In the digital era, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has arisen as a revolutionary influence with the potential to transform multiple spheres of human life. Chatbots, particularly OpenAI's Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), are increasingly recognised as promising tools in diverse aspects, including mental health. This study delves into ChatGPT's effectiveness as an emotional resilience support tool specifically for Generation Z (Gen Z), a demographic deeply engaged in digital interactions. Employing a sequential explanatory design that integrates quantitative and qualitative analyses, the research investigates Gen Z users' perceptions of ChatGPT's effectiveness, barriers to its utilisation, and impact on emotional resilience. The findings reveal a significant acknowledgement of ChatGPT's role in enhancing emotional well-being and notable concerns regarding privacy and security. Further, qualitative insights underscore the significance of personalised interactions, nonjudgmental space, and active listening characteristics of ChatGPT in fostering emotional resilience. Moreover, the study identifies key areas for improvement, such as expanded topic coverage and cultural representation. Educational stakeholders and mental health professionals are encouraged to utilise these insights to integrate ChatGPT and other AI tools into tailored support frameworks for Gen Z.
Abd-alrazaqAAAlajlaniMAlalwanAA, et al. (2019) An overview of the features of chatbots in mental health: a scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics132: 103978.
2.
AbdullahMMadainAJararwehY (2022) ChatGPT: fundamentals, applications and social impacts. In: 2022 Ninth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS), Milan, Italy, 29 November 2022-01 December 2022. pp. 1–8.
3.
AdamopoulouEMoussiadesL (2020) Chatbots: history, technology, and applications. Machine Learning with Applications2: 100006.
AjlouniAOAlmahairehASWhabaFA-A (2023) Students’ perception of using ChatGPT in counseling and mental health education: the benefits and challenges. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)18(20): 199–218.
6.
AkibaDFraboniMC (2023) AI-supported academic advising: exploring ChatGPT’s current state and future potential toward student empowerment. Education Sciences13(9): 885.
7.
AlaneziF (2024) Assessing the effectiveness of ChatGPT in delivering mental health support: a qualitative study. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare17: 461–471.
8.
AlkurdRAbualhaolIYanikomerogluH (2020) Big-data-driven and AI-based framework to enable personalization in wireless networks. IEEE Communications Magazine58(3): 18–24.
9.
BagdeHDhopteAAlamMK, et al. (2023) A systematic review and meta-analysis on ChatGPT and its utilization in medical and dental research. Heliyon9(12): e23050.
10.
BahriniAKhamoshifarMAbbasimehrH, et al. (2023) ChatGPT: applications, opportunities, and threats. In: 2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), Charlottesville, VA, USA, 27 April 2023, pp. 274–279. IEEE.
11.
BakkerDRickardN (2018) Engagement in mobile phone app for self-monitoring of emotional wellbeing predicts changes in mental health: MoodPrism. Journal of Affective Disorders227: 432–442.
12.
BansalGChamolaVHussainA, et al. (2024) Transforming conversations with AI—a comprehensive study of ChatGPT. Cognitive Computation, Epub ahead of print 24 January 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s12559-023-10236-2.
13.
BhartiyaNJangidNJannuS, et al. (2019) Artificial neural network based university chatbot system. In: 2019 IEEE Bombay Section Signature Conference (IBSSC), Mumbai, India, July 2019, pp. 1–6. IEEE.
14.
BiceHTangH (2022) Teachers’ beliefs and practices of technology integration at a school for students with dyslexia: a mixed methods study. Education and Information Technologies27(7): 10179–10205.
BiswasSS (2023) Role of Chat GPT in public health. Annals of Biomedical Engineering51(5): 868–869.
17.
BodieGDVickeryAJCannavaK, et al. (2015) The role of “active listening” in informal helping conversations: impact on perceptions of listener helpfulness, sensitivity, and supportiveness and discloser emotional improvement. Western Journal of Communication79(2): 151–173.
BrandtzaegPBFølstadA (2017) Why People Use Chatbots. The 4th International Conference on Internet Science. Thessaloniki, Greece, November 2017, 377–392.
20.
Brazil CK and Rys MJ (2020) Is smartphone usage predicting fear of missing out and loneliness in a sample from the generation z?Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society - Annual Meeting64(1): 791–795.
21.
