Abstract
In this response, I think through some implications of Chandler and Pugh’s typology of relational ontologies and onto-epistemologies for how we might engage the question of security in the Anthropocene. In doing so, I highlight how their poetic treatment of islands challenges relational thought on the Anthropocene to confront its own embodied and contextual limitations. I suggest here that taking island poetics seriously brings into focus latent desires for security against indeterminacies that the problematic of the Anthropocene—the crisis of modernity—introduces.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
