Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Accumulating evidence demonstrates the link between glucose and bone metabolism. The receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL)/the receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) axis is an essential signaling axis maintaining the balance between bone resorption and bone formation. In recent years, it has been found that RANKL and RANK are distributed not only in bone but also in the liver, muscle, adipose tissue, pancreas, and other tissues that may influence glucose metabolism. Some scholars have suggested that the blockage of the RANKL signaling may protect islet β-cell function and prevent diabetes; simultaneously, there also exist different views that RANKL can improve insulin resistance through inducing the beige adipocyte differentiation and increase energy expenditure. Currently, the results of the regulatory effect on glucose metabolism of RANKL remain conflicting. Denosumab (Dmab), a fully human monoclonal antibody that can bind to RANKL and prevent osteoclast formation, is a commonly used antiosteoporosis drug. Recent basic studies have found that Dmab seems to regulate glucose homeostasis and β-cell function in humanized mice or in vitro human β-cell models. Besides, some clinical data have also reported the glucometabolic effects of Dmab, however, with limited and inconsistent results. This review mainly describes the impact of the RANKL signaling pathway on glucose metabolism and summarizes clinical evidence that links Dmab and DM to seek a new therapeutic strategy for diabetes.

Keywords

denosumab diabetes mellitus glucose metabolism insulin resistance RANKL

Introduction

With its increasing prevalence, diabetes mellitus (DM) has been a serious public health issue in contemporary society, which has already affected more than 537 million adults worldwide in 2021 and approximately 643 million by 2030.¹ A chronic hyperglycemia state caused by islet β-cell dysfunction (insufficient insulin secretion or insulin resistance) can lead to diabetic microvascular and macrovascular complications, which severely influence the patient’s quality of life and expectancy. Therefore, it’s necessary to look for effective approaches to maintain glucose homeostasis and improve β-cell function.

Osteoporosis is a common endocrine disease characterized by bone mass loss and bone microstructure destruction, which predisposes to fractures and contributes to significant disability and mortality. There is mounting evidence that supports a strong interaction between glucose and bone metabolism. DM patients are more likely to fracture than the overall population.^2–4 Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may experience detrimental effects on their bone health as a result of chronic hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, reduced sex hormones, and the use of some antidiabetic drugs such as thiazolidinedione.^5–7 In turn, some osteokines that are bioactive factors and peptides mainly secreted by bone tissue cells are also thought to have the potential to regulate glucose metabolism. Osteocalcin, secreted by osteoblast, can favor insulin secretion and improve glucose tolerance, which is regarded to be a protective factor against the onset of DM.^8,9 The receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL), the receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK), and osteoprotegerin (OPG) are also crucial osteokines to modulate bone metabolism, forming a vital signaling axis that can maintain the balance between bone resorption and bone formation. Previous research has demonstrated that patients with T2DM had higher serum OPG levels, which are also strongly related to the onset of T2DM and its consequences.^10,11 However, several studies have presented opposite views: the RANKL/RANK signaling may be harmful to T2DM by inducing insulin resistance and reducing glucose uptake in peripheral tissues, while OPG, as a RANKL decoy receptor, can block the binding between RANKL and RANK, thereby enhancing insulin sensitivity.¹² Until now, research on the relationship between RANKL signaling and glucose metabolism has been limited and controversial. Similarly, the monoclonal RANKL antibody denosumab (Dmab), which functions in the same way as OPG, has been reported to promote β-cell proliferation and glucose metabolism in basic studies,^12,13 but the corresponding clinical evidence is insufficient. Therefore, this review investigates the effects of the RANKL signal pathway on glucose metabolism and summarizes clinical data related to Dmab to provide new insights into the treatment of diabetes.

RANKL/RANK/OPG pathway

RANKL, encoded by the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) ligand superfamily 11 gene, is a major activator stimulating osteoclast differentiation and maturation. RANK is the sole signaling receptor essential for RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis, which is a homotrimeric transmembrane protein with a 616 amino acid sequence.^14,15 RANKL and RANK are mainly expressed in bone, bone marrow, and lymphoid tissues.¹⁶ OPG, belonging to a member of the TNF receptor superfamily, is a secretory protein that regulates bone density, first identified and named by Simonet’s team in 1997.¹⁷ It is produced in various organs and tissues, not only in bones where OPG levels are highest but also in the liver, kidneys, pancreas, heart, gastrointestinal tract, and vascular endothelium.¹⁸

RANKL plays a pivotal role in the development of osteoporosis. RANKL binds to RANK on the surface of osteoclast precursor cells, triggering a signaling switch called ‘tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6)’, which then activates relevant signaling pathways, including NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), to promote osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption. In turn, as a soluble decoy receptor for RANKL, OPG, can inhibit osteoclastogenesis and prevent bone loss by binding to RANKL and blocking the interaction between RANKL and RANK.^17,19 Therefore, the RANKL/RANK/OPG axis is the essential signaling pathway for modulating the balance of bone metabolism. And Dmab, as the specific RANKL inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of osteoporosis to reduce bone resorption, increase bone mass, and improve bone density.

