Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Triazole antifungals are widely used as broad-spectrum antifungal activity; however, there are many undetected and unreported adverse events (AEs).

Methods:

Data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the first quarter (Q1) of 2004 to the third quarter (Q3) of 2021 were selected for disproportionality analysis to assess the connection between antifungal triazoles, and AEs and important medical events (IMEs).

Results:

A total of 22,566 records associated with triazole antifungals were identified, with 9584 triazole antifungal–IME pairs. The following system organ classes (SOCs) appeared as significant signals: ‘Endocrine disorders’ [reported odds ratio (ROR) = 167.94], ‘Metabolism and nutrition disorders’ (ROR = 46.30), and ‘Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders’ (ROR = 21.37). Strong signals were observed with respiratory failure, rash, hepatic function abnormal, and hypokalemia. Uncommon security signals included a change in the QT interval, neurotoxicity, pseudoaldosteronism, and hallucinations.

Conclusion:

Various triazole antifungals cause AEs of different types and intensities of association. Our results are broadly consistent with prescribing information and previous studies; however, additional pharmacoepidemiological studies are required to verify AEs with modest incidence but high signal.

Plain Language Summary

A study on the adverse effects of triazole antifungals

Introduction: The triazole antifungals we studied include fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole. Triazole antifungals are widely used as broad-spectrum antifungals; however, there are many undetected and unreported adverse events (AEs).

Materials and Methods: The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database contains AEs reported to the FDA by different countries regarding post-marketing drugs. Through the FAERS database, we retrieved a total of 22,566 AE reports related to triazole antifungals. We not only counted information about patients’ gender, age, weight, reporting country, outcome indicators, and indications but also analyzed the system organ classes (SOCs) of AEs, and the number of reported drug-related AEs and the degree of relevance.

Results: We found a total of 22,566 records related to triazole antifungal agents, of which 9584 reports made important medical events (IMEs) about triazole antifungal agents, which are serious AEs. The following SOCs appear as important signals: ‘endocrine disorders’, ‘metabolic and nutritional disorders’, and ‘skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders’. Triazole antifungals produce AEs, such as respiratory failure, rash, hepatic function abnormal, and hypokalemia. They also produce uncommon AEs, including changes in the QT interval, neurotoxicity, pseudoaldosteronism, and hallucinations.

Conclusion: By analyzing data from the FAERS database, we identified more AEs associated with these five triazole antifungals than were indicated in the instructions and our findings provide additional insight into triazole-related AEs to inform clinicians before and during treatment.

Keywords

adverse drug events azole antifungal FDA Adverse Event Reporting System pharmacovigilance system organ class

Introduction

Triazole antifungals cease fungal growth by inhibiting lanolin 1-4-alpha-demethylase, the cytochrome P450-dependent membrane protein that inhibits the conversion of lanolin to ergosterol, which is primarily responsible for maintaining the integrity of fungal cell membrane.^1–3 Triazole antifungals are broad-spectrum antifungals with clinical indications such as the prevention and treatment of invasive fungal diseases primarily caused by immune deficiency, including the prevention and treatment of invasive fungal diseases caused primarily by immune deficiency.^2,4 For the therapy of candidemia in nonneutropenic, invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), and to prevent invasive candidiasis in the intensive care unit setting, the preferred administration of triazole antifungals as therapeutic agents was proposed by the Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis and Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), updated in 2016.^5,6

In 2004, there were already fluconazole and itraconazole in the market. Voriconazole was launched in 2002. Posaconazole and isavuconazole were introduced in 2006 and 2015, respectively. Although voriconazole has been widely used in children aged > 2 years and adults, there is no indication for its use in neonates and children aged < 2 years. The safety and efficacy of isavuconazole in pediatric patients less than 18 years of age have not been established; therefore, there is no indication for pediatric use. Most of the recently reported side effects of the first four antifungals are dryness, drug rash, hair loss, diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting, and can also lead to prolonged QT interval.^7–13 Although isavuconazole has a similar mechanism of action and belongs to the same triazole class, it causes an adverse reaction opposite to that of the other four drugs, for example, shortening of the QT interval.¹⁴ In addition, the boxed warning of itraconazole indicates drug interactions, cardiac effects, and congestive heart failure (CHF). Therefore, patients with onychomycosis should not be treated with itraconazole when they also have CHF or evidence of ventricular dysfunction (such as a history of CHF).

