In response to the commentaries on Anderson et al. (2012), the authors’ short response raises questions about, first, the status of materialism and realism in current debates around relations and relationality and, second, the implications of understanding assemblage as a particular kind of ethos for the politics of assemblage-based thinking.
AndersonBKearnesMMcFarlaneCSwantonD (2012) On assemblages and geography. Dialogues in Human Geography2(2). doi: 10.1177/2043820612449261.
2.
BaradK (1996) Meeting the universe halfway: Realism and social constructivism without contradiction. In: LRNelsonJNelson (eds) Feminism, Science and the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 161–194.
3.
BaradK (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
BennettJ (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
DeLandaM (2011) Philosophy and Simulation: The Emergence of Synthetic Reason. London and New York: Continuum.
6.
DeleuzeG (1969) Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
7.
HarmanG (2010) Towards Speculative Realism: Essays and Lectures. Ropley: Zero Books.
8.
MeillassouxQ (2008) After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency, translated by RBrassier. New York: Continuum.
