In their article on Anthropocene islands, Chandler and Pugh explore the rich relationship between the politics of islands and the grand scale of the Anthropocene. In their complex account of the Anthropocene’s grand scale and the island’s transformative complexity, they stress the intricate relationality generated from the encounter among multiple spaces on the globe, none of which is master of the whole. In this commentary, I add the thought of the resistance and non-relationality of islands, once one thinks of islands in a counter-anthropocentric sense.
ChandlerDPughJ (2021) Anthropocene islands: there are only islands after the end of the world. Dialogues in Human Geography. DOI: 10.1177/2043820621997018.
3.
DonneJ (1999) Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions and Death’s Duel (MotionA, ed.). New York, NY: Vintage Classics.
4.
DwyerJ (2005) Ethics and economics: bridging Adam Smith’s theory of moral sentiments and wealth of nations. Journal of British Studies44(4): 662–687.
5.
HeideggerM (1995) The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude (McNeillWWalkerN, Trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
6.
JemisinNK (2015) The Fifth Season. New York, NY: Orbit.
7.
KantI (1997) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (GregorM, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
MiltonJ (2004) Paradise Lost (TeskeyG, ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