RANKL and glucose metabolism

The adverse effect of RANKL on glucose metabolism

Preceding studies have reported that RANKL and RANK can also be expressed in human liver tissues and pancreas β cells besides bones,²⁰ suggesting that it may participate in the regulation of glucose metabolism. The Bruneck Study, a prospective population survey on 844 Italian citizens with non-T2DM followed for 15 years, showed that RANKL concentration was associated with an increased risk of T2DM and was an independent predictor of the development of T2DM.²¹ Bilger et al.²² revealed that soluble RANKL (sRANKL) concentrations were higher in prediabetes groups than those in body mass index (BMI)- and age-matched control groups, and logistic regression analyses demonstrated that subjects with higher sRANKL levels have an increased risk of prediabetes. Similar findings were found in Karalazou et al.’s study,²³ where T1DM patients had higher serum RANKL levels and lower OPG levels compared with controls. As of now, the mechanism of the RANKL pathway impairing glucose metabolism has not been fully elucidated, which may mainly correlate with insulin resistance and islet β-cell proliferation (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

The effect on glucose metabolism of RANKL/RANK pathway.

RANKL induces insulin resistance

It is generally recognized that hepatic resistance is the key event in the etiology of T2DM, and abundant evidence supports that NF-κB pathway activation is a crucial step to cause hepatic insulin resistance and T2DM.^24–27 As a vital activator of NF-κB, RANKL may contribute to this process. Kiechl et al.²¹ observed that blockage of RANKL signaling remarkably ameliorated liver insulin sensitivity and lowered fasting glucose concentration in both high-fat-fed and leptin-deficiency (ob/ob) mouse models. A similar finding could be seen in a clinical study of 14 osteoporotic women from Italy that the administration of RANKL inhibitor (Dmab) for 4 weeks is helpful to reduce hepatic insulin resistance index (HIRI) (logHIRI: −0.2, p = 0.01).²⁸ Another study from Japan including 20 patients with osteoporosis also found that inhibiting RANKL can improve liver function, with the decline of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (−1.6 U/L, p = 0.004) and aspartate transaminase (AST) (−1.8 U/L, p = 0.014).²⁹ Kiechl’s team performed in vitro studies of cultured mouse hepatocytes and demonstrated that hepatocytes could steadily express RANK mRNA and the stimulation of hepatocytes with RANKL could promote upregulation of NF-κB-induced proinflammatory factors such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and IL-10, and activate kupffer cells, which in turn caused excess accumulation of liver fat and insulin resistance.²¹ Conversely, the role of RANKL disappeared after RANK genes in hepatocytes were knocked out.²¹ It can be seen that the liver is a target organ of RANKL action. The combination of RANKL and RANK activates NF-KB signaling in hepatocytes and induces inflammation, which exerts an essential role in the pathogenesis of hepatic insulin resistance.

Reduced glucose uptake by peripheral tissues is another crucial reason to accelerate insulin resistance. Preceding studies have shown that RANKL mRNA and protein can be detected in the skeletal muscle of mice.^30,31 Recently, Bonnet et al.¹² observed that compared with wild-type (WT) mice, human RANKL transgenic (huRANKLTg⁺) mice (5 times higher levels of human RANKL than WT mice) exhibited the attenuated muscle strength and decreased glucose uptake, accompanied by increased expression of inflammatory markers such as TNF-α and protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor gamma (PTP-RG). As confirmed previously, high TNF-α levels can attenuate the affinity of insulin receptor substrate1 (IRS1) to insulin and impede normal insulin signal transduction.^32,33 PTP-RG is also reported to cause inflammation-induced insulin resistance via binding to NF-kB.³⁴ Besides, Bonnet et al.¹² also found that prolonged RANKL exposure increased the phosphorylation of IRS1 ser318, which is known to downregulate the activity of insulin receptor 1, while OPG-Fc could reverse the deleterious effects of RANKL by blocking the NF-κB pathway, thereby improving insulin receptor activation. In addition, as expected, RANKL inhibitor Dmab, as with OPG, also improved muscle function, glucose entry, and insulin resistance in huRANKLTg⁺ mice. Thus, RANKL signaling can reduce muscle glucose uptake possibly by directly downregulating insulin receptors and indirectly increasing inflammation cytokines, while OPG and Dmab exert a protective effect on insulin sensitivity and glucose utilization by blocking the RANKL-mediated NF-κB pathway.

