This short commentary argues that while Barnett’s critique of critical security and resilience studies needs to be made, the route suggested through the emphasis on ‘the public’ as the milieu of security lacks a necessary engagement with concepts of visibility and transparency. These concepts are used in Barnett’s piece very much in the same gestural way as he observes the critical security studies that he critiques.
BallKS (2009) Exposure: exploring the subject of surveillance. Information, Communication & Society12(5): 639–657.
2.
BarnettC (2015) On the milieu of security: situating the emergence of new spaces of public action. Dialogues in Human Geography5(3): 257–270.
3.
BrighentiAM (2007) Visibility: a category for the social sciences. Current Sociology55(3): 323–342.
4.
BrighentiAM (2010) Visibility in Social Theory and Social Research. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 118.
5.
CollS (2014) Power, knowledge, and the subjects of privacy: understanding privacy as the ally of surveillance. Information, Communication & Society17(10): 1250–1263.
6.
CraryJ (1990) Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7.
DeanJ (2002) Publicity’s Secret: How technoculture capitalizes on democracy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
8.
FinnJ (2012) Seeing surveillantly: surveillance as social practice. In: DoyleALippertRLyonD (eds) Eyes Everywhere: The Global Growth of Camera Surveillance. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 69–78.
9.
GilliomJMonahanT (2012) SuperVision: An Introduction to the Surveillance Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
IsinEF (2004) The neurotic citizen. Citizenship studies8(3): 217–235.
11.
JayM (1993) Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
LevinTYFrohneUWeibelP (eds) (2002) CTRL [SPACE]: Rhetorics of surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother. Karlsruhe: ZKM Center for Art and Media.
13.
LyonD (2007) Surveillance Studies: an Overview. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
MirzoeffN (1999) An Introduction to Visual Culture. New York: Psychology Press.
15.
MirzoeffN (2011) The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality. Durham: Duke University Press.
16.
MonahanT (2015) The right to hide? Anti-surveillance camouflage and the aestheticization of resistance. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies12(2): 159–178.
17.
Murakami WoodD (2007) Beyond the Panopticon? Foucault and surveillance studies. In: CramptonJEldenS (eds) Space, Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 245–263.
18.
Murakami WoodDBallK (2013) Brandscapes of control? Surveillance, marketing and the co-construction of subjectivity and space in neo-liberal capitalism. Marketing Theory13(1): 47–67.
19.
OliverK (2001) Witnessing: Beyond Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
StaplesWG (2013) Everyday Surveillance: Vigilance and visibility in postmodern life. 2nd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
StandingG (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: A&C Black.
22.
VeelKSteinerH (eds) (2014) Invisibility Studies: Surveillance, Transparency and the Hidden in Contemporary Culture. Berne: Peter Lang.
23.
YarM (2003) Panoptic power and the pathologisation of vision: critical reflections on the Foucauldian thesis. Surveillance & Society1(3): 254–271.