However, it is unclear whether triazole antifungals may cause other rare or serious adverse events (AEs). Therefore, a comprehensive and in-depth description of important AEs caused by triazole antifungals is critical. This study analyzed data collected from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to examine the system organ classes (SOCs), AEs, and important medical events (IMEs) signals associated with triazole antifungals. We also analyzed information on patient characteristics to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the safety of triazole antifungals and to provide evidence and assurance for their appropriate use in the clinical setting.

Methods

Data sources and standardization

The FAERS is an adverse reaction spontaneous reporting database which contains AE reports, medication error reports, and product quality complaints resulting in AEs that were submitted to FDA. This study coded reported AEs, product quality complaints, and medication errors using terms from the Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) External Link Disclaimer terminology. It enables quantification of the association between the drug and the reported AEs by signal detection.^15–17 In this study, we extracted reports of all triazole antifungal drugs in FAERS between the first quarter of 2004 (first FDA approval) and the third quarter of 2021 (Q3; the latest). Each report in the FAERS database includes information on the following areas: administrative and demographic information and the PRIMARYID; information on the source of the reports; patient outcome information in the case reports; reaction information in the case reports; and medication information in the case reports. At the same time, the FAERS data are processed to remove duplicate data. The information on the demographic information form is processed according to the FDA recommendation; if two or more reported CASEIDs (the number for identifying a FAERS case) were the same, the latest FDA_DT (the date the FDA received the case) was selected. If the CASEID and FDA_DT were the same, the higher PRIMARYID (a unique number for identifying a FAERS report) was selected.¹⁸ The drug names in FAERS have not been standardized and contain various forms of trade names and generic names for each drug. We obtained the trade names of the drugs to be studied by searching the DrugBank database online. The study drugs included fluconazole (Diflucan), itraconazole (Tolsura, Sporanox), voriconazole (Vfend), posaconazole (Noxafil), and isavuconazole (Cresemba).¹⁹ We selected only the role codes set as the primary suspect drug for the initial report. In MedDRA, all AEs were coded as preferred terms (AEs), and in addition, the corresponding master SOCs were assigned according to the AEs, this corresponds to a systematic classification of medical terms. We screened triazole antifungal drug-associated AEs through the list of IMEs and mapped the characteristics of triazole antifungal drug-associated AEs. To identify suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of concern within routine pharmacovigilance activities, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) developed a list of IMEs, which will be used to prioritize its review of reports of suspected ADRs. A complete list of IMEs can be found at https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/other/meddra-important-medical-event-terms-list-version-241_en.xlsx. Serious outcomes include those that result in disability, hospitalization, death, or life-threatening events.

Statistical analysis

In studies of pharmacovigilance, AE signals can indicate potential drug-related AE risk and can be detected using many methods. In this study, we used the most common method of signal detection, disproportionality analysis, which may represent a signal that the frequency of occurrence of a target drug–event pair is disproportionate to other drug–event pairs in the FAERS database.^20,21 We verify the stability of the detection signal by the proportional reporting rate method.^22,23 The application of the proportional reporting ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from the two-by-two contingency table are shown in Table 1. According to EMA guideline, to reduce the probability of a false-positive signal, a significant signal was defined as reported odds ratio (ROR) > 2 with at least 10 cases. All analyses were performed in Python 3 (Anaconda, Friedrichstrasse 123 10117 Berlin, Germany) and Microsoft^® Excel^® 2019 (Microsoft Company, Microsoft Building, No. 5 Danling Street, Haidian District, Beijing, China).

Table 1.

Two-by-two contingency table for the disproportionality analysis.

	Target AEs	Other AEs
Target drugs	a	b
Other drugs	c	d

AEs, adverse events.

‘a’ represents the number of reports containing both the suspect drug and the suspect ADR; ‘b’ represents the number of reports containing the suspect drug with other ADRs (except the event of interest); ‘c’ represents the number of reports containing the suspect ADR with other medications (except the drug of interest); and ‘d’ represents the number of reports containing other medications and other ADRs.