As is known to all, resistin is an important adipocytokine that can induce insulin resistance by both adenosine 5′ monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-dependent and AMPK-independent pathways. The latest data have indicated that the levels of resistin increase during RANK-induced osteoclast differentiation and osteoclast may decrease glucose uptake in C2C12 cells (a muscle cell) and further promote insulin resistance by secreting resistin.^34,35 Recently, another important regulator of glucose hemostasis, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4), is also identified to be an osteoclast-driving coupling factor in humans. In a novel finding, RANKL signaling in osteoclasts induced DPP-4 expression, high levels of which would accelerate the degradation of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), leading to decreased insulin and increased glucagon secretion, thereby promoting hyperglycemia. Conversely, suppressing RANKL can decline the levels of circulating DPP-4 accompanied by the rising levels of GLP-1, and then improve insulin resistance and glucose metabolism.³⁶ Thus, RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation drives the secretion of some crucial factors modulating glucose metabolism such as resistin and DPP-4, which may be an indirect mechanism of insulin resistance caused by RANKL.

RANKL induces islet β-cell dysfunction

Besides insulin resistance, RANKL/RANK/OPG may affect islet β-cell function. Through in vivo and in vitro experiments, Kondegowda et al.¹³ verified that RANKL may be the breaker of human islet β-cell proliferation, while OPG can exert a protective effect by interfering with RANKL/RANK pathway. MAPK signaling is a vital signaling pathway that regulates cell proliferation, growth, differentiation, and apoptosis in mammal animals, for which P38 MAPK is a crucial component. Plentiful evidence highlights that activation of P38 MAPK is one of the key mechanisms inducing islet β-cell apoptosis.^37,38 It has been confirmed that RANKL can bind to RANK to activate the p38MAPK signaling pathway in osteoclasts, but whether this mechanism exists in the pancreas is unknown. As early as 2007, Schrader et al.³⁹ discovered that OPG could protect pancreatic beta cells from damage by inhibiting p38 MAPK phosphorylation in human islet cells. However, since no RANK mRNA was detected at that time, the effect of RANKL on MAPK and beta cells could not be evaluated. In 2018, Diedisheim’s study described that human islets could also express RANKL and RANK mRNA. RANKL could phosphorylate p38 in a dose-dependent manner, while exogenous OPG prevented the phosphorylation of P38 by RANKL.⁴⁰ Thus, RANKL can activate the p38MAPK, leading to human islet β-cell dysfunction, while OPG can protect it by blunting RANKL signaling.

In addition, Malle’s study demonstrated that the noncanonical NF-κB pathway mediated by NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK) is a novel mechanism of damaging β-cell function. RANKL could induce the activation of NIK, further influencing islet β-cell mass and impairing glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in human islets.⁴¹

The beneficial effect of RANKL on glucose metabolism

Although much data show the deleterious effect of RANKL on glucose metabolism, there also exist contradictory results. In previous reports, high serum OPG level was regarded to increase the risk of obesity, insulin resistance, T2DM, and cardiovascular disease possibly due to the deleterious role on endothelial function.^42–44 Conversely, the latest study found that,⁴⁵ in the condition of the high-fat diet, compared with WT mice, OPG−/− mice exhibit white fat tissue (WAT) browning, lower weight gain, preserved insulin sensitivity, and improved glucose metabolism as well as higher serum RANKL levels. And RANKL treatment could increase energy expenditure by inducing beige adipocyte differentiation in preadipocytes and browning of WAT depots, which shed light on the possible beneficial aspect of RANKL from the perspective of adipocyte cells. However, the levels of serum adiponectin and osteocalcin, two important proteins that are considered to improve insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism,^46,47 are also elevated in this OPG-deficiency mice model, which may interfere with the results.⁴⁵ In addition, besides RANKL, OPG also acts as a decoy ligand for TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a transmembrane belonging to the TNF family number.⁴⁸ Previous studies have shown that TRAIL exhibited positive metabolic effects in mice by decreasing adipose tissue gene expression and inducing adipocyte apoptosis, as well as downregulating inflammatory factors TNF-α and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) in adipose tissue.⁴⁹ Therefore, we speculated that the loss of OPG may enhance the action of TRAIL and play a protective effect on energy metabolism. Taken together, OPG has some biological effects independent of RANKL, which may limit the contribution of the RANKL activation on adipose tissue to some degree. Thus, the deeper mechanism of RANKL acting on adipocytes remains to be investigated.

The Notch signaling pathway is a key pathway leading to islet β-cell impairment in diabetic patients, and there may be an interaction between the RANKL and the Notch pathway. In vitro, exogenous RANKL stimulation for mouse RAW264.7 cell can decrease Notch1 expression and suppress the Notch pathway downstream signal ‘Hes1 and Hey1 molecules’ to inhibit the Notch signal transduction,^50,51 which suggests that RANKL may prevent pancreatic β-cell damage by inhibiting the Notch 1 signal. However, the downregulation of Notch1 can increase the expression of RANK mRNA,⁵¹ further promoting the combination between RANK and RANKL, which may be detrimental for islet β cells. The outcome of the reciprocity between RANKL and Notch1 signal on glucose metabolism is unclear; thus, it is necessary to investigate this mechanism in depth.