BreithauptFOtenenEWrightDR, et al. (2024) Humans create more novelty than ChatGPT when asked to retell a story. Scientific Reports14(1): 875.
22.
BrymanA (2015) Social Research Methods. 4th edition. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
23.
BzdokDMeyer-LindenbergA (2018) Machine learning for precision psychiatry: opportunities and challenges. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging3(3): 223–230.
24.
CarmeliAYitzhak‐HalevyMWeisbergJ (2009) The relationship between emotional intelligence and psychological wellbeing. Journal of Managerial Psychology24(1): 66–78.
25.
CastleberryANolenA (2018) Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: is it as easy as it sounds?Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning10(6): 807–815.
26.
ÇeraENdrecaPÇeraG, et al. (2024) Does generation cohort matter for teleworking? Diving into challenges and advantages of teleworking concerning gen Y and gen Z. Journal of East-West Business30(2): 1–29.
27.
ChenH-TLiX (2017) The contribution of mobile social media to social capital and psychological well-being: examining the role of communicative use, friending and self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior75: 958–965.
28.
ChillakuriBMahanandiaR (2018) Generation Z entering the workforce: the need for sustainable strategies in maximizing their talent. Human Resource Management International Digest26(4): 34–38.
29.
ChinHSongHBaekG, et al. (2023) The potential of chatbots for emotional support and promoting mental well-being in different cultures: mixed methods study. Journal of Medical Internet Research25: e51712.
30.
ChuM-N (2023) Assessing the benefits of ChatGPT for business: an empirical study on organizational performance. IEEE Access11: 76427–76436.
31.
ClearyMVisentinDWestS, et al. (2018) Promoting emotional intelligence and resilience in undergraduate nursing students: an integrative review. Nurse Education Today68: 112–120.
32.
CooperG (2023) Examining science education in ChatGPT: an exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology32(3): 444–452.
33.
CreswellJW (1999) Mixed-method researchHandbook of Educational Policy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 455–472.
34.
CrokerRA (2009) An introduction to qualitative researchQualitative Research in Applied Linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 3–24.
35.
DeneckeKVaaheesanSArulnathanA (2021) A mental health chatbot for regulating emotions (SERMO) - concept and usability test. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing9(3): 1170–1182.
36.
DhimoleaTKKaplan-RakowskiRLinL (2022) Supporting Social and Emotional Well-Being with Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer, 125–138.
37.
DianovaVGSchultzMD (2023) Discussing ChatGPT’s implications for industry and higher education: the case for transdisciplinarity and digital humanities. Industry and Higher Education37(5): 593–600.
38.
DolotA (2018) The Characteristics of Generation Z. E-Mentor2(74), 44–50.
39.
DrigasAPapoutsiC (2018) A new layered model on emotional intelligence. Behavioral Sciences8(5): 45.
40.
ElyosephZHadar-ShovalDAsrafK, et al. (2023) ChatGPT outperforms humans in emotional awareness evaluations. Frontiers in Psychology14.
41.
EsselHBVlachopoulosDEssumanAB, et al. (2024) ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational large language models (LLMs). Computers in Education: Artificial Intelligence6: 100198.
42.
FahadSKAYahyaAE (2018) Inflectional review of deep learning on natural language processing. In: 2018 International conference on smart computing and electronic enterprise (ICSCEE), Shah Alam, Malaysia, July 2018, pp. 1–4. IEEE.
43.
FeijtMde KortYWesterinkJ, et al. (2023) Integrating technology in mental healthcare practice: a repeated cross-sectional survey study on professionals’ adoption of Digital Mental Health before and during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychiatry13.
44.
FitzpatrickKKDarcyAVierhileM (2017) Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health4(2): e19.
45.
GhafouriM (2024) ChatGPT: the catalyst for teacher-student rapport and grit development in L2 class. System120: 103209.
46.
GillSSXuMPatrosP, et al. (2024) Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: emerging era of AI chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems4: 19–23.
47.
GolemanD (1995) Emotional Intelligence.New York: Bantam Books, Inc.
48.
GreenJWillisKHughesE, et al. (2007) Generating best evidence from qualitative research: the role of data analysis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health31(6): 545–550.
49.
GruetzemacherRWhittlestoneJ (2022) The transformative potential of artificial intelligence. Futures135: 102884.
50.
