Inspired by geographical work on the right to the city, there is nascent scholarly interest in a right to the rural. Given that the concept has proven useful in the urban context for both scholars and organizers, it is indeed worth considering its intellectual and political potential in the countryside. We survey the use of the right to the city by both scholars and social movements, as well as nascent efforts to apply this theoretical framework to rural areas. We proceed to argue that struggles over access to rural space are a compelling starting point for developing a right to the rural, highlighting along the way the increasing prominence of rentiership in shaping land control struggles. Drawing on three case studies of conflicts over access to rural space in the USA we argue that a right to the rural is a concept with potential, but also caution that it is not a panacea. It is open-ended, itself a site of struggle.
AndersonJL (2006) Britain’s right to roam: Redefining the landowner’s bundle of sticks. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review (GIELR)19: 375.
3.
AndreucciDGarcía-LamarcaMWedekindJ, et al. (2017) “Value grabbing”: A political ecology of rent. Capitalism Nature Socialism28(3): 28–47.
4.
AngeloH (2017) From the city lens toward urbanisation as a way of seeing: Country/city binaries on an urbanising planet. Urban Studies54(1): 158–178.
5.
ArrighiG (1994) The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and Origins of Our Times. New York: Verso Books.
BaronJB (2013) Rescuing the bundle-of-rights metaphor in property law. University of Cincinnati Law Review82: 57.
9.
BarracloughL (2013) Is there also a right to the countryside?Antipode45(5): 1047–1049.
10.
BergerBR (2023) Property and the right to enter. Washington and Lee Law Review80: 71.
11.
BirchK (2020) Technoscience rent: Toward a theory of rentiership for technoscientific capitalism. Science, Technology & Human Values45(1): 3–33.
12.
BlomleyN (2005) Remember property?Progress in Human Geography29(2): 125–127.
13.
BoggsJ (1983) From rights to power. Monthly Review35(6): 29–39.
14.
BorrasSMFrancoJCSuárezSM (2015) Land and food sovereignty. Third World Quarterly36(3): 600–617.
15.
BorrasSMKayCGómezS, et al. (2012) Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: Key features in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne d'études Du Développement33(4): 402–416.
16.
Borras JrSMHallRScoonesI, et al. (2011) Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: An editorial introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies38(2): 209–216.
17.
BosworthK (2022) Pipeline Populism: Grassroots Environmentalism in the Twenty-First Century. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
BrennerNMarcusePMayerM (2012) Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City, 1st edOxford: Routledge.
ByrdJAGoldsteinAMelamedJ, et al. (2018) Predatory value: Economies of dispossession and disturbed relationalities. Social Text36(2): 1–18.
21.
CaloAShieldsKIlesA (2023) Using property law to expand agroecology: Scotland’s land reforms based on human rights. The Journal of Peasant Studies50(5): 2075–2111.
22.
CheeverFMcLaughlinNA (2015) An Introduction to conservation easements in the United States: A simple concept and a complicated mosaic of law. Journal of Law, Property, and Society1: 108–186.
23.
ChristophersB (2020) Rentier Capitalism: Who Owns the Economy, and Who Pays for It?. New York: Verso Books.
24.
Colorado State Senate (2021) Senate Bill 21-087. Available at: https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/2021a_087_signed.pdf (accessed 29 July 2024).
25.
CurleyA (2021) Unsettling Indian water settlements: The Little Colorado River, the San Juan River, and colonial enclosures. Antipode53(3): 705–723.
26.
DaigleMRamírezMM (2019). Decolonial geographies. In: Antipode Editorial Collective (eds) Keywords in Radical Geography: Antipode at 50. Wiley, pp. 78–84.
27.
DesmaraisAAQualmanDMagnanA, et al. (2017) Investor ownership or social investment? Changing farmland ownership in Saskatchewan, Canada. Agriculture and Human Values34(1): 149–166.
28.
Dunbar-OrtizR (2006) Red Dirt: Growing up Okie. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
29.