Results

Descriptive analysis

During the study period (from 2004Q1 to 2021Q3), 16,854,646 AE reports were collected in the FAERS database, which contained a total of 78,729 reports of triazole antifungals being reported as the primary suspected drug. Including 21,239 (38.24%) AEs and the distribution of IMEs among the five triazole antifungals and information about the clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Figure 1 demonstrates the number and trend of AEs and IMEs for each year from 2004 to 2021. Generally, among AEs and IMEs collected by FAERS related to triazole antifungals, the distribution of such indicators was similar. The majority of reported cases were male (44.76%), and in the information about age, the median age of patients with triazole antifungal-associated AE was 57 years [interquartile range (IQR) 39–69 years], except for unspecified age, and nearly half (45.08%) of the patients were below 65 years of age. Except for unspecified data, the median weight of reported AE-related patients was 64 (IQR: 52–71) kg. There was an overall upward trend in the number of AE and IME reports with each successive reporting year, peaking in 2019 (AE = 2876, IME = 1527). The majority of AE reports were from the United States (40.86%), followed by France (6.56%). The indications were mainly for the prevention and treatment of fungal infections, such as aspergillosis. Among the outcome indicators reported for patients, serious AEs (SAEs) related to hospitalization were the most frequently reported (28.19%), followed by death (19.84%), and life-threatening accounted for 6.33%. It suggested that triazole antifungals may have potentially SAEs.

Table 2.

Distribution of triazole antifungals across therapies.

	Triazole antifungals-related AEs, n (%)	Triazole antifungals-related IMEs, n (%)
Total	78,729	21,239
Fluconazole	27,826 (35.34)	5287 (24.89)
Itraconazole	10,612 (13.48)	2941 (13.85)
Voriconazole	30,939 (39.30)	10,187 (47.96)
Posaconazole	7493 (9.52)	2500 (11.77)
Isavuconazole	1859 (2.36)	324 (1.53)

AEs, adverse effects; IMEs, important medical events.

Table 3.

Information of patients with reported AEs/ IMEs associated with triazole antifungals.

	Triazole antifungals-related AEs, n (%)	Triazole antifungals-related IMEs, n (%)
Total	25,746	14,367
Gender
Male	11,524 (44.76)	7026 (48.90)
Female	10,503 (40.79)	5301 (36.90)
Unknown or missing	3719 (14.44)	2040 (14.20)
Age (year)
Median (IQR)	57 (39–69)	59 (41–70)
<18	1600 (6.21)	927 (6.45)
18–64	10,008 (38.87)	5686 (39.58)
65–84	6047 (23.49)	3809 (26.51)
>84	474 (1.84)	308 (2.14)
Unknown or missing	7617 (29.59)	3637 (25.31)
Weight (kg)
Median (IQR)	64 (52–71)	63 (50–76)
<73	4355 (16.92)	2564 (17.85)
73–87	1284 (4.99)	685 (4.77)
87–104	563 (2.19)	305 (2.12)
>104	296 (1.15)	139 (0.97)
Unknown or missing	19,248 (74.76)	10,674 (74.30)
Reporter country
United States	10,521 (40.86)	4337 (30.19)
France	1689 (6.56)	1209 (8.42)
United Kingdom	1325 (5.15)	977 (6.80)
Japan	1882 (7.31)	1336 (9.30)
China	1062 (4.12)	701 (4.88)
Other countries	9267 (35.99)	5807 (40.42)
Outcome
Death	5109 (19.84)	4028 (28.04)
Life-threatening	1629 (6.33)	1329 (9.25)
Hospitalization	7257 (28.19)	4985 (34.70)
Disability	566 (2.20)	331 (2.30)
Congenital anomaly	124 (0.48)	95 (0.66)
Required intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage	82 (0.32)	55 (0.38)
Indications
Aspergillus infection	2577 (10.01)	1624 (11.30)
Fungal infection	2288 (8.89)	1088 (7.57)
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis	2166 (8.41)	1374 (9.56)
Prophylaxis	1766 (6.86)	1297 (9.03)
Antifungal prophylaxis	1611 (6.26)	1135 (7.90)

AEs, adverse effects; IMEs, important medical events; IQR, interquartile range.

Figure 1.

The number of AE/IME reports for triazole antifungals between 2004 and 2021.

Association intensity of different SOCs with triazole antifungals-related AEs/IMEs

Considering the triazole antifungals as a whole, the associated AE and IME signal intensities at different SOCs are shown in Table 4. The following SOCs with high signal values were observed: ‘Endocrine disorders’ (ROR of AEs = 167.94; ROR of IMEs = 20.89). In addition, ‘Congenital, familial, and genetic disorders’ (ROR of AEs = 109.91; ROR of IMEs = 27.90), ‘Metabolism and nutrition disorders’ (ROR of AEs = 46.30; ROR of IMEs = 9.84), and ‘Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders’ (ROR of AEs = 21.37; ROR of IMEs = 7.71). Triazole antifungal-induced AEs also showed significance, among them, ‘Surgical and medical procedures’ had a lower number of reports but relatively no significance in IMEs.

Table 4.

Signal strength at the SOC level in triazole antifungals and AEs/IMEs.