GuarteJMBarriosEB (2006) Estimation under purposive sampling. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation35(2): 277–284.
51.
GuptaVJoshiVJainA, et al. (2023) Chatbot for mental health support using NLP. In: 2023 4th International conference for emerging technology (INCET), Belgaum, India, 26-28 May 2023, pp. 1–6. IEEE.
52.
HacklE (2024) Assessing ChatGPT’s use of person-first language in healthcare conversations. Discover Artificial Intelligence4(1): 6.
53.
HamanMŠkolníkMŠubrtT (2023) Leveraging ChatGPT for human behavior assessment: potential implications for mental health care. Annals of Biomedical Engineering51(11): 2362–2364.
54.
HammersleyM (2015) On ethical principles for social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology18(4): 433–449.
55.
HanACaiZ (2023) Design implications of generative AI systems for visual storytelling for young learners. In:Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM interaction design and children conference, New York, NY, USA, 19 June 2023, pp. 470–474. ACM.
56.
HornRLWeiszJR (2020) Can artificial intelligence improve psychotherapy research and practice?Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research47(5): 852–855.
57.
ImjaiNAujirapongpanSJutidharabongseJ, et al. (2024) Impacts of digital connectivity on Thailand’s Generation Z undergraduates’ social skills and emotional intelligence. Contemporary Educational Technology16(1): ep487.
58.
ImranNHashmiAImranA (2023) Chat-GPT: opportunities and challenges in child mental healthcare. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences39(4).
IvankovaNVCreswellJWStickSL (2006) Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods18(1): 3–20.
61.
JavaSMohammedHBhardwajAB (2021) Psychological analysis of online counselling platforms offering mental health support. In: 2021 12th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Kharagpur, India, 6 July 2021, pp. 1–7. IEEE.
62.
JavaidMHaleemASinghRP (2023a) ChatGPT for healthcare services: an emerging stage for an innovative perspective. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations3(1): 100105.
63.
JavaidMHaleemASinghRP, et al. (2023b) Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations3(2): 100115.
64.
JoshithVP (2012) Emotional intelligence as A tool for innovative teaching. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology5(4): 54–60.
65.
KambojKPGargP (2021) Teachers’ psychological well-being role of emotional intelligence and resilient character traits in determining the psychological well-being of Indian school teachers. International Journal of Educational Management35(4): 768–788.
66.
KannanLKumarTP (2022) Social Media—The Emotional and Mental Roller-Coaster of Gen Z: An Empirical Study, Berlin: Springer, 81–102.
67.
KasneciESesslerKKüchemannS, et al. (2023) ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences103: 102274.
KnottERaoAHSummersK, et al. (2022) Interviews in the social sciences. Nature Reviews Methods Primers2(1): 73.
70.
KriksciunieneDSakalauskasVLewandowskiR (2019) Evaluating the Interdependent Effect for Likert Scale Items, Berlin: Springer, 26–38.
71.
KukkarAMohanaRSharmaA, et al. (2023) Prediction of student academic performance based on their emotional wellbeing and interaction on various e-learning platforms. Education and Information Technologies28(8): 9655–9684.
72.
KumarHMartinA (2023) Artificial emotional intelligence: conventional and deep learning approach. Expert Systems with Applications212: 118651.
73.
KusalSPatilSChoudrieJ, et al. (2022) AI-based conversational agents: a scoping review from technologies to future directions. IEEE Access10: 92337–92356.
74.
LecceFSmithCRBurbachFR (2023) Digital mental health interventions for people with epilepsy: a systematic review. Seizure: European Journal of Epilepsy107: 91–103.
75.
LeechNLOnwuegbuzieAJ (2009) A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality and Quantity43(2): 265–275.
76.
LevkovichIElyosephZ (2023) Identifying depression and its determinants upon initiating treatment: ChatGPT versus primary care physicians. Family Medicine and Community Health11(4): e002391.
77.
LundBDWangT (2023) Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?Library Hi Tech News40(3): 26–29.
78.
MakridakisS (2017) The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: its impact on society and firms. Futures90: 46–60.
79.
MalmqvistJHellbergKMöllåsG, et al. (2019) Conducting the pilot study: a neglected part of the research process? Methodological findings supporting the importance of piloting in qualitative research studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods18: 160940691987834.
80.