Dunbar-OrtizR (2023) An Indigenous Peoples’ History of the United States. ReVisioning American History. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
30.
EkersM (2019) Financiers in the forests on Vancouver Island, British Columbia: On fixes and colonial enclosures. Journal of Agrarian Change19(2): 270–294.
31.
EmeryMRPierceAR (2005) Interrupting the telos: Locating subsistence in contemporary US forests. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space37(6): 981–993.
32.
EstesN (2019) Our History Is the Future: Standing Rock Versus the Dakota Access Pipeline, and the Long Tradition of Indigenous Resistance. London: Verso.
33.
FairbairnM (2020) Fields of Gold: Financing the Global Land Rush. Cornell Series on Land: New Perspectives on Territory, Development, and Environment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
FieldsD (2018) Constructing a new asset class: Property-led financial accumulation after the crisis. Economic Geography94(2): 118–140.
36.
FosterKJarmanJ (2022) The Right to Be Rural. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.
37.
FreshourCWilliamsB (2022) Toward ‘total freedom’: Black ecologies of land, labor, and livelihoods in the Mississippi Delta. Annals of the American Association of Geographers113(7): 1–10.
38.
FriendlyA (2020) The place of social citizenship and property rights in Brazil’s ‘right to the city’ debate. Social Policy and Society19(2): 307–318.
39.
GhoshSMeerA (2021) Extended urbanisation and the agrarian question: Convergences, divergences and openings. Urban Studies58: 1097–1119.
40.
GillenJBunnellTRiggJ (2022) Geographies of ruralization. Dialogues in Human Geography12(2): 186–203.
41.
GilmoreRW (2007) Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. American Crossroads21. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
GilmoreRW (2008) Forgotten places and the seeds of grassroots planning. In: Hale CR (ed.) Engaging Contradictions. 1st ed. Theory, Politics, and Methods of Activist Scholarship. University of California Press, pp. 31–61.
GrahamNShoemakerJA (2022) Property rights and power across rural landscapes. In: Graham N, Davies M, and Godden L (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Property, Law and Society. London: Routledge, pp. 426–440.
45.
GreenGP (2020) Deindustrialization of rural America: Economic restructuring and the rural ghetto. Local Development & Society1(1): 15–25.
46.
GunnoeA (2014) The political economy of institutional landownership: Neorentier society and the financialization of land. Rural Sociology79(4): 478–504.
47.
HailaA (1990) The theory of land rent at the crossroads. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space8(3): 275–296.
48.
HarrisC (1993) Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review106(8): 1707–1791.
49.
HartGPSitasA (2004) Beyond the urban-rural divide: Linking land, labour, and livelihoods. Transformation (Durban, South Africa)56(1): 31–38.
50.
HarveyD (2003) The New Imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
HarveyD (2008) The right to the city. New Left Review53(53): 23–40.
52.
HayesN (2020) The Book of Trespass: Crossing the Lines That Divide Us. Dublin: Bloomsbury.
53.
HorstMMarionA (2019) Racial, ethnic and gender inequities in farmland ownership and farming in the U.S. Agriculture and Human Values36(1): 1–16.
54.
HuchzermeyerM (2018) The legal meaning of Lefebvre’s the right to the city: Addressing the gap between global campaign and scholarly debate. GeoJournal83(3): 631–644.
55.
InwoodJFJBondsA (2017) Property and whiteness: The Oregon standoff and the contradictions of the U.S. Settler State. Space and Polity21(3): 253–268.
56.
IPES-Food (2024) Land Squeeze: What is driving unprecedented pressures on farmland and what can be done to achieve equitable access to land?Available at: https://ipes-food.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/LandSqueeze.pdf.
57.
JacrouxEFreshourC (2024) Struggles over solar in the United States: Oppositional coalitions and the limits of territorial resentment. Energy Research & Social Science113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103532
58.
