I address three broad themes raised by the discussion of the milieu of security: how to go about theorizing publicness, the potential of the idea of attention for this task and images of critical judgement.
AndersonB (2015) Boredom, excitement and other security affects. Dialogues in Human Geography5(3): 271–274.
2.
BarnettC (2004) Media, democracy and representation: disembodying the public. In: BarnettCLowM (eds) Spaces of Democracy. London: Sage, pp. 185–206.
3.
BarnettC (2015) On the milieu of security: situating the public values of securitization between diagnosis and critique. Dialogues in Human Geography5(3): 257–270.
4.
CroganPKinsleyS. Paying attention: towards a critique of the attention economy. Culture Machine13: 1–29.
5.
D’AoustA-M (2015) Hope of deliverance: thinking new modes of public actions beyond the grips of securitization. Dialogues in Human Geography5(3): 275–279.
6.
DerridaJ (1981) Plato’s pharmacy. In: BarbaraJ (trans.) Dissemination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 67–315.
7.
HannahMG (2015) On shifting pre-conceptions with ‘security’. Dialogues in Human Geography5(3): 280–283.
8.
HonigB (2013) The politics of public things: neoliberalism and the routine of privatization. Available at: http://www.helsinki.fi/nofo/NoFo10HONIG.pdf(accessed June 22 2015).
9.
PykettJ (2015) Reclaiming public action from theories of securitization. Dialogues in Human Geography5(3): 284–286.
10.
WaltersW (2015) Secrecy, publicity, and the milieu of security. Dialogues in Human Geography5(3): 287–290.
11.
WarnerM (2002) Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.
12.
WoodDM (2015) The in(ter)visible subjects of security and the (im)possibility of a ‘public’. Dialogues in Human Geography5(3): 291–295.