MaplesBCeritMVishwanathA, et al. (2024) Loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots. Npj Mental Health Research3(1): 4.
81.
McCarthyJ (1988) Mathematical logic in artificial intelligence. Dædalus117(1): 297–311.
82.
McIntoshTRLiuTSusnjakT, et al. (2024) A culturally sensitive test to evaluate nuanced GPT hallucination. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence1: 1–13.
83.
MengJRheuMZhangY, et al. (2023) Mediated social support for distress reduction: AI chatbots vs. Human. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction7(CSCW1): 1–25.
84.
MeyerJGUrbanowiczRJMartinPCN, et al. (2023) ChatGPT and large language models in academia: opportunities and challenges. BioData Mining16(1): 20.
85.
NazirAWangZ (2023) A comprehensive survey of ChatGPT: advancements, applications, prospects, and challenges. Meta-Radiology1(2): 100022.
86.
OliveiraCPereiraAVagosP, et al. (2021) Effectiveness of mobile app-based psychological interventions for college students: a systematic review of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology12.
87.
OnwuegbuzieAJLeechNL (2005) On becoming a pragmatic researcher: the importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology8(5): 375–387.
88.
OpelDJKiousBMCohenIG (2023) AI as a mental health therapist for adolescents. JAMA Pediatrics177(12): 1253.
89.
PahwaSKhanN (2022) Factors affecting emotional resilience in adults. Management and Labour Studies47(2): 216–232.
90.
PandeySSharmaS (2023) A comparative study of retrieval-based and generative-based chatbots using Deep Learning and Machine Learning. Healthcare Analytics3: 100198.
91.
PandyaALodhaPGanatraA (2024) Is ChatGPT ready to change mental healthcare? Challenges and considerations: a reality-check. Frontiers in Human Dynamics5.
92.
PaniBCrawfordJAllenK-A (2024) Can generative artificial intelligence foster belongingness, social support, and reduce loneliness? A conceptual analysisApplications of Generative AI. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 261–276.
93.
Pérez-FusterPSevillaJHerreraG (2019) Enhancing daily living skills in four adults with autism spectrum disorder through an embodied digital technology-mediated intervention. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders58: 54–67.
94.
PichlerSKohliCGranitzN (2021) DITTO for Gen Z: a framework for leveraging the uniqueness of the new generation. Business Horizons64(5): 599–610.
95.
RaileP (2024) The usefulness of ChatGPT for psychotherapists and patients. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications11(1): 47.
96.
RayPP (2023) ChatGPT: a comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems3: 121–154.
97.
RebeloADVerboomDEdos SantosNR, et al. (2023) The impact of artificial intelligence on the tasks of mental healthcare workers: a scoping review. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans1(2): 100008.
98.
RejebARejebKAppolloniA, et al. (2024) Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on education: a web mining and machine learning approach. International Journal of Management in Education22(1): 100932.
99.
RickardNArjmandH-ABakkerD, et al. (2016) Development of a mobile phone app to support self-monitoring of emotional well-being: a mental health digital innovation. JMIR Mental Health3(4): e49.
100.
RustamovEMusayevaTXalilovaX, et al. (2023) Exploring the relationship between social connectedness and mental wellbeing: the mediating role of psychological resilience among adults in Azerbaijan. Discover Psychology3(1): 15.
101.
SalgueroRBBoguevaDMarinovaD (2024) Australia’s university Generation Z and its concerns about climate change. Sustainable Earth Reviews7(1): 8.
102.
SandhuHSAroraABraschJ, et al. (2019) Mental health stigma: explicit and implicit attitudes of Canadian undergraduate students, medical school students, and psychiatrists. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry64(3): 209–217.
103.
SanjeevMAKhademizadehSArumugamT, et al. (2022) Generation Z and Intention to Use the Digital Library: Does Personality Matter? the Electronic Library 40. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited, 18–37.
104.
SarkerIH (2021) Machine learning: algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN Computer Science2(3): 160.
105.
SarrionandiaARamos-DíazEFernández-LasarteO (2018) Resilience as a mediator of emotional intelligence and perceived stress: a cross-country study. Frontiers in Psychology9.
106.
SchaaffKReinigCSchlippeT (2023) Exploring ChatGPT’s empathic abilities. In: 2023 11th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), Cambridge, MA, USA, 10 September 2023, pp. 1–8. IEEE.