KayK (2016) Breaking the bundle of rights: Conservation easements and the legal geographies of individuating nature. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48(3): 504–522.
59.
KayK (2017) Rural rentierism and the financial enclosure of Maine’s open lands tradition. Annals of the American Association of Geographers107(6): 1407–1423.
60.
KeelerJ (2021) STANDOFF: Standing Rock, the Bundy Movement, and the American Story of Sacred Lands. Salt Lake City, UT: Torrey House Press.
61.
KnuthS (2023) Rentiers of the low-carbon economy? Renewable energy’s extractive fiscal geographies. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space55(6): 1548–1564.
62.
KrauseM (2013) The ruralization of the world. Public Culture25(270): 233–248.
63.
KuymuluMB (2013) The vortex of rights: ‘right to the city’ at a crossroads. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37(3): 923–940.
64.
LefebvreH (1967) Le droit à la ville. L’Homme et la Société6(1): 29–35.
65.
LefebvreH (1996) Writings on Cities. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
66.
LefebvreH (2022) On the Rural: Economy, Sociology, Geography (eds S Elden and AD Morton; tran. R Bononno). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
67.
LoydJM (2012) Race, capitalist crisis, and abolitionist organizing: An interview with Ruth Wilson Gilmore. In: LoydJMMitchelsonMBurridgeA (eds) Beyond Walls and Cages: Prisons, Borders, and Global Crisis. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 42–54.
68.
MacphersonCB (1975) Capitalism and the changing concept of property. In: Kamenka E and Neale RS (eds) Feudalism, Capitalism and Beyond. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 104–124.
69.
MagnanADavidsonMDesmaraisAA (2023) ‘They call it progress, but we don’t see it as progress’: Farm consolidation and land concentration in Saskatchewan, Canada. Agriculture and Human Values40(1): 277–290.
70.
MairJDuffyM (2021) Who has the right to the rural? Place framing and negotiating the Dungog festival, New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Sustainable Tourism29(2-3): 176–192.
71.
MayerM (2009) The ‘right to the city’ in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. City (London, England)13(2-3): 362–374.
72.
MazzucatoM (2018) The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. New York: Hachette.
73.
McCarthyJ (2002) First world political ecology: Lessons from the wise use movement. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space34(7): 1281–1302.
74.
McCarthyJHagueE (2004) Race, nation, and nature: The cultural politics of ‘celtic’ identification in the American west. Annals of the Association of American Geographers94(2): 387–408.
75.
MerrifieldA (2006) Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction. New York: Routledge.
76.
MiddletonBR (2011) Trust in the Land. First Peoples : New Directions in Indigenous Studies. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
77.
MitchellD (2003) The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York: Guilford Press.
78.
MitchellD (2018) Revolution and the critique of human geography: prospects for the right to the city after 50 years. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography100(1): 2–11.
79.
MollettS (2006) Race and natural resource conflicts in Honduras: The Miskito and Garifuna struggle for Lasa Pulan. Latin American Research Review: 76–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2006.0012
80.
MorrisAW (2008) Easing conservation? Conservation easements, public accountability and neoliberalism. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences39(3): 1215–1227.
NeelP (2018) Hinterland: America’s New Landscape of Class and Conflict. London: Reaktion Books.
83.
NewfontK (2012) Blue Ridge Commons: Environmental Activism and Forest History in Western North Carolina. Environmental history and the American South. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
84.
OrtegaAA (2022) Beyond the rural-urban aporia. Dialogues in Human Geography12(2): 223–226.
85.
OumaS (2020) Farming as Financial Asset: Global Finance and the Making of Institutional Landscapes. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
86.
ÖzatağanGEraydinA (2024) Binaries again! Revisiting the urban-rural question through geographies of discontent. Habitat International152: 103–162.
87.
PalmerMA (2020) Rendering settler sovereign landscapes: Race and property in the empire state. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space38(5): 793–810.
88.