Moreover, Some studies have reported that RANKL and RANK are also expressed in the hypothalamus and septal regions of the brain.^31,52 Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) are two important neuropeptides in the hypothalamus that promote and inhibit appetite, respectively.⁵³ Zhu et al.⁵⁴ showed that NPY mRNA decreased and CART mRNA increased in RANKL-treated mice, suggesting that RANKL can reduce food intake and causes weight loss via modulating the hypothalamic NPY/CART pathways. Besides, it has been reported that RANKL/RANK signal exerted an anti-inflammatory influence by preventing Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 signaling in the brain,⁵⁵ the activation of which can induce obesity and insulin resistance, thus leading to T2DM.⁵⁶ Nevertheless, it was conflicting with the results that RANKL/RANK can enhance the expression of proinflammatory factors.^21,12 To conclude, RANKL may play a beneficial role in glucose metabolism by regulating some pathways in the brain, but the specific mechanism remains to be well-studied.

Dmab and glucose metabolism

Dmab, a human monoclonal antibody of RANKL that can specifically bind to RANKL and prevent the combination of RANKL and RANK on osteoclasts, is currently applied to treat osteoporosis clinically due to the ability of anti-bone absorption. Multiple animal studies have demonstrated that Dmab may have the potential to improve glucose metabolism and β-cell function.^13,57 However, available clinical data on Dmab and glucose metabolism are inadequate and inconsistent (Table 1). Weivoda et al.³⁶ found that Dmab treatment could reduce circulating DPP-4 levels and increase GLP-1 levels in nondiabetic postmenopausal women. Based on this, he followed up a cohort including 345 T2DM patients treated with Dmab, versus bisphosphonate or calcium plus vitamin D (C/VitD) for 1 year (115 patients per group), the results indicating that Dmab was helpful to improve glucose homeostasis (HbA1c: −0.239%,+0.126%, and + 0.356% in Dmab, bisphosphonate, and C/VitD groups, respectively; p < 0.05) in T2DM patients compared with controls.³⁶ This not only reconfirms the interconnection between glucose and bone metabolism but also provides a new idea for the treatment of diabetes. Abe et al.²⁹ obtained the same findings from 20 patients with osteoporosis and T2DM: the levels of both fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were decreased from baseline to end-points (52 weeks), simultaneously accompanied by the improvement of insulin resistance [the decrease of homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)] and liver enzymes [alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST)]. Napoli performed a post hoc analysis from a large randomized controlled trial (RCT) on Dmab, and the results were slightly different from the above two studies.⁵⁸ He revealed that Dmab could only reduce FPG levels in diabetic patients who did not receive hypoglycemic drugs, whereas it did not affect FPG in the overall diabetic population. Moreover, he analyzed 1268 pre-diabetic postmenopausal women receiving Dmab therapy and found the FPG levels were also not improved in these populations either.⁵⁸

Table 1.

Clinical studies focused on the effect of denosumab on glucose metabolism.

Author	Study design	Study Subjects	Dmab group sample	follow-up time (months)	Age (years)	Invention	Outcome
Weivoda et al.³⁶	Randomized controlled trial	46 postmenopausal women with NGT	22	3	66.7 ± 4.9 69.5 ± 6.0	Dmab 60mg; placebo	Dmab increased GLP-1 levels and reduced DPP-4 levels, however, without the change of FPG and insulin levels
Weivoda et al.³⁶	Case–control study	345 patients with osteoporosis and T2DM (or prediabetes)	115	6, 12	74.1 ± 10.0 71.4 ± 9.5; 70.3 ± 9.6	Dmab 60mg; calcium/vitamin D; bisphosphate	Compared with either bisphosphonates or calcium and vitamin D, Dmab treatment showed significant reductions in FPG levels at 6 months and HbA1c levels at 12 months in T2DM patients
Abe et al.²⁹	Prospective observational study	20 patients with osteoporosis and T2DM	20	6,12	72.1 ± 7.2	Dmab 60 mg per 26 weeks	Dmab can significantly decrease the levels of FPG, HbA1c, and HOMA-IR as well as the liver enzymes at 12 months
Napoli et al.⁵⁸	Post hoc analysis of FREEDOM study^a	666 postmenopausal women with T2DM	342	36	73.5 ± 5.1; 73.4 ± 5.1	Dmab 60 mg per 6 months, for 36 months; placebo	DMAb did not improve FPG levels in postmenopausal osteoporotic women with diabetes, but the levels of FPG slightly lowered in those with diabetes who were not on antidiabetic drugs
		1268 postmenopausal women with prediabetes	628	36	72.6 ± 5.4;72.4 ± 5.0	Dmab 60 mg per 6 months, for 36 months; placebo	Dmab had no impact on the levels of FPG in postmenopausal osteoporotic women with prediabetes
Passeri et al.²⁸	Prospective observational study	14 postmenopausal osteoporotic women with NGT	14	1, 3	67.1 ± 11.6	Single 60 mg Dmab	Dmab did not affect the levels of FPG, insulin, and HOMA-IR, but the hepatic insulin resistance index was reduced at 1 month, accompanied by the decline of HbA1c
Lasco et al.⁵⁹	Prospective observational study	48 postmenopausal women with NGT	48	1, 3, 6	57.89 ± 6.34	Single 60 mg Dmab	Dmab had no clinical effect on FPG and HOMA-IR in nondiabetic postmenopausal women
Rossini et al.⁶⁰	Prospective observational study	14 postmenopausal Women with breast cancer and NGT	14	1, 5	68.1 ± 8.1	Single 60mg Dmab	Dmab had no influence on glucose metabolism in the population with NGT, but it can induce a short-term insulin sensitivity improvement in insulin-resistant patients