107.
SchneiderTRLyonsJBKhazonS (2013) Emotional intelligence and resilience. Personality and Individual Differences55(8): 909–914.
SharmaMKaushalDJoshiS (2023) Adverse effect of social media on generation Z user’s behavior: government information support as a moderating variable. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services72: 103256.
111.
ShattoBErwinK (2016) Moving on from millennials: preparing for generation Z. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing47(6): 253–254.
112.
ShengJAmankwah-AmoahJWangX (2019) Technology in the 21st century: new challenges and opportunities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change143: 321–335.
113.
SinghSMani PandeyNDattaM, et al. (2021) Stress, internet use, substance use and coping among adolescents, young-adults and middle-age adults amid the ‘new normal’ pandemic era. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health12: 100885.
114.
SquiresMTaoXElangovanS, et al. (2023) Deep learning and machine learning in psychiatry: a survey of current progress in depression detection, diagnosis and treatment. Brain Informatics10(1): 10.
115.
StahlCCLiteratI (2023) #GenZ on TikTok: the collective online self-Portrait of the social media generation. Journal of Youth Studies26(7): 925–946.
116.
SweeneyGMDonovanCLMarchS, et al. (2019) Logging into therapy: adolescent perceptions of online therapies for mental health problems. Internet Interventions15: 93–99.
117.
SzymkowiakAMelovićBDabićM, et al. (2021) Information technology and Gen Z: the role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society65: 101565.
118.
TaecharungrojV (2023) “What can ChatGPT do?” Analyzing early reactions to the innovative AI chatbot on twitter. Big Data and Cognitive Computing7(1): 35.
119.
TakácsRTakácsST KárászJ, et al. (2021) Exploring coping strategies of different generations of students starting university. Frontiers in Psychology12.
120.
TotlisTNatsisKFilosD, et al. (2023) The potential role of ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in anatomy education: a conversation with ChatGPT. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy45(10): 1321–1329.
121.
VamsiGKRasoolAHajelaG (2020) Chatbot: a deep neural network based human to machine conversation model. In: 2020 11th international conference on computing, communication and networking technologies (ICCCNT),Kharagpur, India, July2020, pp. 1–7. IEEE.
122.
Van RooyDLViswesvaranC (2004) Emotional intelligence: a meta-analytic investigation of predictive validity and nomological net. Journal of Vocational Behavior65(1): 71–95.
123.
van WezelMMCCroesEAJAntheunisML (2021) I’m here for you: Can Social Chatbots Truly Support Their Users? A Literature Review. Berlin: Springer, 96–113.
124.
VereschaginMWangAYLeungC, et al. (2023) Co-developing tools to support student mental health and substance use: minder app development from conceptualization to realization. Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy33(1): 35–49.
125.
WangYXuWLuoF (2016) Emotional resilience mediates the relationship between mindfulness and emotion. Psychological Reports118(3): 725–736.
WoodwardKKanjoEBrownDJ, et al. (2022) Beyond mobile apps: a survey of technologies for mental well-being. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing13(3): 1216–1235.
128.
XivuriKTwinomurinziH (2021) A Systematic Review of Fairness in Artificial Intelligence Algorithms. Berlin: Springer, 271–284.
129.
XygkouASiriarayaPCovaciA, et al. (2023) The ‘conversation’ about loss: understanding how chatbot technology was used in supporting people in grief. In: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, 19 April 2023, pp. 1–15. ACM.
130.
YaminM (2019) Information technologies of 21st century and their impact on the society. International Journal of Information Technology11(4): 759–766.
131.
YangLSheng-fengQZhuZ, et al. (2023) Design of a team emotion forecast tool for bettering individual emotional well-being and team performance. Procedia CIRP119: 309–314.
132.
ZhaoWZhaoYLuX, et al. (2023) Is ChatGPT Equipped with Emotional Dialogue Capabilities?arXiv preprint. Epub ahead of print 19 April 2023.
133.
ZhengJLiELiuT (2023) From Web2.0 to Web5.0: the psychological belongingness of gen-Z in the context of digital diversification. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction1–17.
134.
ZhouCLiQLiC, et al. (2023) A Comprehensive Survey on Pretrained Foundation Models: A History from BERT to ChatGPTarXiv preprint. Epub ahead of print 18 February 2023.