PaprockiK (2020) The climate change of your desires: Climate migration and imaginaries of urban and rural climate futures. Environment and Planning. D: Society and Space38(2): 248–266.
89.
PelusoNLLundC (2011) New frontiers of land control: Introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies38(4): 667–681.
90.
PereaJF (2011) The echoes of slavery: Recognizing the racist origins of the agricultural and domestic worker exclusion from the National Labor Relations Act. Ohio State Law Journal72: 95.
91.
PierceAREmeryMR (2005) Interrupting the telos: Locating subsistence in contemporary US forests. Environment and Planning. A37(6): 981–993.
92.
PurcellM (2002) Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal58(2/3): 99–108.
93.
PurcellM (2003) Citizenship and the right to the global city: Reimagining the capitalist world order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research27(3): 564–590.
94.
PurcellM (2014) Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs36(1): 141–154.
95.
PurifoyDM (2022) Remote-control plantations and Black forest relations in the Black belt. Environment and Society13(1): 140–155.
96.
RibotJCPelusoNL (2003) A theory of access. Rural Sociology68(2): 153–181.
97.
RoaneJ (2022) Black ecologies, subaquatic life, and the Jim Crow enclosure of the tidewater. Journal of Rural Studies94: 227–238.
98.
Roman-AlcaláA (2024) Land reform in the United States: Lost cause or simply a cause that has been lost?Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene12(1): 87.
99.
SadowskiJ (2020) The internet of landlords: Digital platforms and new mechanisms of rentier capitalism. Antipode52(2): 562–580.
100.
ShawR (2008) Beyond the Fields: Cesar Chavez, the UFW, and the Struggle for Justice in the 21st Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.
101.
ShoemakerJA (2020) Fee simple failures: Rural landscapes and race. Michigan Law Review119: 1695.
102.
ShoemakerJA (2024) Re-placing property. The University of Chicago Law Review91: 811.
103.
SikorTLundC (2009) Access and property: A question of power and authority. Development and Change40(1): 1–22.
104.
SobelTBlancoE (2015) Memorandum Re: Staff Proposal for an Education Access Regulation for Concerted Activity. Available at: https://perma.cc/2JMF-QHUW (accessed 15 July 2024).
105.
TappR (2020) From the state to the shareholder: Rent and the production of shareholder value in real estate. Antipode52(3): 867–887.
106.
ThorogoodJHastieAHill-ButlerC (2022) Public access, private land, and spatial politics: The geographical importance of the right of way in Coventry, England. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers47(2): 484–498.
107.
Van SantLHardyDNuseB (2021) Conserving what? Conservation easements and environmental justice in the coastal US south. Human Geography14(1): 31–44.
108.
Van SantLSheltonTKayK (2023) Connecting country and city: The multiple geographies of real property ownership in the US. Geography Compass17(2): e12677.
109.
WangC-MMayeDWoodsM (2023) Planetary rural geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography. DOI: 10.1177/20438206231191731.
110.
WangGA (2018) Who controls the land? Lessons from armed takeover of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Case Studies in the Environment2(1): 1–6.
111.
WardCAalbersMB (2016) Virtual special issue editorial essay:‘The shitty rent business’: What’s the point of land rent theory?Urban Studies53(9): 1760–1783.
112.
WeedenSAHardyJFosterK (2022) Urban flight and rural rights in a pandemic: Exploring narratives of place, displacement, and ‘the right to be rural’ in the context of COVID-19. Annals of the American Association of Geographers112(3): 732–741.
113.
WolfordWWWhiteBScoonesI, et al. (2024) Global land deals: What has been done, what has changed, and what’s next?The Journal of Peasant Studies1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2024.2325685.
114.
WoodsM (2023) Rural recovery or rural spatial justice? Responding to multiple crises for the British countryside. The Geographical Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12541. Epub ahead of print 2023.
115.
ZacarésJM (2021) Euphoria of the Rentier? New Left review(129). London: New Left Review Ltd. Epub ahead of print 2021.