Dmab, denosumab; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; NGT, normal glucose tolerance; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

FREEDOM study: FREEDOM is a 3-year randomized, placebo-controlled trial on the efficacy of denosumab on vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Other scholars had also similar conclusions that Dmab did not affect glucose homeostasis in individuals with normal glucose tolerance (NGT).⁵⁹ Notably, although some studies did not find the clinical effect of Dmab on glucose metabolism, they detected that it seems to improve hepatic insulin sensitivity.^28,60 In 2021, to determine whether Dmab can improve glycemic parameters, Pacheco-Soto et al.⁶¹ did a meta-analysis involving 1203 participants and found that Dmab could reduce FPG levels (standardized mean difference, SMD = −0.388 mg/dl, p = 0.017) and ameliorate insulin resistance (HOMA-IR: −0.223, p = 0.008) in the overall population, but without the change of HbA1c (SMD = −0.075%, p = 0.538). Further subgroup analysis showed that this beneficial effect on FPG (SMD = −0.636 mg/dl, p = 0.010) and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR: −0.573, p = 0.008) was more prominent in individuals with prediabetes or diabetes than in those with NGT, and the significant improvement of HbA1c (SMD = −0.292%, p < 0.005) can also be seen.⁶¹ However, there existed a relatively large heterogeneity across studies, which may affect the strength of the results. In brief, the current studies on Dmab and glucose metabolism are limited with relatively small sample sizes, variable study populations and follow-up times, and a lack of high-quality RCTs. But, undoubtedly, Dmab has shown some benefits in regulating glucose disorders, especially for patients with T2DM rather than NGT or prediabetes, the mechanism of which may be related to its ability to improve hepatic insulin resistance. In the future, more large-scale RCTs are still needed to evaluate the efficacy of Dmab in treating hyperglycemia.

Novel hypoglycemic drug: GLP-1RA and RANKL

Diabetic patients are prone to bone damage and have more risk of bone fractures, so the safety of hypoglycemic drugs on bone has always been a research hotspot. Some traditional hypoglycemic drugs that have been identified to affect bone metabolism, such as metformin and sulfonylureas, may be beneficial to the bone, and thiazolidinediones are thought to increase the risk of fracture.^62,63 Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) is a new class of hypoglycemic drugs, which can enhance the effect of GLP-1, an incretin secreted by intestinal L-cell, to potentiate glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Recent studies have demonstrated that GLP-1RA can also improve bone metabolism, in addition to weight reduction and hypoglycemic effects as well as significant cardioprotection.

In some views, GLP-1RA mainly exerts a pro-osteoblast effect, promoting the differentiation of bone mesenchymal precursor cells (BMSCs) and the proliferation of osteoblast cells through acting on the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, which in turn facilitates bone formation,^64–66 while other scholars also reveal that it can influence osteoclast function. The previous report showed that GLP1 could decrease bone resorption through the calcitonin-dependent pathway,⁶⁷ but the latest research works find that it can also regulate the RANKL pathway. In ovariectomized (OVX) mice, exendin-4, a GLP-1RA, can decrease telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX-I) (a bone resorption marker) and RANKL/OPG ratio.⁶⁸ In another experiment, liraglutide manifested the same effect not only in OVX mice but also in the streptozotocin (STZ) + OVX model,⁶⁹ which implied that it may help hinder osteoclast function in diabetic patients. Furthermore, Li et al.⁷⁰ also discovered that liraglutide could reduce RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation by inhibiting NF-κB and MAPK-nuclear factor of activated T cell (NFATc1) signaling pathways. The above animal experiments indicated the potential benefits of GLP-1RA on bone health by inhibiting RANKL. As for clinical studies, there exist some inconsistent results. In some studies, neither exenatide nor liraglutide treatment showed any effect on bone mineral density (BMD) in T2DM patients compared with other hypoglycemic drugs;^71,72 besides, exenatide did not change the level of CTX-1.⁷¹ However, two latest large meta-analyses, including 54 RCTs and 38 RCTs, respectively, indicate that GLP-1R therapy can increase BMD and lower the risk of bone fracture in T2DM individuals.^73,74 Despite different results, possibly related to GLP-RA dose, type, and treatment duration, overall, GLP-1RA seems to be a beneficial hypoglycemic agent for bone health. The effect of GLP-1RA on osteoclast, especially on RANKL, deserve to be deeply explored.