SOC	Triazole antifungals-related AEs		Triazole antifungals-related IMEs
	N	ROR	N	ROR
Investigations	3487	19.58	353	14.45
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders	3082	21.37	575	7.71
General disorders and administration site conditions	2056	9.64	115	6.45
Hepatobiliary disorders	1966	7.63	1444	8.28
Cardiac disorders	1546	12.33	1301	15.41
Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders	1285	11.65	—	17.14
Gastrointestinal disorders	1095	16.46	212	33.13
Nervous system disorders	1053	13.29	665	14.13
Blood and lymphatic system disorders	972	4.30	775	3.92
Renal and urinary disorders	713	5.46	582	4.29
Metabolism and nutrition disorders	680	46.30	339	9.84
Psychiatric disorders	545	9.07	520	9.11
Endocrine disorders	454	167.94	350	20.89
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders	447	10.78	243	16.69
Vascular disorders	311	5.98	81	3.10
Eye disorders	240	16.53	49	13.97
Pregnancy, puerperium, and perinatal conditions	234	9.42	215	12.49
Congenital, familial, and genetic disorders	222	109.91	126	27.90
Injury, poisoning, and procedural complications	188	6.18	19	2.90
Reproductive system and breast disorders	162	23.28	10	9.70
Surgical and medical procedures	93	13.86	—	—
Ear and labyrinth disorders	77	9.29	19	17.26
Neoplasms benign, malignant, and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)	62	16.61	59	17.76

AEs, adverse effects; IMEs, important medical events; ROR, reported odds ratio; SOC, system organ class.

The spectrum of IMEs differs in triazole antifungals regimens

To explore whether there is an association between each specific IME and different drugs, we further analyzed the data. Figure 2 lists the top 50 AEs signals by frequency and also includes whether this adverse reaction was reported in the prescribing information (PI). ROR is set as an indicator by us and it is defined as a strong signal when the value is not below 20. The complete table of PTs for triazole antifungals can be found in Supplementary Table S1. The profiles of AE signals are approximately the same in Figure 2 and Supplementary Table S1. The Preferred Terms (PTs) in Figure 2 are grouped by SOC and further sorted in the corresponding SOCs according to the total number of reports in descending order. For the complete signal spectrum, the signals with ROR ⩾ 10 in triazole antifungal-involved AEs were mainly distributed in ‘General disorders and administration site conditions’ (n = 2853), and accordingly, this is where most signals appeared. This result was in line with the intensity between the relevant SOCs attributed by AEs in Table 4.

Figure 2.

Top 50 AEs induced by triazole antifungals.

From a drug-specific perspective, the broadest spectrum of detected signals was fluconazole, which included a total of 182 signals, ranging from pruritus (ROR = 2.02) to synostosis (ROR = 193.71). Most of the AEs identified with fluconazole were currently known as AEs (rash, neutropenia, etc.); however, some stronger signals were found in it (vaginal mucosal blistering), which was not mentioned in the previous PI for fluconazole. For itraconazole, a total of 72 AE signals were mined, with ROR₀₂₅ values ranging from 2.01 (cardiac failure congestive) to 1211.90 (pseudohyponatremia). Strong signals emerged in pseudohyponatremia, symmetrical drug-related intertriginous, and flexural exanthema. The ROR signal for adverse reactions of voriconazole ranged from 2.04 (face edema) to 48.56 (photosensitivity reaction). A total of 71 significant signals were observed, in addition to the rash, hepatotoxicity, and other ADRs that are common to both fluconazole and itraconazole. Voriconazole also had some ADRs, such as photosensitivity reaction, hallucination, which are different from the other azoles. A total of 36 PTs were strongly associated with posaconazole, of which pseudoaldosteronism (PIPH), hepatocellular injury, and hepatotoxicity were all strongly signaled by posaconazole. Since isavuconazole has been on the market for a relatively short period of time, fewer AEs have been reported, and therefore, no adverse reactions meeting the threshold criteria have been reported.

Discussion

In this study, the ROR method was used to mine the FAERS database for potential adverse signals regarding triazole antifungals. The method is based on statistical ideas and disproportionate analysis of data using the ROR method, which has the advantage of mutual validation in a quantitative and rapid manner to reveal the association of the target drug with AEs. In contrast to previous studies that analyzed AEs caused by all triazole antifungal drugs,^24–27 we concentrated on the IMEs related to triazole antifungals, visually expressing the incidence of an important potential danger signal.

