revised and Expanded Edition: Theory, Research and Practice. New York and Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge

46.

Underhill

(2003) The Cloud of Unknowing: The Classic of Medieval Mysticism Mineola, NY: Dover.

47.

Zhong

C-B

Phillips

Leondardelli

Galinsky

(2004) Defining what you are by what you are not: Negational identity and needs fulfilment. Paper presented at 17th International Association of Conflict Management, Pittsburg, PA, 14 February. Available at: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=610688 (accessed 1 June 2012).

48.