Conclusion and future perspective

In summary, in addition to being a classical regulator of bone metabolism, RANKL can also play a role in glucose metabolism. Most of the evidence supports that RANKL signaling is detrimental to glucose homeostasis. Experimental studies demonstrate that RANKL not only increases hepatic and muscle insulin resistance by activating the NF-κB pathway and promoting inflammatory response, but also induces pancreatic β-cell dysfunction and upregulates negative glycemic regulators such as resistin and DPP-4. In the clinical aspect, the RANKL inhibitor, Dmab, shows a potential beneficial effect on glucose profile in patients with T2DM, although it seems to have no impact on the normal glucose tolerance population. Besides, GLP-1RA, as a new antidiabetic agent, also manifests a protective power on bone, whose mechanism may be related to the inhibition of osteoclast differentiation induced by RANKL, which also indicates that RANKL bridges the link between glucose and bone. Nevertheless, there exist counterarguments. Some scholars find that RANKL may be beneficial to improve glucose metabolism by promoting energy consumption in adipose tissue and feeding signaling and inflammatory pathways in the brain. Although the correlation between RANKL and glucose metabolism has not been fully elucidated at present, indubitably, RANKL signaling will be a promising research target in the field of diabetes treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the pathophysiological mechanism behind its involvement in glucose metabolism in the future.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

None.

Declarations

ORCID iD

Baodi Xing

References

International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. 10th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2021.

Vilaca

Schini

Harnan

, et al. The risk of hip and non-vertebral fractures in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis update. Bone 2020; 137: 115457.

Romero-Díaz

Duarte-Montero

Gutiérrez-Romero

, et al. Diabetes and bone fragility. Diabetes Ther 2021; 12: 71–86.

Koromani

Oei

Shevroja Enisa , et al. Vertebral fractures in individuals with type 2 diabetes: more than skeletal complications alone. Diabetes Care 2020; 43: 137–144.

Compston

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and bone. J Intern Med 2018; 283: 140–153.

Rharass

Lucas

High glucose level impairs human mature bone marrow adipocyte function through increased ROS production. Front Endocrinol 2019; 10: 607.

Zhu

Jiang

Ding

Risk of fracture with thiazolidinediones: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Bone 2014; 68: 115–123.

Kanazawa

Yamaguchi

Tada

, et al. Serum osteocalcin level is positively associated with insulin sensitivity and secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes. Bone 2011; 48: 720–725.

Liu

Zhao

, et al. Association between serum total osteocalcin level and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Horm Metab Res 2015; 47: 813–819.

10.

Nabipour

Kalantarhormozi

Larijani

, et al. Osteoprotegerin in relation to type 2 diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women. Metabolism 2010; 59: 742–747.

11.

Moh

AMC

Pek

SLT

Liu

, et al. Plasma osteoprotegerin as a biomarker of poor glycaemic control that predicts progression of albuminuria in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 3-year longitudinal cohort study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 161: 107992.

12.

Bonnet

Bourgoin

Biver

, et al. RANKL inhibition improves muscle strength and insulin sensitivity and restores bone mass. J Clin Invest 2019; 129: 1298.

13.

Kondegowda

Fenutria

Pollack

, et al. Osteoprotegerin and denosumab stimulate human beta cell proliferation through inhibition of the receptor activator of NF-κB ligand pathway. Cell Metab 2015; 22: 77–85.

14.

Nakagawa

Kinosaki

Yamaguchi

, et al. RANK is the essential signaling receptor for osteoclast differentiation factor in osteoclastogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998; 253: 395–400.

15.

Ikebuchi

Aoki

Honma

, et al. Coupling of bone resorption and formation by RANKL reverse signalling. Nature 2018; 561: 195–200.

16.

Hanada

Sigl

, et al. RANKL/RANK-beyond bones. J Mol Med 2011; 89: 647–656.

17.

Simonet

Lacey

Dunstan

, et al. Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell 1997; 89: 309–319.

18.

Dutka

Bobiński

Wojakowski

, et al. Osteoprotegerin and RANKL-RANK-OPG-TRAIL signalling axis in heart failure and other cardiovascular diseases. Heart Fail Rev 2022; 27: 1395–1411.

19.

Ominsky

Asuncion

, et al. RANKL inhibition with osteoprotegerin increases bone strength by improving cortical and trabecular bone architecture in ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Res 2008; 23: 672–682.

20.

Anderson

Maraskovsky

Billingsley

, et al. A homologue of the TNF receptor and its ligand enhance T-cell growth and dendritic-cell function. Nature 1997; 390: 175–179.

21.

Kiechl

Wittmann

Giaccari

, et al. Blockade of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANKL) signaling improves hepatic insulin resistance and prevents development of diabetes mellitus. Nat Med 2013; 19: 358–363.

22.