Our study showed that some azoles, including fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole, are associated with QT prolongation, this is shown in the PI. The QTc interval is the meaning of the time between depolarization and repolarization of ventricular myocytes, and the interval is related to heart rate, thus is shortened in tachycardia and prolonged in bradycardia. QT intervals > 440 ms are considered pathologically prolonged.²⁸ There are case report studies supporting the association between QT prolongation and fluconazole.^29,30 By retrospectively analyzing patients treated with voriconazole from 2009 to 2015, Gueta et al. compared QT intervals with and without voriconazole, and the results showed a risk of QT prolongation in hematologic patients taking voriconazole, with an AE manifested mainly by QT ⩾ 450 ms and hypokalemia.³¹ Alkan et al. found that an adolescent patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with voriconazole revealed symptoms of QT interval prolongation, nonsustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, and asymptomatic bradycardia. In addition, prolonged QT interval was found to be uncorrelated with voriconazole concentration and dose after redosing.³⁰ By studying the effect of fluconazole on the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) K⁺ channels (wild type, F656C, and Y652A) expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells, Han et al. found that the mechanism by which fluconazole causes acquired long QT syndrome (LQTS) may be through direct inhibition of hERG currents and disruption of hERG protein transport; the obligatory determinants of hERG current inhibition by fluconazole are the Y652 and F656 molecular mutations.³² It is stated in the instructions that these four drugs cause QT prolongation by inhibiting the rectifier potassium channel current (Ikr). Therefore, before prescribing these triazoles, a history of heart disease and coadministration of drugs with potential QT prolongation or metabolism by CYP3A4 should be confirmed in patients. Higher frequency ECGs, and laboratory tests during voriconazole administration, can detect QT interval prolongation over time. However, unlike the first four drugs, the instructions for isavuconazole show that it shortens the QT interval of the heart in a dose-dependent manner. Mellinghoff et al. suggested that the QT interval is influenced by electrolytes, and hypocalcemia influences the de- and repolarization phases of the cardiac action potential by altering the potentials across myocyte cellular membranes.³³ Therefore, in clinical practice, physicians should proactively ask patients if they have a history of relevant genetic disorders. For patients with familial short QT syndrome disease, a very rare autosomal dominant inherited channelopathy, isavuconazole should be contraindicated.^33,34

In Supplementary Table S1, it can be seen that adverse reactions regarding endocrine system disorders mainly include adrenal insufficiency, PIPH. In a single-center, retrospective, observational study, the adverse effects of posaconazole-induced pseudohyperaldosteronism were shown.³⁵ Kevin Kuriakose³⁶ think a potential mechanism is the inhibition of the enzyme 11-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2, with resultant apparent mineralocorticoid excess. Adrenal suppression or insufficiency may also result from azole-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 during concomitant administration of azole antifungals with oral, intravenous, or inhaled corticosteroids.²⁷ If PIPH is not resolved, a change to another triazole antifungal or the addition of an aldosterone antagonist is the additional potential interventions to consider. Despite these interventions, PIPH may persist after treatment modification. Also, early diagnosis and continuous monitoring should also be performed.³⁷

Neurotoxicity, the main feature of the clinical presentation, is a rare and serious adverse reaction.³⁸ It is shown in the instructions that triazoles may increase plasma levels of vinca alkaloids and cause neurotoxicity due to their inhibitory effect on CYP3A4. The mechanism by which triazole antifungals cause neurotoxicity is unclear. Eşkut et al.³⁹ speculated that the coexistence of these systemic abnormalities may be related to the interaction of immune-mediated mechanisms, individual factors, or some unknown genetic cause. Baseline neurotoxicity assessment should be performed before initiating triazole therapy and should be reviewed regularly. Early detection of neuropathy is required to prevent the development of potentially irreversible symptoms.⁴⁰ Such adverse reactions can also occur when two drugs are coadministered. Since vincristine is a CYP3A4 substrate and azole antifungals are CYP3A4 inhibitors, when triazole antifungals are coadministered with vincristine, they inhibit the metabolism of vincristine, resulting in overexposure to vincristine and serious neurotoxicity.^41,42

Thompson et al. found differences in the fluorine content of fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. Voriconazole is a trifluorinated compound containing three fluorine atoms; fluconazole and posaconazole are difluoro compounds with two fluorine atoms; and itraconazole does not contain fluorine atoms.⁴³ By analyzing 215 cases, Tailor and Richardson⁴⁴ found that only voriconazole caused periosteal reactions and bone pain, and concluded that there is a correlation between skeletal manifestations and hyperfluoridemia. This is also indicated in voriconazole’s PI: fluorosis and periostitis reactions have been reported during long-term voriconazole treatment, and voriconazole should be discontinued if these symptoms occur. In a study by Moon et al., high plasma fluoride concentrations with periostitis and clinical symptoms of skeletal pain were found in patients on voriconazole therapy for a long time. This adverse effect can be prevented by measuring fluoride concentrations.⁴⁵ Wermers et al.⁴⁶ found that transplant patients on long-term voriconazole produced exophytic bone and warty painful periostitis associated with fluoride overdose, in addition to a decrease in fluoride levels and improvement in skeletal pain when voriconazole was discontinued.