Bilgir

Yavuz

Bilgir

, et al. Relationship between insulin resistance, hs-CRP, and body fat and serum osteoprotegerin/RANKL in prediabetic patients. Minerva Endocrinol 2018; 43: 19–26.

23.

Karalazou

Ntelios

Chatzopoulou

, et al. OPG/RANK/RANKL signaling axis in patients with type I diabetes: associations with parathormone and vitamin D. Ital J Pediatr 2019; 45: 161.

24.

Shoelson

Herrero

Naaz

Obesity, inflammation, and insulin resistance. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 2169–2180.

25.

Cai

Yuan

Frantz

, et al. Local and systemic insulin resistance resulting from hepatic activation of IKK-beta and NF-kappaB. Nat Med 2005; 11: 183–190.

26.

Cai

Liu

Inflammatory cause of metabolic syndrome via brain stress and NF-κB. Aging 2012; 4: 98–115.

27.

Brenachot

Ramadori

Ioris

, et al. Hepatic protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor gamma links obesity-induced inflammation to insulin resistance. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 1820.

28.

Passeri

Benedini

Costa

, et al. A single 60 mg dose of denosumab might improve hepatic insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal nondiabetic severe osteoporotic women. Int J Endocrinol 2015; 2015: 352858.

29.

Abe

Ochi

Takashi

, et al. Effect of denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), upon glycemic and metabolic parameters: effect of denosumab on glycemic parameters. Medicine 2019; 98: e18067.

30.

Rinotas

Niti

Dacquin

, et al. Novel genetic models of osteoporosis by overexpression of human RANKL in transgenic mice. J Bone Miner Res 2014; 29: 1158–1169.

31.

Kartsogiannis

Zhou

Horwood

, et al. Localization of RANKL (receptor activator of NF kappa B ligand) mRNA and protein in skeletal and extraskeletal tissues. Bone 1999; 25: 525–534.

32.

Hotamisligil

Peraldi

Budavari

, et al. IRS-1-mediated inhibition of insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity in TNF-alpha- and obesity-induced insulin resistance. Science 1996; 271: 665–668.

33.

Aguirre

Werner

Giraud

, et al. Phosphorylation of Ser307 in insulin receptor substrate-1 blocks interactions with the insulin receptor and inhibits insulin action. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 1531–1537.

34.

Sun

, et al. Osteoclasts may affect glucose uptake-related insulin resistance by secreting resistin. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2021; 14: 3461–3470.

35.

Luo

Zhang

, et al. Resistin induces insulin resistance by both AMPK-dependent and AMPK-independent mechanisms in HepG2 cells. Endocrine 2009; 36: 60–69.

36.

Weivoda

Chew

Monroe

, et al. Identification of osteoclast-osteoblast coupling factors in humans reveals links between bone and energy metabolism. Nat Commun 2020; 11: 87.

37.

Widenmaier

Kim

, et al. Suppression of p38 MAPK and JNK via Akt-mediated inhibition of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 constitutes a core component of the beta-cell pro-survival effects of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide. J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 30372–30382.

38.

Makeeva

Myers

Welsh

Role of MKK3 and p38 MAPK in cytokine-induced death of insulin-producing cells. Biochem J 2006; 393: 129–139.

39.

Schrader

Rennekamp

Niebergall

, et al. Cytokine-induced osteoprotegerin expression protects pancreatic beta cells through p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling against cell death. Diabetologia 2007; 50: 1243–1247.

40.

Diedisheim

Oshima

Albagli

, et al. Modeling human pancreatic beta cell dedifferentiation. Mol Metab 2018; 10: 74–86.

41.

Malle

Zammit

Walters

, et al. Nuclear factor κB-inducing kinase activation as a mechanism of pancreatic β cell failure in obesity. J Exp Med 2015; 212: 1239–1254.

42.

Rashad

El-Shal

Shalaby

, et al. Osteoprotegerin expression and serum values in obese women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mol Biol Rep 2021; 48: 7095–7104.

43.

Kotanidou

Kotanidis

Giza

, et al. Osteoprotegerin increases parallel to insulin resistance in obese adolescents. Endocr Res 2019; 44: 9–15.

44.

Pérez

Ciriza

Moreno

Restituto

, et al. Circulating osteoprotegerin is increased in the metabolic syndrome and associates with subclinical atherosclerosis and coronary arterial calcification. Clin Biochem 2014; 47: 272–278.

45.

Matsuo

Cavalcanti de

APH

Mota

, et al. RANKL induces beige adipocyte differentiation in preadipocytes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2020; 318: E866–E877.

46.

Ferron

McKee

Levine

, et al. Intermittent injections of osteocalcin improve glucose metabolism and prevent type 2 diabetes in mice. Bone 2012; 50: 568–575.

47.

Liu

Zhang

, et al. Adiponectin/SIRT1 axis induces white adipose browning after vertical sleeve gastrectomy of obese rats with type 2 diabetes. Obes Surg 2020; 30: 1392–1403.

48.