Some AEs (e.g. hallucinations) associated with voriconazole have been previously reported in the literature.^47–51 Hallucinations may occur after voriconazole and isavuconazole are administered in the PI and may also occur when fluconazole is overdosed. A study addressing the prospective collection of data on AEs and systematic observation of patients using a predefined clinical study format found a 16.6% incidence of hallucinations in patients with hematological and other malignancies after voriconazole administration, which was significantly higher than the levels found in previous studies. This may be because physicians focus more on whether the patient’s illness improves after taking voriconazole and do not ask about AEs (such as hallucinations) that may be considered unrelated. Patients should be warned of this AE before starting treatment with voriconazole; driving should be avoided after administration and patients should be reminded that hallucinations are not a sign of mental illness.⁴⁹ A large multicentre study of therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole showed that AEs related to neurotoxicity (including visual and auditory hallucinations) are minimized when voriconazole is administered at drug concentrations ⩽ 5 mg/liter. Therefore, voriconazole is a predictor of neurotoxic AEs, and its dose can be reduced or it can be discontinued when this AE occurs.⁵²

In AEs and IMEs caused by triazole antifungals, we obtained signals of hepatobiliary disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, and nervous system disorders, which were generally in line with the safety data derived from another systematic review and meta-analysis.⁵³ Therefore, when using such drugs, clinicians and patients should pay attention to whether they have AE symptoms mentioned above and, if necessary, performance measures, such as drug monitoring or drug discontinuation, should be implemented.

This study has some limitations. First, FAERS is the part of the Spontaneous Reporting System, which has inherent flaws, such as incomplete information reported, duplicate cases reported, unverified information in reports, inability to determine incidence through reports, and the presence of reports that do not determine causality. Although we performed duplicate data removal and manual correction of the data, there may still be records for these five drugs that were not retrieved. Second, despite the disproportionate analysis is mostly used in pharmacovigilance, this method still has limitations and lacks criteria to assess the validity and extent of drug safety problems.^54,55 To provide clinicians with a quicker and more intuitive understanding of suspected AEs with triazole antifungals, we defined a threshold grading of signal intensity. In addition, monitored AE signals represent only potential associations, not causality. Finally, the single use of these five triazole antifungal drugs was analyzed by us in this study. Therefore, in the follow-up sequence study, we considered comparing other drugs and the safety signals after the combination. Nonetheless, a large amount of data on adverse drug events is provided by FAERS. We systematically mined and analyzed potential AEs and IMEs signals related to triazole antifungals and provided the number of reported AEs and signal values of triazole antifungal-induced AEs, which may provide a valuable real-world basis for further investigative studies of clinical practice and drug–AE relationships in the field.

Conclusion

With the widespread utilization of triazole antifungals, potential safety concerns have emerged. Our comprehensive study of potential IME signatures of triazole antifungals showed that the typology and number of IMEs varied depending on the medication. The majority of results were in line with the PI and previous studies except for hallucinations, osteochondritis, and prolonged ECG QT. Results based on the FAERS database can only suggest that these IMEs were reported in triazole antifungals, and evidence of causality requires extra studies, such as pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic plausibility, and pharmacoepidemiological studies, and other safety studies.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-taw-10.1177_20420986221143266 – Supplemental material for Safety of triazole antifungals: a pharmacovigilance study from 2004 to 2021 based on FAERS

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-taw-10.1177_20420986221143266 for Safety of triazole antifungals: a pharmacovigilance study from 2004 to 2021 based on FAERS by Shuang Chai, Jing-Lun Zhan, Li-Mei Zhao and Xiao-Dong Liu in Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the contributors of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, and the 345 Talent Program of Shengjing Hospital and Outstanding Scientific Fund of Shengjing Hospital for the funding support.

Declarations

ORCID iD

Shuang Chai

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Fera

La Camera

De Sarro

New triazoles and echinocandins: mode of action, in vitro activity, and mechanisms of resistance. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2009; 7: 981–998.

Tragiannidis

Gkampeta

Vousvouki

, et al. Antifungal agents and the kidney: pharmacokinetics, clinical nephrotoxicity, and interactions. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20: 1061–1074.

Sivasubramanian

Chandrasekar

PH.

Efficacy and safety of Isavuconazole for the treatment of invasive Aspergillus infection – an update of the literature. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23: 543–549.

Panagopoulou

Roilides

Evaluating posaconazole, its pharmacology, efficacy, and safety for the prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23: 175–199.

Pappas

Kauffman

Andes

, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62: e1–e50.

Patterson

Thompson

3rd Denning

, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62: e1–e50.

Schneller-Pavelescu

Ochando-Ibernón

Vergara-de Caso

, et al. Herpes simplex-like fixed drug eruption induced by fluconazole without cross-reactivity to itraconazole. Dermatitis 2019; 30: 174–175.

Davis

Nguyen

Donnelley

, et al. Tolerability of long-term fluconazole therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019; 74: 768–771.

Nasir

Goldsmith

Anogenital allergic contact dermatitis caused by methylchloroisothiazolinone, methylisothiazolinone, and topical clotrimazole with subsequently generalized exanthem triggered by oral fluconazole. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 74: 296–297.

10.

Wang

Xue

Zhu

, et al. Efficacy and safety of echinocandins versus triazoles for the prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections: a meta-analysis of RCTs. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2015; 34: 651–659.

11.

Quindós

Gil-Alonso

Marcos-Arias

, et al. Therapeutic tools for oral candidiasis: current and new antifungal drugs. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2019; 24: e172–e180.

12.

Owens

Jr Nolin

TD.

Antimicrobial-associated QT interval prolongation: pointes of interest. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43: 1603–1611.

13.

Owens

Jr.

QT prolongation with antimicrobial agents: understanding the significance. Drugs 2004; 64: 1091–1124.

14.

Mellinghoff

Bassetti

Dörfel

, et al. Isavuconazole shortens the QTc interval. Mycoses 2018; 61: 256–260.

15.

Goldman

Raschi

Cukierman-Yaffe

, et al. Hyperglycaemic disorders associated with PCSK9 inhibitors: a real-world, pharmacovigilance study. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2022; 29: 1334–1342.

16.

Rana

Aleo

Wen

, et al. Hepatotoxicity reports in the FDA adverse event reporting system database: a comparison of drugs that cause injury via mitochondrial or other mechanisms. Acta Pharm Sin B 2021; 11: 3857–3868.

17.

Swisher

Kshirsagar

Adappa

, et al. Dupilumab adverse events in nasal polyp treatment: analysis of FDA adverse event reporting system. Laryngoscope 2022; 132: 2307–2313.

18.

Liao

Liu

Song

Thyroid dysfunction related to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a real-world study based on FAERS. J Clin Pharm Ther 2021; 46: 1418–1425.

19.

DrugBank database, https://go.drugbank.com/ (accessed 12 April 2022).

20.

Ekhart

van Hunsel

van Puijenbroek

, et al. Post-marketing safety profile of vortioxetine using a cluster analysis and a disproportionality analysis of global adverse event reports. Drug Saf 2022; 45: 145–153.

21.

Alkabbani

Gamble

JM.

Active-comparator restricted disproportionality analysis for pharmacovigilance signal detection studies of chronic disease medications: an example using sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Br J Clin Pharmacol. Epub ahead of print 28 December 2021. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15178.

22.

Shao

Yin

Liu

, et al. Kidney injury following ibuprofen and acetaminophen: a real-world analysis of post-marketing surveillance data. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12: 750108.

23.

Song

Kim

, et al. Potential adverse events reported with the Janus kinase inhibitors approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using spontaneous reports and online patient reviews. Front Pharmacol 2022; 12: 792877.

24.

Polizzi

Raschi

Motola

, et al. Antimicrobials and the risk of torsades de pointes: the contribution from data mining of the US FDA adverse event reporting system. Drug Saf 2010; 33: 303–314.

25.

Nasir

Goldsmith

Anogenital allergic contact dermatitis caused by methylchloroisothiazolinone, methylisothiazolinone, and topical clotrimazole with a generalized exanthem triggered by oral fluconazole. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 74: 296–297.

26.

DiPippo

Rausch

Kontoyiannis

DP.

Tolerability of isavuconazole after posaconazole toxicity in leukaemia patients. Mycoses 2019; 62: 81–86.

27.

Benitez

Carver

PL.

Adverse effects associated with long-term administration of Azole antifungal agents. Drugs 2019; 79: 833–853.