Emery

McDonnell

Burke

, et al. Osteoprotegerin is a receptor for the cytotoxic ligand TRAIL. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 14363–14367.

49.

Bernardi

Zauli

Tikellis

, et al. TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand significantly attenuates metabolic abnormalities in high-fat-fed mice reducing adiposity and systemic inflammation. Clin Sci 2012; 123: 547–555.

50.

Katagiri

Takahashi

Regulatory mechanisms of osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Oral Dis 2002; 8: 147–159.

51.

Wang

Liang

. A preliminary study on the impact of Notch1 on RANKL/RANK system in osteoclast via RAW264.7 cells. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Med Sci) 2018; 38: 1440–1446.

52.

Hanada

Leibbrandt

Hanada

, et al. Central control of fever and female body temperature by RANKL/ RANK. Nature 2009; 462: 505–509.

53.

Sainsbury

Cooney

Herzog

Hypothalamic regulation of energy homeostasis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 16: 623–637.

54.

Zhu

Zhang

Huang

, et al. RANKL reduces body weight and food intake via the modulation of hypothalamic NPY/CART expression. Int J Med Sci 2018; 15: 969–977.

55.

Shimamura

Nakagami

Osako

, et al. OPG/RANKL/ RANK axis is a critical inflammatory signaling system in ischemic brain in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: 8191–8196.

56.

Lee

Wang

Yang

, et al. High-fat diet induces toll-like receptor 4-dependent macrophage/microglial cell activation and retinal impairment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 3041–3050.

57.

Huang

Tsou

, et al. IDF21-0102 RANKL inhibitor denosumab protects against glucolipotoxicity-induced β-cell dysfunction and apoptosis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022; 186: 109608.

58.

Napoli

Pannacciulli

Vittinghoff

, et al. Effect of denosumab on fasting glucose in women with diabetes or prediabetes from the FREEDOM trial. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2018; 34: e2991.

59.

Lasco

Morabito

Basile

, et al. Denosumab Inhibition of RANKL and insulin resistance in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 2016; 98: 123–128.

60.

Rossini

Frigerio

Dozio

, et al. Effect of denosumab on glucose homeostasis in postmenopausal women with breast cancer treated with aromatase inhibitors: a pilot study. Int J Endocrinol 2020; 2020: 1809150.

61.

Pacheco-Soto

Elguezabal-Rodelo

Porchia

, et al. Denosumab improves glucose parameters in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Drug Assess 2021; 10: 97–105.

62.

Zhang

Zheng

Yuan

, et al. Effects of anti-diabetic drugs on fracture risk: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol 2021; 12: 735824.

63.

Mohsin

Baniyas

AlDarmaki

, et al. An update on therapies for the treatment of diabetes-induced osteoporosis. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2019; 19: 937–948.

64.

Sanz

Vázquez

Blázquez

, et al. Signaling and biological effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2010; 298: E634–E643.

65.

Xue

, et al. Liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, facilitates osteogenic proliferation and differentiation in MC3T3E1 cells through phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT), extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK)1/2, and cAMP/pro. Exp Cell Res 2017; 360: 281–291.

66.

Gustafson

Smith

WNT signalling is both an inducer and effector of glucagon-like peptide-1. Diabetologia 2008; 51: 1768–1770.

67.

Yamada

Tsukiyama

, et al. The murine glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor is essential for control of bone resorption. Endocrinology 2008; 149: 574–579.

68.

Meng

Jia

, et al. Exendin-4, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, prevents osteopenia by promoting bone formation and suppressing bone resorption in aged ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Res 2013; 28: 1641–1652.

69.

Wen

Zhao

, et al. Liraglutide exerts a bone-protective effect in ovariectomized rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis. Exp Ther Med 2018; 15: 5077–5083.

70.

Wang

, et al. Liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, suppresses osteoclastogenesis through the inhibition of NF-κB and MAPK pathways via GLP-1R. Biomed Pharmacother 2020; 130: 110523.

71.

Luo

, et al. Effect of exenatide, insulin and pioglitazone on bone metabolism in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol 2015; 52: 1083–1091.

72.

Gilbert

Marre

Holst

, et al. Comparison of the long-term effects of liraglutide and glimepiride monotherapy on bone mineral density in patients with type 2 diabetes. Endocr Pract 2016; 22: 406–411.

73.

Cheng

, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and risk of bone fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2019; 35: e3168.

74.

Zhang

Weng

Xie

, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and fracture risk: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29: 2639–2644.

RANKL inhibition: a new target of treating diabetes mellitus?

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

RANKL/RANK/OPG pathway

RANKL and glucose metabolism

The adverse effect of RANKL on glucose metabolism

RANKL induces insulin resistance

RANKL induces islet β-cell dysfunction

The beneficial effect of RANKL on glucose metabolism

Dmab and glucose metabolism

Novel hypoglycemic drug: GLP-1RA and RANKL

Conclusion and future perspective

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declarations

ORCID iD

References