28.

Pham

de Feiter

van der Kuy

, et al. Long QTc interval and torsade de pointes caused by fluconazole. Ann Pharmacother 2006; 40: 1456–1461.

29.

Elming

Sonne

Lublin

HK.

The importance of the QT interval: a review of the literature. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2003; 107: 96–101.

30.

Alkan

Haefeli

Burhenne

, et al. Voriconazole-induced QT interval prolongation and ventricular tachycardia: a non-concentration-dependent adverse effect. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39: e49–e52.

31.

Gueta

Loebstein

Markovits

, et al. Voriconazole-induced QT prolongation among hemato-oncologic patients: clinical characteristics and risk factors. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2017; 73: 1181–1185.

32.

Han

Zhang

Chen

, et al. Fluconazole inhibits hERG K(+) channel by direct block and disruption of protein trafficking. Eur J Pharmacol 2011; 10650: 138–144.

33.

Mellinghoff

Bassetti

Dörfel

, et al. Isavuconazole shortens the QTc interval. Mycoses 2018; 61: 256–260.

34.

Keirns

Desai

Kowalski

, et al. QT interval shortening with isavuconazole: in vitro and in vivo effects on cardiac repolarization. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2017; 101: 782–790.

35.

Nguyen

Davis

Wittenberg

, et al. Posaconazole serum drug levels associated with pseudohyperaldosteronism. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 70: 2593–2598.

36.

Tantiprawan

Sunthornyothin

Boonchaya-Anant

, et al. Posaconazole-induced pseudohyperaldosteronism. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2021; 37: 253–254.

37.

Davis

Nguyen

Gintjee

, et al. Management of posaconazole-induced pseudohyperaldosteronism. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75: 3688–3693.

38.

Pasikhova

Ludlow

SP.

Fluconazole associated agranulocytosis and thrombocytopenia. Int J Clin Pharm 2014; 36: 268–270.

39.

Eşkut

Gedizlioğlu

Ünal

, et al. Acute fluconazole toxicity: a case presenting with protean manifestations including systemic and neurologic symptoms. Postgrad Med 2021; 133: 250–252.

40.

Baxter

Marshall

Roberts

, et al. Peripheral neuropathy in patients on long-term triazole antifungal therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66: 2136–2139.

41.

Nikanjam

Sun

Albers

, et al. Vincristine-associated neuropathy with antifungal usage: a Kaiser Northern California experience. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2018; 40: e273–e277.

42.

Moriyama

Henning

Leung

, et al. Adverse interactions between antifungal azoles and vincristine: review and analysis of cases. Mycoses 2012; 55: 290–297.

43.

Thompson

3rd Bays

Cohen

, et al. Fluoride excess in coccidioidomycosis patients receiving long-term antifungal therapy: an assessment of currently available triazoles. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56: 563–564.

44.

Tailor

Richardson

ML.

Case 215: voriconazole-induced periostitis. Radiology 2015; 274: 930–935.

45.

Moon

Scheller

Suneja

, et al. Plasma fluoride level as a predictor of voriconazole-induced periostitis in patients with skeletal pain. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59: 1237–1245.

46.

Wermers

Cooper

Razonable

, et al. Fluoride excess and periostitis in transplant patients receiving long-term voriconazole therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52: 604–611.

47.

Maertens

Rahav

Lee

, et al. Posaconazole versus voriconazole for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis: a phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2021; 397: 499–509.

48.

Hoenigl

Prattes

Neumeister

, et al. Real-world challenges and unmet needs in the diagnosis and treatment of suspected invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with haematological diseases: an illustrative case study. Mycoses 2018; 61: 201–205.

49.

Pea

Viale

Hallucinations during voriconazole therapy: who is at higher risk and could benefit from therapeutic drug monitoring. Ther Drug Monit 2009; 31: 135–136.

50.

Boyd

Modi

Howard

, et al. Adverse reactions to voriconazole. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39: 1241–1244.

51.

Walsh

Pappas

Winston

, et al. Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 225–234.

52.

Dolton

Ray

Chen

, et al. Multicenter study of voriconazole pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56: 4793–4799.

53.

Galvão

Rabello

Cota

GF.

Efficacy of azole therapy for tegumentary leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0186117.

54.

Almenoff

Pattishall

Gibbs

, et al. Novel statistical tools for monitoring the safety of marketed drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007; 82: 157–166.

55.

Rothman

Lanes

Sacks

ST.

The reporting odds ratio and its advantages over the proportional reporting ratio. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2004; 13: 519–523.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB